Article in HTML

Author(s): Subrat Verma, Shobhana Ramteke, Manas Kanti Deb

Email(s): shubrmtk21@gmail.com

Address: School of Studies in Environmental Science, Pt. Ravishankar Shukla University, Raipur-492010, CG, India.
School of Studies in Environmental Science, Pt. Ravishankar Shukla University, Raipur-492010, CG, India.
School of Studies in Environmental Science, Pt. Ravishankar Shukla University, Raipur-492010, CG, India.
*Corresponding author: shubrmtk21@gmail.com

Published In:   Volume - 38,      Issue - 1,     Year - 2025


Cite this article:
Verma, Ramteke and Deb (2025). Investigation on Groundwater Quality in Sukma Bastar District, Chhattisgarh. Journal of Ravishankar University (Part-B: Science), 38(1), pp. 205-218. DOI:



Investigation on Groundwater Quality in Sukma Bastar District, Chhattisgarh

 1 Subrat Verma, 1 Shobhana Ramteke and 1Manas Kanti Deb

1School of Studies in Environmental Science, Pt. Ravishankar Shukla University, Raipur-492010, CG, India

*Corresponding author: shubrmtk21@gmail.com

Abstract. Groundwater is the most precious resource on the earth's surface, providing fresh drinking water for human beings and supplying water for plants to survive. The shortage, unavailability, and pollution of fresh drinking water is an emerging issue in almost every part of the world. The present study objectively analyzes the physicochemical parameters and trace elements in Sukma Block of Bastar District in Chhattisgarh region. The analysis of physicochemical parameters of 17 groundwater samples during the month of January 2024 were examined, namely as pH, T°C, EC, TDS, Salt, DO, O2, TH, TA, K+, Na+, Ca2+, Mg2+, Cl-. The value of T°C, pH, DO, RP, EC, TDS, TH, Na+, K+, Mg2+, Ca2+ , Cl- , TH and Alkalinity of the water (n = 17) was ranged from 28.5˚C - 32˚C, 6.75 – 7.17, 0.95 – 1.64 mg/L, 1.7 – 16.3 mV, 62 - 488 μS/cm, 38 - 321 mg/L, 130 - 400 mg/L, 6 – 38 , 11 - 60, 80 - 250, 60 - 210, 50 - 150, 130 – 400 and 125 - 450 mg/L with mean value of 29.82˚C ± 0.494˚C, 6.96 ± 0.065, 1.26 ± 0.102 mg/L, 7.92 ± 1.853 mV, 215.35 ± 56.049 μS/cm, 138.06 ± 37.649 mg/L, 246.47 ± 32.062 mg/L, 18.29 ± 4.224, 29.4 ± 7.152, 125.71 ± 20.138, 113.53 ± 20.094 , 92.12 ± 14.853, 246.47 ± 32.062 and 261.76 ± 53.33mg/L, respectively. The results showed that among various locations, many of the estimated physico-chemical parameters are more or less within the acceptable limits given by WHO except at few locations. The purpose of the dissertation work is to ensure the quality of Sukma Area groundwater that it is acceptable for drinking purpose or not. The water quality index (WQI) used for rating of the water quality".

Keywords: Identification, Qualitative analysis, Groundwater, WQI

Introduction

Ground water is an important resource for drinking and agriculture purposes. Groundwater uses and applications are often related to its composition, which is increasingly influenced by various human activities [1]. In fact the water quality of groundwater was affected by many factors including precipitation, surface runoff, groundwater flow, and the characteristics of the catchment area. The over extraction of groundwater caused huge weathering of the meta-morphic rocks. The sukma district, Chhattisgarh, India is a rice producing area, taking multiple crops by using the water resources [2-15]. The water is hard with contamination of Ca2+, Cland Mg2+ at hazardous levels. In this work, the groundwater quality of sukma district (area ≈ 4000 km2) is described. The Bastar district covers an area of 10577.7 sq. km. It consists of 1087 no of villages. For administrative convenience these villages are grouped into 12 no of development blocks. Jagdalpur is the district headquarter. The block headquarters are Keshkal, Baderajpur, Pharasgaon, Makri, Kondagaon, Bastar, Bakawand, Lohandiguda, Tokapal, Bastanar, Darbha and Jagdalpur. The district is known for its forest produce and mineral wealth [16-20].

