Article in HTML

Author(s): Aayushi Pathak, Anand Kumar, Ramsingh Kurrey, Sudhir Yadav, T. L. Chandra

Email(s): sudhirforensi@gmail.com

Address: Department of Forensic Science, Guru Ghasidas Vishwavidyalaya, Bilaspur, Chhattisgarh India
Department of Forensic Science, Guru Ghasidas Vishwavidyalaya, Bilaspur, Chhattisgarh India
National Center for Natural Resources, Pt. Ravishankar Shukla University Raipur Chhattisgarh, India.
Department of Forensic Science, Guru Ghasidas Vishwavidyalaya, Bilaspur, Chhattisgarh India
State Forensic Science Laboratory Raipur, Chhattisgarh, India

*Corresponding Author: sudhirforensi@gmail.com

Published In:   Volume - 39,      Issue - 1,     Year - 2026


Cite this article:
Pathak, Kumar, Kurrey,Yadav and Chandra (2026). A Comprehensive Exploration of Polycyclic Aromatic Hydrocarbons: Environmental Origins, Analytical Techniques, Health Implications, and Remediation Strategies. Journal of Ravishankar University (Part-B: Science), 39(1), pp. 100-132. DOI:https://doi.org/10.52228/JRUB.2026-39-1-6



A Comprehensive Exploration of Polycyclic Aromatic Hydrocarbons: Environmental Origins, Analytical Techniques, Health Implications, and Remediation Strategies

Aayushi Pathak1, Anand Kumar1, Ramsingh Kurrey2,*, Sudhir Yadav1*,

T. L. Chandra3

1Department of Forensic Science, Guru Ghasidas Vishwavidyalaya, Bilaspur, Chhattisgarh India

2National Center for Natural Resources, Pt. Ravishankar Shukla University Raipur

Chhattisgarh, India

3State Forensic Science Laboratory Raipur, Chhattisgarh, India

*Corresponding Author: sudhirforensi@gmail.com

Graphical Abstract

Figure 1. Graphical abstract

Abstract

Polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbons represent persistent organic pollutants are pervasively distributed throughout diverse environmental matrices, encompassing air, water, soil, sediments, and biological tissues. These compounds primarily originate from incomplete combustion of organic materials, stemming from both anthropogenic and natural sources. Owing to their pronounced hydrophobic and lipophilic nature, PAHs readily accumulate in environmental and biotic compartments, thereby promoting bioaccumulation and posing potential adverse effects on ecosystems and human health. Many PAHs exhibit toxic, mutagenic, teratogenic, and carcinogenic properties, thereby eliciting substantial concerns for environmental integrity and public well-being. This review provides a comprehensive synthesis of PAH sources, environmental distribution, transport processes, toxicological profiles, analytical methods, and remediation strategies, with special emphasis placed on advanced analytical techniques, including gas chromatography–mass spectrometry, high-performance liquid chromatography, and refined microextraction procedures, for the qualitative and quantitative determination of PAHs in complex matrices. Innovations such as nanotechnology-enhanced remediation, photocatalytic degradation, and bioremediation frameworks are also evaluated; moreover, existing analytical challenges, research gaps, and future directions for effective PAH surveillance and abatement are articulated.

Keywords: Polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbons; environmental contamination; toxicity; analytical methodologies; remediation; bioaccumulation.

1. Introduction

Polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbons constitute pervasive environmental pollutants recognized as priority contaminants by the United States Environmental Protection Agency(Beygisangchin et al., 2026; Srogi, 2007). These compounds are characterized by two or more fused aromatic rings comprising solely carbon and hydrogen atoms(Patel et al., 2020). PAHs typically manifest as pale yellow to white solids, exhibiting low aqueous solubility, elevated melting and boiling points, and pronounced lipophilic and hydrophobic properties (Patel et al., 2020)..

Low-molecular-weight PAHs contain two to three aromatic rings, whereas high-molecular-weight PAHs possess four or more rings. PAHs containing six or fewer fused rings are categorized as “small,” while those with more than six rings are considered “large” (Patel et al., 2020). small PAHs have been extensively investigated because of their greater environmental abundance and easier detection in samples(Stogiannidis & Laane, 2014).

Benzene is not classified as a PAH because it contains only a single aromatic ring, whereas naphthalene is recognized as the simplest polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbon consisting of two fused benzene rings(Itodo et al., 2018). Among the extensively studied PAHs are 7,12-dimethylbenz[a]anthracene and benzo[a]pyrene because of their significant toxicological importance(Beygisangchin et al., 2026).

PAHs comprise a large group of environmentally persistent organic compounds exhibiting varying degrees of toxicity(Gopinath et al., 2024). These compounds can induce carcinogenic, mutagenic, and immunosuppressive effects in living organisms (Tartaglione et al., 2023). Their toxicity is primarily associated with disruptions in cellular membranes and enzyme systems. PAHs are generated through incomplete combustion processes from both natural and anthropogenic sources, as well as certain biological activities (Gopinath et al., 2024). Consequently, they are widely distributed in environmental matrices including air, soil, and water (Honda & Suzuki, 2020).

Major anthropogenic sources of PAHs include vehicle emissions, industrial operations, power plants, agricultural activities, and steel manufacturing processes(Albinet et al., 2007). Since these sources are predominantly concentrated in urban regions, PAH concentrations are generally higher in urban environments than in rural areas. Following atmospheric release, PAHs may exist in gaseous form or adsorb onto particulate matter depending on their physicochemical properties (Chattopadhyay et al., 2002). Low-vapor-pressure PAHs preferentially associate with airborne particulate matter, whereas lighter PAHs are more commonly detected in the gaseous phase (Zhang et al., 2019) Their gas-particle partitioning is strongly influenced by vapor pressure and meteorological conditions (Shimmo et al., 2004).

Several PAH congeners are recognized for their carcinogenic, mutagenic, and toxic effects on humans and ecosystems(Contreras-Soto et al., 2019). Therefore, the development of sensitive and reliable analytical methods is essential for understanding their environmental behavior and toxicological impacts. Advanced analytical techniques, particularly chromatographic methods coupled with mass spectrometry, have significantly improved the qualitative and quantitative determination of PAHs in complex environmental matrices(Cam et al., 2000).

This review provides a comprehensive overview of PAH occurrence in various environmental matrices and discusses their environmental distribution, toxicity, analytical determination, and remediation approaches. Special emphasis is placed on chromatographic techniques such as high-performance liquid chromatography (HPLC) and gas chromatography–mass spectrometry (GC–MS), including their advantages and limitations in PAH analysis (Adeniji et al., 2018). Furthermore, the review highlights bioaccumulation, biomarker responses, exposure pathways, and current challenges associated with PAH monitoring and risk assessment in environmental and biological systems.

2. Sources of Polycyclic Aromatic Hydrocarbons in the Environment

PAHs in the environment originate primarily from three major sources: pyrogenic, petrogenic, and biogenic processes involving pyrolysis (Berríos-Rolón et al., 2025), (Montano et al., 2025). Pyrogenic PAHs are generated during the incomplete combustion of organic materials at high temperatures under oxygen-deficient or anaerobic conditions (Kamal et al., 2014). Natural pyrogenic sources include forest fires, volcanic eruptions, bacterial and algal synthesis, petroleum seepage, erosion of petroleum-rich sedimentary rocks, and decomposition of plant litter. Anthropogenic sources include industrial activities, vehicular emissions, power generation, and other combustion-related processes(Hassan et al., 2025). Pyrogenic PAHs may arise from intentional processes, such as coal distillation for coke and coal tar production, or unintentionally through incomplete combustion of organic matter at temperatures ranging from 350–1200°C.

Petrogenic PAHs originate from petroleum and petroleum-derived products (Berríos-Rolón et al., 2025), whereas biogenic PAHs are synthesized naturally by organisms such as algae and phytoplankton(Berríos-Rolón et al., 2025). Pyrogenic sources predominantly produce high-molecular-weight PAHs, while petrogenic sources are generally enriched with low-molecular-weight congeners (Patel et al., 2020). These compounds are environmentally persistent pollutants formed mainly through incomplete combustion processes and are associated with carcinogenic, mutagenic, teratogenic, and toxic effects (Muhyideen et al., 2023).

Atmospheric PAHs are transported and deposited onto soil, vegetation, and aquatic systems through wet and dry deposition processes, primarily in association with particulate matter(Zhang et al., 2018). Figure 2 illustrates the major sources and environmental pathways of PAHs. The persistence of PAHs in the environment is attributed to their low aqueous solubility, high octanol–water partition coefficients, and potential for long-range atmospheric transport(Zhang et al., 2023). Consequently, PAHs have been widely detected in sediments(Baran et al., 2017), dust(Feng et al., 2025), water bodies(Feng et al., 2025), and soils(Botello et al., 2023). Due to their hydrophobic nature, PAHs exhibit strong adsorption affinity toward soil organic matter, resulting in the accumulation of more than 90% of environmental PAH burdens in soils(Kim et al., 2019).

PAHs can absorb ultraviolet and visible radiation, leading to cellular damage involving membranes, proteins, and nucleic acids. Experimental studies have demonstrated that PAHs may disrupt endocrine functions by acting as anti-androgenic and anti-estrogenic agents, thereby affecting reproductive hormones. Their lipophilic nature facilitates bioaccumulation and cellular uptake, increasing toxicological risks in living organisms(Kummer et al., 2008).

The United States Environmental Protection Agency has identified 16 priority PAHs because of their environmental prevalence, persistence, and adverse health effects(Chen et al., 2022). Additionally, nine PAH congeners are included among the most hazardous chemicals listed by the Agency for Toxic Substances and Disease Registry owing to their significant toxicological impacts(Feng et al., 2025). The International Agency for Research on Cancer classifies PAHs according to carcinogenic potential into Group 1 (carcinogenic to humans), Group 2A (probably carcinogenic), Group 2B (possibly carcinogenic), and Group 3 (not classifiable regarding carcinogenicity to humans)(Chen et al., 2022). High-molecular-weight PAHs such as benzo[a]pyrene, benz[a]anthracene, benzo[b]fluoranthene, benzo[k]fluoranthene, chrysene, and indeno[1,2,3-cd]pyrene are frequently associated with carcinogenic activity. Table 1 summarizes the classification, abbreviations, molecular formulas, molecular weights, ring numbers, and carcinogenic classifications of major PAHs(Amato‐Lourenço et al., 2017).

 

Figure 2: Primary sources and environmental transport pathways of polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbons.

 

Table 1. Classification, abbreviations, carcinogenicity classification, molecular formula, molecular weight, and ring numbers of major polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbons (PAHs).

PAHs

Abbreviation

IARC Classification

USEPA Classification

Chemical Formula

Molecular Weight

Number of Rings

Naphthalene

Nap

Group 2B

Group D

C10H8

128.17

2

Acenaphthylene

Acy

C12H8

152.20

3

Acenaphthene

Ace

Group 3

Group C

C12H10

154.21

3

Fluorene

Flu

C13H10

166.22

3

Phenanthrene

Phe

Group 3

Group C

C14H10

178.23

3

Anthracene

Ant

Group 3

Group C

C14H10

178.23

3

Fluoranthene

Fla

Group 3

Group C

C16H10

202.26

4

Pyrene

Pyr

Group 3

Group C

C16H10

202.26

4

Benz[a]anthracene

BaA

Group 2A

Group B2

C18H12

228.29

4

Chrysene

Chr

Group 3

Group C

C18H12

228.29

4

Benzo[b]fluoranthene

BbF

Group 2A

Group B2

C20H12

252.32

5

Benzo[k]fluoranthene

BkF

Group 2A

Group B2

C20H12

252.32

5

Benzo[a]pyrene

BaP

Group 1

Group B1

C20H12

252.32

5

Dibenz[a,h]anthracene

DahA

Group 2A

Group B2

C22H14

278.36

5

Benzo[ghi]perylene

BghiP

Group 2B

Group D

C22H14

278.36

6

Indeno[1,2,3-cd]pyrene

IcdP

Group 2A

Group B2

C22H14

278.36

6

 

2.1 Pathways of PAH Accumulation in the Environment

Figure 3 depicts the principal routes of polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbon accumulation within environmental matrices. PAHs ingress into environmental compartments predominantly via atmospheric deposition, stemming from combustion activities such as biomass burning and fossil fuel utilization (Hrdina et al., 2022). Following atmospheric emission, these compounds undergo long-range atmospheric transport prior to deposition onto terrestrial and aquatic ecosystems.

Soil contamination by PAHs occurs through industrial effluents, inadvertent spills, and atmospheric deposition(Derafshi et al., 2022). Their hydrophobic properties engender strong adsorption to soil particulates, thereby promoting persistence and protracted accumulation. In aquatic systems, PAHs are introduced via surface runoff, industrial wastewater, and atmospheric deposition(Wang et al., 2024), subsequently becoming sequestered in sediments and biota, with potential trophic magnification through food webs.

Bioaccumulation entails the progressive accrual of PAHs in organismal tissues across trophic strata(Wang et al., 2024). Primary producers, encompassing plants, algae, and microbes, assimilate PAHs from polluted soils and waters, thereby mediating transfer to higher trophic levels via trophic interactions.

