Preparation,
Characterization, and Applications of Albumin Serum-Based Nanoparticles
Pritimala Sahua, b, Bhanushree Guptab*,
a School of Studies in Chemistry, Pt. Ravishankar Shukla University
Raipur (C.G.), India 492010
b Center for Basic Sciences, Pt. Ravishankar Shukla University Raipur
(C.G.), India 492010
Abstract
Nanoparticles made of albumin have shown great
application value in the field of medicine as drug carriers because of their
excellent biocompatibility. Albumin-based nanoparticles are generally produced
through a desolvation process, which can be strongly affected by pH,
temperature, and other desolvating chemicals including ethanol and acetone. In
recent years, albumin has been used as a carrier in the diagnosis and treatment
of diseases like cancer, HIV, hepatitis, and influenza. Albumin has been shown
to be a nontoxic, biocompatible, and biodegradable protein carrier for drug
delivery. This review deals with the synthesis of albumin-based nanoparticles
and, their characterization through analytical techniques, and their
applications. The major characterization techniques include UV-Visible
Spectroscopy, Dynamic Light Scattering (DLS), Fourier Transform Infrared
Spectroscopy (FT-IR), Field Scanning Electron Microscopy (FESEM), and
Transmission Electron Microscopy (TEM). These albumin-based nanoparticles provide
an added advantage over other available nanoparticles by being biodegradable
and biocompatible. The albumin-based nanoparticles have their applications in
medicine and therapeutics, agriculture, cosmetics, and the food industry.
Keywords: Albumin,
Biocompatibility, Nanoparticles, Drug delivery, Antiviral diseases.
1.
Introduction
Proteins are linear polymers of amino acids with a
wide range of structural variations and biological activities. They
can be classified based on their solubility, chemical structure, shape, and the
number of the monomeric unit. Protein solubility is determined by a variety of
interactions including protein-protein, protein-water, protein-ions, and
ions-water interactions. Protein-based
nanometric structures have been designed for drug delivery systems due to their
excellent biocompatibility, biodegradability, and low toxicity (Batchelor et
al., 2018). Due to the presence of a number of binding sites in their
molecules, protein nanoparticles show a high drug-loading capacity. Covalent
bonding, electrostatic attraction, and hydrophobic interaction are involved in
drug-loading mechanisms. A variety of proteins have been used in drug
delivery systems including albumin, ferritin, transferrin, low-density
lipoprotein, and high-density protein (Iqbal et al., 2021). They have also been applied in different targeted
therapies like cancer therapy and tumor therapy (Hong et al., 2020).
Albumin proteins are the most common type of proteins
used for disease diagnosis and drug delivery/drug carrier systems. Their
physical and chemical properties have been highly studied. Bovine Serum Albumin (BSA) and Human Serum
Albumin (HSA) have been used as carrier systems for anticancer drugs
(Jimenez-Cruz et al., 2015). There are various types of nanoparticles (NPs)
used as drug delivery carriers, including ceramic nanoparticles, magnetic
nanoparticles, polymeric nanoparticles, solid-liquid nanoparticles, polymeric
micelles, and polymer drugs (Zhou et al., 2013).
Many researchers have explored albumin-based
nanoparticles, that could accumulate on a cancer cell, to enhance targeting
specificity while minimizing side effects to a normal cell (Jahanban-Esfahlan
et al., 2016). Nanomedicines can be made multifunctional by adding extra
features like the triggered release and targeted distribution (Moghimi et
al., 2005).
Numerous nanoparticles such as polymer NPs, liposome NPs, inorganic NPs,
drug conjugates, hydrogel NPs, viral NPs, etc, have been prepared to be applied
in and as various nanoparticle drug delivery systems (Kim et al., 2010, Li et
al., 2018 & Liu et al, 2018). Albumins have emerged as excellent carriers
and are frequently utilized to encapsulate various therapeutic agents.
Albumin-based nanoparticles have shown high binding capacities to many drugs
(Wilson et al., 2015).
This study aims to discuss different types
of protein and their use in the synthesis of nanoparticles and their
application. This review gives an account of a nanoparticle drug delivery
system that uses protein as a drug carrier.
2.
Albumin Protein
Albumin is a type
of protein found in plasma. It plays an important role in our body's
physiological processes. It has eight disulfide bonds and a free sulfhydryl
group, contributing to its high-water solubility (up to 40% w/v at pH 7.4) (Lei
et al., 2021). Albumin makes up around 50% of
all blood proteins and is the main extravascular protein in the blood (35-30
g/L). It is predominantly produced in the liver, at a rate of 0.7 mg/h per gram
of liver weight (10–15 g/day) (Iqbal et al., 2021 & Larsen et al., 2016).
The highly stable protein albumin, doesn't change structurally after being
heated for 10 hours at 60°C (Jain et al., 2018). In vivo,
albumin can be used as a non-specific transport protein to combine with various
insoluble organic molecules and inorganic ions to form soluble complexes
(Larsen et al., 2016).
Types of albumins Protein
a. Ovalbumin
Ovalbumin (OVA) is
the most common protein in egg white, and makes up 54-69% of the total protein
in egg white (Meng et al., 2022). It is
a highly functional food protein used in the food industry. OVA (Figure 1a) is
a typical globulin with a free sulfhydryl group hidden within the hydrophobic
core. It is a monomeric phosphoglycoprotein with 47000 Da molecular weight. It
consists of 365 amino acids and has an isoelectric point of 4.8. OVA is
primarily chosen as a drug carrier owing to its easy availability and low cost
(Jimenez-Cruz et al., 2015 & Liu et al., 2021).
b. Bovine Serum Albumin
BSA (Figure 1b) is
one of the most studied proteins. It has a molecular weight of 69323 Da and an
isoelectric point in the water of 4.7 at a temperature of 25° C (Liu
et al., 2021 & Yu et al., 2015). It is a protein model that is
frequently used to explore how proteins accumulate and fibrillate (Karami et
al., 2020 & Yu et al., 2015). BSA has a great potential for the
preparation of nano vehicles with possible application in the food industry
since it is non-toxic and biodegradable (Jimenez- Cruz et al 2015). It has three identical homolog domains (I,
II, and III) of nine loops. These loops form a triad compound with a
large-small-large sequence. Due to the high affinity of BSA it can be used with
both hydrophobic and hydrophilic drugs. Binding
interaction of BSA with a drug is shown in Figure 2. BSA is used as a carrier
of various drugs like DVH, biotin, etc. because of its high solubility (Karami
et al., 2020).
