Soil as a Carcinogenic Reservoir:
Environmental-Biological Linkage of Polycyclic Aromatic Hydrocarbons and
Subclinical Haematological Alterations in the Siltara Industrial Region,
Central India
Aayushi Pathak1, Neelabh Kashyap2, Tandesh Lal Chandra3,
Pranjal Yadav4, Sudhir Yadav5*
1,2,3,4,5 Guru Ghasiadas Vishwavidylaya,
Bilaspur, Chhattisgarh, India.
1iucpathak22@gmail.com,
2neelkash17@gmail.com, 3drtlchandra76@gmail.com, 4pranjalyadav1602@gmail.com,
5sudhirforensic@gmail.com
Abstract
Industrial activities involving combustion represent primary
sources of polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbon contamination in emerging industrial
zones. Although soil functions as a persistent environmental sink for
carcinogenic PAHs, the degree to which this contamination results in human
internal dosimetry and physiological perturbations is inadequately understood. The
present study examined the environmental–biological continuum of PAHs in the
Siltara Industrial Region, Central India, focusing on soil's carcinogenic
potential, trophic transfer pathways, and biomarker responses in at-risk
populations. PAH concentrations were determined in soil, vegetation, and blood
specimens from industrial workers and nearby residents. Total PAH loads,
prevalence rates, and toxic equivalency quotients were computed.
Bioaccumulation factors were assessed. Independent t-tests, correlational
statistics, and multivariate regressions were utilized to evaluate exposure
disparities and biomarker correlations. Soil displayed substantial total PAH
concentrations with a carcinogenic TEQ of 25.12 BaP-equivalent ppb, affirming
its status as a carcinogenic depot dominated by combustion-sourced
high-molecular-weight PAHs. Vegetation exhibited preferential uptake of
low-molecular-weight PAHs, devoid of quantifiable carcinogenic TEQ. The
industrial cohort showed a 3.27-fold elevation in internal PAH burden relative
to residents. Nonetheless, renal and hepatic biomarkers lacked significant
correlations with PAH exposure. Marginal perturbations in haemoglobin were
noted, hinting at incipient subclinical haematological effects. These results
demonstrate that industrial soil persists as a carcinogenic PAH reservoir, yet
systemic biochemical toxicity appears constrained. Augmented internal PAH
levels in workers imply chronic low-level exposure, wherein subtle haematological
alterations may foreshadow frank organ pathology.
Keywords: Polycyclic Aromatic
Hydrocarbons (PAHs), Industrial Soil Contamination, Toxic Equivalency Quotient
(TEQ), Bioaccumulation, Occupational Exposure, Environmental Toxicology
1.
Introduction
Polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbons represent persistent organic
pollutants chiefly arising from incomplete combustion of fossil fuels and
industrial operations. (Chrysochou et al., n.d.; Kamal et al., 2016; Liu et
al., 2021) Their hydrophobic characteristics and environmental persistence
promote the accumulation of high-molecular-weight PAHs in soil, (Lamichhane et
al., 2016; Ramesh et al., 2014) positioning it as a protracted carcinogenic
reservoir. Accordingly, industrial locales dominated by combustion-intensive
processes remain prone to enduring PAH contamination (Wei et al., 2021; Zhang
et al., 2023).
Although extensive research has quantified PAH levels in
environmental compartments, limited studies have bridged soil contamination
with trophic transfer and human biomonitoring. (Montaño-Soto et al., 2017;
Pérez-Maldonado et al., 2019) Determining the extent to which soil-adsorbed
carcinogenic PAHs manifest as detectable internal dosimetry and biochemical
perturbations is vital for robust risk appraisal.
The Siltara Industrial Region in Central India exemplifies an
expanding industrial corridor susceptible to combustion-emitted PAHs.(Patel et al., 2015) This
investigation sought to measure PAH concentrations in soil and vegetation,
gauge carcinogenic potency through BaP-equivalent toxic equivalency quotients,
characterize plant–soil transfer kinetics, quantify internal PAH loads in
exposed cohorts, and probe linkages with renal, hepatic, and haematological
biomarkers to illuminate the environmental–biological nexus. Unlike conventional studies limited to environmental
monitoring, this work demonstrates that soils in an industrial region function
as a persistent carcinogenic reservoir while revealing a disconnect between
elevated systemic PAH burden and overt hepatorenal toxicity. Additionally, the
study highlights early subclinical haematological alterations and quantifies
incremental lifetime cancer risk, thereby providing a comprehensive framework
linking environmental contamination with early biological effects in exposed
populations.

