Low Noise Amplifier
Design at GHz-Frequencies: A Review of Recent Advances and Challenges
SachchidaNand
Shukla1,*, Syed Shamroz Arshad2, Geetika
Srivastava3, Kavita Thakur4
1Pt.
Ravishankar Shukla University Raipur, Chhattisgarh and
Department of Physics and Electronics (on
lien), Dr Ram Manohar Lohia Avadh University, Ayodhya, Uttar Pradesh
2,3Department
of Physics and Electronics, Dr Ram Manohar Lohia Avadh University, Ayodhya,
Uttar Pradesh
4School of
Studies in Electronics and Photonics, Pt. Ravishankar Shukla University Raipur,
Chhattisgarh
Abstract
The Darlington and Sziklai transistor
pairs have emerged as promising alternatives to conventional single-transistor
configurations due to their advantageous combination of wide bandwidth and high
gain at lower drive voltages. This review presents a detailed examination of
various design approaches for developing Low Noise Amplifiers (LNAs) operating
in the GHz frequency range, with particular emphasis on these transistor pair
topologies. A total of 45 research sources published between 2015 and 2026 were
initially surveyed, out of which 36 were found relevant to the objective of
review. The analysis shows that Darlington pair–based CMOS operational
amplifiers deliver the highest gain, while Sziklai pair–based NMOS and PMOS
LNAs offer the broadest bandwidth compared to conventional LNA architectures.
These findings strongly support the core hypothesis regarding their suitability
for ultra-wideband GHz applications. The review concludes by highlighting the
key challenges associated with implementing these LNAs at GHz frequencies.
Keywords:
Darlington pair, Sziklai pair, Wireless communication, Low Noise Amplifiers,
CMOS
Introduction
The wireless
communication industry has been a profitable market for semiconductor companies
in the last few years. Wireless technologies have a wide range of applications
in sending and receiving data quickly in both personnel and business work. As
per the recent survey, it has been found that more than 18.22 billion wireless
equipment are sold worldwide in the financial year 2025 (Forecast number of
mobile devices worldwide from 2020 to 2025 (in billions) *, 2025). The global
electronics market for mobile communication is rapidly increasing and the
communication industry is searching for the technology that can deliver
advanced capabilities and higher circuit performance.
The need for
mobile communications and instantaneous access to the messages, at any moment,
considerably changed the customer electronics business. Exchange of the data
through mobile handsets, tablets, computers and other types of portable
communications are experiencing record progress. Therefore, to meet out the
demand and need of market, cellular networks are working towards increasing
their data rate speed. The emerging 6G technology targeting the data rates up
to 1000 Gigabits-per-seconds, therefore to allow this high data-transfer speed,
the bandwidth has to be increased (Liu et al. 2019)
This boom has
provided an extraordinary chance for wireless communication industry for
picking the innovative semiconductor technology from substrate materials to
device to design RF front-end blocks of wireless communication system. Block
diagram of general wireless communication system is shown in Fig 1.
Fig.
1. Block Diagram of Wireless Communication System (Singh et al.
2013)
The key
components used in RF front-end blocks, are low noise amplifier (LNA), power
amplifier (PA) and mixer. These components require low noise, high gain, high
linearity, and low power consumption to produce higher circuit performances.
There are various technologies available for designing LNA such as SiGe
heterojunction bipolar technology (HBT), SiCMOS, high-electron-mobility-transistor
(HEMT), CMOS and BiCMOS. Therefore, for wireless communication system, novel
technologies need to be investigated, so that conditions for the modern
wireless communication system with higher circuit performance can be realized.
In this
review, study of the reported low noise amplifiers at GHz frequency and related
challenges with a special reference to multi-BJT based devices has been
performed for front-end-blocks of wireless communication system applications.
Methodology
Literature
Search Strategy
Research
papers published between 2015 to 2026 are collected from the different research
and key words used to retrieved papers from these databases are: (1) Low Noise
Amplifiers, (2) GHz range Low Noise Amplifiers, (3) Technologies for GHz range
Low Noise Amplifier, and (4) Low Noise Amplifier topologies. Inclusion criteria
for the research papers are as follows: (i) papers must be published between 2015
and 2026; (ii) papers should have at least 2 citations (iii) papers must be
available in the database; (iv) papers showing improvement either in gain,
bandwidth, or noise. Abstracts published in conferences, articles which have
bandwidth below 1 MHz range, review papers, website materials, and thesis are
excluded from this review study.
Selection of studies and data extraction
Based on the literature search strategy,
research papers relevant to inclusion criteria were scrutinized from electronic
research database and those papers found under the exclusion criteria are
removed from the review process. Following parameters are observed from the
selected papers: (1) Bandwidth, (2) Gain, (3) Power Consumption, (4) Input P1
dB, (5) IIP3, (6) Noise Figure, (7) Chip Area, (8) Number of stages, (9) Device
Type, (10) Technique. These parameters
are arranged in tabular form for different types of techniques and topologies. Fig.
2 shows the flow chart consisting of meta-analysis for this review study.
Fig.2. Meta analysis of the review study
Research
Gap, Research Contribution and Research Question
Most of the research papers in the literature is
filled with the review of Low Noise amplifiers (LNAs) operating at 2.4 GHz
technology. However, present review,
focussing on the different types of technologies and topologies, offers a
comprehensive review of recently reported LNAs operating up to 580.554 GHz
bandwidth and 70 dB gain along with description over emerging semiconductor
topologies, future research directions and related bottlenecks for GHz range
applications.
This review provides comprehensive review of
different LNA topologies operating up to 580.554 GHz bandwidth and 70 dB gain.
As a novel contribution, this review study found Sziklai pair and other
multi BJT based electronic pairs suitable for UWB applications due to its high
gain and wide band feature. This review also provides issues and
challenges for future UWB applications.
This review study is basically performed to
answer the questions: What are the different technologies and techniques
available to design Low Noise Amplifiers at GHz range? What are the issues and
challenges for LNA operating at GHz range frequency?
Approaches
to improve the Bandwidth for GHz applications
High Electron Mobility
Transistor (HEMT) Process
A high electron mobility
transistor (HEMTs) is a type of FET that uses two semiconductors’ materials
having different band gaps in a junction (Nikandish el al. 2014). It is
also known as Heterostructure FET (HFET) and modulation-doped FET (MODFET). Materials
combinations of GaAs (Gallium Arsenide) and AlGaAs (Aluminium Gallium Arsenide)
are generally used to constitute HEMT.
Gallium arsenide (GaAs) is
good choice for GHz applications due to their high mobility, high breakdown
voltage, high Q values for the passive components and better linearity.
However, this semiconductor technology faces some restrictions such as poor tunability,
low thermal conductivity, high RF loss, complex digital integration, high cost,
high power consumption and complex fabrications.
Recently, GaN (Gallium Nitride)
is widely used in HEMTs due to its high-power characteristics, whereas for high
frequency applications, it is found that HEMTs with In (indium) shows better
performances. These transistors are extensively used in low power RF
applications, satellite receivers, and defense department.