Figure
1. (a) Ovalbumin (PBD 1OVA)23 (b) Bovine serum albumin (PDB ID 3V03) (Chinnathambi
et al., 2015)
Figure 2. (a) BSA (PDB ID 3V03), (b) BSA complex with
a drug (Yu et at., 2019)
c. Human Serum Albumin
HSA is a globular
protein and is mainly found in the human circulatory system. It has a single, typical,
non-glycosylated structure (Karami et al., 2020). The human liver produces a
majority of this plasma protein, which has 585 amino acids (Yu et al., 2015
& Jimenez-Cruz et al., 2015). It is mostly formed of an alpha-helix
structure and lacks a beta-sheet. Lysine amino acid makes up 10% of HSA in
total. HSA (Figure 3) has three
identical domains, each consisting of two-sub domains of A and B with the same
structural components. The primary protein in plasma, albumin has a
concentration of 45 mg/ml and a half-life of 20 days in the blood (Lei et al.,
2021). This albumin has no toxicity
and is utilized as a drug carrier due to availability and biocompatibility
(Batchelor et al., 2018). When HSA is broken down, amino acids provide
nutrition to peripheral tissues. The properties of HSA like its preferential
uptake in tumor cells, easy availability, biodegradability, and lack of
toxicity make it an ideal candidate for drug
delivery (Elzoghby
et al., 2012).
Figure
3. Human serum Albumin (PDB 1BJ5) (Chinnathambi et al., 2015)
3. Protein-Based NPs
Extensive development and research in the
field of nanomedicine gave birth to various design methodologies for
protein-based nanoparticles, mainly including desolvation, self-assembly,
emulsification, biomineralization and covalent noncovalent interaction. A
variety of proteins have been employed to encapsulate or conjugate with
chemotherapeutic drugs, imaging agents, radioactive or photoactive agents, and
functional ligands for various diagnostic and therapeutic processes. The
different methods employed to prepare protein-based NPs generally depend on the
properties of drugs and selected proteins, particle size, and the desired
application (Tarhini et al 2017). Albumin-based nanoparticles are generally
developed through self-assembly, biomineralization, covalent conjugation, or
chemical modification methods, depending on specific drug binding sites,
cysteine-34, and metal binding site (Jacob et al., 2018). Lipoproteins are
naturally represented by lipoprotein nanoparticles (LPN), which are endogenic
self-assemblies of protein and lipids. Depending on their hydrodynamic size and
surface area, LPNs are divided into four basic groups. Including high-density LPNs (size 8-12 nm),
Low-density LPNs (size 18-25 nm), Very low-density LPNs (size
30-80 nm), and High-density LPNs (size less than 25 nm).
4. Significance of Protein-Based nanoparticles
Protein-based nanoparticles are being studied for their applications in
pharmaceutical industries and as functional tools due to their biodegradability
and low toxicity (Li et al., 2018). Proteins are a preferred alternative to
synthesized polymers for applications in the biomedical field because of their
safety and the added advantage of biocompatibility. Not only protein
nanoparticles can be prepared under mild conditions avoiding the use of toxic
chemicals or organic solvents but also their defined primary structure provides
multiple possibilities for surface modification (Wang et al., 2014). In order to be developed as drug delivery
systems, protein-based nanoparticles have several advantages like stability,
ease of surface modification and particle-size control, low toxicity issues,
and biodegradability (Langer et al., 2003). Some advantages of protein-based
NPs are presented in Figure 4. Due to their small size, protein-based
nanoparticles show high dissolution and can be easily transmitted among cells
through endocytosis (Li et al., 2018). Not only these protein nanoparticles are
less toxic but they also enhance the release of drugs in biological systems and
increase their bioavailability. This factor can be utilized to achieve high
efficiency with minimum drug dose and decrease the problem of drug resistance
in the human body (Verma et al., 2018). Since proteins often contain a wide variety of
functional groups, they can bind and transport significant amounts of
therapeutic compounds by a variety of methods, including electrostatic contacts
and hydrophobic interactions, covalent bonds, and interactions (Barchelor et
al., 2018). The presence of a number of functional groups in the protein
structure allows specific binding of drugs with the nanocarrier and the
targeted site in the receptor protein during drug delivery (Ferrara et al.,
2021). Protein-based nanoparticles show a non-immunogenic response i.e. they do
not stimulate immune response at the receptor site. Also, they show increased
cellular uptake as they easily be removed by cells (eg. Vascular epethilialcal)
by different mechanisms (Kianfaret al., 2021).
Figure 4. Advantages of protein nanoparticles in drug delivery
(Ritz et al., 2015).
|
5. Preparation
techniques
5.1 Desolvation
This method is
used for the preparation of protein-based nanoparticles. In this technique
(Figure 5), protein is dissolved in a solution with a pH of 5.5, and ethanol is
continuously added dropwise while the solution is stirred until turbid (Jahanban-Esfahlan
et al., 2016). Since the protein component is less soluble
in water, its phases separate when ethanol is added to the solution (Lei et
al., 2021). The desolvation of protein-based nanoparticles was assessed by
Weber and colleagues (Elzoghby et al., 2012).