PAHs are conveyed atmospherically in both vapor and particulate phases prior to deposition on terrestrial and aquatic surfaces. Over 90% of environmental PAHs are sequestered in soils and sediments owing to robust sorption to organic matter and particulates, which curtails mobility and biodegradability(Han et al., 2014). In soils, dissipation proceeds via volatilization, leaching, photo-oxidation, phytoremediation, and microbial catabolism. Within sediments, PAHs partition into interstitial water and affiliate with colloidal fractions, constituting a salient bioavailable pool. These contaminants are implicated in myriad toxicological sequelae, including mutagenicity, teratogenicity, and carcinogenicity.

A predominant mechanism of PAH assimilation in plants is radicular uptake from contaminated soils and aqueous media. PAHs initially sorb to root exteriors, traverse cellular membranes, and amass in cell walls and vacuoles (Jia et al., 2020). Studies reported modest PAH burdens in the parenchymal tissues of vegetables grown proximate to industrial zones in Greece, wherein low-molecular-weight PAHs prevailed(Tsiodra et al., 2021). PAH accrual profiles in plants are profoundly modulated by species, ambient conditions, and phenological cycles. Foliar deposition from air correlates robustly with vapor pressure and octanol-air partition coefficients (Tsiodra et al., 2021).

Terrestrial invertebrates accrue PAHs chiefly from contaminated soils, whereas aquatic biota encounter them via aqueous, sedimentary, and alimentary vectors (Séguin et al., 2022). In fauna, PAH bioaccumulation occurs via ingestion, inhalation, and transdermal routes, with prospective perturbations to immunological, reproductive, and ontogenetic processes(Séguin et al., 2022).

Notwithstanding the identification of myriad PAH congeners, the United States Environmental Protection Agency has prioritized 16 PAHs due to their toxicity and ubiquity. The enduring persistence and bioaccumulative propensity of PAHs in environmental reservoirs imperil ecological integrity and human salubrity, underscoring the imperative for source apportionment and abatement measures (Wang et al., 2024). Figure 4 delineates the ramifications of PAHs across human, faunal, and floral ecosystems (Wang et al., 2024).

Figure 3. Pathways of polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbon accumulation in the environment..

 

Figure 4. Three distinct sections illustrating the effects of polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbons on human, animal, and plant ecosystems.

2.2 Deposition of PAHs in the Environment

Polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbons enter the environment via diverse pathways, among which atmospheric deposition constitutes a primary mechanism (Abdel‐Shafy & Mansour, 2015). Sources such as fossil fuel combustion, industrial processes, and natural phenomena like wildfires emit PAHs into the atmosphere, facilitating their long-range transport prior to deposition on terrestrial and aquatic surfaces through both dry and wet processes. Contamination of soils and sediments can arise from atmospheric deposition, particularly in the context of forest fires (Campos & Abrantes, 2021). Due to their hydrophobic characteristics, PAHs exhibit strong adsorption to particulate matter, thereby enhancing their persistence and accumulation in the environment.

Biomass combustion, encompassing wildfires and agricultural practices, significantly contributes to atmospheric PAH emissions (Anyahara, 2021). Wet deposition entails the scavenging of PAHs by precipitation events, including rain and snow [CITE_1].

The interaction of PAHs with particulate matter during dry deposition is predominantly governed by particulate surface properties and resistance to sedimentation (Feng et al., 2017). In wet deposition, PAHs are scavenged from the atmosphere via dissolution in precipitation or adsorption to hydrosols, contingent upon their gas-particle partitioning coefficients (Cave et al., 2018). Both deposition modalities substantially contribute to PAH enrichment in soils [CITE_1].

Air-soil exchange represents a critical diffusional process influencing the environmental fate and transport of PAHs (Cabrerizo et al., 2011) Wang et al. documented seasonal fluctuations in PAH concentrations within air and soil samples from urban and rural locales in Dalian, China(Wang et al., 2008).

PAH accumulation in plants is markedly influenced by plant morphology and epicuticular characteristics. Broad-leaved species generally exhibit greater susceptibility to atmospheric deposition, while smooth, waxy surfaces preferentially retain low-molecular-weight PAHs (Al-Nasir et al., 2022). Root uptake is frequently constrained, as hydrophobic PAHs avidly sorb to soil organic matter, diminishing their bioavailability in the soil solution(Krektun et al., 2012).

Certain studies have observed elevated PAH accumulation in plants during winter relative to summer(Srogi, 2007), and attributed this to trichomes that capture atmospheric particulates(Bakker et al., 1999). The authors also reported low PAH concentrations in the parenchymal tissues of vegetables cultivated near industrial sites in Greece, with low-molecular-weight congeners prevailing(Wennrich et al., 2002). Bioaccumulation patterns in plants are substantially modulated by species, seasonal variations, and prevailing environmental conditions(Koukoulakis et al., 2020).

Air-to-foliar deposition may be quantified utilizing vapor pressure and octanol-air partition coefficients(Mamy et al., 2014). Prajapati et al. demonstrated seasonal PAH accumulation in leaves of Ficus benghalensis, peaking in winter due to thickened lipid cuticles that augment pollutant retention(Fellet et al., 2016). Leafy vegetables, such as spinach and cabbage, displayed pronounced PAH enrichment attributable to their extensive surface areas and heightened foliar exposure(Al-Nasir et al., 2022). Foliar uptake predominated over radicular uptake across multiple vegetable species(Tembo & Biswick, 2025). Moreover, fruit and vegetable peels consistently exhibited higher PAH burdens than edible pulp(Zhong & Wang, 2002).

Analogous PAH profiles have been documented in soils and foliar tissues proximate to coal mines and thermal power stations(Yakovleva & Габов, 2020). High-molecular-weight PAHs preferentially sorb to rough, pubescent, or trichome-dense leaf surfaces, whereas low-molecular-weight PAHs accumulate on glabrous or thinly cuticularized surfaces(Bakker et al., 1999). Khalili et al. identified robust correlations between soil PAH concentrations, atmospheric PAHs, and foliar accumulation in cabbage, with maxima in outer leaves and roots and minima in edible cores(Al-Nasir et al., 2022).

Figure 5 illustrates the environmental dynamics of PAHs and the analytical methodologies applied to solid and liquid environmental matrices.

Figure 5. Environmental dynamics of polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbons and analytical procedures for solid and liquid environmental samples.

 

The interaction of PAHs with environmental matrices such as sediments and biota has gained significant attention because of their widespread occurrence and potential ecological and human health impacts(Soursou et al., 2023). Sediments are considered important reservoirs of PAHs due to the strong adsorption of these hydrophobic compounds onto organic matter and particulate materials(Crnković et al., 2020).

Comparative analyses have been conducted on sediments collected from wildfire-affected and unaffected regions, including riverbanks and roadside environments, by evaluating both PAH concentrations and sediment color characteristics(Kieta et al., 2023). The findings indicated that color-based indicators were more effective than PAH concentrations for tracing sediment sources. Furthermore, wildfire events significantly influenced sediment contribution in smaller waterways, whereas these effects became less distinguishable in larger river systems(Muñoz-Arcos et al., 2021).

3. Environmental Distribution and Transport

Polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbons represent persistent environmental contaminants (Feng et al., 2025) capable of exerting detrimental effects on ecosystems and human health at trace levels(Bourguignon et al., 2019). The International Agency for Research on Cancer classifies numerous PAHs as mutagenic, genotoxic, and carcinogenic(Maciejczyk et al., 2023). Their semi-volatility enables widespread dissemination across atmospheric, terrestrial, aquatic, and sedimentary compartments, thereby promoting inter-media transfer.

Although certain soil microbiota can metabolize PAHs (Bourguignon et al., 2019), elevated levels impair microbial assemblages and enzymatic functions(Liang et al., 2016). PAH pollution disrupts soil microbial diversity, enzymatic processes, and overall soil health, with susceptible communities proving especially prone to toxic insult(Ren et al., 2025). Consequently, microbiological metrics—such as microbial biomass and enzymatic assays—serve as reliable proxies for soil condition assessment (Zhu, 2019)

Empirical investigations reveal divergent responses of soil microbial consortia in varied forest habitats to PAH perturbation. Phenanthrene exposure elicits reactive oxygen species production, precipitating oxidative damage and cytotoxicity(He et al., 2021). Ahammed et al. observed that exogenous phenanthrene application suppressed photosynthesis, diminished photosynthetic pigments, and curtailed root and shoot biomass(Ahammed et al., 2012). Analogously, Tomar et al. noted that PAHs inhibit dark reactions of photosynthesis, indicating a reduction in CO₂ fixation rates and underscoring phytotoxicity(Tomar & Jajoo, 2019)

PAHs induce toxicological perturbations in crops like wheat by compromising photosystem II integrity(Tomar & Jajoo, 2019). Fluoranthene diminishes functional quinone-reducing sites while elevating non-functional QB-non-reducing centers, thereby curtailing photosynthetic efficacy and inflicting structural harm to the photosynthetic machinery, with consequent declines in productivity(Tomar et al., 2015).

 

Temporal dynamics modulate PAH sequestration profiles. Elevated high-molecular-weight PAH fractions, including four- and six-ring PAHs, in roots during winter reflect the more efficient absorption of high-ring PAHs from soil, which contributes to synergistic root and foliar uptake(Ailijiang et al., 2022; Desalme et al., 2013). Herbaceous flora exhibit heightened vulnerability owing to adjacency to soil dust and depositional fluxes(Ailijiang et al., 2022), with evergreens accruing higher PAH loads relative to deciduous counterparts(Dreyer et al., 2018).

PAH bioaccumulation instigates physiological duress via inhibition of metabolic cascades. These xenobiotics perturb photosystem heterogeneity, deplete chlorophyll, and provoke reactive oxygen species overproduction, thereby abrogating photosynthetic performance.(Cavé‐Radet et al., 2018). Resultant oxidative disequilibrium erodes cellular integrity and biosynthetic fluxes, while concurrently depleting safeguard antioxidants like ascorbic acid and α-tocopherol—critical for ameliorating oxidative lesions(Ruiz-Pablos et al., 2023). Moreover, alterations in carbohydrate levels disrupt cellular communication and energetics(Savchenko & Тихонов, 2021).

4. Health Effects and Toxicity

Extensive research has examined the impacts of polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbons on hematological parameters, such as red blood cell counts, hemoglobin concentrations, and hematocrit values. Exposure to mixtures comprising naphthalene, phenanthrene, and benzo[a]pyrene substantially diminished hematocrit levels in Clarias gariepinus fish(Osuagwu et al., 2023). Phenanthrene exposure likewise induced reductions in hematocrit, hemoglobin levels, and counts of red and white blood cells in yellowfin seabream(Ren et al., 2024). Investigations of housewives subjected to emissions from coal and fuel-wood combustion similarly documented changes in hemoglobin concentrations and white blood cell counts(Ren et al., 2024).

These observations indicate an inverse correlation between PAH exposure and hematological parameters, potentially compromising immune function and overall physiological well-being. Owing to their persistence and bioaccumulative properties, PAHs are recognized as major environmental contaminants that elicit toxic, mutagenic, teratogenic, and carcinogenic effects in humans and wildlife.

Surveillance of PAHs in surface waters holds particular significance, as these substances impair environmental quality and aquatic ecosystems(Srogi, 2007). PAHs exhibit notable environmental persistence and bioaccumulation in biota, thereby elevating risks of cancer, endocrine disruption, and reproductive impairments(Beygisangchin et al., 2026). Accordingly, international regulatory bodies have underscored the necessity of monitoring PAHs across environmental matrices, particularly in aquatic compartments(Wang et al., 2024).Mitigating associated risks necessitates ongoing enhancements in monitoring protocols, analytical methodologies, and regulatory frameworks tailored to distinct environmental contexts and water utilization objectives(Beygisangchin et al., 2026). Progress in analytical instrumentation and environmental monitoring initiatives has improved the identification and evaluation of PAH pollution in aquatic systems.

The creation of the United States Environmental Protection Agency in 1970, pursuant to Title 40 of the Code of Federal Regulations, marked a pivotal advancement in U.S. environmental protection policy. This was succeeded by the Clean Water Act of 1972, which sought to “restore and maintain the chemical, physical, and biological integrity of the Nation’s waters.”

Table 2. Health-related effects of PAHs and associated parameters.

Findings

Reference

HEMATOLOGICAL PARAMETERS

 

The levels of triglycerides, diastolic blood pressure, white blood cell count, and red blood cell count are greater in individuals with urinary indicators of PAHs.

(Li et al., 2020)

A study showed that white blood cells were negatively but non-significantly associated with both the contaminants phenanthrene and pyrene as they showed little or no effect with the exposure to petroleum and a similar observation was made for hemoglobin

(Lu et al., 2019)

The results indicate that in preschool-aged children, increasing urine concentrations of 1-OHNa and 2-OHNa are linked to higher levels of IL-1β, platelet count, PCT and PLR as well as lower levels of mean platelet volume, platelet distribution width, platelet-large cell ratio and mean platelet volume to platelet count.

(Hu et al., 2021)

It was found that elevated urinary OH-PAHs were associated with increased mean platelet volume and mean platelet volume to platelet count levels in Wuhan residents but not in Zhuhai residents, suggesting that exposure to more PAHs may cause the body's inflammatory response.

(Zhou et al., 2017)

RESPIRATORY FUNCTION

 

The results indicate a high exposure to mixtures of PAHs and lead, and their effects on the respiratory function of workers exposed to black fumes from the brick-kilns. The correlation results show that the workers' lung function is most impaired when they are older and have been working for a longer length of time.

