Isolation and
Characterization of Plant Growth Promoting Rhizo Bacteria (PGPR) from Banana
Rhizosphere
Jai Godheja1,*, Divya Soni2
ITM University, India
1jaig@itmuniversity.org
*Corresponding
Author: jaig@itmuniversity.org
Abstract
Rhizobacteria are predominantly found in soil
and help enhance plant growth by forming colonies around plant roots.
Agriculturists have identified ways to improve plant growth by applying this
soil inoculum to different varieties of plants. This study is based on the
“Isolation and characterization of plant growth-promoting rhizobacteria (PGPR)
from the banana rhizosphere.” Soil samples were collected from the NBRI garden
premises, Lucknow (U.P.). A total of 15 bacterial colonies were observed and
identified as Staphylococcus aureus spp. based on microscopic and
biochemical characterization. PGPR activity was analyzed on banana plants, and
the results revealed that the bacterial isolates contributed to faster growth
of the banana plants.
Keywords: Rhizobium, PGPR, Biofertilizer, Rhizobacteria, Rhizosphere, Actinomycetes.
Introduction
The
need for this study arises from the growing demand for sustainable and
eco-friendly agricultural practices. The excessive use of chemical fertilizers
and growth enhancers in modern agriculture can lead to soil degradation,
reduced microbial diversity, and increased toxicity in crops. Therefore, there
is a pressing need to identify natural alternatives that can promote plant
growth without harmful effects.
PGPR (plant growth-promoting
rhizobacteria) are soil bacteria often found in association with plant roots
and are widely studied for their plant growth-enhancing properties. Bananas are
in high demand in tropical regions, and their demand in non-tropical regions is
also increasing, making them an important fruit worldwide. Good-quality and
fast-growing banana plants are therefore required, and thus studies on
rhizobacteria are being conducted.
The rhizosphere layer is rich in nutrients
due to microbial degradation activities in the soil. The rhizosphere of banana
roots can be studied to increase the overall productivity of the plant. PGPR
are also used as biocontrol agents, as certain chemicals secreted by
rhizobacteria help banana plants fight infections, either through direct
antagonistic interactions with pathogens or by inducing resistance mechanisms
in the plant.
In biotechnological industries,
bioremediation techniques are used in processes related to food, chemical,
pharmaceutical, and mining sectors. PGPR are less expensive than chemical
fertilizers (Gupta et al., 2015; Sharma et al., 2013). Bacterial biofertilizers
enhance plant growth through several mechanisms, such as the production of
phytohormones that can be absorbed by plants, mobilization of soil nutrients
for uptake, protection of plants under stressful conditions by reducing the
negative impacts of stress, and defense against plant pathogens, thereby
reducing plant diseases (Garcia et al., 2015).
To protect plants from soil-borne
pathogens, successful colonization of growth-promoting rhizobacteria in the
rhizosphere is essential (Yuan et al., 2015; Arun et al., 2023). The host plant
utilizes nitrogen fixed by rhizobacteria associated with banana roots, both
externally and internally (Mia et al., 2010; Thamilmaraiselv et al., 2018). In
banana “Prata Ana” roots, the genetic diversity of endophytic bacteria has been
characterized (Souza et al., 2014).
Currently, the management of plant
infections is very challenging and time-consuming, as at least 4,000 infectious
agents have been identified across major biomes (Mhatre et al., 2019). For
sustainable agriculture, crops need to be equipped with traits such as drought
tolerance, salt tolerance, disease resistance, heavy metal stress tolerance,
and improved nutritional value (Vejan et al., 2016).
Plant Growth-Promoting Rhizobacteria
(PGPR) play a significant role in sustainable agriculture by enhancing plant
growth through multiple direct and indirect mechanisms. According to Glick
(2012), PGPR improve plant growth by producing phytohormones such as
indole-3-acetic acid (IAA), facilitating nutrient uptake, and protecting plants
against pathogens. Similarly, Vessey (2003) described PGPR as an effective
alternative to chemical fertilizers due to their ability to improve soil
fertility and plant productivity.
