Article in HTML

Author(s): Ramsingh Kurrey, Anushree Saha, Manas Kanti Deb*

Email(s): debmanas@yahoo.com

Address: School of Studies in Chemistry, Pt Ravishankar Shukla University, Raipur 492010, Chhattisgarh, India

Published In:   Volume - 33,      Issue - 1,     Year - 2020


Cite this article:
Kurrey et al. (2020). Distribution of Some Selected Surface Active Agents (SAAs) in the Aquatic and Global Environment with Their Toxic Impact: A Comprehensive Review. Journal of Ravishankar University (Part-B: Science), 33(1), pp. 31-46.





Journal of Ravishankar University–B, 33 (1), 31-46 (2020)

 

 




Distribution of Some Selected Surface Active Agents (SAAs) in the Aquatic and Global Environment with Their Toxic Impact: A Comprehensive Review

Ramsingh Kurrey, Anushree Saha, Manas Kanti Deb*

School of Studies in Chemistry, Pt Ravishankar Shukla University, Raipur 492010, Chhattisgarh, India

 

*Corresponding author: debmanas@yahoo.com

[Received: 30 November 2019; Revised version: 21 September 2020; Accepted: 21 September 2020]

Abstract. Surface active agents (SAAs) are a class of compounds, which find various applications in different fields of human activities. Surfactants are generally amphiphilic molecules, which are strongly adsorbed at interfaces between the phases. Surfactants windily used as detergency, emulsion, stabilizing and dispersing agents have led to the discharge of highly contaminated wastewaters in aquatic environment. Once reached in the various compartments of the environment such as rivers, lakes, soils, and sediments, surfactants can undergo aerobic or anaerobic degradation. Concentrations of surfactants in wastewaters, river waters, and sewage waters can range milligrams in maximum cases, while it reaches several grams in sludge, soil and sediments in environments. The environmental facts of SAAs and concentration in surface waters, soils or sediments are reviewed in details. This review provides information on levels of surface-active agents in various environmental samples including soil, sediments, sewage wastewater, river wastewater and aerosols.

Keywords: Surface active agents (SAAs), toxicity, distribution, aquatic and global environment.

Introduction

Surface Active Agents (SAAs) or surfactants belong to a group of chemicals that are well known for their cleaning properties with strongly adsorbed at interfaces between the two phases (Kurrey et al., 2019; Olkowska et al., 2012). The SAAs molecule is part of non-polar hydrophobic and polar hydrophilic, Fig. 1. Generally, the hydrophobic part is known as tail, which is usually an elongated hydrophobic alkyl moiety. The properties, which surfactant exhibit in aqueous medium are associated with the nature of polar head or hydrophilic group (Holt, 2000; Thiele, 2005; Myers, 2005; Sinha et al., 2015; Zembrzoska et al., 2016). On the basis of this chemical characteristic behavior SAAs are classified into the following classes. Cationic surfactants: e.g., cetyltrimethylammonium bromide (CTAB); Anionic surfactants: e.g., linear alkylbenzenesulfonates (LAS), sodium dodecyl sulfate (SDS); Non-ionic surfactants: e.g., nonylphenol (NP); Zwitter ionic surfactants: e.g., methyldodecyleaminepropane sulphonate (MDAS); Gemini surfactants: i.e., butanediyl-1, 4-bis (dimethylcetylammonium bromide) (BDAB) (Table 1).Their excessive use as ingredients in care products such as  shampoos, body wash and in household cleaning products like dishwashing detergents, laundry detergents, hard-surface cleaners. These all product containing SAAs has led to the discharge of highly contaminated water system in aquatic and global environment. The report segments the market by application as household detergents, personal care, industrial and institutional cleaners, food processing, oilfield chemicals, agricultural chemicals, textiles, emulsion polymerization (plastics), paints and coating, construction and other. Surfactants long persistence is observed in environment due to their toxic and ionic in nature, maximum concentration is found as pollutants in sewage water, ground water, sediments, sediments sludge, soil and river water etc. The increasing use of SAAs in household and industries has lead to monitor their levels and their toxic impact on environment (Beers and Fisher, 1992; Fernandez et al., 1996; Heinig et al., 1999; Naylor et al., 2002; Singh et al., 2002; Bao et al., 2009; Zembrzuska et al., 2016; Jackson et al., 2016). The different types of physical and chemical changes, which surfactants undergo in environment, can either lead to the positive or negative outcome. The positive consequence may be stated as that the chemical change has lead to death of bacteria, fungi and other micro-organism (Fernandez et al., 1996; Heinig et al., 1999; Naylor et al., 2002; Singh et al., 2002; Bao et al., 2009; Jackson et al., 2016). Table 2 shows the different types of important commercial and industrial surfactants. Its toxicity is mainly attributed to a function of the capability of the surfactant to adsorb and enter into the biological cell membrane and protein; it causes the disturbance in biological activity and cell lyses or even death (Kurrey at al., 2019, Bidari et al., 2010).The interaction of surfactants with cellular membrane of different biota also depends on surface activities as the interaction or reaction with membrane gets facilitated on living of surface tension (Carballo et al., 2007). SAAs load in surface water has lead to various types of diseases like: skin and eyes irritation and cancer and needs frequent monitoring with suitable measures (Li et al., 2003).The amphiphilic properties of these surfactants allow their transportation in dry and wet deposition to surface and runoff water (Bennie et al., 1997; Marcomini et al., 1998;Lang et al., 2002; Bruno et al., 2002; Merino et al., 2003; Carballo et al., 2007; Clara et al., 2007; Andreu et al., 2007; Chen et al., 2008; Silva et al., 2009;Li et al., 2009;Olkowska et al., 2011; Jardak et al., 2016). Moreover, surfactants are reduced of the surface tension in water at very low concentration (Naylor et al., 2002). Another property of the surfactants is ability to association in solution and formation of micelles. The contamination of various wastewater resources by SAAs is a growing concern and relatively poorly understood compared to other freshwater resources of the environments.