(Martínez-Fernández et al., 2017)

REPRODUCTIVE HEALTH AND SEMEN QUALITY

 

The results unequivocally show a link between male reproductive function and airborne PAHs exposure.

(Yang et al., 2010)

Research has demonstrated a correlation between elevated cadmium levels in blood and seminal plasma and aberrant semen volume, progressive motility, and morphology in the general population.

(Wang et al., 2020)

These findings showed that males who smoke are more affected by the drop in semen quality caused by naphthalene exposure, while men who never smoke are more affected by phenanthrene exposure.

(Patil et al., 2015)

CARCINOGENIC RISK

 

The serum of pregnant women in Nantong city was found to have a variety of carcinogenic PAHs, among which BaA warrants special attention due to its high degree of internal exposure and carcinogenic potential.

(Chen et al., 2019)

According to the findings of the current study, sensitive receptors are more exposed to particulate PAHs in the exposed area. Sensitivity analysis revealed that the most convincing factors for predicting precise carcinogenic risk from PAHs exposure were children's body weight and airborne PAHs concentrations.

(Picariello et al., 2020)

In chemical work environments, the possible exposure of employees to PAHs through skin, food, and respiratory routes was evaluated. The incremental lifetime cancer risk (ILCR) for male cancer patients indicated a moderate-to-low cancer risk associated with dust-bound PAHs exposure.

(Possanzini et al., 2004)

1-OHPG concentrations were correlated with same-day meal BaP, pyrene, and total PAHs concentrations, indicating that dietary PAHs exposure represents a significant pathway of exposure.

(Wang et al., 2008)

Elevated PAHs in Guiyu neonates are related to unregulated e-waste recycling initiatives in the neighborhood. Reduced newborn height and gestational age were observed to correspond with benzo[a]anthracene (BaA), chrysene (Chr), and benzo[a]pyrene (BaP) in infants whose birth outcomes are unfavorable.

(Wei et al., 2018)

EFFECT OF PAHS ON DNA DAMAGE

 

The mutagenesis process of polycyclic PAHs and their effects on the body were examined in detail, .

(Poster et al., 2006)

The results showed that compared to children living in low-traffic regions, children living near busy roads are more likely to be exposed to environmental PAHs and have a higher risk of genotoxicity. This study has enhanced the understanding of the connection between genotoxicity in children and urban traffic pollution in Southeast Asia.

(Kamboj et al., 2021)

These findings suggest that the additive interaction between exposure to environmental PAHs and Cd could enhance the burden of oxidative stress and cause oxidative DNA damage.

(Wang et al., 2018)

HEART FAILURE

 

Major environmental pollutants were measured in the serum of heart failure patients and compared with control samples; results showed that every factor was statistically significant.

(Tsapakis & Stephanou, 2004)

Our results provide evidence that exposure to fine particulates causes DNA damage. Furthermore, particulate PAHs could be biologically active constituents of PM2.5 regarding the induction of oxidative DNA damage.

(Lee et al., 1995)

 

5. Analytical Methodologies

The determination of polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbons in environmental samples primarily entails sample collection, extraction, and preconcentration from diverse matrices. Effective extraction during the sampling phase is critical for both gaseous and particulate-bound PAHs to enable precise quantification.(Hartmann, 1996)The broad spectrum of physicochemical properties inherent to PAHs poses substantial challenges in attaining comprehensive extraction and recovery of target analytes (Nowakowski et al., 2021).

To assess extraction efficiency and validate analytical protocols, surrogate standards are routinely incorporated into sorbent materials or filters prior to sampling(Udesky et al., 2019). Isotopically labeled PAH congeners are commonly utilized as surrogate standards owing to their physicochemical properties that closely mimic those of native PAHs(Ghetu et al., 2021). Nevertheless, the post-sampling introduction of isotopically labeled standards may fail to accurately reflect the native sample matrix, especially for particulate-associated PAHs(Udesky et al., 2019). As a result, recoveries of labeled compounds may diverge from those of native analytes (Itoh et al., 2007). Although comprehensive recovery data are not uniformly documented in PAH research, numerous studies have examined extraction efficiencies applicable to both vapor and particulate phases. Table 3 delineates quality assurance metrics for vapor-phase airborne PAH analysis.

A diverse array of analytical techniques has been developed for PAH characterization, tailored to analyte properties and matrix complexity. Among these, gas chromatography–mass spectrometry (GC–MS) and high-performance liquid chromatography represent the predominant methodologies for PAH quantification. Specialized HPLC configurations, such as HPLC with diode-array detection and fluorescence detection, integrate multiple detection modalities to enhance analytical performance (Singh et al., 2019).

The diode-array detector facilitates concurrent multi-wavelength monitoring and provides detailed spectral data, while fluorescence detection augments sensitivity by leveraging the inherent fluorescence of PAHs or via derivatization (Singh et al., 2019). HPLC-FLD approaches are particularly efficacious for intricate environmental matrices due to their superior selectivity and sensitivity for fluorescent PAH species (Chen, 2012).

GC–MS provides exceptional sensitivity, resolution, and unequivocal PAH identification; however, it necessitates costly instrumentation and laborious sample preparation(Okparanma & Mouazen, 2013). Conversely, HPLC-based methods are preferentially employed for thermally labile and high-molecular-weight PAHs attributable to their versatility and minimal thermal degradation(Ehrenhauser, 2011). Thus, the judicious selection of an analytical method hinges on sample characteristics, matrix complexity, target analytes, requisite sensitivity, and laboratory infrastructure(Owsianiak et al., 2011).

In aggregate, these analytical methodologies furnish robust frameworks for the identification and quantification of PAHs across biological, industrial, and environmental matrices, thereby underpinning thorough evaluations of their prevalence, transport, and ecological ramifications.

5.1 Advanced Methodologies

Recent advancements in nanotechnology have markedly enhanced the extraction, detection, and remediation of PAHs within environmental matrices such as soil and water(Shamloo et al., 2024). Nanomaterials have proven instrumental in augmenting analytical sensitivity, selectivity, and remediation efficacy(Munyengabe et al., 2023).

Han et al. (Munyengabe et al., 2023) devised a preconcentration and extraction protocol employing graphene oxide aggregates in conjunction with sodium chloride for PAHs in aqueous matrices. This methodology yielded detection limits of 10–30 ng/L, correlation coefficients exceeding 0.99, and recoveries spanning 80–111%. Moreover, it embodied principles of green chemistry by necessitating merely 1 mL of hexane for subsequent GC–MS analysis.

An alternative innovative strategy entails the integration of silver nanoparticles into porous graphitic carbon nitride matrices. Lu et al. illustrated that this nanocomposite substantially amplified PAH detection sensitivity, exemplified by fluorene, via the surface-enhanced Raman scattering attributes of silver nanoparticles, which consequently affords nano-enabled analytical platforms superior detection sensitivity, selectivity, and reduced limits of detection for trace-level PAH analysis.

Computational chemistry has made substantial contributions to elucidating PAH environmental transformation and degradation pathways, particularly under atmospheric photooxidation (Titaley et al., 2018). Methodologies encompassing molecular mechanics, molecular dynamics, and hybrid computational paradigms yield insights into PAH interactions with environmental matrices and remediation agents(Sandoval‐Pauker et al., 2023). These computational strategies facilitate predictions of PAH transport, transformation, and environmental persistence, thereby informing the formulation of efficacious remediation and risk assessment protocols(Brimo et al., 2017; Wang et al., 2017).

Table 3. Comparative Overview of Conventional and Advanced Analytical Methodologies Used for PAH Detection and Characterization

Analytical Method

Principle

Advantages

Limitations

GC–MS (Gas Chromatography–Mass Spectrometry)

Separation based on volatility followed by mass-based detection(Candraningrat et al., 2021)

High sensitivity, excellent selectivity, reliable identification of trace PAHs(Saldarriaga-Noreña et al., 2019)

Expensive instrumentation, extensive sample preparation(Bonner & Hopfgartner, 2022), unsuitable for thermally unstable compounds(Wang, 2020)

HPLC–UV

Separation using liquid chromatography with UV detection

Simple operation, suitable for non-volatile PAHs, relatively low cost

Lower sensitivity and selectivity compared to GC–MS

HPLC–FLD

Fluorescence-based detection of PAHs after chromatographic separation

High sensitivity and selectivity for fluorescent PAHs

Limited applicability for non-fluorescent compounds

HPLC–DAD

Simultaneous multi-wavelength spectral detection

Provides spectral information and peak confirmation

Lower sensitivity than fluorescence detection

Nanotechnology-Assisted Detection

Use of nanomaterials such as graphene oxide and silver nanoparticles

Enhanced sensitivity, lower detection limits, rapid analysis

High material cost and limited large-scale applicability

Surface-Enhanced Raman Scattering (SERS)

Raman signal enhancement using metallic nanoparticles

Ultra-sensitive detection, rapid analysis, minimal sample requirement

Reproducibility challenges and nanoparticle instability

Computational Chemistry Approaches

Simulation of PAH transport and degradation pathways

Predicts environmental fate and remediation efficiency

Requires computational expertise and validation

 

 

5.2 Extraction Methodologies

5.2.1 Solvent-Based Extraction for Particle-Phase PAHs

After collecting airborne particulate-bound PAHs on filters, samples are typically extracted employing organic solvents such as hexane, dichloromethane, acetone, or methanol, either singly or in mixtures. Extraction efficacy is commonly augmented through specialized techniques, including Soxhlet extraction, microwave-assisted extraction, ultrasonication, and pressurized fluid extraction (Danlami et al., 2014)

Gustafson and Dickhut utilized acetone, petroleum ether, and dichloromethane in a Soxhlet apparatus to extract PAHs from glass fiber filter samples. Lower-molecular-weight PAHs, including naphthalene, displayed suboptimal recoveries(Ho & Yu, 2004).

 Similar extraction efficiencies across various solvent systems, including toluene and dichloromethane, were observed when assessing reference materials such as NIST Standard Reference Material 1649a(Flasch et al., 2016; Schantz et al., 2012). These methods are often utilized in Soxhlet, reflux, microwave-assisted, and ultrasonication procedures.

While solvent-based extraction yields dependable PAH recoveries, efficiency is profoundly influenced by solvent polarity, matrix complexity, and the physicochemical attributes of specific PAH congeners. A compilation of studies assessing extraction efficiencies is presented in Table 3.

5.2.2 Solvent Microextraction

Polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbons are routinely identified in environmental media, including water, soil, sediments, and air. Consequently, efficacious extraction and preconcentration strategies are imperative for monitoring, risk evaluation, and regulatory adherence. Diverse analytical platforms, such as GC–MS/MS, LC–MS/MS, and atomic absorption spectroscopy, have been devised for PAH quantification in environmental, food, and biological specimens (Akinboye & Lee, 2025)

Contemporary microextraction methods prioritize diminished solvent usage, reduced sample volumes, enhanced cleanup, and elevated enrichment factors. Rezaee et al. reported a DLLME technique utilizing a chlorinated solvent as extractant for the determination of PAHs in water samples (Pena et al., 2009).

Magnetic dispersive micro-solid-phase extraction incorporating metal-organic frameworks has been advanced for PAH detection in water, tea, and fruit matrices(P et al., 2021),(Wu et al., 2021). Additional sophisticated techniques comprise stir bar sorptive extraction, dispersive liquid–liquid microextraction, solidification of the floating organic drop, and headspace solid-phase microextraction(Jinadasa et al., 2020).

Smith et al. examined non-modified polydimethylsiloxane fibers paired with microwave-assisted heating and headspace solid-phase microextraction for PAH extraction from water(Hsieh et al., 2014). One-step extraction and cleanup via continuous-flow single-drop microextraction have likewise been established for streamlined PAH analysis(Jalili et al., 2020).

Dispersive liquid–liquid microextraction, introduced in 2006 for the determination of polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbons in water samples, persists as a predominant liquid-phase microextraction approach for PAHs in water (Guiñez et al., 2016). Ionic liquid-based dispersive liquid–liquid microextraction has further been applied for PAH quantification in intricate matrices like tea infusions, beef patties, and water(Germán‐Hernández et al., 2013; Martinis et al., 2017).

Microextraction offers benefits such as curtailed solvent demands, expedited extraction, substantial enrichment, and alignment with green chemistry tenets. Nevertheless, supplementary manipulation may occasionally compromise analytical precision and reproducibility. As noted by (Jinadasa et al., 2020), microextraction constitutes a pivotal progression toward innovative analytical paradigms.

 

 

5.2.3 Soxhlet Extraction

Soxhlet extraction represents a traditional, extensively adopted method for PAH recovery from solid matrices. The process commences with pulverizing the solid sample to augment surface area, followed by placement in a thimble within the Soxhlet apparatus. A suitable solvent, typically hexane or dichloromethane, is chosen based on the matrix. The solvent is heated, vaporized, condensed, and cyclically percolated through the sample over long periods. The resultant extract is collected and concentrated via solvent evaporation prior to analysis.

Soxhlet extraction delivers elevated efficiency and consistent PAH recovery; however, it is protracted, solvent-intensive, and entails extended thermal exposure(Stéphane et al., 2021).