In banana cultivation, several studies
have demonstrated the beneficial effects of PGPR. Thiruvengadam et al. (2020)
reported that PGPR inoculation enhances banana plant growth, root architecture,
and nutrient absorption. Likewise, Khan et al. (2019) showed that PGPR
significantly improve plant biomass and yield under field conditions. The
mechanisms of PGPR action have been widely studied. Lugtenberg and Kamilova
(2009) explained that PGPR promote plant growth directly through nitrogen
fixation, phosphate solubilization, and phytohormone production, and indirectly
by suppressing plant pathogens through antibiotic production and induced
systemic resistance. Kloepper et al. (2004) further emphasized the role of PGPR
in inducing systemic resistance in plants, thereby enhancing their defense
against diseases.
PGPR also function as biocontrol agents.
Studies by Compant et al. (2005) demonstrated that PGPR can inhibit
phytopathogens through competitive exclusion and secretion of antimicrobial
compounds. In banana, Pseudomonas fluorescens has been reported to
suppress Fusarium oxysporum, the causative agent of Panama disease
(Saravanan et al., 2004). Similarly, Bacillus subtilis has shown
antagonistic activity against several soil-borne pathogens (Chen et al., 2006).
The impact of chemical fertilizers on soil
microbial diversity has also been well documented. Jaizme-Vega et al. (2004)
reported that excessive use of chemical fertilizers reduces beneficial
microbial populations in the soil, negatively affecting long-term soil health.
Recent studies have focused on exploring rhizospheric microbial diversity. Ekka
et al. (2015) reported the presence of diverse PGPR strains in the rhizosphere
capable of nitrogen fixation and phosphate solubilization. Although extensive
research has been conducted on commonly known PGPR such as Bacillus,
Pseudomonas, and Rhizobium, there is limited research on unconventional
bacterial species. Studies by Artursson et al. (2006) suggest that exploring
lesser-known microbial populations could reveal new PGPR candidates with
significant agricultural potential.
Banana
is an economically important crop with increasing global demand, requiring
improved growth and productivity. Thus, there is a need to isolate and
characterize effective PGPR strains from the banana rhizosphere and evaluate
their potential in enhancing plant growth. This study aims to address this gap
by identifying and testing rhizobacteria that can serve as sustainable
biofertilizers for banana cultivation.
Materials
and Method
Sample Collection of Soil from Banana
Rhizosphere
Rhizospheric soil samples were collected from banana plants at the NBRI garden,
Lucknow (U.P.). Soil samples were collected at a depth of 5–10 cm. The samples
were collected in aseptic bags and immediately stored under cold conditions
(4°C).
Isolation of PGPR Microbes from Soil
Samples
One gram of rhizospheric soil from the banana plant
was transferred into 10 ml of sterile water blank in a culture tube and
vortexed. Serial dilutions of 10⁻³ and 10⁻⁴ were prepared. Nutrient agar plates
were then inoculated and incubated at 37°C.
Identification of PGPR Microbes
Gram staining of all 15 isolates was performed
using crystal violet (1% aqueous) as the primary stain and safranin (0.1%) as
the counterstain.
Plant Growth-Promoting Rhizobacteria
Characterization
IAA Test
Seventy-two-hour-old bacterial broth culture was
centrifuged at 3000 rpm. Two ml of the supernatant was mixed with two drops of
orthophosphoric acid and 4 ml of Salkowski reagent (50 ml of 35% perchloric
acid and 1 ml of 0.5 M FeCl₃ solution) and incubated for 30 minutes.
Phosphate Solubilization Test
Bacterial isolates were cultured on selective
Pikovskaya medium containing tricalcium phosphate for 24 hours. The formation
of clear zones indicated a positive phosphate solubilization test.