Figure 1. Environmental–biological exposure pathway
of polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbons (PAHs).
2.
Materials and Methods
2.1
Study Area
The present study was conducted within the Siltara Industrial
Region, Raipur, Central India, characterized by combustion-intensive
metallurgical operations, industrial emissions, vehicular exhaust, and
proximate residential zones. This setting typifies a combustion-influenced
industrial landscape where particulate deposition drives the sequestration of
polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbons in soil(Adak & Elumalai, 2021).

Figure 2. Study area map of the Siltara Industrial
Region, Raipur, Central India.
2.2
Study Design and Sample Collection
A multi-matrix environmental-biological investigation was
implemented to assess PAH distribution patterns and internal dosimetry.
Environmental Sampling
● Surface soil samples were
obtained using pre-cleaned stainless-steel implements.
● Vegetation samples were
collected from plants adjacent to the soil sampling sites.
Samples were preserved in solvent-rinsed amber glass containers
and transported under controlled conditions to minimize contamination and
degradation.
Human Sampling
Venous blood specimens were collected from:
● industrial workers
● nearby residents
Samples were obtained in sterile vacutainers and subjected to
standardized laboratory protocols (Kašuba et al., 2020) for biochemical assays
and PAH quantification.
2.3
Chemicals and Reagents
All solvents and reagents employed in this study were analytical
or HPLC grade, ensuring optimal purity and analytical reliability. n-Hexane,
dichloromethane, acetone, and methanol were sourced from Merck, while silica
gel for column chromatography cleanup was obtained from SRL Chemicals.
Anhydrous sodium sulphate, used for moisture removal, was preheated at 400°C
prior to application.
Certified reference standards of polycyclic aromatic
hydrocarbons—including naphthalene, acenaphthylene, fluorene, phenanthrene,
anthracene, fluoranthene, pyrene, and select benzo derivatives—were acquired
from Sigma-Aldrich (purity >98%). Stock standard solutions were prepared in
n-hexane and stored at 4°C in amber glass vials to prevent photodegradation;
working calibration standards were freshly generated via serial dilution before
instrumental analysis.
Ultrapure water for sample preparation and cleaning procedures was
generated using a Milli-Q purification system. All glassware was rigorously
washed, sequentially rinsed with acetone and n-hexane, and oven-dried prior to
use to minimize contamination risk.
2.4
PAH Extraction and Quantification
Polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbons were extracted from soil,
vegetation, and blood matrices via optimized solvent extraction protocols,
followed by instrumental quantification using gas chromatography–tandem mass
spectrometry, (GC-MS/MS) and high-performance liquid chromatography. Air-dried
and homogenized soil and vegetation samples underwent Soxhlet extraction with
an n-hexane: dichloromethane mixture for 16 h to facilitate efficient recovery
of hydrophobic PAHs. Resultant extracts were concentrated under reduced
pressure and purified by silica gel column chromatography to remove
co-extracted organic interferences. Blood samples were subjected to
liquid–liquid extraction, wherein plasma was partitioned with n-hexane,
vortexed, and centrifuged to achieve phase separation, the organic layer was
then collected, evaporated nearly to dryness, and reconstituted in an
appropriate solvent for analysis. PAHs were quantified using a Shimadzu
GCMS-TQ2030 system for volatile and semi-volatile congeners, complemented by HPLC
with UV/fluorescence detection for confirmation and evaluation of targeted
PAHs. Prior to injection, all samples were passed through 0.22 µm membrane
filters.
2.5
Toxic Equivalency (TEQ) Assessment
The carcinogenic potency was evaluated using toxic equivalency
factors (Craemer et al., 2016) relative to benzo[a]pyrene. The toxic equivalency quotient
was determined as follows:
Toxic Equivalency Quotient (TEQ)

where:
·
= concentration of the individual
carcinogenic PAH
·
= toxic equivalency factor of the
corresponding PAH (relative to benzo[a]pyrene)
. The aggregate carcinogenic load was expressed in BaP-equivalent
concentrations(.Isra, 2025).