5.2.4 Accelerated Solvent Extraction

Accelerated solvent extraction constitutes a sophisticated preparatory technique prevalent in analytical chemistry. Samples are micronized and loaded into extraction cells, subjected to heightened temperature and pressure (Sun et al., 2012). The procedure incorporates static and dynamic phases that optimize analyte solubilization and mass transfer.

Relative to traditional methods, accelerated solvent extraction provides abbreviated extraction durations, reduced solvent volumes, and superior yields(Sun et al., 2012). Extracts are gathered and concentrated before instrumental scrutiny.

5.2.5 Ultrasonic Extraction

Ultrasonic extraction harnesses ultrasonic waves to facilitate analyte liberation from environmental matrices (Albero et al., 2019). The sample is blended with an appropriate solvent and exposed to ultrasonication to enhance efficiency. Post-extraction, the liquid fraction is segregated from particulates via filtration or centrifugation, followed by concentration using rotary evaporation.

Liquid–liquid extraction serves as another prevalent approach for PAH isolation from aqueous media, entailing pH modulation and partitioning with solvents like dichloromethane (Mahgoub et al., 2016). Post-agitation and phase demarcation, the organic phase harboring PAHs is retrieved and concentrated for analysis.

Ultrasonic extraction is expeditious, straightforward, and economical; yet, efficacy fluctuates with solvent choice, duration, and matrix composition. Ultrasonic and liquid–liquid extractions remain staples for PAH assessment in environmental and biological specimens.

6. Remediation Strategies

Remediation of polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbons has emerged as a critical environmental imperative due to their persistence, toxicity, and ubiquitous presence in polluted ecosystems. A range of remediation strategies, encompassing biological, chemical, thermal, and photocatalytic methods, has been developed to mitigate PAH contamination in soils and aquatic environments(Vásquez-Murrieta et al., 2016)Bioremediation stands out as one of the most sustainable and eco-friendly methods for PAH elimination. Conventional landfarming practices, which incorporate tilling, bulking, irrigation, and fertilizer supplementation, have exhibited substantial remediation efficacy. Straube et al. documented that these techniques facilitated roughly 86% removal of high-molecular-weight PAHs over a period of 6–12 months(Ghosal et al., 2016).

Earthworm-assisted bioremediation has likewise proven effective. Contreras-Ramos et al. observed that the earthworm Eisenia fetida significantly diminished soil levels of anthracene, benzopyrene, and phenanthrene (Contreras-Ramos et al., 2007). In India, fungal strains including P. chrysogenum, M. racemosus, and L. theobromae have demonstrated PAH degradation in contaminated soils via enzymatic processes mediated by lipase-producing consortia (Venkataraman et al., 2014).

Numerous bacterial species have been recognized as proficient PAH degraders. Strains such as Rhodococcus pyridinivorans and Kocuria flava, derived from oil-polluted soils, displayed robust pyrene degradation (Krivoruchko et al., 2023). Similarly, Agaricomycetes species achieved up to 99% PAH degradation at 10 ppm concentrations (Naloka et al., 2024). Microbial remediation offers advantages including cost-effectiveness, environmental compatibility, and the capacity to mineralize PAHs into less hazardous byproducts. Nonetheless, its performance can be modulated by factors such as temperature, pH, nutrient supply, and pollutant levels.

Thermal remediation has been applied to severely contaminated sites. Incineration at 900–1200°C effectively mineralizes PAHs in contaminated soils and industrial effluents (Patel et al., 2020). While thermal processes enable swift contaminant abatement, they are energy-demanding and prone to producing secondary pollutants.

Chemical oxidation constitutes a key remediation modality. PAH remediation using sodium persulfate in conjunction with electrokinetic treatment demonstrated improved removal efficiency in laboratory experiments (Isosaari et al., 2006). Oxidants like potassium permanganate, sodium-based compounds, and ferrous ions have been employed to activate persulfate and peroxy-acids for PAH degradation in industrial slurries (Bendouz et al., 2017; Liao et al., 2018). Although chemical oxidation yields rapid contaminant breakdown, it often entails elevated costs and potential modifications to soil characteristics.

Photocatalytic degradation employing titanium dioxide has gained prominence as an advanced oxidation process. Under UV irradiation, TiO₂ effectively degrades PAHs such as benzopyrene, pyrene, and phenanthrene on soil surfaces(Marquès et al., 2016; Sun et al., 2021). This method is deemed environmentally benign owing to its promotion of degradation with minimal hazardous residue generation.

Advancements in nanotechnology have bolstered remediation outcomes. Nanoparticle-enhanced phytoremediation leverages plants alongside nanomaterials like Au, Ag, CuO, ZnO, and C₆₀ to augment contaminant uptake and translocation (El-Ramady et al., 2017; Gomes, 2025). Nanotechnological approaches yield superior efficiency, heightened adsorption, and accelerated degradation; however, nanoparticle toxicity and ecological safety warrant further scrutiny.In summary, PAH remediation strategies are advancing toward more sustainable, efficacious, and eco-compatible technologies to rehabilitate contaminated ecosystems.

Table 4. Compilation of Quality Assurance (QA) Data for the Analysis of Airborne Polycyclic Aromatic Hydrocarbons (PAHs) in the Vapor Phase

Target PAHs

Extraction Method

Pre-treatment / Sample Loading

Detection Method

Flow Rate (L/min)

Sampling Volume (L)

LOD (Absolute Mass, ng)

LOD (Concentration, ng/m3)

Precision (%RSD)

Recovery (%)

Reference

 

A

Soxhlet extraction with acetone, ether, and dichloromethane

DI

GC–MS

510–750

172,000

1.2–7.9

79.3–103

(Drooge et al., 2022)

 

A

No solvent

Thermal desorption

GC–MS

665,000

 

A

No solvent

Laser-induced fluorescence (LIF)

GC–MS

0.3

 

A

Ethylene glycol

Microwave-assisted desorption and HS-SPME (PDMS-DVB fiber)

GC–MS

1.4

420

0.02

4–14

80–108

(Ehrenhauser, 2011)

 

A

No solvent

Thermal desorption

GC–MS

61–77

12–25

 

A

Toluene

GC–MS

53–59

 

B

Soxhlet extraction with dichloromethane–methanol

DI

GC–MS

6

36

1 (CHY)–15.3 (NAP)

4–9

90–97

(Sun et al., 2012)

 

B

Soxhlet extraction with dichloromethane

DI

GC–MS

0.002–1460

78–101

(Wu et al., 2021)

 

C

Hexane:methylene chloride with sonication

DI

GC–FID

4

32

0.17–0.49

<10 (except PHE, 20)

85–115

 

C

Dichloromethane–methanol with ultrasonication

DI

GC–FID

4

32

0.17–0.49

<10 (except PHE, 20)

85–115

 

C

Hexane

DI

GC–MS

34

146,880

 

C

Dichloromethane with ultrasonication

DI

GC–MS

2.5

60

1–10

<5

95.1

 

 

C

Soxhlet extraction with n-hexane, acetone, and dichloromethane (2:1:1)

GC–MS

0.071–0.153

0.6–6.7

(Drooge et al., 2023)

 

C

PDMS traps

TD

GC–MS

0.026 (NAP)

0.1

12.9 (NAP)

118 (BGP)

(Carvalho et al., 2019)

 

D

Soxhlet extraction with hexane

DI

GC–MS

600

900,000

0.001

 

D

Soxhlet extraction with dichloromethane

DI

GC–MS

1

240–480

4.2–16 (Coefficient of variation)

 

D

Microwave-assisted methanol–acetone extraction

DI

HRGC–MS/MS

666

960,000

80–90

(Ehrenhauser, 2011)

 

D

Soxhlet extraction with dichloromethane

DI

GC–MS

0.002–59

78–101

 

 

Abbreviations: DI = Direct Injection; TD = Thermal Desorption; GC–MS = Gas Chromatography–Mass Spectrometry; GC–FID = Gas Chromatography–Flame Ionization Detection; HRGC–MS/MS = High Resolution Gas Chromatography–Tandem Mass Spectrometry; HS-SPME = Headspace Solid-Phase Microextraction; PDMS-DVB = Polydimethylsiloxane–Divinylbenzene; LOD = Limit of Detection; RSD = Relative Standard Deviation.

7. Challenges and Future Perspectives

Polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbons, prominent among environmental pollutants, are ubiquitously produced through industrial, agricultural, and transportation activities, leading to pervasive contamination across diverse environmental matrices (Beygisangchin et al., 2026).

A principal challenge in PAH analysis pertains to sample preservation and preparation. Aerosol and air samples necessitate storage at subdued temperatures to avert the volatilization of semi-volatile compounds. Filters are typically segmented into smaller portions, sealed in hermetic containers, and maintained at around 4°C pending analysis (Bari et al., 2010). For gravimetric assessment, filters are routinely preserved under cryogenic conditions (Cutter et al., 2010).

Analogously, polyurethane foam plugs employed for gaseous PAH sampling demand extraction via Soxhlet or ultrasonication, followed by low-temperature storage prior to instrumental scrutiny (Peng & Lim, 2022). These traditional analytical workflows are characteristically laborious, protracted, solvent-profligate, and reliant on advanced instrumentation. Accordingly, sophisticated techniques such as gas chromatography–mass spectrometry (GC–MS) have emerged as the preferred modality for precise PAH quantitation.

GC–MS and allied chromatographic methods are routinely utilized for PAH quantification (Wilson, 2020). PAH extracts derived from filters and PUF plugs are conventionally examined using GC–MS systems incorporating flame ionization detection and capillary columns coated with dimethyl polysiloxane stationary phases (Wilson, 2020). Helium serves as the customary carrier gas in temperature-programmed separations (Wilson, 2020).

Air sampling protocols generally entail high-volume samplers fitted with pre-baked quartz fiber filters for particulate-phase PAHs and with PUF plugs for gaseous-phase PAHs (Ochsenkühn‐Petropoulou et al., 2002). Post-collection, filters are equilibrated under regulated conditions, gravimetrically assessed using microbalances, encased in aluminum foil, and cryopreserved until analysis.

Notwithstanding substantial progress in analytical methodologies, persistent constraints encompass matrix interferences, elaborate sample pretreatment, elevated operational expenses, and the exigency for specialized expertise. Prospective investigations should thus prioritize the development of expeditious, economical, eco-sustainable, and ultrasensitive analytical platforms for real-time PAH surveillance.

Nascent technologies, including nanotechnology-based sensors, biosensors, artificial intelligence-augmented monitoring systems, and portable analyzers, present compelling prospects for augmenting environmental monitoring and risk evaluation. Moreover, synergistic remediation paradigms integrating biological, chemical, and nanomaterial-centric strategies have the potential to optimize PAH abatement in polluted ecosystems.

Global cooperation and unified regulatory frameworks are imperative to counteract the transboundary dissemination of PAHs. Bolstering environmental statutes, refining surveillance initiatives, and fostering sustainable industrial paradigms will prove indispensable for curtailing PAH pollution and safeguarding ecological integrity and human well-being.

8. Conclusion

This review provides a comprehensive synthesis of the origins, environmental dispersion, analytical protocols, toxicological ramifications, and remediation tactics pertinent to polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbons. Both anthropogenic and biogenic sources substantially contribute to PAH dissemination in various matrices such as soil, water, air, and vegetation (Chaurasiaa et al., 2024). Predominant anthropogenic contributors comprise industrial effluents, vehicular emissions, petroleum spills, and urban stormwater runoff, while natural origins encompass volcanic activity and wildfires.

PAHs are recalcitrant organic contaminants primarily formed through incomplete combustion (Feng et al., 2025). Their lipophilic properties lead to sequestration in soils and sediments, promoting bioaccumulation and biomagnification across trophic levels. Atmospheric deposition and phytouptake further propagate PAHs into alimentary webs, imperiling biota and human populations. Elevated PAH levels are frequently documented in flora near industrial areas and high-traffic corridors.

Contemporaneous innovations in analytical instrumentation have markedly enhanced PAH detection, speciation, and quantitation within multifaceted environmental matrices (Smith et al., 2006). Modalities such as GC–MS, high-performance liquid chromatography, nanotechnology-facilitated detection, and microextraction paradigms have elevated analytical acuity and specificity. Nonetheless, impediments concerning sample pretreatment, matrix effects, fiscal burdens, and expansive monitoring endeavors endure (Hossain et al., 2026).

Diverse remediation modalities—encompassing biological, chemical, thermal, photocatalytic, and nanotechnology-mediated interventions—have shown substantial efficacy in reducing PAH contamination. Bioremediation and phytoremediation, in particular, are considered ecologically benign and cost-efficient alternatives.

Future research should focus on developing green analytical methodologies, real-time monitoring devices, hybrid remediation frameworks, and probabilistic risk assessment models to facilitate effective PAH management. Concurrently, strengthened international regulations and coordinated environmental governance are necessary to constrain PAH emissions and mitigate their ecological and public health consequences.

In summary, perpetual scientific innovation and judicious environmental stewardship will be pivotal in ameliorating PAH contamination and preserving environmental and human health.

Credit authorship contribution statement

A. Pathak: Writing – Original draft, Methodology, Data curation, Conceptualization.  R. Kurrey: Writing – review & editing, Resources, Investigation. S. Yadav: Writing – review & editing, Visualization, Validation, Supervision.   T. L. Chandra: Writing – review & editing, funding acquisition. A. Kumar:  Writing – review & editing, Validation, Investigation.