Figure 1.­­ Schematic diagram of surface active agent exhibiting polar head and non-polar tail in the molecule

Table 1. Name and chemical structure of different types of surfactant

S. No.

Class

Name of Surfactant

Chemical Structure

1.

Cationic

 

cetyltrimethylammonium

bromide (CTAB)

2.

Anionic

 

 

sodium

dodecylbenzenesulfate

(SDS)

3.

Non-ionic

nonylphenol (NP)

4.

Amphoteric

 

 

methyldodecyleaminepro

pane sulphonate

(MDAS)

5.

Gemini

 

 

butanediyl-1,4-bis

(dimethylcetylammoniu

m bromide) (BDAB)

Wastewater provides the most reliable perennial source of freshwater on Earth. It maintains flows and levels in rivers and lakes, is essential for the health of wastewater-dependant ecosystems, and in many parts of the world is the most important source of drinking water (Zembrzuska et al., 2016). Wastewaters are the main sources of surfactants in the environment and surface waters contain the greatest loads of surfactants. Groundwater are also generally thought to contain a much greater diversity of compounds compared to wastewater and surface waters, although this may be simply a function of the capability of various analytical methods and the limited number of groundwater studies rather than actual environmental occurrence. It is now established that these compounds enter the environment from a number of sources and pathways: wastewater effluents from municipal treatment plants, septic tanks, hospital effluents, livestock activities including waste lagoons and manure application to soil, subsurface storage of household and industrial waste as well as indirectly through the process of groundwater-surface water (GW-SW) exchange (Carballo et al., 2007; Clara et al., 2007; Andreu et al., 2007; Chen et al., 2008; Silva et al., 2009; Li et al., 2009; Olkowska et al., 2011; Jardak et al., 2016).. There has not been a systematic review of published studies focussing on the occurrence of surfactants in water. Current gaps in our understanding regarding surfactants in various wastewaters are highlighted as well as possible areas for future research.

In the present review an overview on the concentration reported in various solid, liquid and air samples at different study sites in the world has been incorporated. The measurements of surfactant in different sources i.e. ground water, sewage water, industrial water, soil, and aerosol on the human daily life, agriculture, plant, and animal have been described. In this review, we investigate several issues regarding the toxicity of surfactants in the global and marine environment, different ecological behaviors, and the different monitoring procedure in order to reduce the effects and level of surfactants on aquatic and global environments. Also the probable future prospects of research in the field of surfactants have been highlighted concerning the increasing toxicity of surfactants. Abbreviations have been given for various chemical species.

Table 2. Types of surfactants with their commercial, domestic and industrial nomenclatures

Class

Commercial and domestic

 Industrial

Ref.

Anionic

Sodium linear alkylbenzene sulphonate (LABS); sodium lauryl sulphate; sodium lauryl ether sulphates.

Petroleum sulphonates; linosulphonates; naphthalene sulphonates, branched alkylbenzene sulphonates; linear alkylbenzene sulphonates; alcohol sulphates.

Kurrey et. al., 2018

Cationic

Stearalkonium chloride; benzalkonium chloride.

Quaternary ammonium compounds; amine compounds.

Kurrey et. al., 2019

Non-ionic

Coco diethanol-amide alcohol ethoxylates; dodecyl dimethylamine oxide; linear primary alcohol polyethoxylate.

Alkyl phenol ethoxylates; alcohol ethoxylates, EO/PO polyol block polymers; polyethylene glycol esters; fatty acid alkanolamides.

Olkowaska et al., 2011

Amphoteric

Cocoamphocarboxyglycinate; cocamidopropylbetaine.

Betaines; imidazolines.

Petrovic et al., 2002

Gemini

Dialkyldimethylammonium

N-aminoethylpiperazine

1, 2-dioleoyl-3-trimethylammoniumpropane

Zembrzoska et al., 2016

 

Occurrence of SAAs in the environment and their toxic effect

The major sources of surfactants in water bodies

Surfactants are a significant anthropogenic component of the aquatic environment, being used in a large number of household and industrial products, often typified by down the drain disposal. The major components of the surface active agent stream are discharged into surface water (Zembrzoska et al., 2016). Detergents, which contain surfactants, can seriously damage of the living organism in the environments. It has been reported that LAS concentration in the range 0.02-1.0 mg/L can cause excessive secretion of mucus resulting in damage to fish gills and minimize settling rate, break swimming patterns in blue mussel larva and decrease respiration in the human body (Olkowaska et al., 2011). Table 3 shows the toxicity of SAAs is a most important parameter (LC50 and EC50), which determines the extent of their applicability as reported by Olkowska and others (Beers et al., 1992; Naylor et al., 2002; Singh et al., 2002; Olkowaska et al., 2011; Jackson et al., 2016). SAAs are also responsible for chemical process in rivers water and liquid effluents of treatment plants and reduction of water quality parameters (Mungray et al., 2008).