2.6
Transfer Factor (TF) Calculation
The soil-to-vegetation transfer factor (Zhang et al., 2022) was
calculated as follows:
Transfer Factor (TF) Calculation

where:
·
= concentration of PAHs in vegetation
·
= concentration of PAHs in corresponding
soil samples
Values of TF > 1 denote preferential bioaccumulation in
vegetation, while TF < 1 signifies predominant retention in soil.
2.7
Clinical Biomarker Analysis
Biochemical and haematological parameters were quantified using
standardized clinical chemistry protocols.
⒈
Renal Parameters
· Blood Urea Nitrogen
· Serum Creatinine
· Urea
· Uric Acid
⒉
Hepatic Parameters
· Alkaline Phosphatase
· Bilirubin
· Aspartate Aminotransferase
· Alanine Transaminase
⒊
Haematological Parameters
· Haemoglobin
· Lymphocyte count
· Eosinophils
2.8
Statistical Analysis
Statistical analyses were conducted using specialized software
packages. The analyses included descriptive statistics, assessment of detection
frequencies, independent t-tests, Pearson correlation analyses, multivariate
linear regression modelling, and effect size quantification. Statistical
significance was established at the α = 0.05 level.
3.
Results
3.1
Distribution of PAHs in Soil
Eighteen polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbon congeners were quantified
in the soil samples. The mean total PAH concentration was 2398.48 ppb,
reflecting substantial environmental accumulation.
Among the individual congeners, anthracene displayed the highest
mean concentration, followed by benzo triphenylene and 9,10-dimethylanthracene.
Detection frequencies varied considerably, with pyrene and triphenylene
exhibiting the greatest prevalence. High-molecular-weight PAHs, such as indeno pyrene
and benzo fluoranthene, demonstrated consistent presence across samples.
Carcinogenic PAHs collectively contributed a total toxic
equivalency of 25.12 BaP-equivalent ppb, predominantly attributable to indeno pyrene
Table 1. Distribution of PAHs in Soil and Plant Samples
|
S. No.
|
PAH Compound
|
Ring Class
|
Soil Mean (ppb)
|
Plant Mean (ppb)
|
Soil DF (%)
|
Plant DF (%)
|
|
1
|
9,10-Dimethylanthracene
|
3
|
240.33
|
ND
|
8.3
|
0
|
|
2
|
9H-Fluorene,
9-methylene
|
3
|
45.45
|
68.17
|
8.3
|
33.3
|
|
3
|
Acenaphthene
|
3
|
198.27
|
350.63
|
25.0
|
66.7
|
|
4
|
Acenaphthylene
|
3
|
125.08
|
290.16
|
25.0
|
33.3
|
|
5
|
Anthracene
|
3
|
516.18
|
774.24
|
8.3
|
33.3
|
|
6
|
Benzo[k]fluoranthene
|
5
|
47.18
|
ND
|
8.3
|
0
|
|
7
|
Benzo[b]fluoranthene
|
5
|
50.90
|
ND
|
33.3
|
0
|
|
8
|
Benzo[b]triphenylene
|
5
|
262.81
|
ND
|
8.3
|
0
|
|
9
|
Benzo[e]pyrene
|
5
|
99.75
|
74.82
|
16.7
|
33.3
|
|
10
|
Benzo[j]fluoranthene
|
5
|
38.16
|
100.00
|
41.7
|
33.3
|
|
11
|
Chrysene
|
4
|
75.08
|
ND
|
8.3
|
0
|
|
12
|
Fluoranthene
|
4
|
92.14
|
ND
|
8.3
|
0
|
|
13
|
Fluorene
|
3
|
38.67
|
66.65
|
25.0
|
33.3
|
|
14
|
Indeno[1,2,3-cd]pyrene
|
6
|
145.62
|
ND
|
25.0
|
0
|
|
15
|
Naphthalene
|
2
|
75.91
|
37.56
|
41.7
|
33.3
|
|
16
|
Phenanthrene
|
3
|
117.13
|
ND
|
41.7
|
0
|
|
17
|
Pyrene
|
4
|
124.75
|
75.86
|
58.3
|
33.3
|
|
18
|
Triphenylene
|
4
|
105.07
|
76.03
|
58.3
|
33.3
|
Table 2. Carcinogenic PAHs and Toxic Equivalency (TEQ)
|
PAH
|
Soil Mean (ppb)
|
TEF
|
Soil TEQ (BaP eq ppb)
|
Plant TEQ
|
|
Benzo[k]fluoranthene
|
47.18
|
0.1
|
4.718
|
0
|
|
Benzo[b]fluoranthene
|
50.90
|
0.1
|
5.090
|
0
|
|
Chrysene
|
75.08
|
0.01
|
0.751
|
0
|
|
Indeno[1,2,3-cd] pyrene
|
145.62
|
0.1
|
14.562
|
0
|

Figure 3. Soil carcinogenic contribution of
individual PAHs expressed as BaP-equivalent concentration.