 

Data availability statement

No data were used for the research described in the article

 

Conflict of Interest

There is no conflict of interest from the authors.

 

References

  Abdel‐Shafy, H. I., & Mansour, M. S. M. (2015). A review on polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbons: Source, environmental impact, effect on human health and remediation. Egyptian Journal of Petroleum, 25(1), 107–123. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ejpe.2015.03.011

  Adeniji, A. O., Okoh, O. O., & Okoh, A. I. (2018). Analytical Methods for Polycyclic Aromatic Hydrocarbons and their Global Trend of Distribution in Water and Sediment: A Review [Review of Analytical Methods for Polycyclic Aromatic Hydrocarbons and their Global Trend of Distribution in Water and Sediment: A Review]. InTech eBooks. https://doi.org/10.5772/intechopen.71163

  Ahammed, G. J., Zhou, Y., Xia, X., Mao, W., Shi, K., & Yu, J. (2012). Brassinosteroid regulates secondary metabolism in tomato towards enhanced tolerance to phenanthrene. Biologia Plantarum, 57(1), 154–158. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10535-012-0128-9

  Ailijiang, N., Zhong, N., Zhou, X., Mamat, A., Chang, J., Cao, S., Hua, Z., & Li, N. (2022). Levels, sources, and risk assessment of PAHs residues in soil and plants in urban parks of Northwest China. Scientific Reports, 12(1). https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-022-25879-8

  Akinboye, A. J., & Lee, J.-G. (2025). Analytical techniques for the detection of benzo[a]pyrene and other polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbons in food. Food Science and Preservation, 32(6), 978–995. https://doi.org/10.11002/fsp.2025.32.6.978

  Albero, B., Tadeo, J. L., & Pérez, R. A. (2019). Ultrasound-assisted extraction of organic contaminants. TrAC Trends in Analytical Chemistry, 118, 739–750. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.trac.2019.07.007

  Albinet, A., Leoz-Garziandia, E., Budzinski, H., & ViIlenave, E. (2007). Polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbons (PAHs), nitrated PAHs and oxygenated PAHs in ambient air of the Marseilles area (South of France): Concentrations and sources. The Science of The Total Environment, 384, 280–292. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scitotenv.2007.04.028

  Al-Nasir, F., Hijazin, T., Al-Alawi, M., Jiries, A., Al‐Madanat, O., Mayyas, A., Al-Dalain, S. A., Al-Dmour, R. S., Alahmad, A., & Batarseh, M. (2022). Accumulation, Source Identification, and Cancer Risk Assessment of Polycyclic Aromatic Hydrocarbons (PAHs) in Different Jordanian Vegetables. Toxics, 10(11), 643–643. https://doi.org/10.3390/toxics10110643

  Amato‐Lourenço, L. F., Saiki, M., Saldiva, P. H. N., & Mauad, T. (2017). Influence of Air Pollution and Soil Contamination on the Contents of Polycyclic Aromatic Hydrocarbons (PAHs) in Vegetables Grown in Urban Gardens of Sao Paulo, Brazil. Frontiers in Environmental Science, 5. https://doi.org/10.3389/fenvs.2017.00077

  Anyahara, J. N. (2021). Effects of Polycyclic Aromatic Hydrocarbons (PAHs) on the Environment: A Systematic Review [Review of Effects of Polycyclic Aromatic Hydrocarbons (PAHs) on the Environment: A Systematic Review]. International Journal of Advanced Academic Research, 12–26. https://doi.org/10.46654/ij.24889849.e7303

  Bakker, M., Vorenhout, M., Sijm, D. T. H. M., & Kollöffel, C. (1999). Dry deposition of atmospheric polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbons in three Plantago species. Environmental Toxicology and Chemistry, 18(10), 2289–2294. https://doi.org/10.1002/etc.5620181025

  Baran, A., Tarnawski, M., Urbański, K., Klimkowicz‐Pawlas, A., & Spałek, I. (2017). Concentration, sources and risk assessment of PAHs in bottom sediments. Environmental Science and Pollution Research, 24(29), 23180–23195. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11356-017-9944-y

  Bari, Md. A., Baumbach, G., Kuch, B., & Scheffknecht, G. (2010). Particle-phase concentrations of polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbons in ambient air of rural residential areas in southern Germany. Air Quality Atmosphere & Health, 3(2), 103–116. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11869-009-0057-8

  Bendouz, M., Tran, L. H., Coudert, L., Mercier, G., & Blais, J. (2017). Optimization of PAHs Oxidation from a Concentrate of Soil Attrition Using Potassium Permanganate. Soil and Sediment Contamination An International Journal, 26(6), 605–622. https://doi.org/10.1080/15320383.2017.1367754

  Berríos-Rolón, P. J., Cotto, M., & Márquez, F. (2025). Polycyclic Aromatic Hydrocarbons (PAHs) in Freshwater Systems: A Comprehensive Review of Sources, Distribution, and Ecotoxicological Impacts. Toxics, 13(4), 321–321. https://doi.org/10.3390/toxics13040321

  Beygisangchin, M., Jakmunee, J., Kamarudin, S. K., Baghdadi, A. H., Saetang, S., & Thipprasert, S. (2026). A critical review of polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbons and their adverse effects on human health: insights from the past six years. Environmental Sciences Europe. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12302-026-01367-y

  Bonner, R. F., & Hopfgartner, G. (2022). The Origin and Implications of Artifact Ions in Bioanalytical LC–MS. LCGC North America, 10–13. https://doi.org/10.56530/lcgc.na.pd4884b8

  Botello, A. V., Ponce-Vélez, G., Armstrong‐Altrin, J. S., Fragoso, S. V., & Velandia-Aquino, L. B. (2023). Concentration of polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbons (PAHs) in sediments from the Tampamachoco lagoon, Tuxpan River mouth, Gulf of Mexico. Arabian Journal of Geosciences, 16(10). https://doi.org/10.1007/s12517-023-11662-0

  Bourguignon, N., Irazusta, V., Isaac, P., Estévez, C., Maizel, D., & Ferrero, M. A. (2019). Identification of proteins induced by polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbon and proposal of the phenanthrene catabolic pathway in Amycolatopsis tucumanensis DSM 45259. Ecotoxicology and Environmental Safety, 175, 19–28. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecoenv.2019.02.071

  Brimo, K., Garnier, P., Lafolie, F., Séré, G., & Ouvrard, S. (2017). In situ long-term modeling of phenanthrene dynamics in an aged contaminated soil using the VSOIL platform. The Science of The Total Environment, 239–248. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scitotenv.2017.11.089

  Cabrerizo, A., Dachs, J., Moeckel, C., Ojeda, M. E. F., Caballero, G., Barceló,  Damià, & Jones, K. C. (2011). Ubiquitous Net Volatilization of Polycyclic Aromatic Hydrocarbons from Soils and Parameters Influencing Their Soil−Air Partitioning. Environmental Science & Technology, 45(11), 4740–4747. https://doi.org/10.1021/es104131f

  Cam, D., Gagni, S., Meldolesi, L., & Galletti, G. C. (2000). Determination of Polycyclic Aromatic Hydrocarbons in Sediment Using Solid-Phase Microextraction with Gas Chromatography--Mass Spectrometry. Journal of Chromatographic Science, 38(2), 55–60. https://doi.org/10.1093/chromsci/38.2.55

  Campos, I., & Abrantes, N. (2021). Forest fires as drivers of contamination of polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbons to the terrestrial and aquatic ecosystems. Current Opinion in Environmental Science & Health, 24, 100293–100293. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.coesh.2021.100293

  Candraningrat, I. D. A. A. D., Santika, A. A. G. J., Dharmayanti, I. A. M. S., & Prayascita, P. W. (2021). REVIEW KEMAMPUAN METODE GC-MS DALAM IDENTIFIKASI FLUNITRAZEPAM TERKAIT DENGAN ASPEK FORENSIK DAN KLINIK. Jurnal Kimia, 12–12. https://doi.org/10.24843/jchem.2021.v15.i01.p03

  Carvalho, F. I. M., Filho, H. A. D., & Dantas, K. das G. F. (2019). Simultaneous determination of 16 polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbons in groundwater by GC-FID after solid-phase extraction. SN Applied Sciences, 1(7). https://doi.org/10.1007/s42452-019-0839-z

  Cave, M., Wragg, J., Beriro, D. J., Vane, C. H., Thomas, R., Riding, M. J., & Taylor, C. (2018). An overview of research and development themes in the measurement and occurrences of polyaromatic hydrocarbons in dusts and particulates [Review of An overview of research and development themes in the measurement and occurrences of polyaromatic hydrocarbons in dusts and particulates]. Journal of Hazardous Materials, 360, 373–390. Elsevier BV. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jhazmat.2018.08.038

  Cavé‐Radet, A., Salmon, A., Lima, O., Aïnouche, M. L., & Amrani, A. E. (2018). Increased tolerance to organic xenobiotics following recent allopolyploidy in Spartina (Poaceae). Plant Science, 280, 143–154. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.plantsci.2018.11.005

  Chattopadhyay, B., Chatterjee, A., & Mukhopadhyay, S. K. (2002). Bioaccumulation of metals in the East Calcutta wetland ecosystem. Aquatic Ecosystem Health & Management, 5(2), 191–203. https://doi.org/10.1080/14634980290031848

  Chaurasiaa, J., Ghimireyb, V., & Marahattac, S. (2024). UNDERSTANDING THE IMPACT OF POLYCYCLIC AROMATIC HYDROCARBONS:SOIL, ENVIRONMENT, AND HUMAN HEALTH. Environment & Ecosystem Science, 8(2), 88–91. https://doi.org/10.26480/ees.02.2024.88.91

  Chen, B., Inbaraj, B. S., & Hsu, K. (2022). Recent advances in the analysis of polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbons in food and water [Review of Recent advances in the analysis of polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbons in food and water]. Journal of Food and Drug Analysis, 30(4), 494–522. Elsevier BV. https://doi.org/10.38212/2224-6614.3429

  Chen, J., Xia, X., Wang, H., Zhai, Y., Xi, N., Lin, H., & Wen, W. (2019). Uptake pathway and accumulation of polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbons in spinach affected by warming in enclosed soil/water-air-plant microcosms. Journal of Hazardous Materials, 379, 120831–120831. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jhazmat.2019.120831

  Chen, P. (2012). Determination of 15 polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbons in aquatic products by HPLC-Fluorescence.

  Contreras-Ramos, S. M., Álvarez-Bernal, D., & Dendooven, L. (2007). Dynamics of nitrogen in a PAHs contaminated soil amended with biosolid or vermicompost in the presence of earthworms. Chemosphere, 67(10), 2072–2081. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chemosphere.2006.10.069

  Contreras-Soto, M. B., Medrano‐Félix, J. A., Q, C. C., Ibarra-Rodríguez, J., Martínez-Urtaza, J., & Campo, N. C. (2019). Revista Bio Ciencias, 6. https://doi.org/10.15741/revbio.06.nesp.e540

  Crnković, D., Sekulić, Z., Antonović, D., Marinković, А., Popović, S., Nikolić, J., & Drmanić, S. (2020). Origins of Polycyclic Aromatic Hydrocarbons in Sediments from the Danube and Sava Rivers and Their Tributaries in Serbia. Polish Journal of Environmental Studies, 29(3), 2101–2110. https://doi.org/10.15244/pjoes/111319

  Cutter, G. A., Andersson, P., Codispoti, L., Croot, P., François, R., Lohan, M. C., Obata, H., & Loeff, M. M. R. van der. (2010). Sampling and Sample-handling Protocols for GEOTRACES Cruises. Journal of Oral Science, 45(2), 107–110. https://doi.org/10.2334/josnusd.45.107

  Danlami, J. M., Arsad, A., Zaini, M. A. A., & Sulaiman, H. (2014). A comparative study of various oil extraction techniques from plants. Reviews in Chemical Engineering, 30(6). https://doi.org/10.1515/revce-2013-0038

  Derafshi, M., Matin, N. H., & حسنی, ا. (2022). A short review on polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbon contamination [Review of A short review on polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbon contamination]. Acta Horticulturae et Regiotecturae, 25(2), 174–180. Slovak University of Agriculture. https://doi.org/10.2478/ahr-2022-0021

  Desalme, D., Binet, P., & Chiapusio, G. (2013). Challenges in Tracing the Fate and Effects of Atmospheric Polycyclic Aromatic Hydrocarbon Deposition in Vascular Plants. Environmental Science & Technology, 47(9), 3967–3981. https://doi.org/10.1021/es304964b

  Dreyer, A., Nickel, S., & Schröder, W. (2018). (Persistent) Organic pollutants in Germany: results from a pilot study within the 2015 moss survey. Environmental Sciences Europe, 30(1). https://doi.org/10.1186/s12302-018-0172-y

  Drooge, B. L. van, Prats, R. M., Flo, C. J., & Grimalt, J. O. (2022). Determination of subpicogram levels of airborne polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbons for personal exposure monitoring assessment. Research Square (Research Square). https://doi.org/10.21203/rs.3.rs-2024914/v1