 

The Bastar Plateau Region

It covers Bastar, Kondagaon, Narayanpur, Kanker, Bijapur, Sukma and Dantewada districts lying on the southern parts of the State. Except Indravati River plains, most of the area is covered by evergreen dense reserve forests and hilly tracts. The major landforms are high-level plateaus, structural hills and valleys and pediments and pediplains [21-25]. The altitude varies from 400 to 600 m amsl. In the plains of Indravati River covering central parts, and along the Shabri River, covering southeastern parts the altitude varies from 250 to 300 m amsl. The ground water levels observed over a period provides valuable information on the behaviour of the ground water regime, which is constantly subjected to changes due to recharge and discharge phenomena [26-33].

Materials and methods

Study Area 

Bastar is a district located in the central Indian state of Chhattisgarh as presented in Figure 1. It is situated between 19.5676 degrees north and 81.6912 degrees east. Jagdalpur is the district headquarters of Bastar and is surrounded by Nabarangpur and Koraput districts of Odisha state to the east, Narayanpur district to the northwest, Kondagaon district to the north and Dantewada and Sukma to the south. According to the census report, the total population of the district is 8,34,873 people, living in a total area of 6,597 square kilometers. Geologically, the district is covered with gneiss, granite, meta-sedimentary, basalt and gabbroic rocks and the landscape is dominated by dense forest, with half the district being mountainous and rocky. The soil of the district has widely varied such as loam, alfisol, red gravel and red sandy, these are the soils that cover most of the area. The Sukma district included three blocks: Chhindgarh, Konta and Sukma. The area of the district is ≈5897 km2 with population of 19100. The materials i.e. buildings, metals, pipes, etc. are corroded due to acidic nature of water. In present investigation, the Sukma Bastar district of Chhattisgarh state, central India has been selected for groundwater quality studies and collected 17 samples to assess the contaminants Table 1.

 Study Collection

 The groundwater samples were collected from 17 locations of the town and nearby villages, Figure 1.  The water was collected in the post monsoon period, January, 2024 in a 1-L cleaned polyethylene bottle by using established methodology [16].  The bottle was ringed thrice with the sampling water prior to collection and filled up to the mouth with the water. The physical parameters i.e. pH, temperature (T), electrical conductivity (EC), reduction potential (RP) and dissolved oxygen (DO) were measured at the spot.

Figure 1: Sampling location in Sukma district, Chhattisgarh, India.

 

Table 1: Representation of the groundwater sampling location of Sukma region.

S.No.

Date

Locations

Latitude

Longitude

1

05/01/2024

SK-1

18.392899

81.692985

2

05/01/2024

SK-2

18.398195

81.729490

3

05/01/2024

SK-3

18.386282

81.750802

4

05/01/2024

SK-4

18.397343

81.723013

5

05/01/2024

SK-5

18.386253

81.683493

6

05/01/2024

SK-6

18.387262

81.685504

7

05/01/2024

SK-7

18.388004

81.675576

8

06/01/2024

SK-8

18.396003

81.669874

9

06/01/2024

SK-9

18.396041

81.655298

10

06/01/2024

SK-10

18.392477

81.658176

11

06/01/2024

SK-11

18.387386

81.660336

12

06/01/2024

SK-12

18.40877

81.667525

13

06/01/2024

SK-13

18.414298

81.660303

14

07/01/2024

SK-14

18.489968

81.543120

15

07/01/2024

SK-15

18.526912

81.750056

16

07/01/2024

SK-16

18.322277

81.599094

17

07/01/2024

SK-17

18.373292

81.656855

SK-1= Kumharas; SK-2= Jhapra; SK-3=Burdi; SK-4=Ramaram; SK-5=Navodaya; SK-6=Gyanodaya; SK-7= Pawaras; SK-8= Srinagar; SK-9= Patnampara; SK-10= Sukma Bustand; SK-11=Sukma Market; SK-12= Samratnagar; SK-13= Sodipara; SK-14= Gadiras; SK-15=Chindgarh; SK-16=Gongla; SK-17= Kerlapal

