Investigation on Groundwater Quality in
Sukma Bastar District, Chhattisgarh
1 Subrat Verma, 1 Shobhana Ramteke and 1Manas
Kanti Deb
1School of Studies in Environmental Science, Pt. Ravishankar Shukla
University, Raipur-492010, CG, India
Abstract. Groundwater is the most precious resource on the
earth's surface, providing fresh drinking water for human beings and
supplying water for plants to survive. The shortage, unavailability, and
pollution of fresh drinking water is an emerging issue in almost
every part of the world. The present study objectively analyzes the physicochemical
parameters and trace elements in Sukma Block of Bastar District in Chhattisgarh
region. The analysis of physicochemical parameters of 17 groundwater samples
during the month of January 2024 were examined, namely as pH, T°C, EC,
TDS, Salt, DO, O2, TH, TA, K+, Na+, Ca2+,
Mg2+, Cl-. The value of T°C, pH, DO, RP, EC,
TDS, TH, Na+, K+, Mg2+, Ca2+ , Cl-
, TH and Alkalinity of the water (n = 17) was ranged from 28.5˚C - 32˚C, 6.75 –
7.17, 0.95 – 1.64 mg/L, 1.7 – 16.3 mV, 62 - 488 μS/cm, 38 - 321 mg/L, 130 - 400
mg/L, 6 – 38 , 11 - 60, 80 - 250, 60 - 210, 50 - 150, 130 – 400 and 125 - 450
mg/L with mean value of 29.82˚C ± 0.494˚C, 6.96 ± 0.065, 1.26 ± 0.102 mg/L,
7.92 ± 1.853 mV, 215.35 ± 56.049 μS/cm, 138.06 ± 37.649 mg/L, 246.47 ± 32.062
mg/L, 18.29 ± 4.224, 29.4 ± 7.152, 125.71 ± 20.138, 113.53 ± 20.094 , 92.12 ±
14.853, 246.47 ± 32.062 and 261.76 ± 53.33mg/L, respectively. The results
showed that among various locations, many of the estimated physico-chemical
parameters are more or less within the acceptable limits given by WHO except at
few locations. The purpose of the dissertation work is to ensure the
quality of Sukma Area groundwater that it is acceptable for drinking purpose or
not. The water quality index (WQI) used for rating of the water quality".
Keywords: Identification,
Qualitative analysis, Groundwater, WQI
Introduction
Ground water is an important resource for drinking
and agriculture purposes. Groundwater uses and applications are often related
to its composition, which is increasingly influenced by various human
activities [1]. In fact the water quality of groundwater was affected by many
factors including precipitation, surface runoff, groundwater flow, and the
characteristics of the catchment area. The over extraction of groundwater
caused huge weathering of the meta-morphic rocks. The sukma district,
Chhattisgarh, India is a rice producing area, taking multiple crops by using
the water resources [2-15]. The water is hard with contamination of Ca2+,
Cl− and Mg2+ at hazardous levels. In this work, the
groundwater quality of sukma district (area ≈ 4000 km2) is
described. The Bastar district covers an
area of 10577.7 sq. km. It consists of 1087 no of villages. For administrative
convenience these villages are grouped into 12 no of development blocks.
Jagdalpur is the district headquarter. The block headquarters are Keshkal,
Baderajpur, Pharasgaon, Makri, Kondagaon, Bastar, Bakawand, Lohandiguda,
Tokapal, Bastanar, Darbha and Jagdalpur. The district is known for its forest
produce and mineral wealth [16-20].
The
Bastar Plateau Region
It
covers Bastar, Kondagaon, Narayanpur, Kanker, Bijapur, Sukma and Dantewada
districts lying on the southern parts of the State. Except Indravati River
plains, most of the area is covered by evergreen dense reserve forests and
hilly tracts. The major landforms are high-level plateaus, structural hills and
valleys and pediments and pediplains [21-25]. The altitude varies from 400 to
600 m amsl. In the plains of Indravati River covering central parts, and along
the Shabri River, covering southeastern parts the altitude varies from 250 to
300 m amsl. The ground water levels observed over a period provides valuable
information on the behaviour of the ground water regime, which is constantly
subjected to changes due to recharge and discharge phenomena [26-33].