  Drooge, B. L. van, Prats, R. M., Jaén, C., & Grimalt, J. O. (2023). Determination of subpicogram levels of airborne polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbons for personal exposure monitoring assessment. Environmental Monitoring and Assessment, 195(3). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10661-023-10953-z

  Ehrenhauser, F. S. (2011). Photochemical Reaction Products of Polycyclic Aromatic Hydrocarbons Adsorbed at an Air-Water Interface. https://doi.org/10.31390/gradschool_dissertations.530

  El-Ramady, H., Alshaal, T., El-Henawy, A., Abdalla, N., Taha, H., Elmahrouk, M., Shalaby, T., Elsakhawy, T., Omara, A. E.-D., El-Marsafawy, S., Elhawat, N., & Shehata, S. A. (2017). Environmental Nanoremediation under Changing Climate. Environment, Biodiversity and Soil Security, 1(2017), 190–200. https://doi.org/10.21608/jenvbs.2017.1550.1009

  Fellet, G., Poščić, F., Licen, S., Marchiol, L., Musetti, R., Tolloi, A., Barbieri, P., & Zerbi, G. (2016). PAHs accumulation on leaves of six evergreen urban shrubs: A field experiment. Atmospheric Pollution Research, 7(5), 915–924. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.apr.2016.05.007

  Feng, D., Liu, Y., Gao, Y., Zhou, J., Zheng, L., Qiao, G., Ma, L., Lin, Z., & Grathwohl, P. (2017). Atmospheric bulk deposition of polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbons in Shanghai: Temporal and spatial variation, and global comparison. Environmental Pollution, 230, 639–647. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.envpol.2017.07.022

  Feng, Y., Li, Z., & Li, W. (2025). Polycyclic Aromatic Hydrocarbons (PAHs): Environmental Persistence and Human Health Risks. Natural Product Communications, 20(1). https://doi.org/10.1177/1934578x241311451

  Flasch, M., Kistler, M., Kirchsteiger, B., & Kasper‐Giebl, A. (2016). Solvent effects on extraction of polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbons in ambient aerosol samples. E3S Web of Conferences, 10, 21–21. https://doi.org/10.1051/e3sconf/20161000021

  Germán‐Hernández, M., Crespo‐Llabrés, P., Pino, V., Ayala, J. H., & Afonso, A. M. (2013). Utilization of an ionic liquid in situ preconcentration method for the determination of the 15 + 1 European Union polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbons in drinking water and fruit‐tea infusions. Journal of Separation Science, 36(15), 2496–2506. https://doi.org/10.1002/jssc.201300393

  Ghetu, C. C., Scott, R. P., Wilson, G., Liu-May, R., & Anderson, K. A. (2021). Improvements in identification and quantitation of alkylated PAHs and forensic ratio sourcing. Analytical and Bioanalytical Chemistry, 413(6), 1651–1664. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00216-020-03127-0

  Ghosal, D., Ghosh, S., Dutta, T. K., & Ahn, Y. (2016). Current State of Knowledge in Microbial Degradation of Polycyclic Aromatic Hydrocarbons (PAHs): A Review [Review of Current State of Knowledge in Microbial Degradation of Polycyclic Aromatic Hydrocarbons (PAHs): A Review]. Frontiers in Microbiology, 7. Frontiers Media. https://doi.org/10.3389/fmicb.2016.01369

  Gomes, M. P. (2025). Nanophytoremediation: advancing phytoremediation efficiency through nanotechnology integration. Discover Plants., 2(1). https://doi.org/10.1007/s44372-025-00090-x

  Gopinath, V., Giribabu, N., Mohan, P. S., Barathan, M., Govindarajan, V. K., Mani, A., Rahman, P. S. A., & Karsani, S. A. (2024). Environmental impact and human health effects of polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbons and remedial strategies: A detailed review. Chemosphere, 351, 141227–141227. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chemosphere.2024.141227

  Guiñez, M., Martínez, L. D., Fernández, L. P., & Cerutti, S. (2016). Dispersive liquid–liquid microextraction based on solidification of floating organic drop and fluorescence detection for the determination of nitrated polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbons in aqueous samples. Microchemical Journal, 131, 1–8. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.microc.2016.10.020

  Han, Y., Bandowe, B. A. M., Chen, W., Cao, J., Wilcke, W., Wang, G., Ni, H., Zhang, J., An, Z., & Yan, B. (2014). Stronger association of polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbons with soot than with char in soils and sediments. Chemosphere, 119, 1335–1345. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chemosphere.2014.02.021

  Hartmann, R. (1996). Polycyclic Aromatic Hydrocarbons (PAHs) in Forest Soils: Critical Evaluation of a New Analytical Procedure. International Journal of Environmental & Analytical Chemistry, 62(2), 161–173. https://doi.org/10.1080/03067319608027062

  Hassan, S. K., El-Mekawy, A., Shetaya, W. H., Alghamdi, M. A., Nawab, J., Tariq, A., & Khoder, M. I. (2025). Atmospheric fine organic (PAHs) aerosols in Dokki urban area at Greater Cairo, Egypt: A comprehensive analysis of seasonal characterization, source apportionment and exposure implications. Earth Systems and Environment. https://doi.org/10.1007/s41748-025-00720-0

  He, F., Yu, H., Shi, H., Li, X., Chu, S., Huo, C., & Liu, R. (2021). Behavioural, Histopathological, Genetic and Organism-Wide Responses to Phenanthrene-Induced Oxidative Stress in Eisenia Fetida Earthworms in Natural Soil Microcosms. Research Square (Research Square). https://doi.org/10.21203/rs.3.rs-1011942/v1

  Ho, S. S. H., & Yu, J. Z. (2004). In-injection port thermal desorption and subsequent gas chromatography–mass spectrometric analysis of polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbons and n-alkanes in atmospheric aerosol samples. Journal of Chromatography A, 1059, 121–129. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chroma.2004.10.013

  Hossain, M. I., Yi, D. K., & Kim, S. (2026). Recent Advances in Nanomaterial-Based and Colorimetric Technologies for Detecting Illicit Drugs and Environmental Toxins. Applied Sciences, 16(2), 693–693. https://doi.org/10.3390/app16020693

  Hrdina, A., Kohale, I. N., Kaushal, S., Kelly, J. M., Selin, N. E., Engelward, B. P., & Kroll, J. H. (2022). The Parallel Transformations of Polycyclic Aromatic Hydrocarbons in the Body and in the Atmosphere. Environmental Health Perspectives, 130(2), 25004–25004. https://doi.org/10.1289/ehp9984

  Hsieh, P.-C., Jen, J., Lee, C., & Chang, K.-C. (2014). Determination of Polycyclic Aromatic Hydrocarbons in Environmental Water Samples by Microwave-Assisted Headspace Solid-Phase Microextraction. Environmental Engineering Science, 32(4), 301–309. https://doi.org/10.1089/ees.2014.0295

  Hu, T., Mao, Y., Ke, Y.-P., Liu, W., Cheng, C., Shi, M., Zhang, Z., Zhang, J., Qi, S., & Xing, X. (2021). Spatial and seasonal variations of PAHs in soil, air, and atmospheric bulk deposition along the plain to mountain transect in Hubei province, central China: Air-soil exchange and long-range atmospheric transport. Environmental Pollution, 291, 118139–118139. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.envpol.2021.118139

  Isosaari, P., Piskonen, R., Ojala, P., Voipio, S., Eilola, K., Lehmus, E., & Itävaara, M. (2006). Integration of electrokinetics and chemical oxidation for the remediation of creosote-contaminated clay. Journal of Hazardous Materials, 144, 538–548. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jhazmat.2006.10.068

  Itodo, A., Sha’Ato, R., & Arowojolu, M. I. (2018). Polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbons in water samples from a Nigerian bitumen seepage: Gas chromatography- mass spectrometry quantification. Bangladesh Journal of Scientific and Industrial Research, 53(4), 319–326. https://doi.org/10.3329/bjsir.v53i4.39197

  Itoh, N., Numata, M., & Yarita, T. (2007). Evaluation of Behavioral Differences between Native Polycyclic Aromatic Hydrocarbons and 13C-Labeled Internal Standards during Clean-up Steps of Analysis. Analytical Sciences, 23(10), 1245–1248. https://doi.org/10.2116/analsci.23.1245

  Jalili, V., Barkhordari, A., & Ghiasvand, A. (2020). Liquid-phase microextraction of polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbons: A review [Review of Liquid-phase microextraction of polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbons: A review]. Reviews in Analytical Chemistry, 39(1), 1–19. De Gruyter. https://doi.org/10.1515/revac-2020-0101

  Jia, J., Bi, C., Jin, X., Zeng, Y., Deng, L., Wang, X., & Chen, Z. (2020). Uptake, translocation, and risk assessment of PAHs in contaminated soil-air-vegetable systems based on a field simulation experiment. Environmental Pollution, 271, 116361–116361. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.envpol.2020.116361

  Jinadasa, B. K. K. K., Monteau, F., & Morais, S. (2020). Critical review of micro-extraction techniques used in the determination of polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbons in biological, environmental and food samples. Food Additives & Contaminants Part A, 37(6), 1004–1026. https://doi.org/10.1080/19440049.2020.1733103

  Kamal, A., Malik, R. N., Martellini, T., & Cincinelli, A. (2014). PAH exposure biomarkers are associated with clinico-chemical changes in the brick kiln workers in Pakistan. Science of The Total Environment, 490, 521–527. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scitotenv.2014.05.033

  Kamboj, S., Singh, S. K., & Haritash, A. K. (2021). Catabolic enzyme activity and kinetics of pyrene degradation by novel bacterial strains isolated from contaminated soil. Environmental Technology & Innovation, 23, 101744–101744. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.eti.2021.101744

  Kieta, K., Owens, P. N., & Petticrew, E. L. (2023). Determination of sediment sources following a major wildfire and evaluation of the use of color properties and polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbons (PAHs) as tracers. Journal of Soils and Sediments, 23(12), 4187–4207. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11368-023-03565-0

  Kim, L., Jeon, H., Kim, Y., Yang, S.-H., Choi, H., Kim, T.-O., & Lee, S. (2019). Monitoring polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbon concentrations and distributions in rice paddy soils from Gyeonggi-do, Ulsan, and Pohang. Applied Biological Chemistry, 62(1). https://doi.org/10.1186/s13765-019-0423-7

  Koukoulakis, K., Kanellopoulos, P. G., Chrysochou, E., Costopoulou, D., Vassiliadou, I., Leondiadis, L., & Bakeas, E. (2020). Atmospheric Concentrations and Health Implications of PAHs, PCBs and PCDD/Fs in the Vicinity of a Heavily Industrialized Site in Greece. Applied Sciences, 10(24), 9023–9023. https://doi.org/10.3390/app10249023

  Krektun, B. V., Snitynskiy, V. V., Maliszewszka-Kordibach, B., & Smreczak, B. (2012). Modern approaches to assessment of PAHs bioavailability in soil for environmental toxicology research. Acta Agraria Debreceniensis, 49, 35–36. https://doi.org/10.34101/actaagrar/49/2474

  Krivoruchko, A. V., Kuyukina, M. S., Peshkur, T., Cunningham, C., & Ившина, И. Б. (2023). Rhodococcus Strains from the Specialized Collection of Alkanotrophs for Biodegradation of Aromatic Compounds. Molecules, 28(5), 2393–2393. https://doi.org/10.3390/molecules28052393

  Kummer, V., Mašková, J., Zralý, Z., Neča, J., Šimečková, P., Vondráček, J., & Machala, M. (2008). Estrogenic activity of environmental polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbons in uterus of immature Wistar rats. Toxicology Letters, 180(3), 212–221. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.toxlet.2008.06.862

  Lee, W., Wang, Y., Lin, T., Chen, Y., Lin, W.-C., Ku, C.-C., & Cheng, J. (1995). PAH characteristics in the ambient air of traffic-source. The Science of The Total Environment, 159, 185–200. https://doi.org/10.1016/0048-9697(95)04323-s

  Li, C., Mi, L., Yan, J., & Sun, Y. (2020). Occurrence, distribution and ecological risk assessment of polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbons in atmospheric dust from different functional areas of Beijing. J. Hazard. Mater., 383, 121150–121150. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jhazmat.2019.121150

  Liang, Y., Zhao, H., Deng, Y., Zhou, J., Li, G., & Sun, B. (2016). Long-Term Oil Contamination Alters the Molecular Ecological Networks of Soil Microbial Functional Genes. Frontiers in Microbiology, 7. https://doi.org/10.3389/fmicb.2016.00060

  Liao, X., Wu, Z., Li, Y., Luo, J., & Su, C. (2018). Enhanced degradation of polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbons by indigenous microbes combined with chemical oxidation. Chemosphere, 213, 551–558. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chemosphere.2018.09.092

  Lu, Y., Liu, Y., Fu, P., Wang, J., Lu, J., & Ding, J. A. (2019). Distribution, source and risk assessment of polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbons (PAHs) in agricultural soils from the Yangtze River Delta, China. Environ. Pollut., 246, 617–625. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.envpol.2018.12.066

  Maciejczyk, M., Tyrpień-Golder, K., Janoszka, B., Gierat, B., & Muzyka, R. (2023). Mutagenic and carcinogenic polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbons (PAHs) in food – occurrence, human health effects, and assessment methods of exposure. Environmental Medicine, 26, 8–15. https://doi.org/10.26444/ms/168971