There are two versions of HEMT
are available e.g., pHEMT (Pesodomorphic HEMT), mHEMT (metamorphic HEMT). The
pHEMT is achieved by using thin layer of one of the semiconductor materials
which creates larger bandgap and ultimately produces better performances.
However, mHEMT is an improved versions of pHEMT which uses a buffer layer
between the semiconductor’s materials having different lattice constant.
(Zencir et al. 2026) recently investigated single stage GaN low
noise amplifier in common source mode using RLC feedback technique at 0.25 µm
GaN HEMT. At 12V supply voltage, this design generates 16 dB power gain across
20 MHz to 2 GHz bandwidth along with a noise figure less than 1.3 dB and
consumes 1.9 W power.
(Moschetti et al. 2015) proposed the five stage Common source MMIC
amplifier in 50nm mHEMT technology. This five-stage amplifier generates 178-185
GHz bandwidth with 24.5 dB gain, and 24 mW DC power consumption.
(Chou et al. 2016) proposed a Darlington pair power MMIC amplifier
implemented in 0.5µm GaN-on-SiC HEMT technology. This configuration utilizes
the cascode technique to improve the gain and bandwidth. Operating at 30V DC
supply voltage, this amplifier exhibits 15 dB gain, 1.0GHz to 5.8 GHz bandwidth
with 330 mW DC power consumption. This amplifier is suitable in X-band high
power wireless access point.
(Thome et al. 2022) proposed two distributed down converters MMICs
35-nm InGaAs mHEMT Technology, where first MMIC1 represents mixer whereas
second MMIC2 shows enhanced version of MMIC1 with the eight-cell local
oscillator (LO) driver amplifier. Using this topology, the MMIC2 reports the
1-170 GHz bandwidth is achieved with -4.2 dB gain and 180mW DC power
consumption.
(Yan et al. 2023) proposed a two-stage wideband low-noise
amplifier MMIC (Monolithic Microwave integrated Circuit) with
multiple resistive feedback in a 0.15- μm GaAs
E-mode pHEMT technology which features 1.0 to 12.5 GHz bandwidth, 23.6 peak
gain, 87.5 mW power consumption with a compact die size of only 0.75 mm2.
(Yuan et al. 2024) proposed three-stage cascode low
noise amplifier (LNA) in a 0.15- μm GaAs pseudomorphic high electron mobility
transistor (pHEMT) technology. The first two stages use transformer feedback
whereas the third stage employs Darlington pair. The results show that the
proposed architecture achieves gain of 23.4 dB in the operating band from 0.5
GHz to 30 GHz with 246 mW power consumption and 2.2 x 0.7 mm2 area.
Table 1 summerizes the parameters of these LNA
in respect of frequency, gain, DC power consumption, chip area, number of
stages, device type, and technology.
Table 1: Summary of the LNAs based on HEMT technology
|
Ref
|
Frequency
Band (GHz)
|
Gain (dB)
|
DC Power
Consumption (mW)
|
Chip Area
(mm2)
|
Number
of Stages
|
Device
Type
|
Technology
|
|
(Zencir et al. 2026)
|
0.02-2
|
16*
|
1900
|
---
|
Single Stage
|
Common Source GaN LNA with RLC Feedback
|
0.25 µm GaN HEMT
|
|
(Moschetti et al. 2015)
|
178-185
|
24.5
|
24
|
1 x 2
|
Five Stage
|
Common source MMIC amplifier
|
50nm mHEMT GaAs
|
|
(Chou et al. 2016)
|
1.0-5.8
|
15
|
330
|
3.78
|
Single Stage
|
Darlington pair power MMIC amplifier
|
0.5µm GaN-on-SiC HEMT
|
|
(Thome et al. 2022)
|
1-170
|
-4.2
|
180
|
1.5 x 1
|
Single Stage
|
Distributed Down Converters
|
35-nm InGaAs mHEMT
|
|
(Yan et al. 2023)
|
1.0-12.5
|
23.6
|
87.5
|
0.75
|
Two Stage
|
Low Noise Amplifier MMIC
|
0.15 μm GaAs E-mode
pHEMT
|
|
(Yuan et al. 2024)
|
0.5-30
|
23.4
|
246
|
2.2 x 0.7
|
Three Stage
|
Cascode LNA
|
0.15 μm GaAs pHEMT
|
* Power Gain
Heterojunction Bipolar Transistor (HBT)
Process
The
Heterojunction Bipolar Transistor is a type of BJT which uses dissimilar
semiconductor materials for base and emitter (Zhu et al 2023). The
advantages of HBT are high power density, high efficiency, and high frequency
performances. There are two types of HBTs available,
·
SHBT (Single heterojunction bipolar transistor)
·
DHBT (Double heterojunction bipolar transistor)
Heterojunction transistor is
generally formed when emitter is made up of wide band gap semiconductors
(AlInAs or InP) and base is made up of narrow band gap semiconductors (GaInAs).
In SHBT, same semiconductors are used for collector and base whereas, different
semiconductors are used in the formation of DHBT.
(Kundu et al. 2026) presented the
design of SiGe HBT based low noise amplifier for radio frequency front end
receivers using Keysight’s Advanced Design System (ADC). This design achieves
power gain (S21) of 33.409 dB at 3 GHz bandwidth along with NF of
0.931 dB.
(Eriksson et al. 2015) proposed
the three Distributed amplifier topologies based on cascode gain cell in 250nm
InP DHBT technology. First amplifier is a single stage Distributed amplifier
which achieves 7.5 dB gain and 192 GHz bandwidth. Second amplifier is a two
cascaded single stage Distributed amplifier which produces 16 dB gain and 235
GHz bandwidth. Similarly, third stage is a distributed amplifier which receives
12.8 dB gain and 180 GHz bandwidth.
(Jyo et al. 2019) reports the
design of Distributed amplifier in 0.25µm Indium Phosphide (InP) DHBT
technology. This amplifier uses a transmission line in cascode topology to
improve the bandwidth. Under this situation, extremely wide bandwidth of 241
GHz, 10dB gain, 387 mW DC power consumption with 0.82 mm2 chip area
is achieved.
(Nguyen et al. 2020) proposed the
nine-cell double stacked MMIC based distributed amplifier in indium phosphide
(InP) DHBT technology. This design is based on the 3D interdigital capacitor CS.
This amplifier produces 10.5 dB gain, 1-160 GHz bandwidth, and 288 mW DC power
consumption.
(Zhu et al 2023) presents the application of the fT doubler technique to improve the
cut-off frequency (fT) of
InP heterojunction bipolar transistors (HBTs). A fT doubler structure was implemented by
the InGaAs/InP DHBTs technique in the Institute of Microelectronics Chinese
Academy of Science (IMECAS), which uses three InP DHBTs with the same emitter
area of 0.8×10μm [39]. The
forward Gummel plot and output characteristic of the single DHBT and fT -doubler were compared and
analyzed. The cut-off frequency (peak fT ) of fT -doubler is obtained as 263 GHz
by extrapolating H21 , while the peak fT of single DHBT is 165 GHz. In
addition, the small-signal parameters of the fT -doubler were extracted,
resulting in a good fit. This demonstrates that the reduction of Cπ is responsible for the increase in fT, and confirms the applicability of
the fT-doubler structure
as a single unit for circuit design.