     According to the literature review, the concentration of surfactants as according to Bureau of Indian Standards (BIS 1991) and Indian Standard Drinking Water Specification (ISDWS 2012), the concentration of anionic surfactants has to be less than 1.0 mg/L (BIS, 1991). The water quality of Ganga Canal at various sites, are drastically increasing due to the industrial discharge from Haridwar and nearby city Roorkee, India (Seth et al., 2013; BIS, 1991). The river Ganga is of utmost religious and natural aesthetic importance in India. However, the river canal is under threat of loads of pollution due to the performance of various sacraments like mass bathing, waste disposal and various ritual practices. The toxic influence of these human activities was monitored by measuring the levels of surfactants (Seth et al., 2013). The Har Ki Pauri, Singhdwar, Piran Kaliyar and Old Bridge, Roorkee sites have been investigated for determination of surfactant concentrations in the range 1.18-2.5 mg/L, which were found to be more than permissible limit (1.00 mg/L). Also surfactants’ concentration crossed the desirable limit of BIS during the period of analysis (Davi et al., 1999; Krogh et al., 2003; Sublayrolles et al., 2009). 

 

Table 3­. Toxicity and micro-organism of SAAs with respect recommended lethal concentration.

Class with SAAs

Micro-Organism

Family name

Concentration range (mg/L)

Effective dose

Period

Reference

Cationic

 

 

 

 

 

 

BDMAC

Green algae

Danaliella Salina

0.79

EC50

24 h

Jackson et al., 2016

TMAC

Dephnia

Daphnia Magna

0.13-0.38

IC50

24 h

Olkowaska et al., 2011

QAC

Amphipod,

Crustaceans

Echirogammarus tibaldili, Daphnids

7.7, 0.1-1.0

LC50

24 h

Jardak et al., 2016

Anionic

 

 

 

 

 

 

SDS

Algae

Raphidocelis Subcapitata

36.58

IC50

72 h

Olkowaska et al., 2012

AES

Dephnia

Daphnia Magna

33.61

LC50

24 h

Jackson et al., 2016

LAS

Bacteria

Vibriofischeri

109.7

EC50

12h

Jardak et al., 2016

AEO

Invertebrate

Daphnia agna

0.36-50.5

EC50

12 h

Jardak et al., 2016

Non-ionic

 

 

 

 

 

 

NP

Algae

Raphidocelis Subcapitata

1.23-1.89

LC50

48 h

Naylor et al., 2002

AE

Dephnia

Daphnia Magna

4.0-7.4

EC50

48 h

Singh et al., 2002

Anionic surfactants (AS) in sewage were found as a result of the consumption of consumer products like detergents, shampoo, cleaning and washing agents, and personal care products. The group of AS is linear alkylbenzene sulfonate (LAS). The LAS concentrations of sewage water were reported upto 3-21 mg/L(BIS, 1991; Davi et al., 1999; Krogh et al., 2003;Mungray et al., 2008; Sublayrolles et al., 2009; Bidari et al., 2010; Seth et al., 2013). These levels depend on the removal of LAS in WWTPs and STPs(Scott and Jones,2000; Holt et al., 1995; Paul et al.,1988; Tabor and Barber1996; Mcavoy et al.,1993; Othman et al.,2007; Feijtel et al.,1995; Waters and Feijtel, 1995; Gandolfie,2000; Nishiyama et al.,2003;Holtet al.,1998; Longwell and Maniece,1995). Even though, the anionic surfactants were reported in treated sewage while studying risk assessment to aquatic environment by Mungray and Kumar. In India, per capita consumption of detergents rose to over 4000 mg/L in 2005 (Seth et al., 2013). Surfactants concentration increased can be the result of the worse dissemination rate of the sewage treatment and waste water treatment system in India(Sun et al.,2003; Waters et al.,1976; Petrovic and Barceló,2004; Osburn, 1982). We suggest according to information of Water Pollution Control Board, Bureau of Indian Standards and Indian Standard Drinking Water Specification, the higher coverage of wastewater treatment plants facilities including sewage contribution to the decrease of the concentration of various surfactant (Din, 1989; Hellmann and Fresenius,1980; Hellmann and Fresenius, 1983; Schroder, 2001). It is generally considered that concentration of surfactants in river and surface water depending on the volume of characteristics of wastewater flowing into the river and surface water system, and is mostly related to the degree of pollution in the environment. The main reason behind increased of the concentration of surfactants and water pollution levels that the number of sampling site and frequency of monitoring are limited, analysis of data from the monitoring programs together with other information not easily available in comparison other countries(Hellmann, 1978).