3.2
PAHs in Vegetation and Ecological Transfer
Vegetation samples displayed a mean total PAH concentration of
1913.12 ppb. Low-molecular-weight PAHs, including anthracene and acenaphthene,
exhibited greater accumulation in vegetation than in soil.
Transfer factor calculations revealed heterogeneous uptake
patterns into vegetation. Acenaphthylene and benzo fluoranthene displayed TF
values exceeding 1, whereas naphthalene and pyrene yielded TF values below 1.
No carcinogenic TEQ was detected in vegetation samples.
3.3
Internal PAH Burden in Human Participants
Industrial participants
displayed a 3.27-fold greater internal PAH burden relative to the residential
cohort. Effect size analysis revealed a Cohen’s d of 0.82, signifying a
substantial exposure disparity. Nonetheless, this intergroup difference failed
to achieve statistical significance at conventional levels.
Table 3. Blood PAH Burden and
Biomarker Comparison
|
Parameter
|
Industrial (Mean ± SD)
|
Residential (Mean ± SD)
|
p-value
|
|
Total PAH (ppb)
|
475.72 ± 566.12
|
145.53 ± 0.00
|
0.098
|
|
Blood Urea Nitrogen
|
10.64 ± 4.31
|
10.64 ± 4.31
|
>0.05
|
|
Serum Creatinine
|
1.73 ± 2.29
|
1.73 ± 2.29
|
>0.05
|
|
Uric Acid
|
4.68 ± 1.63
|
4.68 ± 1.63
|
>0.05
|
|
Urea
|
22.78 ± 9.23
|
22.78 ± 9.23
|
>0.05
|
|
Alkaline Phosphatase
|
119.85 ± 132.60
|
79.85 ± 13.65
|
0.367
|
|
AST
|
34.18 ± 28.30
|
34.18 ± 28.30
|
>0.05
|
|
ALT
|
21.45 ± 13.08
|
21.45 ± 13.08
|
>0.05
|
|
Haemoglobin
|
11.67 ± 1.77
|
9.77 ± 2.38
|
0.059
|

Figure 4. Comparative total PAH burden
in industrial and residential groups.
3.4 Renal and Hepatic Biomarker Profiles
No statistically significant
differences were observed between industrial and residential groups in renal
biomarkers, including blood urea nitrogen, serum creatinine, urea, and uric
acid.
Hepatic biomarkers similarly
showed no substantial intergroup variations.
Multivariate linear regression
models using total PAH burden as the predictor variable exhibited limited
explanatory power for biomarker variability and revealed no evident
dose-response relationships.

Figure 5. Correlation heatmaps of total
PAH burden and clinical biomarkers in industrial and residential groups.
3.5
Haematological Findings
Assessment of haematological parameters indicated a
near-significant intergroup difference in haemoglobin concentrations between
industrial and residential cohorts (p = 0.059). Although this discrepancy fell
short of the conventional alpha = 0.05 threshold, the trend suggests underlying
cohort heterogeneity.
No statistically significant intergroup differences emerged in
lymphocyte counts or eosinophil levels.
4.
Discussion
4.1
Soil PAH Burden in Regional Context
In this study, soil exhibited a total polycyclic aromatic
hydrocarbon concentration of 2398.48 ppb, and a carcinogenic toxic equivalency
of 25.12 BaP-equivalent ppb. These concentrations indicate considerable buildup
of combustion-origin PAHs within the Siltara Industrial Region.
By contrast, Patel et al.(Patel et al., 2015; Shrivastava et al., 2015) observed that the aggregate of 13 PAHs in road dust from a
Raipur industrialized zone averaged 15,282 µg/kg, denoting elevated
contamination in dust relative to soil. Such divergence underscores disparate
deposition processes between atmospheric particulates and soil, wherein dust
functions as a proximate receptor for airborne PAH emissions and soil
constitutes a persistent, equilibrated depository.
