Abstract View

Author(s): Armiya Sultan, Saba Taj, Vivek Choudhary, Arti Parganiha

Email(s): arti.parganiha@gmail.com

Address: Chronobiology and Animal Behavior Laboratory
School of Studies in Life Science
Pt. Ravishankar Shukla University, Raipur - 492010, India
Regional Cancer Center, Pt. J.N.M. Medical College
Dr. B.R. Ambedkar Memorial Hospital, Raipur – 492001, India
Center for Translational Chronobiology
Pt. Ravishankar Shukla University, Raipur – 492010, India.

Published In:   Volume - 30,      Issue - 1,     Year - 2017

DOI: 10.52228/JRUB.2017-30-1-14  

ABSTRACT:
Unlike normal humans, an alteration in circadian pattern in energy expenditure (EE) has been observed in cancer patients. In the current cross sectional study we examined rhythm characteristics of EE in cancer in- (n = 30) and out-patients (n = 26), and healthy controls (n = 30). EE was assessed non-invasively using an electronic device - the Actical, programmed with data sampling epoch of 60 seconds. All patients and control subjects wore instrument on their non-dominant hand for 3- 4 consecutive days. Cosinor rhythmometry was used to determine the rhythm characteristics, such as 24-h average/Mesor, amplitude, and peak/acrophase of EE. Circadian and rhythm quotients were derived from the rhythm characteristics. Two- way ANOVA was employed to determine the effects of factors, ‘group’ and ‘gender’ on rhythm characteristics. A significant circadian rhythm in EE was validated in all groups. However, rhythm detection ratio, at 12 h period, was found to be low in both cancer in- and out-patients as compared to controls. Factor ‘group’ produced significant effect on 24 -h average, amplitude, acrophase, rhythm quotient and circadian quotient of EE rhythm. However, effects of factor ‘gender’ and interaction of both factors was significant on circadian quotient only. At the group level, rhythm characteristics, namely 24-h average, amplitude, and circadian quotient of three groups varied from each other significantly in the following order: in - patient < out-patient < control. In conclusion, EE rhythm deteriorated in both in- and out-patients as compared to control subjects, although the deterioration was more pronounced in cancer in-patients. We suggest that further extensive investigation involving larger sample should be carried out to validate the above findings.

Cite this article:
Sultan, Taj, Choudhary and Parganiha (2017). Circadian Rhythm in Energy Expenditure in Cancer In-and Out-Patients: A Comparative Study. Journal of Ravishankar University (Part-B: Science), 30(1), pp.110-117.DOI: https://doi.org/10.52228/JRUB.2017-30-1-14


References not available.

Related Images:



Recent Images



Optimized Structural Design of G+7 Residential Buildings: A Modern Approach with ETABS
Quantitative Estimation of Piperine in Drakshadi Ghrita by HPTLC Method
Screening of phenolics and flavonoids using FTIR and UV-Vis: Antioxidant activity and HPLC quantification of gallic acid and ellagic acid
Carbon Dots in Biomedical Applications: A Review of Their Interaction with Serum Albumins, Antidepressant Agents, and Enzymatic Systems
Review on Solar Energy in India, Achievements (2021–2025), and Benefits of Solar Energy
Investigation on Groundwater Quality in Sukma Bastar District, Chhattisgarh
Implement of Dijkstra method in Village data management system for Optimal Route Calculation
Fiber Reinforced Concrete: Comparative Analysis of Helix Steel Fibers and Plain Steel Fibers in Structural Applications
Dynamic Geometrical Modeling and Computational Analysis of Multi-Bob Pendulum Wave Interference Systems
A Comparative Analysis of Inventory Models: Evaluating the Economic Order Quantity (EOQ) Model with Constant Demand versus Variable Demand Rates

Tags


Recomonded Articles:

Author(s): Surendra G Gattani; Ravina Shete; Sandeep Ambore

DOI:         Access: Open Access Read More

Author(s): Naman Shukla; K. Anil Kumar; Madhu Allalla; Sanjay Tiwari

DOI: 10.52228/JRUB.2022-35-1-2         Access: Open Access Read More

Author(s): Arushi Saloki; Taranjeet Kukreja; Sarita Gaikwad; Arvind Kumar; Ayush Parker; Bhavana Dowand; Chetna Sahu; Damini Mali; Swarnlata Saraf

DOI: 10.52228/JRUB.2023-35-2-3         Access: Open Access Read More

Author(s): Srishti Verma; Visheshta Valvi; Kamlesh Kumar Shukla

DOI: 10.52228/JRUB.2022-35-1-6         Access: Open Access Read More

Author(s): Ankita Sahu; Manju Singh; Vishal Jain; Veenu Joshi; Amber Vyas

DOI: 10.52228/JRUB.2023-36-2-1         Access: Open Access Read More

Author(s): Nikita Verma; Swarnlata Saraf

DOI:         Access: Open Access Read More

Author(s): Shradha Devi Dwivedi; Madhu Yadav; Deependra Singh; Manju Rawat Singh

DOI: 10.52228/JRUB.2024-37-1-1         Access: Open Access Read More

Author(s): AR Sood and RC Rathor

DOI:         Access: Open Access Read More

Author(s): Shatabdi Ghose; Umamaheswari S; Susithra E; Rajasekhar Chekkara; Naresh Kandakatla; Uma Maheswara Reddy C

DOI:         Access: Open Access Read More

Author(s): Pratik Singh; Denish Gandhi; Ajay Khopade; Mukesh Sharma; Kushagra Nagori; Kalyani Sakure; Ajazuddin

DOI: 10.52228/JRUB.2024-37-2-10         Access: Open Access Read More

Author(s): Princy Dugga; Shamsh Pervez; Rakesh Kumar Sahu; Madhuri Verma; Shahina Bano; Manas Kanti Deb

DOI: 10.52228/JRUB.2017-30-1-5         Access: Open Access Read More

Author(s): R.Singh; U.C. Singh

DOI:         Access: Open Access Read More

Author(s): Manmohan S Jangdey; Anshita Gupta; Shailendra Saraf; Swarnlata Saraf

DOI:         Access: Open Access Read More

Author(s): Rupal Purena; Renu Bhatt

DOI:         Access: Open Access Read More