Many researchers have reported the occurrence of SAAs and their mechanistic biological route to its degraded products in surface and wastewater samples (Szymanski et al., 2001; Polish Standard PN-EN 903). The total concentration of anionic surface active agents in the river effluents of Polish zone of the Baltic Sea was determined by meteorological and water management institute of Gdynia in years 1990-1999(Pastewski and Mędrzycka, 2003). The Warta River and its tributaries were selected for the quantification of anionic surfactants in year 1997-98, Poland. The high levels of analyte were observed during winter season by Pastewski and Mędrzycka(2003). The concentrations observed in the Wisla River and Reda River was0.015-0.082 mg/L and 0.008-0.066 mg/L, respectively asreported by Pastewski and Medrzycka (2003). Latif et al. 2012have investigated the concentration of surfactants in the 12 inter-connecting water bodies of Lake Chini, the second largest natural Lake in Malaysia (Othman et al., 2007; Latif et al.,2012). According to the studies, the concentration of SAAsas MBAS and DBAS in the Lake surface microlayer was reportedin the ranges0.0467- 0.13mg/L and 0.0526, 0.0584 mg/L, respectively without therecord of temperature variability parameter (Latif et al., 2012).Concentrations of anionic surfactants between 0.005 and 0.15 mg/L were established in the analyzed water streams (Chitikela et al., 1995; Pedraza et et al., 2007). The main reason behind increased the concentration of surfactants that the low coverage rate of the sewage treatment plant process in many other countries. This review indicated that distribution of different classes of surfactant is the presence of various sources e.g., sewage sludges, sediments, soil in solid samples, intake water, river water, natural or untreated water, sewage water, and tap water inliquid samples and aerosols.

The major sources of surfactants in sewage sludges, sediments, soil

Majorities of the studies have been reported for SAAs level in sediments sludges from river and lake water of coastal area, especially in North America, Europe and Asia (Petrovic et al., 2002). Several papers have been currently published for quantitative analysis of alkylphenolic group of compound (Li et al., 2009). Levels of alkylphenolic group of compound found upstream of point origin of pollution were generally lower than 0.0002 mg/L. And many investigators also found higher concentration of alkylphenolic group of compounds in upstream pollution of STPs. Concentration was ranging generally from 0.000075 to 0.00055 mg/L and 0.00001 mg/L in highly industrialized area (Kloepffer, 1996). Petrovic and Bercelo (2004) give an overview of the concentration of surfactants in sludge, sludge amended soil and sludge in agricultural product (Petrovic and Barcelo, 2004). Majority of investigatorshavefound higher concentration of anionic surfactant (LAS) compounds in sewage sludge and soil samples, and concentrations were more than permissible limit in the region. The higher concentrations of another class of surfactants, alkylphenolic group of compounds have been found in work done by Hosselsoe and co-workers(Hesseloe,2001).Similarly, a major proportion of surfactants studies have been done in sewage sludge and soil, which shows the high quantitative levels of anionic surfactants (LAS) as reported byPetrovic and Barcelo, 2000;Scott and Jones,2000) has reported that the LAS concentrations up to 100500 and 5000 to 15,000 mg/kg in sewage sludge that had been aerobically and anaerobically treated, respectively(Scott and Jones,2000;Latorre et al.,2003). In the same way, higher concentrations of AFEOs detected in anaerobically treated sludge ranged from 900 to 1100 mg/kg. According to Jensen et al., 1999, high concentrations of LAS were reported in anaerobically digested sludge ranged 300030,000 mg/kg compared to lower amounts of LAS reported in aerobic stabilized sludge ranged up to 100500 mg/kg or untreated sludge up to 40014,000 mg/kg(Jensen,1999).The worldwide concentrations of various surfactants are a presence in solid environmental samples. The majorities of researchers have been reported for the concentration of surfactants for various solid environmental samples (Hennes and Rapapost,1989; Vejrup and Wolkoff,2002; Munoz et al.,2016; Breen et al.,1996; Hellmann,1981; Waters,1989).The higher concentration of the non-ionic surfactants e.g. NP (15%) and OPEO (11%) are a presence in solid samples in comparison with other surfactants as shown in Fig. 3.d

 

The major composition of surfactants in atmospheric aerosols

Surfactants in the atmosphere may act as cloud condensation nuclei (CCN), with a potentially negative impact on the environment (Gill and Graedel, 1985, Seidl and Hanel, 1983; Becagli et al., 2011; Sukapan and Brimblecombe, 2002; Radke, 2005; Wahid, 2011). The use of surfactants in motor vehicles, lubricants and diesel fuel, biomass burning, road dust and construction, which is the reason behind the increase the concentration of atmospheric surfactants in aerosols (Radke, 2005; Andrews and Larson, 1993; Frka et al., 2012; Loglio et al., 1985; Halim et al., 2010). The highest concentration of surfactants may influence the state of the gas-liquid interfaces of atmospheric particles and droplets (Latif et al., 2011). Many research group, have suggested that models of cloud formation based organic and inorganic compounds provide a decrease in surface tension (Latifand Brimblecombe, 2007; Latif et al., 2005; Roslan et al., 2010; Srivastava et al., 2008; Awuku et al., 2007). Surface tension is one of the most important factors that control the vapour pressure of small droplets and minimize the surface area of the liquid (Vejrup and Wolkoff, 2002). Olkowska et al. have been investigated the major group of surfactants in presence of tropospheric aerosol, which can affect the formation and development of clouds (Karsa and Porter, 1995; Wahid, 2011; Frka et al., 2012; Loglio et al., 1985; Halim et al., 2010; Latif et al., 2011). The presence of SAAs in atmospheric aerosol samples have also been observed and reported that anionic surface active agents (MBAS) have high levels in the atmosphere i.e. 59 pmol  m-3 in comparison with  level of cationic surface active agents (DBAS) concentration upto 36 pmol  m-3 by Latif and Brimblecombe (Latifand Brimblecombe, 2004). According to Bascom and co-workers anionic surface active agents (MBAS) were dominant in fine mode atmospheric aerosol samples, ranging between 35 and 40 pmol  m-3 and cationic surface active agents (DBAS) was  also found to be dominant in the coarse mode atmospheric aerosol samples, and ranged between 22 and 23 pmol  m-3.