Table 2 enlists performance parameters of LNA based on
HBT process.
Table 2: Summary of the LNAs based on HBT technology
|
Ref
|
Frequency
Band (GHz)
|
Gain (dB)
|
DC Power
Consumption (mW)
|
Chip Area
(mm2)
|
Number
of Stages
|
Device
Type
|
Technology
|
|
(Kundu et al. 2026)
|
3
|
33.409*
|
---
|
---
|
---
|
SiGe HBT based low noise amplifier
|
Keysight’s
Advanced Design System (ADC)
|
|
(Eriksson et al. 2015)
|
192
|
7.5
|
40
|
0.24
|
Single Stage
|
Single stage Distributed Cascode amplifier
|
250nm InP DHBT
|
|
235
|
16
|
117
|
0.41
|
Two cascaded single stage Distributed
amplifier
|
|
180
|
12.8
|
110
|
0.32
|
Conventional distributed amplifier
|
|
(Jyo et al. 2019)
|
241
|
10
|
387
|
0.82
|
Single Stage
|
Distributed Amplifier
|
0.25µm Indium
Phosphide (InP) DHBT technology
|
|
(Nguyen et al. 2020)
|
1-160
|
10.5
|
288
|
1.6 x 0.8
|
Single Stage
|
Nine-cell double stacked MMIC based
distributed amplifier
|
Indium phosphide (InP) DHBT
|
|
(Zhu et al 2023)
|
263
|
---
|
---
|
0.000008
|
Single
Stage
|
InP DHBT amplifier
|
InGaAs/InP DHBTs process
|
*Power Gain
CMOS and BiCMOS Processes
(Yadav et al. 2026) proposed the design of 28
GHz receiver front end using 3-stage differential ended LNA at 130nm BiCMOS
technology. The design includes inductively degenerate cascode LNA in first
stage, down mixer with common base technique in second stage, and Gm-C filter
in third stage. With a gain of 30 dB and NF of 2.2 dB, this design consumes
20.9 mW power at a supply voltage of 3.3V and covers an area of 0.64 mm2.
(Pandey et al. 2015) reported the design of
Darlington pair CMOS Op-Amp using slew rate enhancement technique in standard
45nm CMOS Process. Under this technique, high gain of 70 dB, 1.74 GHz
bandwidth, and 0.76 mW DC power consumption at ±1V supply voltage is achieved.
(Fritsche et
al. 2015) proposed cascaded identical travelling wave stages based
Distributed amplifier in 0.13µm SiGe BiCMOS technology. Measurement of the
amplifier shows 18.7 dB gain, 180 GHz bandwidth, 86 mW DC power consumption,
and 0.61 mm2 chip area.
(Singh et al. 2016)
introduce the design of three Stage Darlington pair amplifier connected with
positive and negative slew rate booster technique in GPDK 180nm CMOS process.
Observation indicates that the slew rate of the proposed design is doubled in
comparison to the conventional Darlington pair without slew rate booster
technique. Using slew rate booster technique, 30 dB gain with 1.9-26.7 GHz
bandwidth, and 28.4 V/µs slew rate is achieved.
(Hasan et
al. 2020) proposed the three stage CMOS power amplifier with reverse bias
and power divider technique in 0.18µm CMOS silterra process. The simulation
outcomes report 62.56 mW DC power consumption from 1.9V supply voltage, 8.08 dB
gain, and 28 GHz bandwidth. The proposed configuration is suitable for mm-wave
application and future 5G communication.
The LNA
parameters based on CMOS and BiCMOS technology is recorded in Table 3.
Table 3: Summary of the LNAs based on CMOS and BiCMOS
technology
|
Ref
|
Frequency
Band
(GHz)
|
Gain
(dB)
|
DC
Power
Consumption
(mW)
|
Chip
Area
(mm2)
|
Number
of
Stages
|
Device
Type
|
Technology
|
|
(Yadav et al.
2026)
|
28
|
30
|
20.9
|
0.64
|
Three
Stage
|
Differential
ended LNA
|
130nm
BiCMOS Technology
|
|
(Pandey et al. 2015)
|
1.7
|
70
|
0.76
|
---
|
Two
Stage
|
Darlington pair-based
CMOS OP Amp using Slew rate Enhancement Technique
|
45nm CMOS Process
|
|
(Fritsche
et al. 2015)
|
180
|
18.7
|
86
|
0.61
|
Single
Stage
|
Cascaded
identical travelling wave stages based Distributed amplifier
|
0.13µm SiGe BiCMOS technology
|
|
(Singh et al. 2016)
|
1.9-26.7
|
30
|
---
|
---
|
Three
Stage
|
Darlington pair
amplifier with Slew rate Enhancement Technique
|
180nm CMOS Process
|
|
(Hasan et al. 2020)
|
28
|
6.67
|
62.56
|
---
|
Three
Stage
|
CMOS
power amplifier with power divider technique
|
0.18µm
CMOS silterra process
|
Different Techniques used to improve
the Performance of LNA
Inductively Degeneration Technique
This
technique is widely used in designing LNA because it provides excellent input
matching, low noise figure and high gain on the cost of narrow bandwidth (Malathi
et al. 2019).
To
achieve input impedance matching, inductors Lg and Ls are
placed at the gate and source of transistor M1 respectively.
However, inductor Ld is used for output impedance matching. The
capacitor Cext added between the gate and source of M1 is
used to control the Q value of the transistors. The output signal is received
at the drain of M2 while the input signal is applied at the gate of
M1.
(Malathi
et al. 2019) reported the designs of radio frequency common gate CMOS LNA and
inductively degenerated common source LNA for space exploration. The LNA was
simulated with the help of HSPICE circuit simulation software at 90nm CMOS
technology. Observations are made at 2GHz for both LNAs and it is found that
inductively degenerate CS LNA shows better results with 31.97 dB gain, 1.04 mW
power consumption, and 0.063 dB noise figure than RF CMOS CG LNA having 13.63
dB gain, 0.904 mW power consumption and 0.78 dB noise figure.
(Bansal et
al. 2019) proposed the cascode CS LNA based on inductively degenerate
technique. Authors have used different types of output circuit structures to
observe the behavior. When R is used as load; 16.65 dB gain, 2.95 mW power
consumption, and 7.802 dB noise figure is received, when L is used as load;
13.91 dB gain, 2.51 mW power consumption, and 8.419 dB noise figure is
received, when LC is used as load; 26.52 dB gain, 5.011 mW power consumption,
and 7.464 dB noise figure is found, and when RLC is used as load, 15.84 dB
gain, 1.98 mW power consumption, and 7.784 dB noise figure is observed.