Materials and methods
Study Area
Bastar
is a district located in the central Indian state of Chhattisgarh as presented
in Figure 1. It is situated between 19.5676 degrees
north and 81.6912 degrees east. Jagdalpur is the district headquarters of
Bastar and is surrounded by Nabarangpur and Koraput districts of Odisha state
to the east, Narayanpur district to the northwest, Kondagaon district to the
north and Dantewada and Sukma to the south. According to the census report, the
total population of the district is 8,34,873 people, living in a total area of
6,597 square kilometers. Geologically, the district is covered with gneiss,
granite, meta-sedimentary, basalt and gabbroic rocks and the landscape is
dominated by dense forest, with half the district being mountainous and rocky.
The soil of the district has widely varied such as loam, alfisol, red gravel
and red sandy, these are the soils that cover most of the area. The Sukma district included three
blocks: Chhindgarh, Konta and Sukma. The area of the district is ≈5897 km2
with population of 19100. The materials i.e. buildings, metals, pipes, etc. are
corroded due to acidic nature of water. In present investigation, the Sukma
Bastar district of Chhattisgarh state, central India has been selected for
groundwater quality studies and collected 17 samples to assess the contaminants
Table 1.
Study Collection
The
groundwater samples were collected from 17 locations of the town and nearby
villages, Figure
1.
The water was collected in the post monsoon period, January, 2024 in a 1-L cleaned polyethylene bottle
by using established methodology [16]. The bottle was ringed thrice with the
sampling water prior to collection and filled up to the mouth with the water.
The physical parameters i.e. pH, temperature (T), electrical conductivity (EC),
reduction potential (RP) and dissolved oxygen (DO) were measured at the spot.
Figure 1:
Sampling location in Sukma district, Chhattisgarh, India.
|
Table 1:
Representation of the groundwater sampling location of Sukma region.
|
|
S.No.
|
Date
|
Locations
|
Latitude
|
Longitude
|
|
1
|
05/01/2024
|
SK-1
|
18.392899
|
81.692985
|
|
2
|
05/01/2024
|
SK-2
|
18.398195
|
81.729490
|
|
3
|
05/01/2024
|
SK-3
|
18.386282
|
81.750802
|
|
4
|
05/01/2024
|
SK-4
|
18.397343
|
81.723013
|
|
5
|
05/01/2024
|
SK-5
|
18.386253
|
81.683493
|
|
6
|
05/01/2024
|
SK-6
|
18.387262
|
81.685504
|
|
7
|
05/01/2024
|
SK-7
|
18.388004
|
81.675576
|
|
8
|
06/01/2024
|
SK-8
|
18.396003
|
81.669874
|
|
9
|
06/01/2024
|
SK-9
|
18.396041
|
81.655298
|
|
10
|
06/01/2024
|
SK-10
|
18.392477
|
81.658176
|
|
11
|
06/01/2024
|
SK-11
|
18.387386
|
81.660336
|
|
12
|
06/01/2024
|
SK-12
|
18.40877
|
81.667525
|
|
13
|
06/01/2024
|
SK-13
|
18.414298
|
81.660303
|
|
14
|
07/01/2024
|
SK-14
|
18.489968
|
81.543120
|
|
15
|
07/01/2024
|
SK-15
|
18.526912
|
81.750056
|
|
16
|
07/01/2024
|
SK-16
|
18.322277
|
81.599094
|
|
17
|
07/01/2024
|
SK-17
|
18.373292
|
81.656855
|
|
SK-1= Kumharas;
SK-2= Jhapra; SK-3=Burdi; SK-4=Ramaram; SK-5=Navodaya; SK-6=Gyanodaya; SK-7=
Pawaras; SK-8= Srinagar; SK-9= Patnampara; SK-10= Sukma Bustand; SK-11=Sukma
Market; SK-12= Samratnagar; SK-13= Sodipara; SK-14= Gadiras; SK-15=Chindgarh;
SK-16=Gongla; SK-17= Kerlapal
|
Methodology
Hydrological Parameters sampling
The groundwater sampling network, based on
water uses and contamination sources is shown in Figure 1. The
hydrological parameters (i.e. age and depth) of 18 tube wells were recorded in
January 2024. The water sample was collected in the cleaned narrow polyethylene
250-mL bottle in duplicate during January 2024 [16]. The physical parameters
i.e. temperature (T), pH, dissolved oxygen (DO), reduction potential (RP) and
electrical conductivity (EC) were measured at the spot. The samples were
dispatched to the laboratory for the analysis by subsequent refrigerating at
−4˚C.