  Mahgoub, H. A., Hiba, A., Nimir, A., Tawfeeg, E., Hiba, A., Nimir, A., Binkov, B., rm, R., Singh, V., Patel, D., Jyoti, R., Mathur, N., Siddiqui, M., Wu, B., Zhang, R., Cheng, S., Ford, T., Li, A., Zhang, M., … John, L. (2016). Extraction Techniques for Determination of Polycyclic Aromatic Hydrocarbons in Water Samples. International Journal of Science and Research (IJSR), 5(1), 268–272. https://doi.org/10.21275/v5i1.nov152648

  Mamy, L., Patureau, D., Barriuso, E., Bedos, C., Bessac, F., Louchart, X., Martin‐Laurent, F., Miège, C., & Benoît, P. (2014). Prediction of the Fate of Organic Compounds in the Environment From Their Molecular Properties: A Review [Review of Prediction of the Fate of Organic Compounds in the Environment From Their Molecular Properties: A Review]. Critical Reviews in Environmental Science and Technology, 45(12), 1277–1377. Taylor & Francis. https://doi.org/10.1080/10643389.2014.955627

  Marquès, M., Mari, M., Audí-Miró, C., Sierra, J., Soler, A., Nadal, M., & Domingo, J. L. (2016). Photodegradation of polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbons in soils under a climate change base scenario. Chemosphere, 148, 495–503. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chemosphere.2016.01.069

  Martínez-Fernández, D., Vítková, M., Michálková, Z., & Komárek, M. (2017). Engineered Nanomaterials for Phytoremediation of Metal/Metalloid-Contaminated Soils: Implications for Plant Physiology (pp. 369–403). https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-52381-1_14

  Martinis, E. M., Grijalba, A. C., Pérez, M. B. Á., Llaver, M., & Wuilloud, R. G. (2017). Synergistic analytical preconcentration with ionic liquid–nanomaterial hybrids. TrAC Trends in Analytical Chemistry, 97, 333–344. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.trac.2017.10.004

  Montano, L., Baldini, G. M., Piscopo, M., Liguori, G., Lombardi, R., Ricciardi, M., Esposito, G., Pinto, G., Fontanarosa, C., Spinelli, M., Palmieri, I., Sofia, D., Brogna, C., Carati, C., Esposito, M., Gallo, P., Amoresano, A., & Motta, O. (2025). Polycyclic Aromatic Hydrocarbons (PAHs) in the Environment: Occupational Exposure, Health Risks and Fertility Implications. Toxics, 13(3), 151–151. https://doi.org/10.3390/toxics13030151

  Muhyideen, O., Shittu, L., Ajibola, Y. F., & Okechukwu, I. P. (2023). Assessment of Mutagenicity and Carcinogenicity Risks and Source Apportionment of Polycyclic Aromatic Hydrocarbons of Monitored Black Carbon (Soot) in Air and Swimming Pool Water in Port Harcourt. Research Square (Research Square). https://doi.org/10.21203/rs.3.rs-2880375/v1

  Muñoz-Arcos, E., Castillo, A., Cuevas-Aedo, A., Ovando-Fuentealba, L., Taylor, A., Bustamante‐Ortega, R., Blake, W., & Bravo‐Linares, C. (2021). Sediment source apportionment following wildfire in an upland commercial forest catchment. Journal of Soils and Sediments, 21(6), 2432–2449. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11368-021-02943-w

  Munyengabe, A., Sibali, L. L., & Ndibewu, P. P. (2023). Advances in Polymer Nanocomposite Materials for Photocatalytic Degradation of Polynuclear Aromatic Hydrocarbons in Environmental Matrices: A Review [Review of Advances in Polymer Nanocomposite Materials for Photocatalytic Degradation of Polynuclear Aromatic Hydrocarbons in Environmental Matrices: A Review]. International Journal of Chemistry, 15(1), 13–13. Canadian Center of Science and Education. https://doi.org/10.5539/ijc.v15n1p13

  Naloka, K., Kuntaveesuk, A., Muangchinda, C., Chavanich, S., Viyakarn, V., Chen, B., & Pinyakong, O. (2024). Pseudomonas and Pseudarthrobacter are the key players in synergistic phenanthrene biodegradation at low temperatures. Scientific Reports, 14(1). https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-024-62829-y

  Nowakowski, M., Rykowska, I., Wolski, R., & Andrzejewski, P. (2021). Polycyclic Aromatic Hydrocarbons (PAHs) and their Derivatives (O-PAHs, N-PAHs, OH-PAHs): Determination in Suspended Particulate Matter (SPM) – a Review [Review of Polycyclic Aromatic Hydrocarbons (PAHs) and their Derivatives (O-PAHs, N-PAHs, OH-PAHs): Determination in Suspended Particulate Matter (SPM) – a Review]. Environmental Processes, 9(1). Springer Science+Business Media. https://doi.org/10.1007/s40710-021-00555-7

  Ochsenkühn‐Petropoulou, M., Staikos, K., Matuschek, G., & Kettrup, A. (2002). On-line determination of polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbons in airborne particulate matter by using pyrolysis/GC–MS. Journal of Analytical and Applied Pyrolysis, 70(1), 73–85. https://doi.org/10.1016/s0165-2370(02)00096-7

  Okparanma, R. N., & Mouazen, A. M. (2013). Determination of Total Petroleum Hydrocarbon (TPH) and Polycyclic Aromatic Hydrocarbon (PAH) in Soils: A Review of Spectroscopic and Nonspectroscopic Techniques [Review of Determination of Total Petroleum Hydrocarbon (TPH) and Polycyclic Aromatic Hydrocarbon (PAH) in Soils: A Review of Spectroscopic and Nonspectroscopic Techniques]. Applied Spectroscopy Reviews, 48(6), 458–486. Taylor & Francis. https://doi.org/10.1080/05704928.2012.736048

  Osuagwu, U. O., Ujowundu, C. O., Nwaogu, L., & Nwaoguikpe, R. N. (2023). Effects of PAH Mixtures on Haematological, Hepatic and Oxidative Stress Biomarkers in Clarias gariepinus. Asian Journal of Fisheries and Aquatic Research, 22(4), 9–16. https://doi.org/10.9734/ajfar/2023/v22i4576

  Owsianiak, M., Rosenbaum, R. K., & Hauschild, M. Z. (2011). A Methodology for Inclusion of Terrestrial Ecotoxic Impacts of Metals in Life Cycle Impact Assessment. Research Portal Denmark, 773. https://local.forskningsportal.dk/local/dki-cgi/ws/cris-link?src=dtu&id=dtu-a5279429-9815-4a21-8ecc-921c8ab106e2&ti=A%20Methodology%20for%20Inclusion%20of%20Terrestrial%20Ecotoxic%20Impacts%20of%20Metals%20in%20Life%20Cycle%20Impact%20Assessment

  P, F. R. C., Tan, Y., Zhang, S., Yu, X.-F., Chen, H., Dang, X., & Liu, X. (2021). Moisture‐sensitive metal–organic framework constructed from cobalt and 4‐(4‐pyridyl) benzoic acid for dispersive solid‐phase extraction of polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbons in apple. Journal of Separation Science, 44(8), 1706–1715. https://doi.org/10.1002/jssc.202001158

  Patel, A. B., Shaikh, S., Jain, K., Desai, C., & Madamwar, D. (2020). Polycyclic Aromatic Hydrocarbons: Sources, Toxicity, and Remediation Approaches [Review of Polycyclic Aromatic Hydrocarbons: Sources, Toxicity, and Remediation Approaches]. Frontiers in Microbiology, 11. Frontiers Media. https://doi.org/10.3389/fmicb.2020.562813

  Patil, S., Shedbalkar, U. U., Truskewycz, A., Chopade, B. A., & Ball, A. S. (2015). Nanoparticles for environmental clean-up: A review of potential risks and emerging solutions. Environmental Technology & Innovation, 5, 10–21. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.eti.2015.11.001

  Pena, M. T., Casais, M. C., Mejuto, M. C., & Cela, R. (2009). Development of an ionic liquid based dispersive liquid–liquid microextraction method for the analysis of polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbons in water samples. Journal of Chromatography A, 1216(36), 6356–6364. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chroma.2009.07.032

  Peng, P. L., & Lim, L. H. (2022). Polycyclic Aromatic Hydrocarbons (PAHs) Sample Preparation and Analysis in Beverages: A Review. Food Analytical Methods, 15(4), 1042–1061. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12161-021-02178-y

  Picariello, E., Baldantoni, D., & Nicola, F. D. (2020). Acute effects of PAH contamination on microbial community of different forest soils. Environmental Pollution, 262, 114378–114378. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.envpol.2020.114378

  Possanzini, M., Palo, V. D., Gigliucci, P., Scianò, M. C. T., & Cecinato, A. (2004). Determination of phase-distributed PAH in Rome ambient air by denuder/GC-MS method. Atmospheric Environment, 38(12), 1727–1734. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.atmosenv.2003.12.024

  Poster, D. L., Schantz, M. M., Sander, L. C., & Wise, S. A. (2006). Analysis of polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbons (PAHs) in environmental samples: a critical review of gas chromatographic (GC) methods. Analytical and Bioanalytical Chemistry, 386(4), 859–881. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00216-006-0771-0

  Ren, L., Wang, Y., Ren, Y., Li, G., & Sang, N. (2024). Phenanthrene perturbs hematopoietic development and causes hematopoietic defects in zebrafish. Journal of Environmental Sciences, 151, 573–581. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jes.2024.02.018

  Ren, L., Zhang, J., Geng, B., Zhao, J., Jia, W., & Cheng, L.-R. L. (2025). Ecological Shifts and Functional Adaptations of Soil Microbial Communities Under Petroleum Hydrocarbon Contamination. Water, 17(8), 1216–1216. https://doi.org/10.3390/w17081216

  Ruiz-Pablos, M., Paiva, B., & Zabaleta, A. (2023). Epstein–Barr virus-acquired immunodeficiency in myalgic encephalomyelitis—Is it present in long COVID? [Review of Epstein–Barr virus-acquired immunodeficiency in myalgic encephalomyelitis—Is it present in long COVID?]. Journal of Translational Medicine, 21(1). BioMed Central. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12967-023-04515-7

  Saldarriaga-Noreña, H., López-Márquez, R., Murillo-Tovar, M. A., Arias-Montoya, M. I., Guerrero‐Álvarez, J., & Vergara-Sánchez, J. (2019). Recent Advances for Polycyclic Aromatic Analysis in Airborne Particulate Matter. In IntechOpen eBooks. IntechOpen. https://doi.org/10.5772/intechopen.79714

  Sandoval‐Pauker, C., Yin, S., Castillo, A., Ocuane, N., Puerto-Diaz, D., & Villagrán, D. (2023). Computational Chemistry as Applied in Environmental Research: Opportunities and Challenges. ACS ES&T Engineering, 4(1), 66–95. https://doi.org/10.1021/acsestengg.3c00227

  Savchenko, T., & Тихонов, К. Г. (2021). Oxidative Stress-Induced Alteration of Plant Central Metabolism. Life, 11(4), 304–304. https://doi.org/10.3390/life11040304

  Schantz, M. M., McGaw, E. A., & Wise, S. A. (2012). Pressurized Liquid Extraction of Diesel and Air Particulate Standard Reference Materials: Effect of Extraction Temperature and Pressure. Analytical Chemistry, 84(19), 8222–8231. https://doi.org/10.1021/ac301443v

  Séguin, J. Y., Mason, J., Hanson, M. L., Hollebone, B. P., Orihel, D. M., Palace, V., Rodríguez‐Gil, J. L., & Blais, J. M. (2022). Bioaccumulation and toxicokinetics of polycyclic aromatic compounds and metals in giant floater mussels (Pyganodon grandis) exposed to a simulated diluted bitumen spill. Aquatic Toxicology, 252, 106316–106316. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.aquatox.2022.106316

  Shamloo, E., Shokri, S., Sadighara, P., Fallahizadeh, S., Ghasemi, A., Abdi-Moghadam, Z., Rezagholizade-shirvan, A., & Mazaheri, Y. (2024). Application of nanomaterials for determination and removal of polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbons in food products: A review. Food Chemistry X, 24, 101833–101833. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.fochx.2024.101833

  Shimmo, M., Saarnio, K., Aalto, P. P., Hartonen, K., Hyötyläinen, T., Kulmala, M., & Riekkola, M. (2004). Particle Size Distribution and Gas-Particle Partition of Polycyclic Aromatic Hydrocarbons in Helsinki Urban Area. Journal of Atmospheric Chemistry, 47(3), 223–241. https://doi.org/10.1023/b:joch.0000021088.37771.f7

  Singh, R. P., Yadav, A., Chopra, A., Christopher, J., & Kapur, G. S. (2019). Comparison of five different HPLC columns with different particle sizes, lengths and make for the optimization of seven polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbons (PAH) analysis. SN Applied Sciences, 1(4). https://doi.org/10.1007/s42452-019-0330-x

  Smith, K. E. C., Northcott, G. L., & Jones, K. C. (2006). Influence of the extraction methodology on the analysis of polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbons in pasture vegetation. Journal of Chromatography A, 1116, 20–30. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chroma.2006.03.040