(Prasad et
al. 2022) presented the design and implementation of cascade CS LNA using 65nm
CMOS technology. At supply voltage of 1 volt, 25 dB gain, less than 2.6 dB
noise figure, and 2.4 GHz bandwidth are observed.
Table
4 records the different performance metrics of LNA based
inductively degenerate technique.
Table 4: Summary of the LNAs based on Inductively Degenerate technique
|
Ref
|
Frequency
Band
(GHz)
|
Gain
(dB)
|
DC
Power
Consumption
(mW)
|
Noise
Figure
(dB)
|
Number
of Stages/Condition
|
Device
Type
|
Technology
|
|
(Malathi
et al. 2019)
|
2
|
31.97
|
1.04
|
0.063
|
Single
Stage
|
Inductively
Degenerate CS LNA
|
90nm CMOS
|
|
13.63
|
0.904
|
0.78
|
Single
Stage
|
Radio Frequency CMOS
CG LNA
|
|
(Bansal
et al. 2019)
|
2.9
|
16.65
|
2.95
|
7.802
|
R as
Load
|
Inductively
Degenerate Cascode CS LNA
|
45nm CMOS
|
|
2.6
|
13.91
|
2.51
|
8.419
|
L as
Load
|
|
2.3
|
26.52
|
5.011
|
7.464
|
LC as
Load
|
|
2.4
|
15.84
|
1.98
|
7.784
|
RLC as
Load
|
|
(Prasad et al.
2022)
|
2.4
|
25
|
---
|
2.6
|
Single
Stage
|
Cascade
CS LNA with Inductive Degeneration
|
65nm CMOStechnology
|
Current Reuse Technique
Current
reuse technique is primarily used for improving the gain of LNA (Chunhua et al.
2011). In current reuse technique, the driver transistor amplifies the input
signal and current generated is used by the driver transistor which eventually
lower the power consumption and noise figure while providing high gain.
(Zhang et
al. 2026) reported four stage common emitter W-band current reuse low noise
amplifier at 130nm SiGe process. Use of noise measure (NM) technique and source
degeneration inductor alongwith metal line-based input network enabled them to
achieve 20.4 dB gain, NF of 4 dB, power consumption of 12.5 mW from a supply
voltage of 2.5 V across 78-106 GHz bandwidth.
Two
Stage CS-CS LNA is proposed by (Shankar et al. 2015) to improve the gain using
current reuse technique. Using 0.18µm CMOS technology and operating at 1.2-volt,
12.554 dB of gain, 2.874 mW of power consumption, and 5.4 GHz of wide bandwidth
is received.
(Sunganthi
et al. 2022) introduced the inductor less pre-distortion two stage LNA circuit
using current reuse technique at 90nm CMOS technology. The proposed LNA has
three separate blocks- pre distortion circuit, current reuse blocks, and source
follower circuit. Under this arrangement, 2.2 dB of gain, 7.01 mW of power
consumption, 2,67 dB of noise figure, 3 dBm of P1dB, -1dBm of IIP3, and 2.4 GHz
of wide bandwidth is observed.
Single
stage current reuse complementary CMOS LNA is proposed by (Chang et al. 2022)
for sub-6 GHz 5G system. Using body floating and self forward bias technique,
this LNA occupies small area of 0.34 mm2 along with 8.1±1.5 dB gain,
7.3 mW power consumption, 3.02-5.2 dB noise figure, 0.3 to -1.3 dBm IIP3 and
3.7-11.9 GHz bandwidth. Low Power consumption of this LNA is due to low power
supply feature.
Different
LNA based on current reuse technique are tabulated in Table 5 with their
respective performance metrics.
Table 5: Summary of the LNAs based on Current Reuse technique
|
Ref
|
Frequency
Band
(GHz)
|
Gain
(dB)
|
DC
Power
Consumption
(mW)
|
Noise
Figure
(dB)
|
IIP3
(dBm)
|
Area
(mm2)
|
Number
of Stages
|
Device
Type
|
Technology
|
|
(Zhang et. al.
2025)
|
78-106
|
20.4
|
12.5
|
4
|
---
|
0.57
|
Four
Stage
|
W-band
current reuse LNA
|
130nm SiGe process
|
|
(Shankar et
al. 2015)
|
5.4
|
12.554
|
2.874
|
0.423
|
---
|
---
|
Two
Stage
|
CS-CS Current reuse
LNA
|
0.18µm CMOS
process
|
|
(Sunganthi et
al. 2022)
|
2.4
|
2.2
|
7.01
|
2.67
|
-1
|
0.10
|
Two
Stage
|
Inductor
less Pre-Distortion LNA using Current reuse technique
|
90nm CMOS process
|
|
(Chang et al.
2022)
|
3.7-11.9
|
8.1±1.5
|
7.3
|
3.02-5.2
|
0.3 to
-1.3 dBm
|
0.34
|
Single
Stage
|
Current reuse
complementary CMOS LNA
|
180nm CMOS process
|
|
* Power Gain
|
Cascode Technique
This
technique is used to improve the gain of LNA (Ibrahim et al. 2020). (Ibrahim et
al. 2020) proposed two stage cascode pHEMT LNA with negative feedback using
Advance Design System (ADS) Tool. In this design, pHEMT FHX76LP manufactured
by Eudyna Devices Inc is used to study the behavior of LNA. In addition,
T-matching network is used at input and output port to realize maximum power
transfer. With frequency band of 5.8 GHz, this LNA shows 0.360 dB noise figure
and 20.199 dB gain.
Two
Stage source degenerated cascode LNA using magnetic coupling feedback technique
is proposed by (Kobal et al. 2023). The proposed LNA is simulated and
fabricated using 22nm FD SOI CMOS technology which shows 23.1 dB gain, 2.1 dB
noise figure, -16.5 dBm IIP3 at 28 GHz, 5.6 mW power consumption while working
at 23.7-28.5 GHz technology. Layout area of the LNA is 0.9 mm2.
(Yuan et
al. 2024) proposed three stage cascode LNA using transformer feedback
technique and Darlington pair. The Darlington pair is used in the third stage
while first two stage uses transformer feedback to attain low frequency gain. Using
0.15µm GaAs pHEMT technology, this LNA consumes 246 mW power, and
achieves 23.4 dB gain, 2.1 dB noise figure while operating in 0.5-30 GHz
frequency band. This LNA also covers an area of 1.54 mm2.
Cascode
Feedback technique based LNA are tabulated in Table 6 with their
respective performance metrics.
Table 6: Summary of the LNAs based on Cascode technique
|
Ref
|
Frequency
Band
(GHz)
|
Gain
(dB)
|
DC
Power
Consumption
(mW)
|
Noise
Figure
(dB)
|
IIP3
(dBm)
|
Area
(mm2)
|
Number
of Stages
|
Device
Type
|
Technology
|
|
(Ibrahim
et al. 2020)
|
5.8
|
20.199
|
---
|
0.360
|
---
|
---
|
Two Stage
|
Cascode
pHEMT LNA with negative feedback
|
Advance Design System (ADS) Tool
|
|
(Kobal et al.