 

Methodology

Hydrological Parameters sampling

The groundwater sampling network, based on water uses and contamination sources is shown in Figure 1. The hydrological parameters (i.e. age and depth) of 18 tube wells were recorded in January 2024. The water sample was collected in the cleaned narrow polyethylene 250-mL bottle in duplicate during January 2024 [16]. The physical parameters i.e. temperature (T), pH, dissolved oxygen (DO), reduction potential (RP) and electrical conductivity (EC) were measured at the spot. The samples were dispatched to the laboratory for the analysis by subsequent refrigerating at −4˚C.

Analysis

The physical parameters such as temperature, pH, EC, RP, DO, TDS and Salinity were examined in the laboratory at department by using the HANNNA made sensors (model no.  pH7200) Various other chemical parameters such as TH, Ca2+, Na+, K+, Mg2+ etc. were also analyzed in the groundwater samples. The standard methods of analysis have been summarized in Figure 2.

Figure 2: Representation of the analysis of groundwater samples.

Water Quality Index

The investigation is based on the secondary data which is taken from the Central Ground Water Board, Department of Ground Water, Raipur, Chhattisgarh. Water samples have been analysed for 7 physico-chemical parameters such as pH, Calcium, Magnesium, Chloride, and Electrical Conductivity in the laboratory as per the standard procedures of Bureau of Indian Standards (BIS). The WQI has been calculated by using the standards of drinking water quality recommended by World Health Organization [18], and Bureau of Indian Standards [19]. The weighted Arithmetic index method has been used for the calculation of WQI of the drinking water.

nking water (Table 2). The physico-Chemical parameters of seventeen different stations (SK-1, SK-2, SK-3, SK-4, SK-5, SK-6…….SK-17) are summarized (Table 2). There are some remarkable variations of physico-chemical data are found at all the sixteen sampling sites in study area (District Bastar). Some hidden forces like temperature changes in season to season which are sometimes more controlling to some parameters like electrical conductivity, pH etc. An example of calculation of WQI has been given in Table 2.

Table 2: Water Quality Status based on WQI.

S.No.

Water Quality Index

Status of Water Quality

1

0  ̶   25

Excellent Water Quality

2

26  ̶  50

Good Water Quality

3

51  ̶   75

Poor Water Quality

4

76   ̶  100

Very Poor Water Quality

5

>100

Unfit for Drinking

Result and discussion

Physical Characteristics of Ground water

 The physical parameters (i.e. age and depth of tube wells) and habitant population were recorded with the help of public health engineering department, and data are presented in Table 3, Figure 3. The value of T°C, pH, DO, RP, EC, TDS and TH of the water (n = 18) was ranged from 28.5˚C - 32˚C, 6.75 – 7.17, 0.95 – 1.64 mg/L, 1.7 – 16.3 mV, 62 - 488 μS/cm, 38 - 321 mg/L and 130 - 400 mg/L with mean value of 29.82˚C ± 0.494˚C, 6.96 ± 0.065, 1.26 ± 0.102 mg/L, 7.92 ± 1.853 mV, 215.35 ± 56.049 μS/cm, 138.06 ± 37.649 mg/L and 246.47 ± 32.062 mg/L, respectively.

 

Table 3. Physical parameters of ground water in January, 2024.