Weber reported that the minimum glutaraldehyde concentration for
producing stable nanoparticles is around 40% with 24 hours of incubation. Particle diameters affected by the pH of the
environment (Jahanban-Esfahlan et al.,
2016).
Figure 5. Preparation of protein-based nanoparticles by desolvation
method
|
5.2
Emulation
The emulation
technique is used to create polymeric nanoparticles with protein stabilization
using thermal or chemical techniques (Figure 6) (Karami et al., 2020). Using the thermal method, protein nanoparticles are produced by quickly
homogenizing the solution containing a protein drop, then heating at 175–180°C
for 10 min (Yu et al., 2015). The solution is cooled using ethyl ether to
facilitate phase separation during centrifugation. (Lei et al., 2021 &
Solanki et al., 2021). In the chemical method, the
aqueous protein solution is stabilized by emulsification at 25°C into the oil.
The aqueous protein solution is then denatured using formaldehyde suspension
(kim et al., 2010 & Liu et al., 2018).
Figure 6. Preparation of protein-based
nanoparticles by emulation method
5.3 Thermal gelation
The
thermal gelation technique is used to synthesize gel from a solution by heating
(Figure 7). This process involves the heat-induced unfolding of native protein
structure followed by protein-protein interactions involving hydrogen ions,
electrostatic forces, and hydrophobic bonds (Yedomon et al 2013). Thermal
gelation often involves mixing lysozyme and albumin solution at pH 5.3 to
create nanoparticles. The pH is then set to 10.3 and the produced solution is
heated again (Lei et al., 2021 & Yu et al., 2015).
Figure 7. Preparation of
protein-based nanoparticles by thermal gelation.
5.4 Nanoparticle albumin-bound (NAB) technology
NAB technology was developed by an American bioscience
company. In this method (Figure 8), a drug is combined with a selected albumin
protein in an aqueous solution to create protein nanoparticles that range in
size from 100 to 200 nm (Moghimi et al., 2005 & Jimenez_Cruz et al., 2015).
The NP NAB technology was developed to make NPs
that are safe and appropriate for intravenous administration of anticancer
drugs with limited solubility.
Figure 8. Preparation
of albumin-Based nanoparticles by NAB technique method.
5.5 Self-Assembly
In this technique, protein nanoparticles involve an
arrangement of protein units into ordered structures by linking the monomers.
This method (Figure 9) of producing self-assembly protein nanoparticles (SAPNs)
involves increasing the hydrophobic power of protein by adding lipophilic drugs
and decreasing amino groups from the surface of the proteins (Tarhini et al.,
2017).
Figure 9. Preparation
of albumin-Based nanoparticles by Self-assembly method
5.6 Nano spray drying
Spray drying is a well-established
method commonly used in the pharmaceutical industry to produce dry powder from
a liquid phase. Nanoparticles in liquid samples can be processed using nano
spray drying (Figure 10). The nozzle sprays liquid samples into chambers that
contain hot nitrogen and carbon dioxide gas flowing in the same direction.
(Vandervoort, Ludwig 2002, & Ahmed et al., 2012). Nanoparticles are
collected using an electrode located at the bottom of the chamber. These
electrodes provide an electrostatic charge to the sprayed droplets as they go
toward the chamber's bottom. This is a step-by-step process as well as a fast
and cost-effective way of producing small-scale protein particles. Lee et al.
employed the innovative Nano Spray Dryer B-90 and Tween 80 as a surfactant to
create BSA nanoparticles in a single step in a practical manner. (equipped with
a vibrating mesh spray technology and an electrostatic particle collector) (Lee
et al., 2011). When the surfactant was added, the particles' form shifted to a
spherical one, stabilizing the nanoparticles. Optimized production of smooth
spherical nanoparticles (median size:460±10nm and yield:72±4%) was achieved
using the 4μm spray mesh at 0.1%w/v BSA concentration, 0.05%w/v surfactant
concentration, drying flow rate of 150L/min and inlet temperature of 120°C (Lee
et al., 2011).
Figure 10. Preparation
of albumin-Based nanoparticles by Nano spray drying method.
5.7 Complex coacervation method
In the coacervation process (Figure 11),
when a salt is added to a protein solution, liquid-liquid phase separation
occurs, giving rise to a polymer-rich dense phase at the bottom and a
transparent solution above resulting in the desired NPs (Lu et al., 2004 &
Elzoghby et al., 2015). Proteins include
several charged functional groups and are amphoteric; they can be made cationic
or anionic by varying several variables, including the protein's pH. Other
polymeric electrolytes can engage in electrostatic interactions with the
charged protein. Proteins and other polymers can interact electrostatically at
pH-dependent levels to create stable, biocompatible nanoparticles and
coacervates that enable the regulated transfer of DNA and bioactive therapies.
(Ahmed et al., 2012).
Figure 11. Preparation
of albumin-Based nanoparticles by Complex coacervation method method.
5.8 Ionotropic
gelation
Calvo et al. (1997) first reported
this technique and has been widely examined and developed. The method utilizes
the electrostatic interaction between the amine group of protein/ biopolymer
and a negatively charged group of polyanion such as tripolyphosphate (Figure
12). Protein can be dissolved in an organic solvent of stabilizing agents, such
as poloxamer. Polyanion was then added, and nanoparticles were formed
spontaneously under mechanical stirring at room temperature. The size and
surface charge of particles can be modified by changing the ratio of
proteins/biopolymers to the stabilizer. A general increase in particle
compactness and size was observed by increasing the proteins/biopolymer
concentration and increasing the polymer to polyanion ratio (Diyva et al., 2018
& Jonassen et al., 2012). They also reported that the smaller particle size
found in the presence of sodium chloride made nanoparticles dispersed in saline
solution more stable. This is because a univalent salt like sodium chloride
when added to the solvent screens out to the electrostatic repulsion between
the positively charged amine groups on the proteins/biopolymer backbone. This
will increase the flexibility of the polymer chains in solution and thus
increase its stability (Ilium 1998). The advantages and disadvantages of
different preparation techniques used in the synthesis of protein-based nanoparticles
are discussed in Table 1.