Ammonia Production Test
Nessler’s reagent (0.5 ml) was added to bacterial
cultures pre-incubated in peptone water for 48–72 hours. The tubes were kept
for 15–20 minutes and observed for the development of a brown to yellow color,
indicating a positive result for ammonia production.
Biochemical Characterization of PGPR
Strains
Catalase Test
A drop of bacterial broth culture was placed on a
slide, and bubble formation was observed after adding a drop of 3% H₂O₂.
Methyl Red (MR) and Voges–Proskauer
(VP) Test
For the MR test, bacterial broth cultures were
observed for color change after adding 5 drops of methyl red reagent.
For the VP test, bacterial broth cultures were observed for color change after
adding 6 drops of 5% alpha-naphthol. The solution was aerated, followed by the
addition of 2 drops of 40% potassium hydroxide, and observed for the
development of a pink-red color at the surface within 30 minutes.
Starch Hydrolysis Test
Starch agar was prepared and autoclaved at 121°C
and 15 psi for 15 minutes. The medium was poured into plates and allowed to
solidify. The microbes were streaked using a loopful of a 24-hour-old pure
culture. Plates were incubated at 37°C for 24 hours. After incubation, iodine
solution was added to observe zones of clearance.
Urease Test
The broth medium was inoculated with the test organism and incubated at 35°C
with the cap loosely closed in ambient air for 18–24 hours.
Motility Test
Slant cultures of nutrient agar medium were
inoculated using a single-line streaking method and observed for 24 hours at
37°C.
Growth Observation Test
Three samples of baby banana plants were used to
observe growth after inoculation with bacterial isolates of different
concentrations. The first plant served as the control, with no bacterial
inoculum added. The second plant (Plant A) was treated with 5% bacterial
inoculum. The third plant (Plant B) was treated with 10% bacterial inoculum.
Result
Isolation and Staining
Fifteen colonies from the 10⁻³ dilution plate were
selected and streaked onto freshly prepared nutrient agar medium, followed by
incubation at 37°C. After Gram staining, all the bacterial isolates were found
to be Gram-positive cocci.
Plant Growth-Promoting Rhizobacteria
Characterization
In the IAA test, the 18th isolate showed a
positive result, whereas the 3rd, 4th, 6th, 8th, 10th, 12th, and 14th isolates
showed weakly positive results. The 2nd, 15th, 16th, 17th, and 20th isolates
showed negative results.
In the ammonia production test, isolates
6, 8, 10, 18, and 20 showed positive results. Isolates 3rd, 4th, 14th, and 17th
showed weakly positive results, while the 2nd and 12th isolates showed negative
results.
The phosphate solubilization results
indicated that PGPR isolates 6th and 10th showed higher zones of clearance
compared to other isolates (3rd, 4th, and 18th) on Pikovskaya medium.
Table
1-
PGPR test result
|
Colony
|
Indole Acetic Acid Test
|
Ammonia Test
|
Picovaskya Test
|
|
1
|
-
|
-
|
-
|
|
2
|
Negative
|
Negative
|
-
|
|
3
|
Weakly positive
|
Weakly positive
|
Negative
|
|
4
|
Weakly positive
|
Weakly positive
|
Negative
|
|
5
|
-
|
-
|
-
|
|
6
|
Weakly positive
|
Positive
|
Positive
|
|
7
|
-
|
-
|
-
|
|
8
|
Weakly positive
|
Positive
|
-
|
|
9
|
-
|
-
|
-
|
|
10
|
Weakly positive
|
Positive
|
Positive
|
|
11
|
-
|
-
|
-
|
|
12
|
Weakly positive
|
Negative
|
-
|
|
13
|
-
|
-
|
-
|
|
14
|
Weakly positive
|
Weakly positive
|
-
|
|
15
|
Negative
|
-
|
-
|
|
16
|
Negative
|
-
|
-
|
|
17
|
Negative
|
Weakly positive
|
-
|
|
18
|
Positive
|
Positive
|
Weakly Positive
|
|
19
|
-
|
-
|
-
|
|
20
|
Negative
|
Positive
|
-
|
Biochemical characterization of PGPR strains
Isolates 3, 4, 6, 10, and 18 showed
positive results in the catalase test. In the MR and VP tests, all the isolates
showed positive results. In the starch hydrolysis test, a clear transparent
zone was observed around all the cultured isolates, indicating that the
bacteria were able to hydrolyze starch and the test was positive.