2023)
|
23.7-28.5
|
23.1
|
5.6
|
2.1
|
-16.5
at 28 GHz
|
0.9
|
Two
Stage
|
Cascode LNA with
magnetic Coupling Feedback
|
22nm FD SOI CMOS
technology
|
|
(Yuan et al.
2024)
|
0.5-30
|
23.4
|
246
|
2.1
|
---
|
1.54
|
Three
Stage
|
Cascode
LNA with Darlington pair and Transformer Feedback
|
0.15µm
GaAs pHEMT technology
|
Gm boosting Technique
This
technique is particularly used to enhance the transconductance (gm) of
transistors (Majeed et al. 2022). Enhancing Gm leads to higher gain, wider
bandwidth and low noise figure of broadband LNA.
An
auxiliary transistor is inserted between gate and source terminals of
transistor which provides negative voltage gain to the gate. However, this
technique, due to the addition of auxiliary amplifier, enhances DC power
consumption and noise figure.
To
reduce the noise figure and power consumption of common gate LNA, (Rafati et
al. 2019) reported two stage UWB LNA design using noise cancellation and gm
boosting topology. This design uses CG main amplifier and CS booster amplifier
in first stage of gm boosting while the second stage utilize two CS amplifier
and cascode CG amplifier for cancelling noise at TSMC 90 nm RF CMOS technology.
The layout of LNA covers 0.67 mm2 area, 14.5 dB gain, 2.2 dB noise
figure in 3-5 GHz bandwidth.
(Majeed et
al. 2022) proposed active inductor (AI) based three stage ultra-wide band
common gate LNA using Gm boosted current reuse technique. First stage
incorporates CG amplifier, second stage consists of gm boosting stage while
third stage utilizes active inductor stage in the topology of the proposed LNA.
Using 90nm CMOS technology, proposed LNA dissipates 10.4 mW of power, 18.0±0.8
of gain, 3.36-4.68 of noise figure, -22.8 dBm of IIP3 in the frequency range of
3.1-10.6 GHz.
Table
7 shows the Gm boosting technique based LNA in regards to
frequency, gain, DC power consumption, noise figure, IIP3, area, number of
stages, device type, and technology.
Table 7: Summary of the LNAs based on Gm boosting technique
|
Ref
|
Frequency
Band
(GHz)
|
Gain
(dB)
|
DC
Power
Consumption
(mW)
|
Noise
Figure
(dB)
|
IIP3
(dBm)
|
Area
(mm2)
|
Number
of Stages
|
Device
Type
|
Technology
|
|
(Rafati et al.
2019)
|
3-5
|
14.5
|
8.2
|
2.2
|
---
|
0.67
|
Two
Stage
|
gm
-boosting noise-canceling UWB LNA
|
TSMC 90
nm RF-CMOS technology
|
|
(Majeed
et al. 2022)
|
3.1-10.6
|
18.0±0.8
|
10.4
|
3.36-4.68
|
-22.8
|
---
|
Three
Stage
|
Gm boosted active
inductor based UWB CG LNA
|
90nm CMOS
|
Gain Inductor Peaking Technique
Gain inductor
peaking technique is used to enhance the gain at high frequency and provide
gain flatness in UWB LNA.
(Kazemi et
al. 2021) analyzed the three-stage complementary structure based UWB LNA using
series inductor peaking technique. Two complementary structure is used at first
and third stage and common source amplifier is used in the second stage. Die
area of 0.59 mm2, power dissipation of 6.8 mW, NF of 2.2 dB, IIP3 of
-4 dBm, gain of 16.05±0.45, and bandwidth of 3.1-10.6 GHz is received using
180nm CMOS technology.
Fabricated
and simulated in 55nm CMOS technology, (Dong et al. 2023) proposed two stage
LNA design based on resistive feedback, inductive source degeneration and
coupled inductive peaking technique. With an area of 0.39 mm2, this
LNA receives 20.3 dB gain, 2.5 dB noise figure, 0.4-30 GHz bandwidth, and
dissipated 23.5 mW of power from 1.5 V supply.
(Kim et
al. 2023) proposed the design of cascode LNA using resistive feedback and
inductive peaking technique at 90nm RF SOI technology. The designed LNA
generates gain of 20.68 dB and 19.94 dB along with noise figure of 1.57-1.73 dB
and IIP3 of -15.4 dBm. The layout area of the proposed design is 0.7 mm2.
Performance metrics of Gain inductor peaking
technique based LNA is recorded in Table 8.
Table 8: Summary of the LNAs based on Gate Inductive Peaking technique
|
Ref
|
Frequency
Band
(GHz)
|
Gain
(dB)
|
DC
Power
Consumption
(mW)
|
Noise
Figure
(dB)
|
IIP3
(dBm)
|
Area
(mm2)
|
Number
of Stages
|
Device
Type
|
Technology
|
|
(Kazemi et al.
2021)
|
3.1-10.6
|
16.05±0.45
|
6.8
|
2.2
|
-4
|
0.59
|
Three
Stage
|
Complementary
series inductor peaking LNA
|
180nm RF CMOS technology
|
|
(Dong et al.
2023)
|
0.4-30
|
20.3
|
23.5
|
2.5
|
---
|
0.39
|
Two
Stage
|
Coupled inductive
peaking LNA
|
55nm CMOS technology
|
|
(Kim et al. 2023)
|
4.4-5.0
|
20.6-19.9
|
---
|
1.57-1.73
|
-15.4
|
0.7
|
Single
Stage
|
Resistive
feedback and inductively Degenerate LNA
|
90nm RF SOI technology
|
* Power Gain
Multi
transistors-based Technique: Darlington pair and Sziklai pair
The Sziklai pair topology has emerged as a promising
solution for designing high-performance small-signal and low-noise amplifiers,
outperforming the Darlington pair in key metrics such as gain, bandwidth, and
noise figure.
Compound
Sziklai pair, comprising of NMOS Sziklai pair and MOSFET based complementary
Sziklai pair, were used to design low power LNA (Arshad et al. 2026). In this
design, cascode feedback technique in conjunction with ITC (impedance tuning
circuit) for tuning purpose were used, resulting in voltage gain
of 19.51 dB with a bandwidth of 36.42 GHz and peak current gain of 39.87 dB, NF
of 0.343 dB at 10 GHz, input third-order intercept point (IIP3) of 1.5 dBm, and
chip area of 267.96 µm² for Ultra-Wideband (UWB) and lower millimeter-wave
(mmWave) applications in RF front-end systems.
(Arshad
et al. 2025) proposed NMOS and PMOS Sziklai pair amplifiers using bandwidth
boosting technique at 180nm CMOS technology. The simulation results display
that NMOS LNA has a bandwidth of 580.554 GHz, NF of 1.66 dB at 63.09 GHz, input
P1dB of 0.883 dBm, and IIP3 of 10.22 dBm while PMOS LNA has bandwidth of
299.956 GHz, and NF of 11.71 dB at 283.09 GHz, input P1dB of 0.822 dBm, and
IIP3 of 6.72 dBm. Three stage broadband distributed amplifiers (DAs) and D-band
microwave tuneable second order band reject filter (BRF) are also configured by
the authors using the proposed amplifiers to validate the design.