Additionally, nationwide soil risk evaluations have determined
90th percentile cancer risk levels of 3.156 × 10⁻⁵ for adults in
severely contaminated Indian soils, (Kumar et al., 2014; Sankar et al., 2023;
Wei et al., 2021) denominated in BaP equivalents and encompassing Raipur among
other locales. The 25.12 ppb TEQ recorded in Siltara soils corresponds to these
national projections, thereby framing the site's soil within a quantifiable
carcinogenic risk paradigm comparable to fellow Indian industrial locales.
4.2
Combustion-Derived Signature and Source Consistency
The predominance of high-molecular-weight polycyclic aromatic
hydrocarbons, such as indeno[1,2,3-cd] pyrene and benzo[b]fluoranthene,
signifies pyrogenic provenance (Ramteke et al., 2024). Atmospheric monitoring studies in the Raipur region have
documented elevated organic aerosol concentrations in areas including Siltara,
thereby affirming combustion as the principal emission source.(Giri et al.,
2012; Ramteke et al., 2024) These multi-ring PAHs are indicative of industrial
and vehicular combustion emissions, in accordance with diagnostic ratios
employed in source apportionment methodologies(Ramteke et al., 2024).
4.3
Ecological Transfer and Vegetation Uptake
Plant samples in the present study exhibited a total mean PAH
concentration of 1913.12 ppb. Light PAHs (e.g., acenaphthylene) showed
TF values exceeding 1, suggesting preferential bioaccumulation of
low-molecular-weight compounds in vegetation, whereas carcinogenic
high-molecular-weight PAHs demonstrated TF < 1.
Ecological assessments conducted in the Siltara region have noted
industrial deposition impacts on local vegetation, though most prior studies
have focused on physical stress markers rather than PAH accumulation (Balakrishna et al., 2011). The absence of detectable carcinogenic TEQ in plant
matrices of the present study indicates limited ecological amplification,
consistent with the expectation that heavier PAHs largely remain soil-bound due
to strong hydrophobic partitioning.
4.4
Internal PAH Burden and Exposure Gradient
The mean total blood PAH concentration in the industrial group (475.72
ppb) was markedly higher than in the residential group (145.53 ppb),
representing a 3.27-fold elevation and a large effect size (Cohen’s d
= 0.82), though the difference was of borderline significance (p = 0.098).
These exposure patterns are consistent with regional PM characterization
studies in Raipur that identified combustion-related aerosol fractions as
dominant contributors to air pollution (Guttikunda et al., 2018; Pervez et al.,
2020)
While external environmental contamination (e.g., road dust, soil)
shows elevated PAH burdens exceeding 10,000 ppb(Patel et al., 2015), internal blood concentrations are comparatively lower,
likely reflecting metabolic processing and clearance of parent PAH compounds
following inhalation or dermal contact(Badran, 2019; Fourth National Report on
Human Exposure to Environmental Chemicals, 2021).
4.5
Systemic Biomarker Response
Despite expectations of pronounced systemic toxicity, renal and
hepatic biomarkers exhibited no significant intergroup differences between
industrial and residential cohorts. Multivariate regression analyses
demonstrated limited predictive capacity of total PAH burden for clinical
biomarker variability, yet underscored that chronic low-level exposures can
elicit detectable organ pathology (Aziz et al., 2022; Maciejczyk et al., 2023).
The borderline significant disparity in haemoglobin concentrations
(p=0.059) potentially signals an early subclinical response to environmental
insult. Nevertheless, the paucity of robust renal or hepatic correlations in
this population accords with extant literature attributing constrained systemic
perturbation to efficient PAH biotransformation and excretion at analogous
exposure gradients. (Sankar et al., 2023; Wei et al., 2021)
4.6
Integrated Regional Perspective
Collectively, regional research demonstrates:
● Road dust ΣPAHs in Raipur
industrial zones reached ~15,282 ppb, much higher than soil ΣPAHs in Siltara ((Patel et al., 2015)).
● National soil cancer risk
indices based on BaP equivalents reached 3.156 × 10⁻⁵ for adults ((Bjelić et al., 2021)).
● Organic aerosol fractions
dominated by high-molecular-weight compounds consistent with industrial
combustion profiles ((Isra, 2025; Sankar et al., 2023)).