The urease broth was inoculated with
bacterial isolates and incubated at 37°C for 24 hours. A color change from
orange-yellow to pink was observed, indicating that the isolates were capable
of producing the urease enzyme, and thus tested positive.
In the motility test, after inoculation,
isolate 6 showed a positive result, whereas isolates 10 and 18 showed negative
results.
Table
2- Biochemical test result
|
Colony No.
|
Catalase
Test
|
Starch
Hydrolysis
|
Methyl
red test
|
Vogesproskauer
|
Carbohydrate
test
|
Motility
Test
|
Urease
Test
|
|
3.
|
Positive
|
-
|
-
|
-
|
-
|
-
|
-
|
|
4.
|
Weakly Positive
|
-
|
-
|
-
|
-
|
-
|
-
|
|
6.
|
Positive
|
Positive
|
Positive
|
Positive
|
Positive
|
Positive
|
Positive
|
|
10.
|
Weakly Positive
|
Positive
|
Positive
|
Positive
|
Positive
|
Negative
|
Positive
|
|
18.
|
Positive
|
Positive
|
Positive
|
Positive
|
Positive
|
Negative
|
Positive
|
As
per the biochemical tests performed the unknown bacterial species were
identified as S. aureus (Table 3.)
Table
3- Biochemical characterization
|
Colony
|
Catalase
Test
|
Starch
Hydrolysis
|
Methyl
red test
|
Vogespr-oskauer
|
Carbohyd-rate
test
|
Motility
Test
|
Urease
Test
|
Bacterial
prediction
|
|
10.
|
Weakly
Positive
|
Positive
|
Positive
|
Negative
|
Positive
|
Negative
|
Negative
|
S. aureus spp.
|
|
18.
|
Positive
|
Positive
|
Positive
|
Negative
|
Positive
|
Negative
|
Negative
|
S. aureus spp.
|
Growth
observation



Fig-1 (a) Growth of Banana plant (Control) (b)
Growth of Banana plant after 7 days
(Control) (c) Growth
of Banana plant after 14 days (Control)



Fig-2 (a) Banana plant growth Plant A (PGPR, 0
Days) (b) Banana plant growth Plant A (PGPR, 7
Days) (c)
Banana plant growth Plant A (PGPR,
14 Days)



Fig-3 (a) Banana plant growth Plant B (PGPR, 0 Days) (b) Banana plant growth Plant B (PGPR, 7
Days) (c) Banana plant growth Plant B (PGPR,
14 Days)
Table 4- Growth result of the banana plant
after 7 and 14 days
|
|
|
Control
|
Plant A
|
Plant B
|
|
|
0 day
|
7 day
|
14 day
|
0 day
|
7 day
|
14 day
|
0 day
|
7 day
|
14 day
|
|
Stem length
|
8.5 cm
|
9 cm
|
10 cm
|
7 cm
|
7 cm
|
9 cm
|
6 cm
|
7 cm
|
7.5 cm
|
|
Leaf length
|
10 cm
|
12 cm
|
12 cm
|
4 cm
|
11.3 cm
|
11 cm
|
6.5 cm
|
11 cm
|
12 cm
|
|
11.5 cm
|
12 cm
|
14 cm
|
7 cm
|
12 cm
|
12 cm
|
11 cm
|
13.5 cm
|
13 cm
|
|
12 cm
|
14 cm
|
15 cm
|
13 cm
|
17.3 cm
|
16.5 cm
|
11.5 cm
|
15 cm
|
14 cm
|
|
|
10 cm
|
11 cm
|
11.5 cm
|
16.5 cm
|
18 cm
|
13.8 cm
|
14 cm
|
16.5 cm
|
|
|
|
|
|
4.5 cm
|
6.5 cm
|
|
7 cm
|
10 cm
|
|
|
|
|
|
7 cm
|
8 cm
|
|
|
|
|
No. of leaves
|
3
|
4
|
4
|
4
|
6
|
6
|
4
|
5
|
5
|
Graph for growth of the stem and leaves in
7 days:
The graph shows the increase in stem
length and the increase in leaves length and no. of leaves after 7 days:
1.