S. No.

Locations

T

˚C

pH

EC,

µs/cm

TDS, mg/L

Salt,

mg/L

DO, mg/L

RP,

mV

1

SK-1

32°

7.08

198

118

85

1.64

          11.8

2

SK-2

31.5°

7.07

135

83

60

1.58

11.0

3

SK-3

31.3°

7.17

356

251

174

1.51

10.7

4

SK-4

30.5°

7.13

62

38

26

1.52

16.3

5

SK-5

30.5°

6.79

100

67

47

1.42

15

6

SK-6

29.9°

6.79

209

132

78

1.14

5.4

7

SK-7

29.6°

7.1

160

103

70

0.95

5.2

8

SK-8

29.5°

7.02

90

57

38

1.33

8.2

9

SK-9

29.5°

7.01

108

67

47

1.30

7.7

10

SK-10

29.2°

6.84

252

156

113

1.24

1.7

11

SK-11

28.8°

6.80

488

321

229

0.98

3.9

12

SK-12

28.8°

6.98

223

129

96

1.22

6.1

13

SK-13

29.5°

6.99

250

159

115

1.18

6.4

14

SK-14

28.5

7.02

144

91

66

1.10

7.7

15

SK-15

28.7

6.79

311

201

141

0.98

4.6

16

SK-16

29.7

6.75

404

261

189

1.20

7.1

17

SK-17

28.8

6.96

171

113

81

1.11

5.8

SK-1= Kumharas; SK-2= Jhapra; SK-3=Burdi; SK-4=Ramaram; SK-5=Navodaya; SK-6=Gyanodaya; SK-7= Pawaras; SK-8= Srinagar; SK-9= Patnampara; SK-10= Sukma Bustand; SK-11=Sukma Market; SK-12= Samratnagar; SK-13= Sodipara; SK-14= Gadiras; SK-15=Chindgarh; SK-16=Gongla; SK-17= Kerlapal

 Figure 3: Representation of Total concentration of the various physical parameters in different groundwater samples.

 Chemical Characteristics of Water

The chemical characteristics of the groundwater are presented in Table 4, Figure 4.  The concentration of Na+, K+, Mg2+, Ca2+, Cl-, TH and Alkalinity was ranged from 6 – 38, 11 - 60, 80 - 250, 60 - 210, 50 - 150, 130 – 400 and 125 - 450 mg/L with mean value of 18.29 ± 4.224, 29.4 ± 7.152, 125.71 ± 20.138, 113.53 ± 20.094, 92.12 ± 14.853, 246.47 ± 32.062 and 261.76 ± 53.33mg/L, respectively. However, Mg2+ and Ca2+ concentration was above recommended limit of 60 and 80 mg/L in the 33 and 67% tube wells.

 

Table 4. Chemical parameters of ground water in January, 2024. mg/L

S.No.

Locations

Date

Na+

K+

Ca2+

Mg2+

Cl-

TH

Alkalinity

1

SK-1

29/01/2024

10

18

90

80

128

170

275

2

SK-2

29/01/2024

6

11

60

95

80

230

225

3

SK-3

29/01/2024

18

48

110

130

150

210

300

4

SK-4

29/01/2024

12

20

200

250

50

190

325

5

SK-5

29/01/2024

16

15

210

160

60

130

225

6

SK-6

29/01/2024

14

18

150

80

130

260

425

7

SK-7

29/01/2024

25

18

110

125

70

320

200

8

SK-8

29/01/2024

28

20

90

132

50

250

125

9

SK-9

29/01/2024

25

35

80

140

80

170

175

10

SK-10

29/01/2024

33

50

70

90

100

280

200

11

SK-11

29/01/2024

11

21

150

85

150

270

425

12

SK-12

29/01/2024

12

21

100

120

95

230

125

13

SK-13

29/01/2024

38

28

80

145

100

250

150

14

SK-14

29/01/2024

16

50

90

160

85

350

125

15

SK-15

29/01/2024

22

43

100

95

70

400

400

16

SK-16

29/01/2024

15

60

120

150

88

260

450

17

SK-17

29/01/2024

10

25

120

100

80

220

300

SK-1= Kumharas; SK-2= Jhapra; SK-3=Burdi; SK-4=Ramaram; SK-5=Navodaya; SK-6=Gyanodaya; SK-7= Pawaras; SK-8= Srinagar; SK-9= Patnampara; SK-10= Sukma Bustand; SK-11=Sukma Market; SK-12= Samratnagar; SK-13= Sodipara; SK-14= Gadiras; SK-15=Chindgarh; SK-16=Gongla; SK-17= Kerlapal


Figure 4: Representation of Total concentration of the various chemical parameters in different groundwater samples.