Figure 12. Preparation of protein/biopolymer-Based nanoparticles by Ionotropic
gelation method.
Table
1. Advantages and disadvantages of
preparation techniques of protein-based nanoparticles (Hong et al., 2020).
Preparation
techniques
|
Advantages
|
Disadvantages
|
Desolvation
|
Ø High stability
Ø Small
nanoparticles
Ø High
encapsulation efficiency
Ø The size and
shape of nanoparticles can be controlled by reaction conditions
|
Ø Only possible
for proteins that can be minimally affected by the dissoluble process itself
or diluted by transporter proteins.
|
Emulation
|
Ø High stability
Ø High
encapsulation efficiency
Ø The size and
shape of nanoparticles can be controlled by reaction conditions
|
Ø Generating
particles larger than those obtained by desolvation
Ø Thermodynamic
instability
Ø Need surfactants
and stabilizers
|
Self-assembly
|
Ø High stability
Ø Small
nanoparticles
Ø High
encapsulation efficiency
|
Ø Difficult to
control the size and shape of nanoparticles
Ø Protein strain
potential exists
|
Electrospray
technique
|
Ø Small
nanoparticles
Ø High solubility
|
Ø Low flow
Ø This technique
may induce some macromolecule degradation due to the stress involved in the
operation parameters
|
Nano spray
technique
|
Ø Cost-effective
Ø Control of
particle size, shape and morphology
|
Ø Limited to
small-scale production
Ø Challenging to
incorporate hydrophobic drugs
|
Coacervation
method
|
Ø High stability small
nanoparticles Can be mixed with sensitive drugs (protein or peptide) The
shape and size of nanoparticles can be controlled by reaction conditions
|
Ø Diffculty of
scale-up
|
Nano spray
drying
|
Ø Control of
particle size, shape, and morphology One-step semi-continuous process
Processing of heat-sensitive substances with low risk of degradation
Cost-effective
|
Ø Limited to
small-scale production Challenging to incorporate hydrophobic drugs
|
6. Characterization techniques
6.1 Dynamic
Light Scattering (DLS) system
Dynamic light
scattering (DLS) determines the particle diameter with the aid of Brownian
motion and light scattering properties. He-Ne laser operation at 90° angle are
used in dynamic light scattering (DLS) equipment with a 4 mW to detect the
average size and PDI (Yedomon et al., 2013 & Elzoghby et al., 2015). DLS is based on scattered light
interacting with a sample which provides information about the size of
nanoparticles, PDI, and nanoparticle’s stability (Verma et al., 2015). The PDI
is a measure of a sample’s particle size distribution. It ranges from 0
(monodispersed) to 1 (broad distribution)
(Al-jawad et al.,
2018).
6.2 UV-Visible Spectrophotometer
UV-Vis
Spectroscopy is a type of electronic microscopy. It is based on the principle
of Beer- Lambert law and is used for quantitative analysis of the sample.
According to law, when the monochromatic beam of light passes through the
homogenous absorbing medium, then the absorbance of the sample is in direct
proportion to the path length (l) and concentration (c) of absorbing moieties
in the sample at a particular wavelength. Deuterium tungsten lamps can be used
as a light source for UV-Vis Spectroscopy (Jimenez-Cruz et al., 2015). In the
range of 200-600nm, UV-Visible spectrophotometer measurements of albumin-based
nanoparticles are made at 250C in the range of 200-600 nm (Jahanban-
Esfahlan et al., 2016).
6.3 Field Scanning Electron
Microscopy (FESEM) study-
It is a
high-resolution image technique focused on the high energy electron beam (Verma
et al., 2015). The secondary electron emitted during this interaction provides
the insight about the geometry, topography and composition of the sample under
investigation The sample must be electronically grounded and conducting in
nature for the imaging. the non conductive specimens are often coated with the
thin layer of metals, mainly platinum, tungsten, gold, chromium and graphite,
that prevents the accumulation of the negative charge on the surface. At room
temperature, the protein nanoparticles can be dispersed using sonication and
then subjected to analysis at a voltage of 5–20 kV (Jahanban- Esfahlan et al.,
2016).
6.4 Transmission Electron Microscopy (TEM)
It is a
high-resolution imaging technique that involves electrons with very short
wavelengths for imaging. TEM images for protein nanoparticles can be captured
at an accelerating voltage of 100 kV (Karami et al., 2020). Initially the
prepared samples need to be stained with a 2% solution of ammonium molybdate
that had been filtered through a 0.45µm millipore filter (Yedomon et al.,
2013). The nanoparticle suspension can then be applied to the carbon-coated
copper grid, and any excess solution should be removed with filter paper.
6.5 Fourier Transform Infrared (FTIR) Spectroscopy
It is based on the
vibrational transition that can be the determination of the functional group
associated with the nanoparticles (Elzoghby et al., 2015 &
Jahanban-Esfahlan et al., 2016). FT-IR
spectroscopy is used to detect and record the spectra throughout a 400–4000 cm-1
wavelength range. The region between 1500-400 cm-1
is referred to as a fingerprint region and 4000-1600 cm-1 is
regarded as a functional group region. Only the molecules with net dipole
considered are IR active. The functionalization of nanoparticles can easily
determine the bond strength, types of bonds, and structure of molecules (Verma
et al., 2020).