Analysis
The physical parameters such as temperature, pH, EC,
RP, DO, TDS and Salinity were examined in the laboratory at department by using
the HANNNA made sensors (model no.
pH7200) Various other chemical parameters such as TH, Ca2+,
Na+, K+, Mg2+ etc. were also analyzed in the
groundwater samples. The standard methods of analysis have been summarized in Figure
2.
Figure 2: Representation of the
analysis of groundwater samples.
Water Quality Index
The investigation is based on the secondary data which
is taken from the Central Ground Water Board, Department of Ground Water,
Raipur, Chhattisgarh. Water samples have been analysed for 7 physico-chemical
parameters such as pH, Calcium, Magnesium, Chloride, and Electrical
Conductivity in the laboratory as per the standard procedures of Bureau of
Indian Standards (BIS). The WQI has been calculated by using the standards of
drinking water quality recommended by World Health Organization [18], and Bureau
of Indian Standards [19]. The weighted Arithmetic index method has been used
for the calculation of WQI of the drinking water.
nking water (Table 2). The physico-Chemical parameters of
seventeen different stations (SK-1, SK-2, SK-3, SK-4, SK-5, SK-6…….SK-17) are
summarized (Table 2). There are some remarkable variations of
physico-chemical data are found at all the sixteen sampling sites in study area
(District Bastar). Some hidden forces like temperature changes in season to
season which are sometimes more controlling to some parameters like electrical
conductivity, pH etc. An example of calculation of WQI has been given in Table
2.
|
Table 2: Water
Quality Status based on WQI.
|
|
S.No.
|
Water Quality
Index
|
Status of Water
Quality
|
|
1
|
0 ̶
25
|
Excellent Water
Quality
|
|
2
|
26 ̶ 50
|
Good Water
Quality
|
|
3
|
51 ̶
75
|
Poor Water
Quality
|
|
4
|
76 ̶
100
|
Very Poor Water
Quality
|
|
5
|
>100
|
Unfit for
Drinking
|
Result and discussion
Physical Characteristics
of Ground water
The
physical parameters (i.e. age and depth of tube wells) and habitant population
were recorded with the help of public health engineering department, and data
are presented in Table 3, Figure 3. The value of T°C, pH, DO, RP, EC,
TDS and TH of the water (n = 18) was ranged from 28.5˚C - 32˚C, 6.75 – 7.17,
0.95 – 1.64 mg/L, 1.7 – 16.3 mV, 62 - 488 μS/cm, 38 - 321 mg/L and 130 - 400
mg/L with mean value of 29.82˚C ± 0.494˚C, 6.96 ± 0.065, 1.26 ± 0.102 mg/L,
7.92 ± 1.853 mV, 215.35 ± 56.049 μS/cm, 138.06 ± 37.649 mg/L and 246.47 ±
32.062 mg/L, respectively.
|
Table 3. Physical parameters of ground water in January,
2024.