Water Quality Index

The Water Quality Index of the groundwater in the sampling period was ranged from 22 - 226 with mean value of 97 ± 12. The value of TDS, TH in the water of all groundwater was found above permissible limits of 500, 120, 300, 1.5 and 45 mg/L, respectively [35-36]. Generally, Na + Mg + Ca type of water was found to exist in the groundwater aquifer of the Sukma area. In some locations, other types of water i.e. Na + Mg + Ca + Cl were also marked. The value of TH, Mg, and Ca content was found to be higher than recommended value of 200, 30, and 75 mg/L, respectively [19]-[20].  The value of WQI was ranged from 86 – 713 with mean value of 275±60 respectively. The classification of groundwater was grouped on the basis of SH values, excellent (<20 %), good (20–40 %), permissible (40–60 %), doubtful (60–80 %) and unsuitable (>80 %).  However, in the pre monsoon period, the value of Mg2+ and Ca2+ crossed significantly the prescribed permissible limit of 30 and 75, making water unsafe for drinking purposes. It means the water of the studied area was found to be sodic and hard in nature, being unsuitable for the drinking purposes. They could be used for the irrigation purposes but prolonged excessive extraction of the water may cause adverse impacts in rice yields in near future.

 

Statistical Parameters of the Samples

The statistical parameters are been detected by various physico-chemical characteristics with the mean value, Minimum, Maximum, Standard deviation (Std) , Confidence limit (CL) and mean Concentration of various groundwater samples which is been represented in Table 5.

Table 5: Statistical Parameters of the Groundwater Samples in Baster Region.

S.No.

Parameters

Min

Max

Mean

Std

Conf Limit

Mean Conc

1

TºC

28.5

32

29.82

1.04

0.494

29.82 ± 0.495

2

pH

6.75

7.17

6.96

0.14

0.065

6.96 ± 0.065

3

EC

62

488

215.35

117.91

56.049

215.35 ± 56.049

4

TDS

38

321

138.06

79.2

37.649

138.06 ± 37.649

5

Salt

26

229

97.35

56.83

27.015

97.35 ± 27.015

6

DO

0.95

1.64

1.26

0.21

0.102

1.26 ± 0102

7

RP

1.7

16.3

7.92

3.9

1.853

7.92 ± 1.853

8

Na+

6

38

18.29

8.89

4.224

18.29 ± 4.224

9

K+

11

60

29.47

15.05

7.152

29.47 ± 7.152

10

Ca2+

60

210

113.53

42.27

20.094

113.53 ± 20.094

11

Mg2+

80

250

125.71

42.36

20.138

125.71 ± 20.138

12

Cl-

50

150

92.12

31.25

14.853

92.12 ± 14.853

13

TH

130

400

246.47

67.45

32.062

246.47 ± 32.062

14

Alkalinity

125

450

267.76

112.19

53.332

267.76 ± 53.332

 

Correlation Matrix

The EC were having a good correlation with TDS and Salt. Similarly, K+ also shows good correlation with Cl-. Similarly, RP which shows good correlation with DO and Mg2+ indicates good correlation with Redox Potential. (see Table 6)

 

Table 6: Correlation Matrix of groundwater samples of Sukma region.

 

TºC

pH

EC

TDS

Salt

DO

RP

Na+

K+

Ca2+

Mg2+

Cl-

TH

Alk

TºC

1














pH

0.451

1













EC

-0.192

-0.442

1












TDS

-0.173

-0.416

0.996

1











Salt

-0.183

-0.406

0.995

0.997

1










DO

0.841

0.485

-0.373

-0.360

-0.350

1









RP

0.657

0.432

-0.493

-0.462

-0.456

0.777

1








Na+

-0.268

-0.036

-0.030

-0.029

-0.027

-0.281

-0.394

1







K+

-0.303

-0.225

0.452

0.460

0.474

-0.227

-0.337

0.306

1






Ca2+

0.055

-0.251

-0.066

-0.039

-0.061

0.033

0.490

-0.349

-0.285

1





Mg2+

0.025

0.318

-0.408

-0.383

-0.366

0.239

0.619

0.062

0.081

0.474

1




Cl-

0.177

-0.072

0.691

0.692

0.669

-0.007

-0.286

-0.168

0.135

-0.116

-0.537

1



TH

-0.569

-0.235

0.329

0.316

0.308

-0.723

-0.649

0.253

0.408

-0.344

-0.242

-0.034

1


Alk

0.061

-0.497

0.593

0.603

0.570

-0.166

-0.067

-0.411

0.153

0.432

-0.176

0.363

0.124

1

 