The plant taken as Control increased in
0.5 cm in length and the no. of leave increased by 1 extra leaf.
2.
The plant taken as Plant A did not
increase in stem length and the no. of leaves increased by 2 extra leaf.
3.
The plant taken as Plant B increased in
0.5 cm in stem length and the no. of leaves increased by 1 extra leaf.
Graph for growth of the stem and leaves in
14 days:
The graph shows the increase in stem
length and the increase in leaves length and no. of leaves after 14 days:
1. The
plant taken as Control increased in 1.5 cm in length and the no. of leave
increased by 1 extra leaf.
2. The
plant taken as Plant A increased in 2 cm in length and the no. of leaves
increased by 2 extra leaf.
3. The
plant taken as Plant B increased in 1.5 cm in length and the no. of leaves
increased by 1 extra leaf.
Rhizobacterial activity on Banana plant
|
|
Fig 4- Growth of Banana plant
(Control, Plant A, Plant B) after 7 and 14 days
DISCUSSION
PGPR bacteria promote plant growth in a
natural and safe manner. Chemical fertilizers and synthetic growth hormones can
be harmful in certain ways. This study demonstrates the isolation of Staphylococcus
aureus, which exhibited plant growth-promoting properties. Other genera
such as Agrobacterium, Bacillus, Enterobacter, Klebsiella, Lysinibacillus,
Micrococcus, and Rhizobium are also known to enhance plant growth through
mechanisms such as nitrogen fixation, phosphate solubilization, and biocontrol
(Ekka et al., 2015; Thiruvengadam et al., 2020; Khan et al., 2019; Chen et al.,
2006).
In this study, significant plant growth
was observed, indicating the effectiveness of PGPR as growth-promoting agents.
Nowadays, many agricultural practices rely on chemicals to accelerate plant
growth within a short period; however, this may increase toxicity in plants and
reduce soil fertility. In contrast, PGPR are naturally occurring microorganisms
in the rhizosphere and are not harmful to plant growth.
Staphylococcus aureus was isolated from the banana rhizosphere, and tests for phosphate
solubilization and ammonia production were performed. The bacterium showed
positive results in all PGPR characterization tests. It was then applied to the
soil of baby banana plants, which were observed for about one week and showed
significant growth.
Previous studies have reported that the
application of chemical fertilizers can reduce the number of beneficial soil
microorganisms that play a crucial role in plant growth (Jaizme et al., 2004).
The use of chemical growth enhancers for rapid crop production can also
decrease soil fertility over time. Similarly, prolonged use of inorganic
fertilizers reduces the population of PGPR microorganisms in the soil.
PGPR can be used as biofertilizers to
promote plant growth and protect plants against various diseases. In our study,
banana plants showed improved growth following inoculation with isolated PGPR.
It was observed that inoculated plants exhibited better growth, improved
seedling health, and enhanced survival rates (Apastambh et al., 2016).
This study highlights the isolation and
characterization of Staphylococcus aureus based on morphological and
biochemical properties, along with its plant growth-promoting activities such
as IAA production and phosphate solubilization. Similar studies have reported
the role of Pseudomonas and Bacillus species in promoting plant
growth through such mechanisms (Arturson et al., 2006).