6.6 X-Ray
diffraction (XRD)
X-Ray Diffraction technique is a significant tool used
to identify the nanoparticles' structure. It is a non-destructive, non-contact
technique that can provide extensive information on the chemical and physical
characteristics of the sample, but most crucially about the crystal structure,
including crystallite size, crystallite strain, orientation, and defect. It has
a quantitative approach (Jahanban-Esfahlan et al., 2016 & Karami et al.,
2020). It
can be determined using Bragg’s law [Eq. (1)]
nλ = 2dsinθ (1)
where, n= order of reflection, λ = x-ray wavelength, d= interplanar
distance, θ= angle between incident beam and lattice plane.
6.7 Atomic Force Microscopy (AFM)
Atomic Force
Microscopy is a type of scanning probe microscopy, it is a non-destructive
technique, that can be used in the characterization of various surface
measurements such as texture and roughness by provideding 3D topographic images
of nanoparticles (Verma et al., 2015). AFM can be operated in majorly three
modes such as contact mode, non-contact mode, and tapping mode (Elzoghby et
al., 2012).
7. Encapsulation and drug loading Efficiency of
Albumin-based nanoparticles
The effectiveness of drug encapsulation plays an
important role in the selection of a drug-delivery vehicle. This efficiency can
be calculated in percentage using Equations [Eq. (2) & (3)] (Subia, Kundu
2012).
Encapsulation efficiency =
× 100 % (2)
Drug Loading efficiency =
× 100 %
(3)
The concentration of the free, nonentrapped medication
is ascertained by producing a calibration curve of varying amounts of the
entrapped drug using UV-visible spectroscopy (Figure 13). K.P.Singh and group
evaluated the encapsulation efficiency of albendazole-encapsulated Liposome and
PEG-coated Liposome and found the values to be 72% and 81% respectively (Panwar
et al., 2010).
Figure 13 Method of drug
loading
|
8. In Vitro release studies
The drug release rate is an important factor in
selecting a nanocarrier for drug delivery. The in vitro studies for drug release from encapsulated protein
nanoparticles can be performed by dialysis method. K.P. Singh and group have
studied and compared the in vitro release behavior of free and encapsulated
albendazole. Encapsulation was done by both conventional and PEG-coated
Liposome systems (Panwar et al., 2010).
S.C. Kundu and group studied the in vitro release behavior of
methotrexate from silk fibroin- Albumin nanocarriers and found that 85% drug
was released after 12 days (Subia, Kundu 2012). The encapsulation, loading, and
release of drugs are highly effected by size, change, and hydrophobicity of the
carrier system.
9. Applications of
protein-based nanoparticles in drug delivery
Protein-based nanoparticles
are being used as drug-delivery systems in the field of medicine. The surface
of protein nanoparticles can be easily functionalized in addition to being
biocompatible and biodegradable due to their specified basic structure. Also,
charged proteins can assist drug loading through electrostatic interactions.
The scopes of the protein nanocarrier systems have been investigated both in
vitro and in vivo to encapsulate several medicinal compounds.
Albumin proteins are used as a carrier in the treatment of cancer, diabetes,
etc. Several albumin-based drug delivery systems are commercially available
like abraxane, levmir and victoza in the treatment of diabetes,
(Frates et al., 2018) ozoralizumab in the treatment of rheumatoid arthritis and
albuferon in the treatment of hepatitis C (Elsadek et al., 2012). Satya Prakash
and group have developed and assessed HSA
nanoparticle for the targeted delivery of milrinone for the treatment of congestive Heart failure
(Sarfaraz et al., 2021). Liposomes have
also been used for a number of clinical applications.
9.1 Role of
protein-based nanoparticles in cancer treatment
Cancer is one of the
terrible diseases that the world has been dealing with for years. Albumin
nanospheres have been used to entrap chemotherapy drugs such 5-fluorouracil,
doxorubicin, and methotrexate, and their properties have been thoroughly
investigated (Lomis et al., 2021). Protein nanoparticles have been employed in
different types of cancer therapies.
Chemotherapy
One of the most popular forms of cancer treatment,
chemotherapy uses chemotherapeutic medications to destroy cancer and achieve
the desired therapeutic outcome. Chemotherapy frequently has a long list of
side effects because of the non-specific toxicity of the drugs (Jose et al.,
2014 & Lei et al., 2021) The albumin-based nanoparticles usually have the
following advantages over conventional drug delivery techniques for the
delivery of anticancer medicines (Zhou et al., 2013 & Yu et al., 2015).
Gene therapy
Exogenetic genes are inserted into target
cells during gene therapy to correct defective genes and express desirable
proteins in order to achieve therapeutic goals. Gene therapy has significantly
advanced cancer treatment over the last few decades. However, exogenous nucleic
acids can be quickly eliminated when supplied through in vivo delivery
(Joye et al., 2014). Due to their
versatility, the use of biopolymeric nanocarriers like protein nanoparticles in
drug or gene delivery systems made it simple to reach specific target areas
(Chen et al., 2018, & Jeslin et al., 2018). Before the drug or gene can be
delivered, the nanocarriers carrying the drug or gene must get past a variety
of biological obstacles and enter the bloodstream. The biocompatibility of
protein nanoparticles makes them advantageous over other synthetic polymeric
nanoparticles. Different tactics, including active targeting, passive
targeting, and stimuli-modulated drug release can be used to accomplish gene
therapy through protein nanoparticles (Jeslin et al., 2018 & Nitta et al.,
2013).