The present study complements these findings by establishing soil
as a carcinogenic reservoir, characterizing ecological transfer, quantifying
elevated internal PAH burden among industrial workers, and demonstrating
limited clinical toxicity under current exposure conditions.
5.
Risk Assessment
5.1
Carcinogenic Risk from Soil (TEQ-Based Assessment)
The total carcinogenic toxic equivalency (TEQ) of soil PAHs was
calculated as 25.12 BaP-equivalent ppb. Benzo[a]pyrene is routinely
employed as the benchmark carcinogen in PAH risk assessments, with
international frameworks utilizing BaP-equivalent concentrations to derive
estimates of incremental lifetime cancer risk.(Lemieux et al., 2014)
Although computing a complete ILCR demands site-specific exposure
parameters (e.g., ingestion, dermal contact, and inhalation rates), contextual
benchmarking against meta-analyses of Indian soils is instructive.(Sankar et al., 2023) Nationwide evaluations report adult cancer risks
attributable to soil PAHs in industrial locales ranging from 10-6 to
10-5, with Raipur-area projections nearing 2.5 × 10⁻⁵ in zones of pronounced impact.
The Siltara soil TEQ of 25.12 ppb thus corresponds to a moderate
yet quantifiable lifetime carcinogenic risk under protracted exposure regimens.
These observations corroborate that:
● Soil serves as a reservoir for
carcinogenic PAHs;
● Associated risks are chiefly
chronic, rather than acute;
● High-molecular-weight PAHs
predominate in the carcinogenic profile.
5.2
Ecological Risk via Vegetation
Although soil PAH concentrations were elevated, plant samples
exhibited a mean total PAH concentration of 1913.12 ppb with no detectable
carcinogenic toxic equivalency. Transfer factor analysis indicated TF > 1
for low-molecular-weight PAHs, reflecting preferential uptake, whereas
carcinogenic high-molecular-weight PAHs remained predominantly soil-bound (TF
< 1). These results denote limited dietary amplification of carcinogenic
PAHs and negligible enhancement of carcinogenic exposure through ecological transfer,
confirming that vegetation does not constitute a primary carcinogenic exposure
pathway in the region.
5.3
Internal Exposure Risk (Human Biomonitoring)
Industrial workers exhibited a mean total blood PAH concentration
of 475.72 ppb, compared to 145.53 ppb in the residential group—a 3.27-fold
elevation with a large effect size (Cohen’s d = 0.82). This pattern
substantiates a pronounced exposure gradient between cohorts.
In contrast, renal and hepatic biomarkers showed no significant
intergroup differences, while multivariate regression analyses indicated
limited predictive utility of total PAH burden for biomarker variability (R²
< 0.16). A borderline difference in haemoglobin levels (p = 0.059) hints at
potential early haematological perturbation.
These results thus confirm elevated internal exposure without
overt organ dysfunction, and possible subclinical haematological modulation
consistent with chronic low-dose exposure paradigms.
5.4
Toxicokinetic Considerations
Polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbons are metabolized primarily in the
liver through Phase I oxidation via cytochrome P450 enzymes, followed by Phase
II conjugation and subsequent excretion. (Bilodeau et al., 2018; Feng et al.,
2025; Maciejczyk et al., 2023; Poulsen et al., 2022) The detection of parent
PAH compounds in blood signifies ongoing exposure, short-term accumulation, and
limited long-term bioaccumulation. (Jodice et al., 2023; Pleil et al., 2010)
This toxicokinetic profile elucidates the observation that while
environmental PAH reservoirs remain elevated and internal body burdens are
substantially heightened, systemic toxicity is a concern(Sombiri et al., 2024).
5.5
Integrated Risk Characterization
|
Risk Component
|
Status
|
|
Soil Carcinogenic Load
|
Moderate–High
|
|
Vegetation Carcinogenic Transfer
|
Low
|
|
Industrial Internal Exposure
|
Elevated
|
|
Renal Toxicity
|
Absent
|
|
Hepatic Toxicity
|
Absent
|
|
Haematological Signal
|
Emerging (Borderline)
|
|
Overall Risk Pattern
|
Chronic Subclinical Exposure
|
5.6
Incremental Lifetime Cancer Risk (ILCR) and Hazard Quotient
Employing the USEPA soil exposure model with a BaP-equivalent
concentration of 25.12 µg/kg, the incremental lifetime cancer risk for adults
was calculated as 1.06 × 10⁻⁵ (Kumar et al., 2014),(Qi et al., 2019). This
estimate falls within the acceptable risk range (10⁻⁶–10⁻⁴) yet signifies a
quantifiable chronic carcinogenic hazard under protracted exposure conditions(Lemieux et al., 2014).