  Soursou, V., Campo, J., & Picó, Y. (2023). Revisiting the analytical determination of PAHs in environmental samples: An update on recent advances. Trends in Environmental Analytical Chemistry, 37. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.teac.2023.e00195

  Srogi, K. (2007). Monitoring of environmental exposure to polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbons: a review. Environmental Chemistry Letters, 5(4), 169–195. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10311-007-0095-0

  Stéphane, F. F. Y., Jules, B. K. J., Batiha, G. E., Ali, I., & Bruno, L. N. (2021). Extraction of Bioactive Compounds from Medicinal Plants and Herbs. In IntechOpen eBooks. IntechOpen. https://doi.org/10.5772/intechopen.98602

  Stogiannidis, E., & Laane, R. W. P. M. (2014). Source Characterization of Polycyclic Aromatic Hydrocarbons by Using Their Molecular Indices: An Overview of Possibilities. Reviews of Environmental Contamination and Toxicology, 234, 49–133. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-10638-0_2

  Sun, H., Ge, X., Lv, Y., & Wang, A. (2012). Application of accelerated solvent extraction in the analysis of organic contaminants, bioactive and nutritional compounds in food and feed. Journal of Chromatography A, 1237, 1–23. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chroma.2012.03.003

  Sun, X., Bai, J., Dong, D., & Fan, Z. (2021). UV Assisted Photocatalytic Remediation of Polycyclic Aromatic Hydrocarbons (Pahs) in Sewage Sludge Addition Soils Using Synthesized Nanometer Mixed-crystal TiO2: Experiment and Simulation. Soil and Sediment Contamination An International Journal, 31(5), 572–585. https://doi.org/10.1080/15320383.2021.1981822

  Tartaglione, A. M., Racca, A., & Ricceri, L. (2023). Developmental exposure to polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbons (PAHs): Focus on benzo[a]pyrene neurotoxicity. Reproductive Toxicology, 119, 108394–108394. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.reprotox.2023.108394

  Tembo, P., & Biswick, T. (2025). Contaminants and Nutrient Transfer in Organic Farming Systems: a review of risks and food safety implications in vegetable crops [Review of Contaminants and Nutrient Transfer in Organic Farming Systems: a review of risks and food safety implications in vegetable crops]. Research Square (Research Square). Research Square (United States). https://doi.org/10.21203/rs.3.rs-7943193/v1

  Titaley, I. A., Walden, D. M., Dorn, S. E., Ogba, O. M., Simonich, S. L. M., & Cheong, P. H. (2018). Evaluating Computational and Structural Approaches to Predict Transformation Products of Polycyclic Aromatic Hydrocarbons. Environmental Science & Technology, 53(3), 1595–1607. https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.est.8b05198

  Tomar, R. S., & Jajoo, A. (2019). Photosynthetic response in wheat plants caused by the phototoxicity of fluoranthene. Functional Plant Biology, 46(8), 725–731. https://doi.org/10.1071/fp18328

  Tomar, R. S., Sharma, A., & Jajoo, A. (2015). Assessment of phytotoxicity of anthracene in soybean (Glycine max) with a quick method of chlorophyll fluorescence. Plant Biology, 17(4), 870–876. https://doi.org/10.1111/plb.12302

  Tsapakis, M., & Stephanou, E. G. (2004). Occurrence of gaseous and particulate polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbons in the urban atmosphere: study of sources and ambient temperature effect on the gas/particle concentration and distribution. Environmental Pollution, 133(1), 147–156. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.envpol.2004.05.012

  Tsiodra, I., Grivas, G., Tavernaraki, K., Bougiatioti, A., Apostolaki, M., Paraskevopoulou, D., Gogou, A., Parinos, C., Oikonomou, K., Tsagkaraki, M., Zarmpas, P., Nenes, A., & Mihalopoulos, N. (2021). Annual exposure to polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbons in urban environments linked to wintertime wood-burning episodes. Atmospheric Chemistry and Physics, 21(23), 17865–17883. https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-21-17865-2021

  Udesky, J. O., Dodson, R. E., Perovich, L. J., & Rudel, R. A. (2019). Wrangling environmental exposure data: guidance for getting the best information from your laboratory measurements. Environmental Health, 18(1). https://doi.org/10.1186/s12940-019-0537-8

  Vásquez-Murrieta, M. S., Hernández-Hernández, O. J., Cruz-Maya, J. A., Cancino‐Díaz, J. C., & Jan‐Roblero, J. (2016). Approaches for Removal of PAHs in Soils: Bioaugmentation, Biostimulation and Bioattenuation. In InTech eBooks. https://doi.org/10.5772/64682

  Venkataraman, B., Pugazhendi, A., & Ebenezer, P. J. (2014). Enzymatic bioremediation of polyaromatic hydrocarbons by fungal consortia enriched from petroleum contaminated soil and oil seeds. PubMed, 35(3), 521–529. https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/24813008

  Wang, C., Zhou, S., He, Y., Wang, J., Wang, F., & Wu, S. (2017). Developing a Black Carbon-Substituted Multimedia Model for Simulating the PAH Distributions in Urban Environments. Scientific Reports, 7(1). https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-017-14789-9

  Wang, D., Yang, M., Jia, H., Zhou, L., & Li, Y.-F. (2008). Seasonal variation of polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbons in soil and air of Dalian areas, China: an assessment of soil–air exchange. Journal of Environmental Monitoring, 10(9), 1076–1076. https://doi.org/10.1039/b805840g

  Wang, J., Lu, Y., Liu, Y., & Xu, J. (2018). Contamination levels and potential sources of polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbons (PAHs) in urban soils in Beijing, China. Environ. Sci. Pollut. Res., 15, 15049–15057. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11356-018-1668-8

  Wang, J., Zhang, H., Bao, H., Li, J., Li, J., Xing, W., Hong, H., & Wu, F. (2020). Dynamic distribution and accumulation of PAHs in winter wheat during whole plant growth: Field investigation. Ecotoxicology and Environmental Safety, 202, 110886–110886. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecoenv.2020.110886

  Wang, T. (2020). Food Monitoring by Untargeted Screening with Semi Quantification — Feasibility Study on Analysis of Cereals and Honey. Research Portal Denmark, 243. https://local.forskningsportal.dk/local/dki-cgi/ws/cris-link?src=dtu&id=dtu-d8892345-5edc-4fed-b544-de7758fed02c&ti=Food%20Monitoring%20by%20Untargeted%20Screening%20with%20Semi%20Quantification%20%2014%20Feasibility%20Study%20on%20Analysis%20of%20Cereals%20and%20Honey

  Wang, Z., Meng, Q., Sun, K., & Wen, Z. (2024). Spatiotemporal Distribution, Bioaccumulation, and Ecological and Human Health Risks of Polycyclic Aromatic Hydrocarbons in Surface Water: A Comprehensive Review. Sustainability, 16(23), 10346–10346. https://doi.org/10.3390/su162310346

  Wei, Z., Guo, H., Li, Y., Zhang, X., & Qiu, Y. (2018). The effects of polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbons (PAHs) on human health: A review. Environ. Sci. Pollut. Res., 25(9), 8190–8209.

  Wennrich, L., Popp, P., & Zeibig, M. (2002). Polycyclic Aromatic Hydrocarbon Burden in Fruit and Vegetable Species Cultivated in Allotments in an Industrial Area. International Journal of Environmental & Analytical Chemistry, 82(10), 667–690. https://doi.org/10.1080/0306731021000075401

  Wilson, W. B. (2020). Chromatographic Separations and Sample Extractions for Polycyclic Aromatic Hydrocarbons. Chromatographia, 83(3), 319–320. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10337-020-03868-1

  Wu, H., Li, D., Zhao, B., Guan, S., Jing, X., Ding, Y., & Fan, G. (2021). Magnetic covalent organic framework nanocomposites as a new adsorbent for the determination of polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbons in water and food samples. Analytical Methods, 13(25), 2847–2856. https://doi.org/10.1039/d1ay00496d

  Yakovleva, E. V., & Габов, Д. Н. (2020). Polyarenes accumulation in tundra ecosystem influenced by coal industry of Vorkuta. Polish Polar Research, 237–268. https://doi.org/10.24425/ppr.2020.134122

  Yang, Y., Zhang, N., Xue, M., & Tao, S. (2010). Impact of soil organic matter on the distribution of polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbons (PAHs) in soils. Environmental Pollution, 158(6), 2170–2174. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.envpol.2010.02.019

  Zhang, A., Zhang, H., Mi, L., Ding, L., Jiang, Z., Yu, F., & Tang, M. (2023). Diabetes: A potential mediator of associations between polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbon exposure and stroke. Research Square (Research Square). https://doi.org/10.21203/rs.3.rs-3478439/v1

  Zhang, J., Yang, L., Mellouki, A., Chen, J., Chen, X., Gao, Y., Jiang, P., Li, Y., Yu, H., & Wang, W. (2018). Diurnal concentrations, sources, and cancer risk assessments of PM2.5-bound PAHs, NPAHs, and OPAHs in urban, marine and mountain environments. Chemosphere, 209, 147–155. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chemosphere.2018.06.054

  Zhang, Y., Yang, L., Gao, Y., Chen, J., Li, Y., Jiang, P., Zhang, J., Yu, H., & Wang, W. (2019). Comparative Study of PAHs in PM1 and PM2.5 at a Background Site in the North China Plain. Aerosol and Air Quality Research, 19(10), 2281–2293. https://doi.org/10.4209/aaqr.2018.12.0462

  Zhong, W., & Wang, M. (2002). SOME POLYCYCLIC AROMATIC HYDROCARBONS IN VEGETABLES FROM NORTHERN CHINA. Journal of Environmental Science and Health Part A, 37(2), 287–296. https://doi.org/10.1081/ese-120002588

  Zhou, Q., Fang, Y., Yang, R., & Chen, Y. (2017). Spatial distribution, source apportionment, and ecological risk assessment of polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbons (PAHs) in urban soils from five cities in the Yangtze River Delta, China. Environ. Sci. Pollut. Res., 24(3), 2338–2352.

  Zhu, C. (2019). MICROBIAL COMMUNITY FUNCTIONAL DIVERSITY IN AN ORGANOCHLORINE CONTAMINATED SITE AND EVALUATION OF BIODEGRADATION EFFICIENCY. Applied Ecology and Environmental Research, 17(5). https://doi.org/10.15666/aeer/1705_125371254.



Related Images:

Recomonded Articles:

Author(s): Benvikram Barman; Manoj Kumar Banjare; Bhupendra Singh Banjare; Dolly Baghel

DOI: 10.52228/JRUB.2025-38-1-7         Access: Open Access Read More

Author(s): Pooja Deshpande, Suman Shrivastava, S.J. Daharwal*

DOI: 10.52228/JRUB.2018-31-1-7         Access: Open Access Read More

Author(s): Reena Jamunkar; Deepak Sinha; Tarun Kumar Patle; Kamlesh Shrivas

DOI: 10.52228/JRUB.2024-37-1-10         Access: Open Access Read More

Author(s): Tarun Kumar Patle; Kamlesh Shrivas; Reena Jamunkar; Antresh Kumar; Khushali Tandey

DOI: 10.52228/JRUB.2025-38-1-11         Access: Open Access Read More

Author(s): Nisha Sahu; Sukrita Shriwas; Yeendeswari Gendre; Aakanksha Sinha; S.J. Daharwal

DOI: 10.52228/JRUB.2023-36-1-9         Access: Open Access Read More

Author(s): Shradha Devi Dwivedi; Madhu Yadav; Deependra Singh; Manju Rawat Singh

DOI: 10.52228/JRUB.2024-37-1-1         Access: Open Access Read More

Author(s): Sonam Patel; Afreen Anjum; Veenu Joshi; Afaque Quraishi

DOI: 10.52228/JRUB.2024-37-1-4         Access: Open Access Read More

Author(s): Naman Shukla; K. Anil Kumar; Madhu Allalla; Sanjay Tiwari

DOI: 10.52228/JRUB.2022-35-1-2         Access: Open Access Read More

Author(s): Richa Tembekar; Kallol K. Ghosh; Angel Minj; Abhishek Katendra

DOI: 10.52228/JRUB.2024-37-2-15         Access: Open Access Read More

Author(s): Madhu Allalla; Naman Shukla; Sweta Minj; Sanjay Tiwari

DOI: 10.52228/JRUB.2022-35-1-5         Access: Open Access Read More

Author(s): Vaibhav Dixit, Rajiv Nayan; Shubhra Sinha; Suryakant Manikpuri; Manmohan L. Satnami; Kallol K. Ghosh; Manas Kanti Deb; Shamsh Pervez; Indrapal Karbhal

DOI: 10.52228/JRUB.2023-36-2-5         Access: Open Access Read More

Author(s): Dinesh Kumar Sharma; Bhabani S Nayak

DOI:         Access: Open Access Read More

Author(s): Princy Dugga; Shamsh Pervez; Rakesh Kumar Sahu; Madhuri Verma; Shahina Bano; Manas Kanti Deb

DOI: 10.52228/JRUB.2017-30-1-5         Access: Open Access Read More

Author(s): AR Sood and RC Rathor

DOI:         Access: Open Access Read More

Author(s): B S Ajitkumar; Prashant S Hande; Vikas Jha; Pratiksha Alagh; Shailendra Rane

DOI:         Access: Open Access Read More