(Shukla et al. 2023) designed Complementary
Sziklai pair LNA using BJTs at 180nm CMOS technology. Similar to the Sziklai
pair, this innovative pair is reported to carry two opposite polarity BJTs with
collector of PNP transistor is connected to the base of NPN transistor. This
pair is exhaustively discussed in Chapter 5. Under CC mode, the proposed LNA
generates 0.99 current gain, 0.13 voltage gain, 1.90 MHz bandwidth, 1.76E-6%
THD while under CE mode, voltage gain of 200.05, current gain of 11.62,
bandwidth of 1.64 MHz, and THD of 1.29E-6% is obtained.
(Nguyen et al. 2023)
presented the design of Darlington cell to improve the GBP (gain bandwidth
product) and output power of distributed amplifiers. Conventional Darlington
pair is modified using two diode transistors to balance the voltage and
current. Observations indicate that this DA produce gain of 13 dB over 3 to
230-GHz bandwidth
Darlington pair based LNA proposed
by different researchers have already been discussed earlier in (Nikandish et al. 2014, Moschetti et al. 2015, Chou et al. 2016, Pandey et al.
2015, and Mehra et al. 2017). Therefore, descriptions of these work will
not be discussed here.
Table 9 depicts performance metrics of LNA related to Sziklai pair
technique.
Table 9: Summary of the LNAs based on Sziklai pair technique
|
Ref
|
Frequency
Band
(GHz)
|
Gain
(dB)
|
DC
Power
Consumption
(mW)
|
Noise
Figure
(dB)
|
IIP3
(dBm)
|
Area
(mm2)
|
Number
of Stages
|
Device
Type
|
Technology
|
|
(Shukla et al.
2023)
|
0.001
|
0.13
|
10.63
|
---
|
---
|
141.16
x 10-6
|
Single
Stage
|
Complementary
Sziklai CC LNA
|
180nm CMOS Technology
|
|
0.001
|
200.05
|
13.60
|
---
|
---
|
158.30
x 10-6
|
Single
Stage
|
Complementary
Sziklai CE LNA
|
|
(Nguyen et al.
2023)
|
3-230
|
13
|
---
|
---
|
---
|
---
|
Single
Stage
|
Darlington
Cell based InP Distributed Amplifier
|
InP Technology
|
|
(Arshad
et al. 2025)
|
580.554
|
339.7
|
306.4
|
1.66
|
10.22
|
8.29 x
10-5
|
Single
Stage
|
NMOS Sziklai LNA
|
180nm CMOS
Technology
|
|
299.956
|
24.74
|
310.3
|
11.71
|
6.72
|
7.75 x
10-5
|
Single
Stage
|
PMOS
Sziklai LNA
|
|
(Arshad et al.
2026)
|
3.4-39.82
|
19.51
|
0.049
|
0.343
|
1.5
|
0.000267
|
Single
Stage
|
Cascode feedback
Compound Sziklai pair LNA
|
180nm CMOS Technology
|
Results & Discussions
The
comparative discussion of all the topologies deliberated above are summarized
the Table 10 based on their advantages and disadvantages.
Table 10: Comparative advantages and
disadvantages of different LNA topologies
|
Topology
|
Advantages
|
Disadvantages
|
|
Inductive
Degenerate
|
Excellent
input matching
|
Narrow
bandwidth
|
|
Current
Reuse
|
High
gain
|
High
input and output impedance
|
|
Cascode
|
High
Gain
|
Large area
|
|
Gm
boosting
|
High
Transconductance
|
High
power dissipation and noise figure
|
|
Gain
Inductor Peaking
|
High
Gain
|
High
power dissipation and large area
|
|
Sziklai
Pair
|
High
Power Gain, Wide Bandwidth
|
Limited
Voltage gain
|
Refer Table
10. The selection
of an LNA configuration technique depends on the specific application
requirements. Each technique offers distinct advantages and disadvantages,
which must be carefully considered.
The ‘Inductively
Degenerate’ technique provides excellent input matching but not suitable for
wide band applications (Malathi et al. 2019). Similarly, ‘Current Reuse’ technique
improves gain while maintain minimum power dissipation but results in high
input and output impedance On the other hand, ‘Cascode Technique’ provides
larger band signals but occupies too much space (Ibrahim et al. 2020).
Moreover, ‘Gm boosting Technique’ enhances transconductance which increases the
gain but leads to high power dissipation and noise figure (Majeed et al. 2022).
Inductor utilized in ‘Gain peaking inductor’ technique enhance the gain but
acquires large area on chip. ‘Multi transistors-based Technique’ provides high
power gain and wide bandwidth but have a limited voltage gain (Arshad et al. 2025
and Arshad et al. 2026).
Fig.3 and Fig.4
shows the bar graph of high gain and wide band LNA reported in this study
respectively. The Darlington pair-based CMOS Op-Amp using slew rate enhancement
technique at 45nm CMOS (Pandey et al. 2015) appears with highest bandwidth
while NMOS and PMOS Sziklai LNA at CMOS 180nm (Arshad et al. 2025) technology
evolves with widest bandwidth and suitable for ultra-wide band GHz application.
Fig. 3. High-Gain topologies
Fig. 4. Wideband topologies
Challenges
in Low Noise Amplifiers at GHz range frequency
At higher
frequencies (above 1 GHz range), noise performance of LNA is measured in terms
of noise power rather than noise voltage or noise current. It is defined as the
amount of voltage measured at the output even without the input (Shukla et
al. 2024). Schottky noise dominates in high performance LNA at higher frequencies which is caused
by the fluctuation of current flow in semiconductors through PN junction. In
Schottky noise, Mean square value of the current is expressed by equation (1),
Where q
denotes electron charge, I shows forward junction current and
represents frequency bandwidth.
In addition, it is also indorsed that the supply voltage should be
2Volt or less for better performance of high frequency LNA. This is controlled
by the following equation,
Where
is the stage delay time, VT
and VCC represents theshold voltage and supply voltage respectively.
Conclusion
This review reports the recent advancement in Ultra-wide
band LNAs based on the different techniques and technologies. Research articles
from electronic research database are
collected from 2015 to 2026 year, and found that
Darlington pair CMOS Op-Amp based on slew rate enhancement technique at 45nm
CMOS technology (Pandey et al. 2015) appears with highest bandwidth while NMOS
and PMOS Sziklai LNA at 180nm CMOS technology (Arshad et al. 2025) evolves with
widest bandwidth and suitable for ultra-wide band GHz application. Different types of
topologies for designing UWB LNA are also discussed which indicates that
Sziklai pair topology has a high gain and wide bandwidth compared to the
conventional LNA topologies and thus can be used to develop LNA for GHz range
in near future.