 

 

Figure 2.The concentration of surfactants for various solid environmental samples

 

The major source of these surfactants has been attributed to industrialization in the sampling vicinity(Bascom et al.,1996).Many other research groups, including Sukapan et al. 2002, Andrews et al. 1983, and Loglio et al. 1985 have found the higher concentration of surfactants in various size fraction aerosols. Comparative studied, the result indicated that the highest level of surfactants e.g. MBAS and DBAS in aerosols was recorded the various monsoons like: summer season, autumn season and winter season (Loglio et al., 1985). The source apportionment analysis for the concentration of MBAS and DBAS for various size fractions of aerosols like: Course modes, fine mode, TSP, PM2.5, PM10 and PM1 have been reported(Sukapan and Brimblecombe, 2002; Radke, 2005; Wahid, 2011;Radke, 2005; Andrews and Larson, 1993; Frka et al., 2012; Loglio et al.,1985; Halim et al., 2010; Latif et al., 2011;Latifand Brimblecombe,2007; Latif et al., 2005; Roslan et al., 2010; Srivastava et al., 2008; Awuku et al., 2007;Vejrup and Wolkoff,2002;Bascom et al.,1996).The world wide concentration of anionic and cationic surfactants of higher in various monsoons like: summer season (PM10=36.6% for MBAS and PM10=25.8% for DBAS), autumn season (PM2.5=48% for MBAS and PM2.5=28.4% for DBAS) and winter season (PM2.5=29.4% for MBAS and PM1=40.9% for DBAS)are distributed in aerosols in comparison with otherclasses of surfactants as shown in Fig. 3.


 

Figure 3.The source apportionment result for the concentration of MBAS and DBAS for various size fractions of aerosol


The major composition of surface active agents in liquid environmental samples

Majorities of research groups have been investigating the total concentration of various surfactants in liquid environmental samples as shown in Fig.5.

Intake and River water

Tap and surface water sample in several countries were found to be contaminated with surfactants e.g. perfluorooctane sulfonate (PFOS) and perfluorooctanoic acid (PFOA) (Hanif et al., 2012). These compounds were detected globally in the tissues of fish, marine mammals and bird, but their concentrations ofSAAs in animals from industrialized areas were higher in comparison with less populated in remote areas. Anionic and nonionic surface active agents are toxic in the 0.1 mg/L concentration level for living organismas reported by Vejrup and Wolkoff, 2002.

Natural or Untreated water

In the industrialized world the different type of surfactant will pass through a sewage treatment plants as well as waste water treatment plants. In these processes the surfactants are exposed and released into natural water, therefore, generally surfactants based are aerobic biodegradation and biodegradation process generally depend on the limit or enough solubility of surfactants in water (Barekat and Afzali,2013).The usage of household cleaning detergents and other domestic use might appear to be the major source of anionic and non-ionic surfactants. The usage of elevated amounts of detergents and washing products result in higher concentration in river, and seaside. Determination of surfactants in river water, raw water supply and drinking water are important since surfactants have become a threat to our water supply network. Many researchers have detected town area having a higher concentration of surfactants in wet season (MBAS = 0.262mg/L, DBAS = 0.01169 mg/L) (Chitikela et al.,1995;Janssens, et al.,1997; Bolong et al., 2009; Fujii et al., 2007). The concentration of surfactants at other areas is lower in comparison to town areas. River water along with the town area may receive a variety of organic wastes generated from domestic waste discharged by nearby restaurants. Furthermore, in town areas, other anthropogenic sources might as well supply to the high level of surfactants. Street dusts mainly consist of particles emitted by vehicles and industries, are believed to contain large amount of surfactants, which might be dissolved in runoff water and ultimately enter the river water (Hellmann and Fresenius, 1980; Grisp et al.,1983). Comparative studies the concentrations of SAAs were drastically higher in trafficked road dust in comparison with residential road dust (Sanemasa et al., 2006). Meanwhile, during the dry season, rural areas provide the highest concentration of both surfactants (MBAS = 0.462mg/L, DBAS = 0.035mg/L) (Hanif et al., 2012).