The non-carcinogenic hazard quotient was determined to be 0.0048,
well below the safety threshold of 1, indicating negligible health risks from
soil exposure.
These results suggest that acute systemic toxicity is unlikely,
while chronic carcinogenic exposure remains a pertinent concern in the Siltara
Industrial Region.
Table 4. Carcinogenic and Non-Carcinogenic Risk Estimates
|
Risk Parameter
|
Value
|
Interpretation
|
|
Soil TEQ (BaP eq)
|
25.12 ppb
|
Carcinogenic burden
|
|
ILCR
|
1.06 × 10⁻⁵
|
Acceptable but measurable risk
|
|
Hazard Quotient (HQ)
|
0.0048
|
Negligible non-cancer risk
|
|
Risk Category
|
10⁻⁶ – 10⁻⁴ range
|
Chronic low-dose risk
|
The Siltara Industrial Region is characterized by:
● Persistent carcinogenic
polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbons bound to soil(Singh & Singh, 2025)
● A contamination profile
indicative of combustion-derived sources (Sankar et al., 2023)
● Elevated internal PAH exposure
among industrial workers (Koslitz et al., 2023)
● Indications of potential early haematological
alterations(Wang et al., 2019)
The predominant risk stems from protracted carcinogenic exposure,
rather than acute systemic toxicity.
6.
Conclusion
This study reveals extensive PAH
contamination in soils of the Siltara Industrial Region, confirming their role
as a carcinogenic sink predominantly derived from combustion sources.
Vegetation exhibited selective accumulation of low-molecular-weight PAHs, with
negligible translocation of carcinogenic fractions. Industrial workers
demonstrated a 3.27-fold increase in systemic PAH levels compared to
residential controls; however, no significant renal or hepatic dysfunction was
observed. The estimated incremental lifetime cancer risk indicates an acceptable
yet discernible chronic hazard, while non-carcinogenic risks remain negligible.
Notably, while previous investigations in this region have largely
focused on PAH contamination in environmental matrices such as air, soil, and
vegetation, the present study uniquely establishes a direct
environmental–biological linkage by incorporating human biomonitoring through
blood-based PAH assessment. In aggregate, these findings delineate a
persistent environmental carcinogenic burden alongside constrained systemic
toxicity under prevailing exposure conditions, underscoring the importance of
continued biomonitoring and surveillance in industrial settings.
[1]
Adak,
P., & Elumalai, S. P. (2021). Estimation of Onsite Factors on Polycyclic
Aromatic Hydrocarbon Particulate Buildup in Urban Road Networks. Frontiers
in Environmental Science, 9.
https://doi.org/10.3389/fenvs.2021.768358
[2]
Balakrishna,
G., Pervez, S., & Bisht, D. S. (2011). Source apportionment of arsenic in
atmospheric dust fall out in an urban residential area, Raipur, Central India. Atmospheric
Chemistry and Physics, 11(11), 5141.
https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-11-5141-2011
[3]
Bjelić,
L. S., Markić, D. N., Ilić, P., & Farooqi, Z. U. R. (2021). Polycyclic
Aromatic Hydrocarbons in Soils in Industrial Areas: Concentration and Risks to
Human Health. Polish Journal of Environmental Studies, 31(1),
595. https://doi.org/10.15244/pjoes/137785
[4]
Craemer,
S. D., Croes, K., Larebeke, N. V., Sioen, I., Schoeters, G., Loots, I., Nawrot,
T. S., Nelen, V., Campo, L., Fustinoni, S., & Baeyens, W. (2016).
Investigating unmetabolized polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbons in adolescents’
urine as biomarkers of environmental exposure. Chemosphere, 155,
48. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chemosphere.2016.04.017
[5]
.Isra,
K. (2025). Polycyclic Aromatic Hydrocarbons in the GCC Region: Exposure and
Health Risk Assessment. International Journal for Research in Applied
Science and Engineering Technology, 13(9), 2174.
https://doi.org/10.22214/ijraset.2025.74385
[6]
Kumar,
B., Verma, V. K., Sharma, C. S., & Akolkar, A. B. (2014). Estimation of
Toxicity Equivalency and Probabilistic Health Risk on Lifetime Daily Intake of
Polycyclic Aromatic Hydrocarbons from Urban Residential Soils. Human and
Ecological Risk Assessment An International Journal, 21(2), 434.
https://doi.org/10.1080/10807039.2014.921530
[7]
Lemieux,
C., Long, A. S., Lambert, I. B., Lundstedt, S., Tysklind, M., & White, P.