|
|
S. No.
|
Locations
|
T
˚C
|
pH
|
EC,
µs/cm
|
TDS, mg/L
|
Salt,
mg/L
|
DO, mg/L
|
RP,
mV
|
|
1
|
SK-1
|
32°
|
7.08
|
198
|
118
|
85
|
1.64
|
11.8
|
|
2
|
SK-2
|
31.5°
|
7.07
|
135
|
83
|
60
|
1.58
|
11.0
|
|
3
|
SK-3
|
31.3°
|
7.17
|
356
|
251
|
174
|
1.51
|
10.7
|
|
4
|
SK-4
|
30.5°
|
7.13
|
62
|
38
|
26
|
1.52
|
16.3
|
|
5
|
SK-5
|
30.5°
|
6.79
|
100
|
67
|
47
|
1.42
|
15
|
|
6
|
SK-6
|
29.9°
|
6.79
|
209
|
132
|
78
|
1.14
|
5.4
|
|
7
|
SK-7
|
29.6°
|
7.1
|
160
|
103
|
70
|
0.95
|
5.2
|
|
8
|
SK-8
|
29.5°
|
7.02
|
90
|
57
|
38
|
1.33
|
8.2
|
|
9
|
SK-9
|
29.5°
|
7.01
|
108
|
67
|
47
|
1.30
|
7.7
|
|
10
|
SK-10
|
29.2°
|
6.84
|
252
|
156
|
113
|
1.24
|
1.7
|
|
11
|
SK-11
|
28.8°
|
6.80
|
488
|
321
|
229
|
0.98
|
3.9
|
|
12
|
SK-12
|
28.8°
|
6.98
|
223
|
129
|
96
|
1.22
|
6.1
|
|
13
|
SK-13
|
29.5°
|
6.99
|
250
|
159
|
115
|
1.18
|
6.4
|
|
14
|
SK-14
|
28.5
|
7.02
|
144
|
91
|
66
|
1.10
|
7.7
|
|
15
|
SK-15
|
28.7
|
6.79
|
311
|
201
|
141
|
0.98
|
4.6
|
|
16
|
SK-16
|
29.7
|
6.75
|
404
|
261
|
189
|
1.20
|
7.1
|
|
17
|
SK-17
|
28.8
|
6.96
|
171
|
113
|
81
|
1.11
|
5.8
|
|
SK-1= Kumharas; SK-2= Jhapra; SK-3=Burdi; SK-4=Ramaram;
SK-5=Navodaya; SK-6=Gyanodaya; SK-7= Pawaras; SK-8=
Srinagar; SK-9= Patnampara; SK-10= Sukma Bustand; SK-11=Sukma
Market; SK-12= Samratnagar; SK-13= Sodipara; SK-14=
Gadiras; SK-15=Chindgarh; SK-16=Gongla; SK-17=
Kerlapal
|
Figure 3:
Representation of Total concentration of the various physical parameters in different
groundwater samples.
Chemical
Characteristics of Water
The
chemical characteristics of the groundwater are presented in Table 4, Figure
4. The concentration of Na+,
K+, Mg2+, Ca2+, Cl-, TH and
Alkalinity was ranged from 6 – 38, 11 - 60, 80 - 250, 60 - 210, 50 - 150, 130 –
400 and 125 - 450 mg/L with mean value of 18.29 ± 4.224, 29.4 ± 7.152, 125.71 ±
20.138, 113.53 ± 20.094, 92.12 ± 14.853, 246.47 ± 32.062 and 261.76 ±
53.33mg/L, respectively. However, Mg2+ and
Ca2+ concentration was above recommended limit of 60 and 80 mg/L in
the 33 and 67% tube wells.
|
Table
4. Chemical parameters of ground
water in January, 2024. mg/L
|
|
S.No.
|
Locations
|
Date
|
Na+
|
K+
|
Ca2+
|
Mg2+
|
Cl-
|
TH
|
Alkalinity
|
|
1
|
SK-1
|
29/01/2024
|
10
|
18
|
90
|
80
|
128
|
170
|
275
|
|
2
|
SK-2
|
29/01/2024
|
6
|
11
|
60
|
95
|
80
|
230
|
225
|
|
3
|
SK-3
|
29/01/2024
|
18
|
48
|
110
|
130
|
150
|
210
|
300
|
|
4
|
SK-4
|
29/01/2024
|
12
|
20
|
200
|
250
|
50
|
190
|
325
|
|
5
|
SK-5
|
29/01/2024
|
16
|
15
|
210
|
160
|
60
|
130
|
225
|
|
6
|
SK-6
|
29/01/2024
|
14
|
18
|
150
|
80
|
130
|
260
|
425
|
|
7
|
SK-7
|
29/01/2024
|
25
|
18
|
110
|
125
|
70
|
320
|
200
|
|
8
|
SK-8
|
29/01/2024
|
28
|
20
|
90
|
132
|
50
|
250
|
125
|
|
9
|
SK-9
|
29/01/2024
|
25
|
35
|
80
|
140
|
80
|
170
|
175
|
|
10
|
SK-10
|
29/01/2024
|
33
|
50
|
70
|
90
|
100
|
280
|
200
|
|
11
|
SK-11
|
29/01/2024
|
11
|
21
|
150
|
85
|
150
|
270
|
425
|
|
12
|
SK-12
|
29/01/2024
|
12
|
21
|
100
|
120
|
95
|
230
|
125
|
|
13
|
SK-13
|
29/01/2024
|
38
|
28
|
80
|
145
|
100
|
250
|
150
|
|
14
|
SK-14
|
29/01/2024
|
16
|
50
|
90
|
160
|
85
|
350
|
125
|
|
15
|
SK-15
|
29/01/2024
|
22
|
43
|
100
|
95
|
70
|
400
|
400
|
|
16
|
SK-16
|
29/01/2024
|
15
|
60
|
120
|
150
|
88
|
260
|
450
|
|
17
|
SK-17
|
29/01/2024