Sewage, River, Tap and Waste water

Municipal and industrial waste waters are one of the most important pollution sources affecting the quality of ground as well as surface water adversely in many developed countries by Koparal et al. 2006(Alaton and Erdinc,2006). According to many researchers including, Arslan-Alaton et al. 2006, Gomez et al. 2011, Huang et al. 2012, Olmez-Hanci et al. 2011 the surfactants are regarded as one of the major pollutants detected in the aquatic environment(Gomez et al., 2011; Huang et al.,2012; Hanci et al., 2011; Idouhar and Tazerouti, 2008). The average concentrations have been reported at around 40.6 and 82.6 mg/Lto 48.3 and 98.3 mg/L, in sea water by Ross and Liao (2015) (Akyuz, 2007).According to Norberg and co-workers, the average concentration of surfactants has been investigated at 2–7 mg/L in waste water.Majority of researchers have found average concentration of ionic and non-ionic surfactants in sewage water as well as waste water samples, and concentrations were more than permissible limit in the region (Ferrer and Barcelo,2001; Lara etal.,2006).Koga et al. 1995 have been reported the concentration of anionic and cationic surfactants e.g. DBAS was 22-17 mg/Land 47-40 mg/ Lin river water(Koga et al.,1995). According to international and domestics guideline the tolerance limit for NS concentration are not prescribed in tap water, the higher concentration of anionic surfactants was found 0.2 mg/L and 0.5 mg/L in comparison with NS by the Ministry of Health and Labor in Japan and U.S.E.P.A. respectively(Munoz et al., 2014; Moldvan et al., 2011; Chen et al., 2014; Borghi et al., 2011; Ferella et al., 2013; Rao et al.,1995).The higher concentration of anionic and cationic surfactants e.g. LAS (14.2%) and CTAB (11%) are presence in liquid samples in comparison with another classes surfactants as shown in Fig.4.Rivera-Utrilla et al. 2012 have been reported the average concentration of surfactants is ranging between 1 and 10 mg/L in domestics waste waters (Utrilla et al., 2012). In previous research work finding the LAS concentration ranging from 2 to 21 mg/L, 400 to 14,000 mg/L in raw waste water and untreated sludge, respectively  by Fountoulakis and co-workers (Fountoulakis et al.,2009). Majorities of research groups including, Holt et al. 1998; Ying et al. 2006 were also detected the LAS concentration (up to 0.05 to 400 mg/L and 1090 to 1100 mg/L) in sewage water, wastewaters and surface waters(Holt et al., 1998; Ying,2006). Eschauzier and co-workers have been reported that PFOA and PFOS removal from drinking water as well as surface waters were using granular activated carbon and that their concentrations ranged below 4.2 ng/L(Eschauzier et al.,2012).In the UK, total concentrations of AP1EOs at 45±16 mg/L and up to 3970 mg/L were detected in WWTP effluents and river sediments, respectively by Montgomery and others (Bennie et al.,1997; Clara et al., 2007). Isobe et al. 2001 have been carrying out the total concentrations of NP in river water ranging from undetectable to 17.5 mg/L in Spain, Japan, Germany, USA, and Canada (Céspedes et al.,2009). Majorities of authors have been reported concentrations of NP in river, vicinity of contaminated rivers water and agricultural activities ranging from undetectable to 17.5 mg/L, 0.1 0.8 mg/L and 0.16 0.38 mg/L in Spain, Japan, Germany, USA, and Canada (Barber et al., 1988; Ahel etal.,1994, Rudel et al.,1998). NP have been also found in various sources such as lake water, waste water, surface water sewage, water river water etc at relatively high concentrations. The following Table 4and Fig.5shows the levels of different types of surfactants detected in the various environmental samples from all over the world (Olkowaska et al., 2012; Andreu et al., 2007; Li et al., 2009; Olkowaska et al., 2011, 40-45,53, 63-110,112).

Figure 4. The concentration of various surfactants in liquid environmental samples

       Figure 5. The earlier concentration of some surfactants in wastewater samples.


Table 4. Levels of different type of surfactants detected in the environmental samples

SAAs

Concentration Levels

Degradable

Half Life, %h

Recommended samples

Reference

LAS

1090 mg L-1, 30200 mg L-1

0.416 mg L-1, (0.01 to 20),

 100 to 15000 mg L-1,

 1140 to 42300,

Mono- and

dicarboxylic SPC

56–76/720 /-

Sewage effluent, Treated sludge

Surface water, Soil (forest area), Lake sediment,

Indoor dust (building, house, office)

(Olkowaska et al., 2012; Bao et al., 2009; Zembrzoska et al. 2016;Olkowska et al., 2011)

 

AES

 (0.24 to 2.85) mg L-1, (0.003 to 0.012) mg L-1, 0.17 to 0.54 µg kg-1, 

Alcohols, aldehydes, fatty acids, and

sulfur

75.1–98.2/-

Wastewater, WWTP effluent

Soil (forest area), river sediment

(Li et al., 2009, Nishiyama et al., 2003);

PFOS

3.28 to 47.5 µg kg-1

sulfur

50–80/96–576

Soil (forest area)

(Hesseloe et al., 2001

PFOA

8.58 to 10.4, 7.7 to 0.9 µg kg-1

methylamine

50–80/-

Soil (forest area), Street dust

(Li et al., 2009; Olkowska et al., 2011; Petrovic and Barcelo, 2002)

QAC

0.062 mg L-1, 5870 mg L-1, (0.022 to 0.206) mg L-1

fatty acids,

 

50/72–192

Sewage effluent, Treated sludge,

(Pedraza et al., 2007; Scott and Jones, 2000; Loyo et al., 2003)

BAC

6 mg L-1, 3.6, 0.021 to 0.26 mg kg-1

methylamine

50/96–192

Hospital effluent, river sediment

(Petrovic and Barcelo, 2000; Hellmann and Fresenius, 1980; Hanif et al., 2012)