Conclusion

The groundwater quality of the Sukma district, Chhattisgarh, central India was found to be highly contaminated with Cl and Ca2+ above the permissible limits, which rendering water not suitable for the drinking purposes. The Water Quality Index of groundwater was found to be ≥ 100 making water unsafe for dinking purposes. The groundwater of Sukma area is deteriorated rapidly due to its excessive extraction for the irrigation purposes. The water is sodic and hard in nature. The value of EC, TH, Na+, Mg2+, Ca2+ and Cl were observed to be above reported permissible limits.  The water is seemed to be unsuitable for the drinking purposes due to high mineralization of the bed-rock elements in the aquifer. The water could be used for the irrigation of the new varieties rice crops required less water with lower ripping life.

Acknowledge

The authors are thankful to the Head of the Department of the School of Studies in Environmental Science, Pt. Ravishankar Shukla University, Raipur, for providing all the necessary facilities to execute research.

References

  1. Salve, P.R., Maurya, A., Kumbhare, P.S., Ramteke, D.S., and Wate, S.R. (2008). Assessment of Groundwater Quality with Respect to Fluoride. Bulletin of Environmental Contamination and Toxicology, 81: 289-293.  http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00128-008-9466-x 
  2. Vikas, C. (2009). Occurrence and Distribution of Fluoride in Groundwater of Central Rajasthan, India. Journal of Environmental Science and Engineering, 51: 169-174. 
  3. Kundu, M.C., and Mandal, B. (2009). Assessment of Potential Hazards of Fluoride Contamination in Drinking Groundwater of an Intensively Cultivated District in West Bengal, India. Environmental Monitoring and Assessment, 152: 97-103. http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s10661-008-0299-1 
  4. Rao, N.S., (2009) Fluoride in Groundwater, Varaha River Basin, Visakhapatnam District, Andhra Pradesh, India. Environmental Monitoring and Assessment, 152: 47-60. http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s10661-008-0295-5 
  5. Viswanathan, G., Jaswanth, A., Gopalakrishnan, S., Siva Ilango, S. and Aditya, G. (2009). Determining the Optimal Fluoride Concentration in Drinking Water for Fluoride Endemic Regions in South India. Science of Total Environment, 407: 5298-5307. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.scitotenv.2009.06.028 
  6. Karthikeyan, K., Nanthakumar, K., Velmurugan, P., Tamilarasi, S. and Lakshmanaperumalsamy, P. (2010) Prevalence of Certain Inorganic Constituents in Groundwater Samples of Erode District, Tamilnadu, India, with Special Emphasis on Fluoride, Fluorosis and its Remedial Measures. Environmental Monitoring and Assessment, 160: 141-155.  http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s10661-008-0664-0 
  7. Avishek, K., Pathak, G., Nathawat, M.S., Jha, U. and Kumari, N. (2011). Water Quality Assessment of Majhiaon Block of Garwa District in Jharkhand with Special Focus on Fluoride Analysis. Environmental Monitoring and Assessment, 167: 617-623 http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s10661-009-1077-4 
  8. Pandey, J., and Pandey, U. (2011). Fluoride Contamination and Fluorosis in Rural Community in the Vicinity of a Phosphate Fertilizer Factory in India. Bulletin of Environmental Contamination and Toxicology, 87: 245-249.  http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00128-011-0344-6 
  9. Brindha, K., Rajesh, R., Murugan, R. and Elango, L. (2011). Fluoride Contamination in Groundwater in Parts of Nalgonda District, Andhra Pradesh, India. Environmental Monitoring and Assessment, 172: 481-492.  http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s10661-010-1348-0 
  10. Jagtap, S., Yenkie, M.K., Labhsetwar, N. and Rayalu, S. (2012). Fluoride in Drinking Water and Defluoridation of Water. Chemical Review, 112, 2454-2466. http://dx.doi.org/10.1021/cr2002855 
  11. Arif, M., Hussain, I., Hussain, J., Sharma, S. and Kumar, S. (2012). Fluoride in the Drinking Water of Nagaur Tehsil of Nagaur District, Rajasthan, India. Bulletin of Environmental Contamination and Toxicology, 88: 870-875.  http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00128-012-0572-4 