9.2 Role of
Protein-Based nanoparticles in delivery of antiviral drugs
Protein-based nanoparticles can be applied to
encapsulate and deliver anti-viral drugs. J. M. Irache and group have studied
intravitreal delivery of two different anti-cytomegaloviral drugs ganciclovir
and formivisen (Wu et al., 2019). Ocular drug delivery systems have
also been developed with BSA nanoparticles. These systems have been studied for
ocular delivery of Acyclovir, an antiviral compound (Irache et al., 2005 &
Suwannoi et al., 2017).
10. Conclusion
Protein-based nanoparticles are a better alternative
to metallic nanoparticles and other synthetic polymeric nanoparticles due to
their properties like biocompatibility, biodegradability, ease of surface
modification, ease of particle size control, non-immunogenic response,
increased cellular uptake and targeted binding to the receptor site. Using
biopolymeric nanoparticles is a great and economically viable approach for the
targeted delivery of drugs for treatment of various diseases. Studies have shown
that using protein nanoparticles as nanocarriers increases the stability and
effectiveness of drugs while reducing their toxicity. Such protein-based
nanocarriers have found various applications in the field of medicine as drug
delivery systems, especially in the case of cancer treatment. However, their
applications in the treatment of other life-threatening diseases need to be
explored further.
11. Future
perspective
Albumin-based nanocarriers are predicted to play an
important role in combined therapy and theranostic in the future. Considering
the harmful side-effects of commercially available cosmetics and skin-care
products, the potential of protein nanoparticles must also be explored in this
category. The potential of protein-based nanoparticles can also be explored to
enhance the quality and quantity of products in the field of agriculture, food,
cosmetics, etc. The application of structurally designed biopolymer particles
in the food industry is still in the initial stages of research. Food companies
are looking for ways to make the healthiness of their products without
compromising their quality or the way consumers perceive them. Toxicological
studies should also be done to make sure that the new technologies are safe for
wide use in the food industry.
12. Acknowledgment
We are thankful to the Head of Department, School of Studies in Chemistry
and Director, Center for Basic Sciences, Pt. Ravishankar Shukla University,
Raipur for providing the research facilities. The authors are grateful to the
Department of Science & Technology, Government of India for providing
financial assistance (DST/INSPIRE Fellowship/2022/IF220056).
References
Ahmed O.
Elzoghby, Wael M. Samy, Nazik A. Elgindy (2012). Albumin-based nanoparticles as
potential controlled release drug delivery systems J Controlled Rel 157
168–182. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jconrel.2011.07.031.
AL-Jawad,
S.M.H., Taha, A.A., Al-Halbosiy, M.M.F., AL-Barram, L.F.A., (2018). Synthesis and characterization of small-sized
gold nanoparticles coated by bovine serum albumin (BSA) for cancer photothermal
therapy, Photodiagnosis Photodyn Ther, 21 201–210. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pdpdt.2017.12.004.
Batchelor,
H., Kaukonen, A.M., Klein, S., Davit B., Ju, R., Ternik, R., Heimbach, T., Lin,
W., Wang, J., Storey, D., (2018). Food effects in pediatric medicines
development for products Co-administered with food, Int J Pharm, 536
530–535. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijpharm.2017.05.011.
Chamundeeswari,
M., Jeslin, J., Verma, M.L., (2018).
Nanocarriers for drug delivery applications, Undefined, 17
849–865. https://doi.org/10.1007/S10311-018-00841-1.
Chen, C.,
Yang, Z., Tang, X., (2018). Chemical modifications of nucleic acid drugs and
their delivery systems for gene-based therapy, Med Res Rev, 38
829–869. https://doi.org/10.1002/med.21479.
Chinnathambi,
S., Karthikeyan, S., Velmurugan, D., Hanagata, N., Aruna, P., Ganesan, S.,
(2015). Effect of Moderate UVC Irradiation on Bovine Serum Albumin and Complex
with Antimetabolite 5-Fluorouracil: Fluorescence Spectroscopic and Molecular
Modelling Studies, Int J Spectro, 2015
12. http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2015/315764.
Divya,
K., Jisha, M. S., (2018). Chitosan nanoparticles
preparation and applications, Enviro Chem Letters, 16 101-112.
https://doi.org/10.1007/s10311017.
Elsadek, B.,
Kratz, F., (2012). Impact of albumin on
drug delivery — New applications on the horizon, J Controlled Rel, 157
4–28. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jconrel.2011.09.069.
Elzoghby, A. O., Elgohary, Mayada
M., Kamel, Nayra M., (2015). Implications of Protein- and Peptide-Based
Nanoparticles as Potential Vehicles for Anticancer Drugs, Adv in Protein
Chem and Str Bio, 169-221. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/bs.apcsb.2014.12.002.
Elzoghby,
A.O., Elgohary, M.M., Panwar, P., Pande, B., Lakhera, P.C., Singh, K.P.,
(2010). Preparation, characterization, and in vitro release study of
albendazole-encapsulated nanosize liposomes, Int J Nanomedicine, 5
101–108. https://doi.org/10.2147/ijn.s8030.
Elzoghby, A.O., Samy, W.M., Elgindy,
N.A., (2012). Albumin-based nanoparticles as potential controlled release drug
delivery systems, J Control Relhup, 157 168–182. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jconrel.2011.07.031.
Ferrara, F.,
Pambianchi, E., Woodby, B., Messano, N., Therrien, J.P., Pecorelli, A.,
Canella, R., Valacchi, G., (2021).
Evaluating the effect of ozone in UV-induced skin damage, Toxicol
Lett, 338 40–50. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.toxlet.2020.11.023.
Frates, K. de, Markiewicz, T., Gallo, P.,
Rack, A., Weyhmiller, A., Jarmusik, B., Hu, X., (2018). Protein Polymer-Based
Nanoparticles: Fabrication and Medical Applications, Int J Mol Sci, 19
1717. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijms19061717.