DDAC

5 to 50 mg kg-1

Trimethylamine, dimethylamine, and methylamine

50/2.5

River sediment

(Kloepffer, 1996)

DTDMAC

1140 to 42300 mg kg-1

dimethylamine, methylamine

50/>360

Marine sediments

(Mcavoy et al., 1993;-45)

APE

0.33 mg L-1, 81 mg kg-1

polyethylene glycols dimethylamine,

63.5–93.3/-

Sewage effluent, Treated sludge

(Latif et al., 2012; Hesseloe et al., 2001); Jardak et al.,2016

AE

(0.002 to 0.017) mg L-1, (0.001 to 0.023) mg L-1 (0.001 to 0.016) mg L-1

dimethylamine,

44/720

WWTP effluent

(Petrovic and Barcelo, 2002)

 

NP

0.0047-0.0313 mg L-1

NPEC, NP, OP, APDECs

240/-

River sediment, Marine sediments

(Hesseloe et al., 2001)

OP

0.17-72 mg L-1, 0.0024-0.91 mg L-1

Alcohols, aldehydes

2304/-

River sediment, Marine sediments

(Bao et al., 2009; Li et al., 2009; Olkowska et al., 2011)

NPE

38 mg L-1, 3.2-100 mg L-1

APDECs

68/720/-

River/ Lake sediment

(Chitikela et al., 1995; Latif and Brimblecombe, 2004)

NPEO

2.1-135 mg L-1, 200-229000 µg kg-1

Alcohols, aldehydes

50–80/96–576/-

River sediment, Soil (forest and Agriculture area)

(Petrovic and Barcelo, 2000);

 OPEO

0.032-1.5 mg L-1, 0.15 mg L-1

 

 

River sediment, Soil (urban area)

Soil (forest area)

(Scott and Jones, 2000)


Conclusions and future prospective

Surfactants find various applications in different fields of human activity. These compounds can move freely within the environment such as waters and sediments, soil and even living organisms. This review provides comprehensive information on the toxicity of surfactants, concentration or distribution of surfactants in environmental samples of different composition and origin. The higher concentrations of surfactants have been reported in various solid and liquid samples at different study sites in the world. This review proposes that anthropogenic sources such as motor vehicles and industries contribute to a majority of surfactants in the atmosphere. Due to the effects of surfactants, which can negatively influence human health; generate more clouds and thus have an impact on climate change, the chemistry of different type of surfactants in atmospheric aerosols needs to be monitored regularly. The management and emissions of motor vehicles which can contribute to a large number of surfactants in urban areas also need to be reconsidered so as to develop a better urban environment in the future. In this review, the authors conclude that the sewage treatment and wastewater treatment plant that might contribute to a bulky number of surfactants in sewage water along with wastewater, also need to be at higher coverage so as to develop a better future in the environment. In nonurban areas wastewaters that contained various classes of surface active agents are discarded directly to surface waters and they might be dispersed into different elements of environment.This review also, concludes the high amount of surfactants presence of soil, road dust, sediment and sediments sludge’s, which can cause a negative impact on the environment, also need to be reconsidered. The main reason behind the increase of the concentration of surfactants and water bodies and sediments, soils pollution levels that the number of sampling site and frequency of monitoring are limited. And source apportionment analysis using surfactants in solid and liquid environmental samples may be necessary for future research, to improve our knowledge and understanding.

 

Acknowledgements

The authors are thankful to Prof. Shamsh Pervez, Head, School of Studies in Chemistry, Pt. Ravishankar Shukla University, Raipur for providing facilities.

 

References

Ahel, M., Giger, W., Koch, M. (1994). Behaviour of alkylphenol polyethoxylate surfactants in the aquatic environmentI. Occurrence and transformation in sewage treatment. Water Research, 28:11311142.

Akyuz, M. (2007). Ion pair extraction and GC-MS determination of linear alkylbenzesulfonates in aqueous environmental samples. Talanta, 71:471–478.

Alaton, A., Erdinc. E. (2006). Effect of photochemical treatment on the biocompatibility of a commercial non-ionic surfactant used in the textile industry. Water Research, 40:34093418.

Andreu, V., Ferrer, E., Rubio, J. L., Font, G., Picó, Y. (2007). Quantitative determination of octylphenol, nonylphenol, alkylphenol ethoxylates and alcohol ethoxylates by pressurized liquid extraction and liquid chromatography-mass spectrometry in soil treated with treated with sewage sludge. Analytical Chemistry, 76 (2007) 2875-2888.

Andrews, E., Larson, S.M. (1993). Effect of surfactant layer on the size changes of aerosol: particles as a function of relative humidity. Environmental Science Technology. 27:857-865.

Asa-Awuku, A., Nenes, A., Sullivan, A.P., Hennigan, C.J., Weber, R.J. (2007). Investigation of Molar Volume and Surfactant Characteristics of Water-soluble Organic Compounds in Biomass Burning Aerosol. Chemistry and Physics Discussions, 7:3589–3627.

Bao, J., Jin, Y., Liu, Ran, X., Zheng, Z. (2009). Perfluorinated compounds in sediments from the Daliuo River system of Northeast China. Chemosphere 77:648-652.