Declarations
Conflict of Interest: The authors declare no Conflict of interests.
Funding source: This
research received no external funding.
References
https://www.statista.com/statistics/245501/multiple-mobile-device-ownership
worldwide/
Liu et al., 2019
“Impacts of the digital transformation on the environment and sustainability”, Technical
Report, Öko-Institut e.V.,
https://www.statista.com/statistics/263437/global-smartphone-sales-to-end-users-since-2007/
Singh, I. V., 2013.
“Design and performance investigation of nano-scale SOI MOSFETS for low power
GHz applications”, Ph.D. Thesis, Aligarh Muslim University, Aligarh.
S. S. Arshad, G. Srivastava, S.
N. Shukla, 2025. “Design of ultra‑wideband
Sziklai pair based LNAs for wireless communication applications”, International
Journal of information Technology, 17(1):301-319,
https://doi.org/10.1007/s41870-024-02188-z
P. L. Longhi, L. Pace, S, Colangli, W.
Ciccognani, and E. limiti. 2019. “Technologies, Design, and Applications
of Low-Noise Amplifiers at Millimetre-Wave: State-of-the-Art and Perspectives”
Electronics, 8:1222, https://doi.org/10.3390/electronics8111222
T. S.
Reddy, V. Nath, 2024. “2.4 GHz low noise amplifier: A comprehensive
review and pioneering research contributions for RF applications” Microwave
Review, 30(1):55-66, https://oi.org/10.18485/mtts_mr.2024.30.1.8
S. Pargaien, A. S. Bist, R. Sharma, A. Patrick. 2016.
“A review of 2.4 GHz LNA using different topologies in standard CMOS”, International
journal of engineering sciences & research technology, 5(3):373-378.
M.
Bansal, Jyoti, 2017. “A review of low noise amplifier for 2.4GHz
frequency band”, 2017 International Conference on innovations in Control,
Communications and Information system (ICICCI), 1-6, https://doi.org/10.1109/ICICCIS.2017.8660895.
Ertan
Zencir, 2026. “A Highly Linear 0.02-2 GHz RLC Feedback LNA MMIC with
1.3-dB NF in 0.25- µm GaN HEMT Technology for GPR”, Journal of Circuits,
Systems and Computers, 35(9), 2650107,
https://doi.org/10.1142/S0218126626501070
G.
Nikandish, and AliMedi, 2014. “Design and Analysis of
Broadband Darlington Amplifiers with Bandwidth Enhancement in GaAs pHEMT
Technology”, IEEE Transactions on Microwave theory and Techniques,
62(8):1705-1715, https://doi.org/10.1109/TMTT.2014.2328972
G. Moschetti, A. Leuther, H. Maßler, B.
Aja, M. Rösch, M. Schlechtweg, O. Ambacher, V. Kangas, and M.
Geneviève-Perichaud, 2015. “A 183 GHz Metamorphic HEMT Low-Noise
Amplifier With 3.5 dB Noise Figure”, IEEE Microwave and Wireless Components
Letters, 25(9):618-620, https://doi.org/10.1109/LMWC.2015.2451355.
Min-Li
Chou, Hong-Kun Wang, Hsien-Chin Chiu and Fan-Hsiu Huang, 2016. “A
Broadband Darlington Power Amplifier using 0.5 µm GaN-on-SiC HEMT process”, 2016
URSI Asia-Pacific Radio Science Conference, 1947-1948.
X. Yan, J. Zhang, H. Luo, S. -P. Gao and Y. Guo, 2023.
"A Compact 1.0–12.5-GHz LNA MMIC With 1.5-dB NF Based on Multiple
Resistive Feedback in 0.15-μm GaAs pHEMT Technology," in IEEE
Transactions on Circuits and Systems I: Regular Papers, 70(4):1450-1462, https://doi.org/10.1109/TCSI.2023.3238361.
Y. Yuan, B. Yuan, J. Li, Z. Wang, J. Zeng and Z. Yu, 2024.
"A Broadband Cascode Low-Noise Amplifier Using Transformer Feedback and
Darlington Techniques," IEEE Transactions on Circuits and Systems
II: Express Briefs, 71(1):41-45, https://doi.org/10.1109/TCSII.2023.3303437.
R. Kundu et al.,2026.
“Design and Simulation of a 3GHz SiGe HBT Based Low Noise Amplifier for S-band
Applications”, 2026 9th International Conference on Electronics,
Materials Engineering & Nano-Technology MENTech), 9, 1-4,
https://doi.org/10.1109/IEMENTech202669403.2026.11434144
Z. Zhu et al.,
2023. "Improving the RF Performance of InP DHBT Using
fT-Doubler Technique," in IEEE Microwave and Wireless Technology
Letters, 33(12):1615-1618, https://doi.org/10.1109/LMWT.2023.3319813
Nguyen L.
K. Nguyen, Duy P. Nguyen, Alexander N. Stameroff, and Anh-Vu Pham, 2020.
“A 1–160-GHz InP Distributed Amplifier Using 3-D Interdigital Capacitors”, IEEE Microwave and
Wireless Components Letters, 30(5):492-495, https://doi.org/10.1109/LMWC.2020.2980280
Teruo Jyo, Munehiko Nagatani, Minoru Ida, Miwa Mutoh,
Hitoshi Wakita, Naoki Terao, Hideyuki Nosaka, 2019. “A 241-GHz-Bandwidth Distributed Amplifier with 10-dBm
P1dB in 0.25-µm InP DHBT Technology”, 2019 IEEE/MTT-S International
Microwave Symposium,
1430-1433,
Klas Eriksson, Izzat Darwazeh, and Herbert Zirath, 2015.
“InP DHBT Distributed Amplifiers With Up to 235-GHz
Bandwidth”, IEEE Transactions on Microwave Theory
and Techniques, 63(4):1334-1341, https://doi.org/10.1109/TMTT.2015.2405916
Teruo Jyo, Munehiko Nagatani, Minoru Ida, Miwa Mutoh,
Hitoshi Wakita, Naoki Terao, Hideyuki Nosaka, 2020. “A DC to 194-GHz Distributed Mixer in 250-nm InP
DHBT Technology”, 2020
IEEE/MTT-S International Microwave Symposium, 771-774.
David
Fritsche, Gregor Tretter, Corrado Carta, and Frank Ellinger, 2015.
“A Trimmable Cascaded Distributed Amplifier With 1.6
THz Gain-Bandwidth Product”, IEEE Transactions on Terahertz Science and Technology, 5(6):
1094-1096, 2015, https://doi.org/10.1109/TTHZ.2015.2482940
F.