Hong, S., Choi, D.W., Kim, H.N., Park,
C.G., Lee, W., Park, H.H., (2020). Protein-Based Nanoparticles as Drug Delivery
Systems, Pharma, 12 604. https://doi.org/10.3390/pharmaceutics12070604.
Ilium, L., (1998). Chitosan and its use as a
pharmaceutical excipient. Pharm Res, 15(9) 1326–1331. https://doi.org/10.1023/a:1011929016601.
Iqbal, H.,
Yang, T., Li, T., Zhang, Zhang, M., Ke, H., Ding, D., Deng, Y., Chen, H.,
(2021). Serum protein-based
nanoparticles for cancer diagnosis and treatment, J Control Rel, 329
997–1022. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jconrel.2020.10.030.
Irache, J.,
Merodio, M., Arnedo, A., Camapanero, M., Mirshahi, M., Espuelas, S., (2005).
Albumin nanoparticles for the intravitreal delivery of anticytomegaloviral
drugs, Mini Rev Med Chem, 5 293–305. https://doi.org/10.2174/1389557053175335.
Jacob, J.,
Haponiuk, J.T., Thomas, S., Gopi, S., (2018). Biopolymer based nanomaterials in
drug delivery systems: A review, Mater Today Chem, 9 43–55. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.mtchem.2018.05.002.
Jahanban-Esfahlan,
A., Dastmalchi, S., Davaran, S., (2016). A simple improved desolvation method
for the rapid preparation of albumin nanoparticles, Int J Biol Macromol, 91
703–709. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijbiomac.2016.05.032.
Jain, A.,
Singh, S.K., Arya, S.K., Kundu, S.C., Kapoor, S., (2018). Protein
Nanoparticles: Promising Platforms for Drug Delivery Applications, ACS
Biomater Sci Eng, 4 3939–3961. https://doi.org/10.1021/acsbiomaterials.8b01098.
Jiménez-Cruz,
E., Arroyo-Maya, I.J., Hernández-Arana,
A., Cornejo-Mazón, M., Hernández-Sánchez, H., (2015). Protein-based nanoparticles, Food Eng
Series, 69–79. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-13596-0_5.
Jonassen, H., Kjoniksen, AL.,
Hiorth, M., (2012). Stability of chitosan nanoparticles cross-linked with
tripolyphosphate. Biomacro mol, 13(11) 3747–3756. https://doi.org/10.1021/bm301207a.
Joye, I.J., McClements, D.J.,
(2014). Biopolymer-based nanoparticles
and microparticles: Fabrication, characterization, and application, Curr
Opin Colloid Interface Sci, 19 417–427. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cocis.2014.07.002.
Kamel, N.M.,
(2015). Implications of Protein- and
Peptide-Based Nanoparticles as Potential Vehicles for Anticancer Drugs, Adv
Protein Chem Struct Biol, 98 169–221. https://doi.org/10.1016/bs.apcsb.2014.12.002.
Karami, E.,
Behdani, M., Kazemi-Lomedasht, F., (2020). Albumin nanoparticles as
nanocarriers for drug delivery: Focusing on antibody and nanobody delivery and
albumin-based drugs, J Drug Deliv Sci Technol, 55 101471. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jddst.2019.101471.
Kianfar, E.,
(2021). Protein nanoparticles in drug delivery: animal protein, plant proteins
and protein cages, albumin nanoparticles, J Nanobiotechn, 19
1–32. https://doi.org/10.1186/S12951-021-00896-3.
Kim, B.Y.S., Rutka, J.T., Chan,
W.C.W., (2010). Nanomedicine, N Engl
J Med, 363 2434–2443. https://doi.org/10.1056/nejmra0912273.
Langer, K.,
Balthasar, S., Vogel, V., Dinauer, N., von Briesen, Schubert, H., D., (2003).
Optimization of the preparation process for human serum albumin (HSA)
nanoparticles, Int J Pharm, 257 169–180. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0378-5173(03)00134-0.
Larsen,
M.T., Kuhlmann, M., Hvam, M.L., Howard, K.A., (2016). Albumin-based drug
delivery: harnessing nature to cure disease, Mol Cell Ther, 4 3-10.
https://doi.org/10.1186/S40591-016-0048-8.
Lee, S.H.,
Heng, D., Ng, W.K., Chan, H.K., Tan, R.B., (2011). Nano spray drying: a novel
method for preparing protein nanoparticles for protein therapy, Int J Pharm,
403 192–200. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijpharm.2010.10.012.
Lei, C.,
Liu, X.R., Chen, Q.B., Li, Y., Zhou, J.L., Zhou, L.Y., Zou, T., (2021).
Hyaluronic acid and albumin based nanoparticles for drug delivery, J of
Controlled Release, 331 416–433. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jconrel.2021.01.033.
Li, G., Zhang, Y.Y., Guo, H., Huang, L., Lu,
H., Lin, X., Wang, Y.L., Du, S., Gao, H.J., (2018). Epitaxial growth and
physical properties of 2D materials beyond graphene: from monatomic materials
to binary compounds, Chem Soc Rev, 47 6073–6100. https://doi.org/10.1039/c8cs00286j.
Li, W.,
Wang, H.F., Kuruneru, S.T.W., Wang, T., Sauret, E., Li, Z.Y., Zhao, C.X., Gu, Y.T., (2018). A
numerical investigation of drug extravasation using a tumour–vasculature
microfluidic device, Microfluidics and Nanofluidics, 22 1–11. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10404-018-2165-y.
Liu, Y.,
Hui, Y., Ran, R., Yang, G.Z., Wibowo, D., Wang, H.F., Middelberg, A.P.J., Zhao,
C.X., (2018). Synergetic Combinations of Dual-Targeting Ligands for Enhanced In
Vitro and In Vivo Tumor Targeting, Adv Healthc Mater, 7 1800106. https://doi.org/10.1002/adhm.201800106.