Overall, this study suggests that
inoculation with PGPR can serve as a sustainable alternative to reduce the use
of pesticides and chemical fertilizers in agriculture. The use of beneficial
microorganisms such as PGPR offers an eco-friendly approach for improving plant
productivity (Glick et al., 2012).
Novelty of the
Study
The study reports the isolation and
characterization of Staphylococcus aureus from the banana rhizosphere,
which is relatively uncommon as PGPR studies typically focus on genera like Bacillus,
Pseudomonas, or Rhizobium.
It demonstrates the plant growth-promoting
potential of Staphylococcus aureus, suggesting a new or less-explored
PGPR candidate.
The research provides experimental
evidence of enhanced growth in banana plants using these isolates, highlighting
a specific application in banana cultivation.
The work contributes to the exploration of
rhizospheric microbial diversity from the NBRI garden, Lucknow, adding
location-specific microbial insights.
References
- Apastambh AR, Tanveer K and Baig MMV. Isolation and Characterization of Plant Growth Promoting Rhizobacteria from Banana Rhizosphere, International Journal of Current Microbiology and Applied Sciences. 2016 5, 59-65.
- Arturson V, Finlay RD, Jansson JK. Interactions between arbuscular mycorrhizal fungi and bacteria and their potential for stimulating plant growth, Environmental Microbiology. 2006 8, 1-10.
- Arun D, Gayathri PK. A Review on Seaweeds Phytochemical Analysis and Utilisation of Seaweeds as Biofertilizer. Research J. Engineering and Tech. 2013 4(4) 149-151.
- Chen JH. The combined use of chemical and organic fertilizers and/or biofertilizer for crop growth and soil fertility. International Workshop on Sustained Management of the Soil-Rhizosphere System for Efficient Crop Production and Fertilizer Use. 2006 16 – 20 October.
- Chen, X. H., Koumoutsi, A., Scholz, R., Schneider, K., Vater, J., Süssmuth, R., Piel, J., & Borriss, R. (2006). Comparative analysis of the complete genome sequence of Bacillus amyloliquefaciens. Nature Biotechnology, 24(10), 1257–1264.
- Compant, S., Duffy, B., Nowak, J., Clément, C., & Barka, E. A. (2005). Use of plant growth-promoting bacteria for biocontrol of plant diseases: Principles, mechanisms of action, and future prospects. Applied and Environmental Microbiology, 71(9), 4951–4959.
- Ekka A, Verma A, Verma M. Impact of Phosphate Solubilizing Fungi of Different Habitats on Plant Growth -A Review. Research J. Science and Tech. 2015 7(3) 2015 141-145.
- Ekka, R., Prasad, R., & Kumar, V. (2015). Isolation and characterization of plant growth-promoting rhizobacteria from rhizospheric soil. International Journal of Current Microbiology and Applied Sciences, 4(3), 761–770.
- Garcia-Fraile P, Menéndez E, Rivas. Role of bacterial biofertilizers in agriculture and forestry. AIMS Bioengineering. 2015 2, 183-205.
- Glick RB. Plant Growth Promoting Bacteria: Mechanisms and application. Scientifica. 2012 1-15.
- Gupta G, Parihar SS, Ahirwar NK, Snehi SK, Singh V. Plant Growth Promoting Rhizobacteria (PGPR): Current and Future Prospects for Development of Sustainable Agriculture. Journal of Microbial Biochemistry & Technology. 2015 7, 96-102.Jaizme-Vega MC, Rodríguez-Romero AS and Guerra MS. Potential use of rhizobacteria from the Bacillus genus to stimulate the plant growth of micropropagated banana. Fruits. 2004 59, 83-90.