Hasan, S. A. Z. Murad, F. A. Bakar, T. Z. A. Zulkifli, 2020. “A 28 GHz
high efficiency fully integrated 0.18 μm combined CMOS power amplifier using
power divider technique for 5G millimeter-wave applications”, Bulletin of Electrical Engineering and
Informatics, 9(2):
644-651, https://doi.org/10.11591/eei.v9i2.1854
P. K. Yadav, P. K. Mishra, 2026. “A
28-GHz mmWave Receiver Frontend With an Improved FOM of 15.56-dB for 5G New
Radio in 130-nm BiCMOD Technology”, IEEE Access, 14:21200-21212,
https://doi.org/10.1109/ACCESS.2026.3662040
Abhishek
Pandey, Subhra Chakraborty and Vijay Nath, 2015. “Slew rate enhancing technique in Darlington pair based
CMOS Op-Amp”, ARPN
Journal of Engineering and Applied Sciences, 10(9):3970-3973.
Rashmi
Singh, Rajesh Mehra, 2017. “Design A
Darlington Amplifier with Improved Gain and Slew Rate”, International Journal of Electronics
& Communication Technology, 8(4):13-16.
D
Malathi and M Gomathi, 2019. “Design of
inductively degenerated common source RF CMOS Low Noise Amplifier”, Sadhna, 44(4):1-4, https://doi.org/10.1007/s12046-018-1017-5
Malti
Bansal, Diksha Singh, 2019. “Cascode
Common Source LNA with Inductive Degeneration Topology utilizing Different
Output Matching Circuits in 45nm CMOS Technology”, Proceedings of the Fourth International
Conference on Communication and Electronics Systems (ICCES 2019), 595-599.
Zhang
L. et. al., 2026. “A 78-106-GHz Current-Reuse LNA with4-dB
Minimum NF and 12.5-mW Power Consumption Based on 130-nm SiGe Technology”, IEEE
Microwave and Wireless Technology Letters, 35(3):330-333,
https://doi.org/10.1109/LMWT.2025.3527522.
D.V.Prasad,
RLBR Prasad Reddy, Dr. Mahesh Mudavath. 2022. “Design and Implementation of CMOS CS-Cascode Low Noise
Amplifier”, International
Journal for Research Trends and Innovation, 7(10):297-304.
S.Udaya
shankar, M.Davidson Kamala dhas, 2015. “Design and Performance Measure of 5.4 GHZ CMOS Low
Noise Amplifier using Current Reuse Technique in 0.18μm Technology”, Procedia Computer Science,
47:135-143.
K.
suganthi, B. venila, M. S. abirami, Ritam dutta, 2022. “Low Noise Amplifier design with current reuse
architecture and pre-distortion technique for nanoelectronic sensors operating
at 2.4 GHz”, Journal of Nano- and Electronic Physics, 14(3):003006-1-003006-5, https://doi.org/10.21272/jnep.14(3).03006
Jin-Fa Chang, Yo-Sheng Lin, 2022.
“Complementary Current-Reused 3.7–11.9 GHz LNA Using Body-Floating and
Self-Bias Technique for Sub-6 GHz 5G Communications”, Circuits
System and Signal Processing, 41:5968–5989, https://doi.org/10.1007/s00034-022-02077-5.
A B Ibrahim, N H
Kahar, C G Che Kob, A R Othman, 2020. “Cascode Low Noise Amplifier
(LNA) with Negative Feedback for Long Term Evolution (LTE)”, Proceedings of ICATAS-MJJIC 2020, 1051:012027,
https://doi.org/10.1088/1757-899X/1051/1/012027
Y.
Yuan, B. Yuan, J. Li, Z. Wang, J. Zeng and Z. Yu, 2024. "A
Broadband Cascode Low-Noise Amplifier Using Transformer Feedback and Darlington
Techniques," IEEE Transactions on Circuits and Systems II: Express
Briefs, 71(1): 41-45, https://doi.org/10.1109/TCSII.2023.3303437.
E. Kobal, T. Siriburanon, R. B. Staszewski and A.
Zhu, 2023. "A Compact, Low-Power, Low-NF, Millimeter-Wave Cascode
LNA With Magnetic Coupling Feedback in 22-nm FD-SOI CMOS for 5G
Applications," in IEEE Transactions on Circuits and Systems II:
Express Briefs, 70(4):1331-1335, https://doi.org/10.1109/TCSII.2022.3224412
H. Majeed and V.
Singh, 2022. "A common-gate, gm-boosting LNA using active
inductor-based input matching for 3.1–10.6 GHz UWB applications", Electrica.,
22(2):173-187, https://doi.org/10.54614/electrica.2022.21136
Maryam Rafati, Seyed Ruhallah
Qasemi, Ali Nejati, Parviz Amiri, 2019. “A gm-Boosting 3-5 GHz Noise-Cancelling LNA”, 27th
Iranian Conference on Electrical Engineering (ICEE2019), 376-379, 2019, https://doi.org/10.1109/IranianCEE.2019.8786680
H.
Dong, K. Wang, G. Yang, S. Ma and K. Ma, 2023. "A 0.4-to-30 GHz
CMOS Low Noise Amplifier With Input-Referred Noise Reduction and
Coupled-Inductive-Peaking Technique," IEEE Microwave and Wireless
Technology Letters, 33(6):859-862, https://doi.org/10.1109/LMWT.2023.3268096
Amir Hossein Kazemi, Mohsen Hayati, 2021. “Analysis and design of
ultra-wideband low noise amplifier using complementary structure with series
inductive peaking technique and shunt feedback”, International
Journal of Circuit Theory and Applications, 49(10):3209-3229 https://doi.org/10.1002/cta.3039
Kim M-S, Yoo S-S. 2023. “RF-SOI Low-Noise
Amplifier Using RC Feedback and Series Inductive-Peaking Techniques for 5G New
Radio Application”, Sensors, 23(13):5808, https://doi.org/10.3390/s23135808
S.N. Shukla, S. Shamroz Arshad, and G. Srivastava. 2023.
"Novel complementary Sziklai pair based high gain low noise small-signal
amplifiers." International Journal of Power Electronics and Drive
Systems (IJPEDS) 14(4):2283-2292, https://doi.org/10.11591/ijpeds.v14.i4.pp2283-2292
P. T. Nguyen, N. L. K. Nguyen, N. S. Wagner, A. Stameroff and
A. -V. Pham, 2023. "A Balanced Darlington Cell for a 3–230-GHz InP
Distributed Amplifier," in IEEE Transactions on Microwave Theory
and Techniques, 72(7):4043-4057 https://doi.org/10.1109/TMTT.2023.3339017
SN
Shukla, S Shamroz Arshad, K. Thakur, and G. Srivastava. 2024.
"Issues and Challenges in Small-Signal Low-Power Amplifiers: A
Review." Indian Journal of Science and Technology 17(36):3787-3799,
https://doi.org/10.17485/IJST/v17i36.2171.
S. Shamroz Arshad, G. Srivastava, S.N. Shukla,
M.B.I. Reaz, E. Kurniawan, and M.N. Mohanty. 2026. “Low Power
Electronically Tunable Compound Sziklai pair based Low Noise Amplifier for High
Frequency Applications”, Journal of Circuit, Systems and Computers, https://doi.org/10.1142/S021812662650204X
(Online Ready)