A. (2014). Cancer Risk Assessment of Polycyclic Aromatic Hydrocarbon
Contaminated Soils Determined Using Bioassay-Derived Levels of Benzo[a]pyrene
Equivalents. Environmental Science & Technology, 49(3), 1797.
https://doi.org/10.1021/es504466b
[8]
Patel,
K. S., Ramteke, S., Naik, Y. A., Sahu, B. L., Sharma, S., Lintelmann, J., &
Georg, M. (2015). Contamination of Environment with Polycyclic Aromatic
Hydrocarbons in India. Journal of Environmental Protection, 6(11),
1268. https://doi.org/10.4236/jep.2015.611111
[9]
Qi,
H., Chen, X., Du, Y., Niu, X., Guo, F., & Li, W. (2019). Cancer risk
assessment of soils contaminated by polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbons in Shanxi,
China. Ecotoxicology and Environmental Safety, 182, 109381.
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecoenv.2019.109381
[10] Ramteke, S., Sahu, B. L., Patel, K. S.,
Pandey, P. K., Yurdakul, S., Martín‐Ramos, P., Ren, P., & Fu, P. (2024).
Characterization of Organic Aerosols in the Ambient Air of Raipur, Central
India: Distribution, Seasonal Variations, and Source Apportionment. Research
Square (Research Square). https://doi.org/10.21203/rs.3.rs-4336888/v1
[11] Sankar, T. K., Kumar, A., Mahto, D. K.,
Das, K. C., Narayan, P., Fukate, M., Awachat, P., Padghan, D., Mohammad, F.,
Al‐Lohedan, H. A., Soleiman, A. A., & Ambade, B. (2023). The Health Risk
and Source Assessment of Polycyclic Aromatic Hydrocarbons (PAHs) in the Soil of
Industrial Cities in India. Toxics, 11(6), 515.
https://doi.org/10.3390/toxics11060515
[12] Shrivastava, D., Sharma, K., & ulla, R.
(2015). STUDIES IN SILTARA INDUSTRIAL AREA, RAIPUR, CHHATTISGARH I – HERBACEOUS
VEGETATION. International Journal of Scientific Research, 4(5),
53.
https://www.worldwidejournals.com/international-journal-of-scientific-research-(IJSR)/recent_issues_pdf/2015/May/May_2015_1492855063__199.pdf
[13] Singh, R. K., & Singh, S. K. (2025).
Persistent polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbons (PAHs) in the soil, its
bioremediation, and health effects. Environmental Sciences Europe, 37(1).
https://doi.org/10.1186/s12302-025-01230-6
[14] Sombiri, S., Balhara, N., Attri, D., Kharb,
I., & Giri, A. (2024). An overview on occurrence of polycyclic aromatic
hydrocarbons in food chain with special emphasis on human health ailments. Discover
Environment, 2(1). https://doi.org/10.1007/s44274-024-00121-6
[15] Wang, Y., Zhao, H., Wang, T., Liu, X., Ji,
Q., Zhu, X., Sun, J., Wang, Q., Yao, H., Niu, Y., Jia, Q., Su, W., Chen, W.,
Dai, Y., Zhi, Q., Wang, W., Li, Y., Gao, A., & Duan, H. (2019). Polycyclic
aromatic hydrocarbons exposure and hematotoxicity in occupational population: A
two-year follow-up study. Toxicology and Applied Pharmacology, 378,
114622. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.taap.2019.114622
[16] Zhang, H., Huang, Q., Han, P., Zhang, Z.,
Jiang, S., & Yang, W. (2022). Source identification and toxicity
apportionment of polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbons in surface soils in Beijing
and Tianjin using a PMF-TEQ method [Review of Source identification and
toxicity apportionment of polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbons in surface soils in
Beijing and Tianjin using a PMF-TEQ method]. PLoS ONE, 17(6).
Public Library of Science. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0268615