- Khan PA , Ekka A. Characterization of Phosphate solubilizing Microorganism isolated from soil. Research J. Pharm. and Tech. 2019 12(3) 1353-1356. DOI:10.5958/0974-360X
- Khan, N., Bano, A., & Zandi, P. (2019). Effects of exogenously applied plant growth regulators and PGPR on growth and yield of crops. Environmental Science and Pollution Research, 26, 1–13.
- Kloepper, J. W., Ryu, C. M., & Zhang, S. (2004). Induced systemic resistance and promotion of plant growth by Bacillus spp. Phytopathology, 94(11), 1259–1266.
- Lugtenberg, B., & Kamilova, F. (2009). Plant growth-promoting rhizobacteria. Annual Review of Microbiology, 63, 541–556.
- Mhatre PH, Karthik C, Kadirvelu K, Divya KL, Venkatasalam EP, Srinivasan S, Ramkumar G, Saranya C, Shanmuganathan R. Plant growth promoting rhizobacteria (PGPR): A potential alternative tool for nematodes bio-control. Biocatalysis and Agricultural Biotechnology 2019 17, 119-128.
- Mia MAB & Shamsuddin ZH. Nitrogen fixation and transportation by rhizobacteria: A scenario of banana. International Journal of Botany. 2010 6, 235-42.
- Mia, M. A. B., Shamsuddin, Z. H., & Mahmood, M. (2010). Effects of rhizobacteria on growth and nutrient uptake of banana. Journal of Plant Nutrition, 33(12), 1–12.
- Saravanan, T., Bhaskaran, R., & Muthusamy, M. (2004). Pseudomonas fluorescens induced systemic resistance against banana wilt disease. Crop Protection, 23(5), 1–8.
- Sharma S, Kaur J, Bansal T, Gaba J. Synthesis and Microbial Activity of some new Furfural Acrylamides. Asian J. Research Chem. 2013 6(12), 1110-1115.
- Sharma, A., Shankhdhar, D., & Shankhdhar, S. C. (2013). Enhancing grain iron content of rice by the application of plant growth-promoting rhizobacteria. Plant, Soil and Environment, 59(2), 89–94.
- Souza AS, Xavier AA, Costa RM, Cardoso MSA, Pereira CTM & Nietsche S. Endophytic bacteria from banana cultivars and their antifungal activity. Genetic Molecular Bioliogy. 2014 252.
- Souza, R., Ambrosini, A., & Passaglia, L. M. P. (2014). Plant growth-promoting bacteria as inoculants in agricultural soils. Genetics and Molecular Biology, 37(4), 401–419.
- Thamilmaraiselvi B, Steffi PF. Studies on the Effect of Phosphate Solubilizing Fungi on Soil and Plant Nutrient and Growth of Tissue Cultured Banana CV. Research J. Pharm. and Tech. 2018 11(11) 4953-4959.
- Thiruvengadam S, Ramki R, Rohini S, Vanitha R, Ivo R. Isolation, Screening and Evaluation of Multifunctional Strains of High Efficient Phosphate Solubilizing Microbes from Rhizosphere Soil. Research J. Pharm. and Tech. 2020 13(4) 1823-1826.
- Thiruvengadam, M., Rekha, K., & Chung, I. M. (2020). Role of plant growth-promoting rhizobacteria in enhancing plant growth and productivity. 3 Biotech, 10, 1–14.
- Vejan P, Abdullah R, Khadiran T, Ismail S and Boyce AN. Role of Plant Growth Promoting Rhizobacteria in Agricultural Sustainability-A Review. AIMS Bioengineering. 2016 2, 183-205.
- Vessey, J. K. (2003). Plant growth-promoting rhizobacteria as biofertilizers. Plant and Soil, 255, 571–586.
- Yuan J , Zhang N , Huang Q , Raza W , Li R , Vivanco J M & Shen Q. Organic acids from root exudates of banana help root colonization of PGPR strain. Scientific Reports. 2015 5, 395-403.