|
10
|
25
|
120
|
100
|
80
|
220
|
300
|
|
SK-1= Kumharas; SK-2= Jhapra; SK-3=Burdi; SK-4=Ramaram;
SK-5=Navodaya; SK-6=Gyanodaya; SK-7= Pawaras; SK-8=
Srinagar; SK-9= Patnampara; SK-10= Sukma Bustand; SK-11=Sukma
Market; SK-12= Samratnagar; SK-13= Sodipara; SK-14=
Gadiras; SK-15=Chindgarh; SK-16=Gongla; SK-17= Kerlapal
|
Figure 4:
Representation of Total concentration of the various chemical parameters in
different groundwater samples.
Water
Quality Index
The
Water Quality Index of the groundwater in the sampling period was ranged from
22 - 226 with mean value of 97 ± 12. The value of TDS, TH in the water of all
groundwater was found above permissible limits of 500, 120, 300, 1.5 and 45
mg/L, respectively [35-36]. Generally, Na + Mg + Ca type of water was found to
exist in the groundwater aquifer of the Sukma area. In some locations, other
types of water i.e. Na + Mg + Ca + Cl were also marked. The value of TH, Mg,
and Ca content was found to be higher than recommended value of 200, 30, and 75
mg/L, respectively [19]-[20]. The value of WQI was ranged from 86 – 713
with mean value of 275±60 respectively. The classification of groundwater was
grouped on the basis of SH values, excellent (<20 %), good (20–40 %),
permissible (40–60 %), doubtful (60–80 %) and unsuitable (>80 %). However, in the pre monsoon period, the value
of Mg2+ and Ca2+ crossed significantly the prescribed
permissible limit of 30 and 75, making water unsafe for drinking purposes. It
means the water of the studied area was found to be sodic and hard in nature,
being unsuitable for the drinking purposes. They could be used for the
irrigation purposes but prolonged excessive extraction of the water may cause
adverse impacts in rice yields in near future.
Statistical Parameters of the Samples
The statistical parameters are been detected by
various physico-chemical characteristics with the mean value, Minimum, Maximum,
Standard deviation (Std) , Confidence limit (CL) and mean Concentration of
various groundwater samples which is been represented in Table 5.
|
Table 5: Statistical Parameters of the
Groundwater Samples in Baster Region.
|
|
S.No.
|
Parameters
|
Min
|
Max
|
Mean
|
Std
|
Conf Limit
|
Mean Conc
|
|
1
|
TºC
|
28.5
|
32
|
29.82
|
1.04
|
0.494
|
29.82 ± 0.495
|
|
2
|
pH
|
6.75
|
7.17
|
6.96
|
0.14
|
0.065
|
6.96 ± 0.065
|
|
3
|
EC
|
62
|
488
|
215.35
|
117.91
|
56.049
|
215.35 ± 56.049
|
|
4
|
TDS
|
38
|
321
|
138.06
|
79.2
|
37.649
|
138.06 ± 37.649
|
|
5
|
Salt
|
26
|
229
|
97.35
|
56.83
|
27.015
|
97.35 ± 27.015
|
|
6
|
DO
|
0.95
|
1.64
|
1.26
|
0.21
|
0.102
|
1.26 ± 0102
|
|
7
|
RP
|
1.7
|
16.3
|
7.92
|
3.9
|
1.853
|
7.92 ± 1.853
|
|
8
|
Na+
|
6
|
38
|
18.29
|
8.89
|
4.224
|
18.29 ± 4.224
|
|
9
|
K+
|
11
|
60
|
29.47
|
15.05
|
7.152
|
29.47 ± 7.152
|
|
10
|
Ca2+
|
60
|
210
|
113.53
|
42.27
|
20.094
|
113.53 ± 20.094
|
|
11
|
Mg2+
|
80
|
250
|
125.71
|
42.36
|
20.138
|
125.71 ± 20.138
|
|
12
|
Cl-
|
50
|
150
|
92.12
|
31.25
|
14.853
|
92.12 ± 14.853
|
|
13
|
TH
|
130
|
400
|
246.47
|
67.45
|
32.062
|
246.47 ± 32.062
|
|
14
|
Alkalinity
|
125
|
450
|
267.76
|
112.19
|
53.332
|
267.76 ± 53.332
|
Correlation Matrix
The EC were having a good correlation with TDS
and Salt. Similarly, K+ also shows good correlation with Cl-.