Lohcharoenkal, W., Wang, L., Chen, Y.C.,
Rojanasakul, Y., (2014). Protein nanoparticles as drug delivery carriers for
cancer therapy, Biomed Res Int, 2014 1-12. https://doi.org/10.1155/2014/180549.
Lomis, N.,
Sarfaraz, Z.K., Alruwaih, A., Westfall, S., Shum-Tim, D., Prakash, S., (2021).
Albumin Nanoparticle Formulation for Heart-Targeted Drug Delivery: In Vivo
Assessment of Congestive Heart Failure, Pharmaceuticals, 14 697. https://doi.org/10.3390/ph14070697.
Lu, Z., Yeh, T. K., Tsai, M., Au, J.
L., & Wientjes, M. G. (2004). Paclitaxel-loaded gelatin nanoparticles for
intravesical bladder cancer therapy. Clin Cancer Research, 10(22)
7677–7684 https://doi.org/10.1158/1078-0432.ccr-04-1443.
Meng, R.,
Zhu, H., Wang, Z., Hao, S., Wang, B., (2022). Preparation of Drug-Loaded
Albumin Nanoparticles and Its Application in Cancer Therapy, J Nanomater,
1–12. https://doi.org/10.1155/2022/3052175.
Moghimi, S.M., Hunter, A.C., Murray, J.C., (2005). Nanomedicine: current status and future
prospects, Faseb J, 19 311–330. https://doi.org/10.1096/fj.04-2747rev.
Nitta, S. K.
and Numata, K., (2013). Biopolymer-Based
Nanoparticles for Drug/Gene Delivery and Tissue Engineering, Int J Mol Sci,
14, 1629–1654. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijms14011629.
Ritz, S.,
Schöttler, S., Kotman, N., Baier, G., Musyanovych, A., Kuharev , J., Landfester , K., Schild , H., Jahn, O.,
Tenzer, S., Mailänder, V., (2015).
Protein corona of nanoparticles: distinct proteins regulate the cellular
uptake, Biomacromol, 16 1311–1321. https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.biomac.5b00108.
Solanki,
R., Patel, K., Patel, S., (2021). Bovine Serum Albumin Nanoparticles for the
Efficient Delivery of Berberine: Preparation, Characterization and In vitro
biological studies, Colloids Surf A Physicochem Eng Asp, 608
125501. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.colsurfa.2020.125501.
Sripriyalakshmi,
S., Jose, P., Ravindran, A., Anjali, C.H., (2014). Recent Trends in Drug Delivery System Using
Protein Nanoparticles, Cell Biochem Biophys, 70 17–26. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12013-014-9896-5.
Suwannoi,
P., Chomnawang, M., Sarisuta, N., Reichl, S., Müller-Goymann, C.C., (2017).
Development of Acyclovir-Loaded Albumin Nanoparticles and Improvement of
Acyclovir Permeation Across Human Corneal Epithelial T Cells, J Ocul
Pharmacol Ther, 33 743–752. https://doi.org/10.1089/jop.2017.0057.
Tarhini, M.,
Greige-Gerges, H., Elaissari, A., (2017). Protein-based nanoparticles: From
preparation to encapsulation of active molecules, Int J Pharm, 522
172–197. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijpharm.2017.01.067.
Vandervoort,
J., Ludwig, A., (2002). Biocompatible
stabilizers in the preparation of PLGA nanoparticles: a factorial design study,
Int J Pharm, 238 77–92. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0378-5173(02)00058-3.
Verma, D.,
Gulati, N., Kaul, S., Mukherjee, S., Nagaich, U., (2018). Protein Based
Nanostructures for Drug Delivery, J Pharm (Cairo), 2018 1–18. https://doi.org/10.1155/2018/9285854.
Verma, M.L.,
Dhanya, B.S., Sukriti, Rani, V., Thakur, M., Jeslin, J., Kushwaha, R., (2020).
Carbohydrate and protein based biopolymeric nanoparticles: Current status and
biotechnological applications, Int J Biol Macromol, 154 390–412. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijbiomac.2020.03.105.
Wilson, B.,
Paladugu, L., Priyadarshini, S.R.B., Jenita, J.J.L., (2015). Development of
albumin-based nanoparticles for the delivery of abacavir, Int J Biol
Macromol. 81 763–767. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijbiomac.2015.09.015.
Wu, L.X.,
Qiao, Z.R., Cai, W.D., Qiu,W.Y., Yan,
J.K., (2019). Quaternized curdlan/pectin polyelectrolyte complexes as
biocompatible nanovehicles for curcumin, Food Chem, 291 180–186. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.foodchem.2019.04.029.
Yedomon, B.,
Fessi, H., Charcosset, C., (2013). Preparation of Bovine Serum Albumin (BSA)
nanoparticles by desolvation using a membrane contactor: A new tool for large
scale production, European J Pharma and Biopharma, 85 398–405. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ejpb.2013.06.014.
Yu,
J., Chen, Y., Xiong, L., Zhang, X., Zheng, Y., (2019). Conductance Changes in
Bovine Serum Albumin Caused by Drug-Binding Triggered Structural Transitions, Materials, 12 102. http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/ma12071022.
Yu, X., Jin, C., (2015). Application of albumin-based nanoparticles in
the management of cancer, Journal of Materials Science: Materials in
Medicine, 27 1–10. https://doi.org/10.1007/S10856-015-5618-9.
Zhou, H.Y., Hao, J.L., Wang, S.,
Zheng, Y., Zhang, W.S., (2013). Nanoparticles in the ocular drug delivery, Int
J Ophthalmol, 6 390–396. https://doi.org/10.3980/j.issn.2222-3959.2013.03.25.