  12. Hussain, I., Arif, M. and Hussain, J. (2012). Fluoride Contamination in Drinking Water in Rural Habitations of Central Rajasthan, India. Environmental Monitoring and Assessment, 184: 5151-5158.  http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s10661-011-2329-7 
  13. Arlappa, N., Aatif Qureshi, I. and Srinivas, R. (2013). Fluorosis in India: An Overview. International Journal of Research and Development of Health, 1: 97-102. 
  14. Datta, A.S., Chakrabortty, A., De Dalal, S.S. and Lahiri, S.C. (2014). Fluoride Contamination of Underground Water in west Bengal, India. Fluoride, 47: 241-248. 
  15. Umarani, P., and Ramu, A. (2014) Fluoride Contamination Status of Groundwater in East Coastal Area in Tamilnadu, India. International Journal of Innovative Research in Science, Engineering and Technology, 3: 10045-10051. 
  16. Yadav, A., Sahu, Y.K., Rajhans, K.P., Sahu, P.K., Chakradhari, S., Sahu, B.L., Ramteke, S. and Patel, K.S. (2016). Fluoride Contamination of Groundwater and Skeleton Fluorosis in Central India. Journal of Environmental Protection, 7: 784-792. http://dx.doi.org/10.4236/jep.2016.76071
  17. Sahu, B.L., Banjare, G.R., Ramteke, S., Patel, K.S. and Martini, L. (2016). Fluoride Contamination of Groundwater and Toxicities in Dongargaon Block, Chhattisgarh, India. Exposure and Health, 9: 143-156. Doi:10.1007/s12403-016-0229-3
  18. WHO (2011). Guidelines for Drinking-Water Quality. 4th Edition, World Health Organization, Switzerland.  http://www.who.int/water_sanitation_health/publications/2011/dwq_chapters/en/
  19. BIS (2009). Drinking Water-Specification, Bureau of Indian Standards. New Delhi.  http://bis.org.in/sf/fad/FAD25(2047)C.pdf
  20. Benjamin R., Chakrapani, B. K., Naarthana A. V., Ramchandra, T. V., (1996). Fish Mortality in Bangalore Lakes, India. Electric Green Journal, 1(6): 73- 79.
  21. Schultze, M.,  Friese, K., Sanchez, J. and López, E. (2006). Pit lake Aznalcóllar - water quality and options of control,  ASMR, 7thICARD, March 26-30.
  22. Banjare R, Ramteke S, and Sahu, BL (2021). Assessment of Fluoride Level in the Groundwater of Ambagarh Chowki Block Chhattisgarh Journal of Science and Technology 18(4): 160-165.
  23. Wang, Y.L., Hu, Y.D., Wu, L.Y. and W. Zhong, W. (2006). Predicting Aqueous Solubility of Chlorinated Hydrocarbons by the MCI Approach, International Journal of Molecular Science. 7: 47-58.
  24. Choudhary, S., Ramteke, S., Rajhans, K.P., Sahu, P.K., Chakradhari, S., Patel, K.S. and Matini, L. (2016). Assessment of Groundwater Quality in Central India. Journal of Water Resource and Protection, 8: 12-19. http://dx.doi.org/10.4236/jwarp.2016.81002
  25. Ramteke, S., Verma, V., Chakradhari, S., Sahu, P.K., Sahu, B.L., Rajhans, K.P., Yadav, A. and Patel, K.S. (2016). Pit Lake Water Quality of Central India. Journal of Geographic Information System, 8: 28-39. http://dx.doi.org/10.4236/jgis.2016.81003
  26. Castro, J.M. and Moore, J.N. (2000). Pit lakes: their characteristics and the potential for their remediation, Environmental Geology, 39: 1254-1260.doi: 10.1007/s002549900100
  27. Nirmalkar O, Ramteke S, Mondal B and Sahu BL (2022). Assessment of Fluoride Level in the Groundwater of Dongargaon City, Chhattisgarh Journal of Science and Technology, 19(2): 151-156.
  28. Tanwer YB, Ramteke S, Mondal B and Sahu BL (2021). Assessment of Fluoride Level in The Groundwater of Dongargarh City. Chhattisgarh Journal of Science and Technology, 18(1): 47-51.
  29. Miller, GC, Lyons, WB and Davis, A (1996). Understanding the Water Quality of Pit Lakes. Environmental Science Technology, 30: 118A-123A. doi: 10.1021/es9621354
  30. Castro, JM and Moore, JN (2000). Pit lakes: Their Characteristics and the Potential for their Remediation. Environmental Geology, 39: 1254-1260. doi:10.1007/s002549900100
  31. Gupta, S, Nayak, S and Saha, RN (2012). Major Ion Chemistry and Metal Distribution in Coal Mine pit lake contaminated with industrial effluents: constraints of weathering and anthropogenic inputs. Environmental Earth Science, 67: 2053-2061. doi:10.1007/s12665-012-1644-9 
  32. Singh, AK, Mahato, MK, Neogi, B, Tewary, BK and Sinha, A. (2012). Environmental geochemistry and quality assessment of mine water of Jharia coalfield, India, Environmental Earth Science, 65: 49-65.doi: 10.1007/s12665-011-1064-2
  33. Sahu L, Ramteke S, Bijnaneswar Mondal and Bharat Lal Sahu (2021). Assessment of Fluoride Level in the Ground water of Rajnandgaon City. Chhattisgarh Journal of Science and Technology, 18(2): 5-10.