Similarly, RP which shows good correlation with DO and Mg2+ indicates
good correlation with Redox Potential. (see Table 6)
|
Table 6: Correlation Matrix of groundwater samples of Sukma
region.
|
|
|
TºC
|
pH
|
EC
|
TDS
|
Salt
|
DO
|
RP
|
Na+
|
K+
|
Ca2+
|
Mg2+
|
Cl-
|
TH
|
Alk
|
|
TºC
|
1
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
pH
|
0.451
|
1
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
EC
|
-0.192
|
-0.442
|
1
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
TDS
|
-0.173
|
-0.416
|
0.996
|
1
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Salt
|
-0.183
|
-0.406
|
0.995
|
0.997
|
1
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
DO
|
0.841
|
0.485
|
-0.373
|
-0.360
|
-0.350
|
1
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
RP
|
0.657
|
0.432
|
-0.493
|
-0.462
|
-0.456
|
0.777
|
1
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Na+
|
-0.268
|
-0.036
|
-0.030
|
-0.029
|
-0.027
|
-0.281
|
-0.394
|
1
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
K+
|
-0.303
|
-0.225
|
0.452
|
0.460
|
0.474
|
-0.227
|
-0.337
|
0.306
|
1
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Ca2+
|
0.055
|
-0.251
|
-0.066
|
-0.039
|
-0.061
|
0.033
|
0.490
|
-0.349
|
-0.285
|
1
|
|
|
|
|
|
Mg2+
|
0.025
|
0.318
|
-0.408
|
-0.383
|
-0.366
|
0.239
|
0.619
|
0.062
|
0.081
|
0.474
|
1
|
|
|
|
|
Cl-
|
0.177
|
-0.072
|
0.691
|
0.692
|
0.669
|
-0.007
|
-0.286
|
-0.168
|
0.135
|
-0.116
|
-0.537
|
1
|
|
|
|
TH
|
-0.569
|
-0.235
|
0.329
|
0.316
|
0.308
|
-0.723
|
-0.649
|
0.253
|
0.408
|
-0.344
|
-0.242
|
-0.034
|
1
|
|
|
Alk
|
0.061
|
-0.497
|
0.593
|
0.603
|
0.570
|
-0.166
|
-0.067
|
-0.411
|
0.153
|
0.432
|
-0.176
|
0.363
|
0.124
|
1
|
Conclusion
The
groundwater quality of the Sukma district, Chhattisgarh, central India was
found to be highly contaminated with Cl− and Ca2+ above
the permissible limits, which rendering water not suitable for the drinking
purposes. The Water Quality Index of groundwater was found to
be ≥ 100 making water unsafe for dinking purposes. The groundwater of Sukma
area is deteriorated rapidly due to its excessive extraction for the irrigation
purposes. The water is sodic and hard in nature. The value of EC, TH, Na+,
Mg2+, Ca2+ and Cl− were observed to be above reported permissible limits. The water is seemed to be unsuitable for the
drinking purposes due to high mineralization of the bed-rock elements in the
aquifer. The water could be used for the irrigation of the new varieties rice
crops required less water with lower ripping life.
Acknowledge
The authors are thankful to the Head of the Department
of the School of Studies in Environmental Science, Pt. Ravishankar Shukla
University, Raipur, for providing all the necessary facilities to execute
research.
References
- Salve, P.R., Maurya, A., Kumbhare, P.S., Ramteke, D.S., and Wate, S.R. (2008). Assessment of Groundwater Quality with Respect to Fluoride. Bulletin of Environmental Contamination and Toxicology, 81: 289-293. http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00128-008-9466-x
- Vikas, C. (2009). Occurrence and Distribution of Fluoride in Groundwater of Central Rajasthan, India. Journal of Environmental Science and Engineering, 51: 169-174.
- Kundu, M.C., and Mandal, B. (2009). Assessment of Potential Hazards of Fluoride Contamination in Drinking Groundwater of an Intensively Cultivated District in West Bengal, India. Environmental Monitoring and Assessment, 152: 97-103. http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s10661-008-0299-1
- Rao, N.S., (2009) Fluoride in Groundwater, Varaha River Basin, Visakhapatnam District, Andhra Pradesh, India. Environmental Monitoring and Assessment, 152: 47-60. http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s10661-008-0295-5
- Viswanathan, G., Jaswanth, A., Gopalakrishnan, S., Siva Ilango, S. and Aditya, G. (2009). Determining the Optimal Fluoride Concentration in Drinking Water for Fluoride Endemic Regions in South India. Science of Total Environment, 407: 5298-5307. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.scitotenv.2009.06.028
- Karthikeyan, K., Nanthakumar, K., Velmurugan, P., Tamilarasi, S. and Lakshmanaperumalsamy, P. (2010) Prevalence of Certain Inorganic Constituents in Groundwater Samples of Erode District, Tamilnadu, India, with Special Emphasis on Fluoride, Fluorosis and its Remedial Measures. Environmental Monitoring and Assessment, 160: 141-155. http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s10661-008-0664-0
- Avishek, K., Pathak, G., Nathawat, M.S., Jha, U. and Kumari, N. (2011). Water Quality Assessment of Majhiaon Block of Garwa District in Jharkhand with Special Focus on Fluoride Analysis. Environmental Monitoring and Assessment, 167: 617-623 http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s10661-009-1077-4
- Pandey, J., and Pandey, U. (2011). Fluoride Contamination and Fluorosis in Rural Community in the Vicinity of a Phosphate Fertilizer Factory in India. Bulletin of Environmental Contamination and Toxicology, 87: 245-249. http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00128-011-0344-6
- Brindha, K., Rajesh, R., Murugan, R. and Elango, L. (2011). Fluoride Contamination in Groundwater in Parts of Nalgonda District, Andhra Pradesh, India. Environmental Monitoring and Assessment, 172: 481-492. http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s10661-010-1348-0
- Jagtap, S., Yenkie, M.K., Labhsetwar, N. and Rayalu, S. (2012). Fluoride in Drinking Water and Defluoridation of Water. Chemical Review, 112, 2454-2466. http://dx.doi.org/10.1021/cr2002855
- Arif, M., Hussain, I., Hussain, J., Sharma, S. and Kumar, S. (2012). Fluoride in the Drinking Water of Nagaur Tehsil of Nagaur District, Rajasthan, India. Bulletin of Environmental Contamination and Toxicology, 88: 870-875. http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00128-012-0572-4
- Hussain, I., Arif, M. and Hussain, J. (2012). Fluoride Contamination in Drinking Water in Rural Habitations of Central Rajasthan, India. Environmental Monitoring and Assessment, 184: 5151-5158. http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s10661-011-2329-7
- Arlappa, N., Aatif Qureshi, I. and Srinivas, R. (2013). Fluorosis in India: An Overview. International Journal of Research and Development of Health, 1: 97-102.
- Datta, A.S., Chakrabortty, A., De Dalal, S.S. and Lahiri, S.C. (2014). Fluoride Contamination of Underground Water in west Bengal, India. Fluoride, 47: 241-248.
- Umarani, P., and Ramu, A. (2014) Fluoride Contamination Status of Groundwater in East Coastal Area in Tamilnadu, India. International Journal of Innovative Research in Science, Engineering and Technology, 3: 10045-10051.