Related Images:

Recomonded Articles:

Author(s): Benvikram Barman; Manoj Kumar Banjare; Bhupendra Singh Banjare; Dolly Baghel

DOI: 10.52228/JRUB.2025-38-1-7         Access: Open Access Read More

Author(s): Reena Jamunkar; Deepak Sinha; Tarun Kumar Patle; Kamlesh Shrivas

DOI: 10.52228/JRUB.2024-37-1-10         Access: Open Access Read More

Author(s): SachchidaNand Shukla; Syed Shamroz Arshad; Kavita Thakur; Geetika Srivastava

DOI: 10.52228/JRUB.2023-36-2-4         Access: Open Access Read More

Author(s): Sahdev; Tomeshwar; Kuldeep

DOI: 10.52228/JRUB.2024-37-2-16         Access: Open Access Read More

Author(s): Shubhra Sinha; Manas Kanti Deb; Indrapal Karbhal; Suryakant Manikpuri; Rajiv Nayan; Babita Markande

DOI: 10.52228/JRUB.2024-37-1-6         Access: Open Access Read More

Author(s): Princy Dugga; Shamsh Pervez; Rakesh Kumar Sahu; Madhuri Verma; Shahina Bano; Manas Kanti Deb

DOI: 10.52228/JRUB.2017-30-1-5         Access: Open Access Read More

Author(s): B S Ajitkumar; Prashant S Hande; Vikas Jha; Pratiksha Alagh; Shailendra Rane

DOI:         Access: Open Access Read More

Author(s): Sakshi Tiwari Bajaj; S K Taunk; G S Tomar

DOI:         Access: Open Access Read More

Author(s): Subhendu Saha

DOI:         Access: Open Access Read More

Author(s): Subhadip Banerjee; Ranjit K Harwnsh; Shiv Bahadur; Amit Kar; Pulok Mukherjee

DOI:         Access: Open Access Read More

Author(s): Deepti Tikariha; Jyotsna Lakra; Srishti Dutta Roy; Toshikee Yadav; Kallol KGhosh

DOI:         Access: Open Access Read More