- Yadav, A., Sahu, Y.K., Rajhans, K.P., Sahu, P.K., Chakradhari, S., Sahu, B.L., Ramteke, S. and Patel, K.S. (2016). Fluoride Contamination of Groundwater and Skeleton Fluorosis in Central India. Journal of Environmental Protection, 7: 784-792. http://dx.doi.org/10.4236/jep.2016.76071
- Sahu, B.L., Banjare, G.R., Ramteke, S., Patel, K.S. and Martini, L. (2016). Fluoride Contamination of Groundwater and Toxicities in Dongargaon Block, Chhattisgarh, India. Exposure and Health, 9: 143-156. Doi:10.1007/s12403-016-0229-3
- WHO (2011). Guidelines for Drinking-Water Quality. 4th Edition, World Health Organization, Switzerland. http://www.who.int/water_sanitation_health/publications/2011/dwq_chapters/en/
- BIS (2009). Drinking Water-Specification, Bureau of Indian Standards. New Delhi. http://bis.org.in/sf/fad/FAD25(2047)C.pdf
- Benjamin R., Chakrapani, B. K., Naarthana A. V., Ramchandra, T. V., (1996). Fish Mortality in Bangalore Lakes, India. Electric Green Journal, 1(6): 73- 79.
- Schultze, M., Friese, K., Sanchez, J. and López, E. (2006). Pit lake Aznalcóllar - water quality and options of control, ASMR, 7thICARD, March 26-30.
- Banjare R, Ramteke S, and Sahu, BL (2021). Assessment of Fluoride Level in the Groundwater of Ambagarh Chowki Block Chhattisgarh Journal of Science and Technology 18(4): 160-165.
- Wang, Y.L., Hu, Y.D., Wu, L.Y. and W. Zhong, W. (2006). Predicting Aqueous Solubility of Chlorinated Hydrocarbons by the MCI Approach, International Journal of Molecular Science. 7: 47-58.
- Choudhary, S., Ramteke, S., Rajhans, K.P., Sahu, P.K., Chakradhari, S., Patel, K.S. and Matini, L. (2016). Assessment of Groundwater Quality in Central India. Journal of Water Resource and Protection, 8: 12-19. http://dx.doi.org/10.4236/jwarp.2016.81002
- Ramteke, S., Verma, V., Chakradhari, S., Sahu, P.K., Sahu, B.L., Rajhans, K.P., Yadav, A. and Patel, K.S. (2016). Pit Lake Water Quality of Central India. Journal of Geographic Information System, 8: 28-39. http://dx.doi.org/10.4236/jgis.2016.81003
- Castro, J.M. and Moore, J.N. (2000). Pit lakes: their characteristics and the potential for their remediation, Environmental Geology, 39: 1254-1260.doi: 10.1007/s002549900100
- Nirmalkar O, Ramteke S, Mondal B and Sahu BL (2022). Assessment of Fluoride Level in the Groundwater of Dongargaon City, Chhattisgarh Journal of Science and Technology, 19(2): 151-156.
- Tanwer YB, Ramteke S, Mondal B and Sahu BL (2021). Assessment of Fluoride Level in The Groundwater of Dongargarh City. Chhattisgarh Journal of Science and Technology, 18(1): 47-51.
- Miller, GC, Lyons, WB and Davis, A (1996). Understanding the Water Quality of Pit Lakes. Environmental Science Technology, 30: 118A-123A. doi: 10.1021/es9621354
- Castro, JM and Moore, JN (2000). Pit lakes: Their Characteristics and the Potential for their Remediation. Environmental Geology, 39: 1254-1260. doi:10.1007/s002549900100
- Gupta, S, Nayak, S and Saha, RN (2012). Major Ion Chemistry and Metal Distribution in Coal Mine pit lake contaminated with industrial effluents: constraints of weathering and anthropogenic inputs. Environmental Earth Science, 67: 2053-2061. doi:10.1007/s12665-012-1644-9
- Singh, AK, Mahato, MK, Neogi, B, Tewary, BK and Sinha, A. (2012). Environmental geochemistry and quality assessment of mine water of Jharia coalfield, India, Environmental Earth Science, 65: 49-65.doi: 10.1007/s12665-011-1064-2
- Sahu L, Ramteke S, Bijnaneswar Mondal and Bharat Lal Sahu (2021). Assessment of Fluoride Level in the Ground water of Rajnandgaon City. Chhattisgarh Journal of Science and Technology, 18(2): 5-10.