Barber, L.B., Thurman, E.M., Schroeder, M.P., LeBlanc, D.R. (1988). Long-term fate of organic micropollutants in sewage-contaminated groundwater. Environmental Science & Technology, 22:205211.

Barekat, A., Afzali, S. (2013). Determination trace amounts of cationic surfactants cetyltrimethylammonium bromide (CTAB) by method of spectrophotometry extraction. The Journal of Novel Applied Sciences, 10:541-545.

Bascom, R., Bromberg, P.A., Hill, C., Costa, D.L., Devlin, R., Dockery, D.W. (1996). Health effect of outdoor air pollution. American Journal of Respiratory and Critical Care Medicine, 153, 477-498.

Becagli, S., Ghedini, C., Peeters, S., Rottiers, A., Traversi, R., Udisti, R., Chiari, M., Jalba, A., Despiau, S., Dayan, U., Temara, A. (2011) MBAS (methylene blue active surfactants) and LAS (linear alkylbenzene sulphonates) in Mediterranean coastal aerosols: Source and transport processes. Atmospheric Environment, 45: 6788-6801.

Beers, M.F., Fisher, A.B. (1992). Surfactants protein C: a review of its unique properties and mechanism. American Journal of Physiology, 263 (1992) 151-157.

Bennie, D., Sullivan, C., Lee, H.B., Peart, T., Maguire, R. (1997). Occurrence of alkylphenols and alkylphenol mono-and diethoxylates in natural waters of the Laurentian Great Lakes basin and the upper St. Lawrence River. Science of the Total Environment, 193:263275.

Bidari, A., Ganjali, M.R., Norouzi, P. (2010). Development and evolution of a dispersive liquid-liquid microextraction based test method for quantification of total anionic surfactants: Advantages against reference method. Central European Journal of Chemistry, 8:702–708.

Bolong, N., Ismail, A.F., Salim, M.R., Matsuura, T. (2009). A review of the effects of emerging contaminants in wastewater and options for their removal. Desalination, 238: 229-246.

Borghi, C.C., Fabbri, M., Fiorini, M., Mancini, M., Ribani, P.L. (2011). Magnetic removal of surfactants from wastewater using micrometric iron oxide powders. Separation and Purification Technology, 83:180188.

Breen, D.G., Horner, J.M., Bartle, K.D., Clifford, A.A., Waters, J., Lawrecne, J.G. (1996). Supercritical fluid extraction and off- line HPLC analysis of cationic surfactants from dried sewage sludge. Water Resources Research, 30:476–480.

Bruno, F. R., Curie, A.D., Carcia, L., Fochi, M., Nazzari, R. (2002). Determination of surfactants and some of their metabolites in untreated and anaerobically digested sewage sludge by subcritical water extraction followed by liquid chromatography-mass spectrometry. Environ Sci Technol, 36:4156-4161.

Bureau of Indian Standards (BIS) Specification for drinking water 1S:10500: (1991). Bureau of Indian Standards, New Delhi

Buxton, H.T., Kolpin, D.W. (2002). Pharmaceuticals, hormones, and other organic wastewater contaminants in US streams. Wiley, Hoboken.

Carballo, E.M., Barreiro, C.G., Sitka, A., Kreuzinger, N., Schart, S., Gans, O. (2007). Determination of selected quaternary ammonium compound by liquid chromatography with mass spectrometry Part I. Application to surface, waste and indirect discharge water samples in Austria. Environmental Pollution, 146:543-546.

Cespedes, R., Lacorte, S., Ginebreda, A., Barceló, D. (2008). Occurrence and fate of alkylphenols and alkylphenol ethoxylates in sewage treatment plants and impact on receiving waters along the Ter River (Catalonia, NE Spain). Environmental Pollution, 153: 384392.

Chen, A. Y., Panchangam, S., Tsai, Y.T., Hsienyu, T. (2014). Occurrence of Perflurinated compounds in the aquatic environment as found in science park effluent, river water, rain water, sediments and biotissues. Environmental Monitoring and Assessment, 186:3265-3275.

Chen, Y., Guo, Z., Wang, X., Qiu, C. (2008). Sample preparation. Journal of Chromatography A,1184:191-219.

Chitikela, S., Dentel, S.K., Allen, H.E. (1995). Modified method for the analysis of anionic surfactants as methylene blue active substances. The Analyst, 120: 2001–2004.

Clara, M., Scharf, S., Scheffknecht, C., Gans, O. (2007). Ocurrence of selected surfactants in untreated and treated sewage.

Crisp, P.T., Eckert, J.M. Gibson, N.A., (1983). The determination of anionic surfactants in natural and waste water. Journal of Chemical Education, 60, 236-238.

Davı̀, M.L., Gnudi, F. (1999). Phenolic compound in surface water. Water Research, 33: 3213–3219.

Din German Standard method for the examination of water, waste water and sludge determination of Disulfine blue active substances.

Eschauzier, C., Beerendonk, E., Veenendaal, P.S., Voogt, P.D. (2012). Impact of treatment processes on the removal of perfluoroalkyl acids from the drinking water production chain. Environmental Science & Technology, 46:17081715

Feijtel, T.C.J., Matthjis, E., Rottiers A., Kiewiet A. (1995). Environmental risk characterization of 4 major surfactants used in the Netherlands. Chemosphere, 30 (1995) 1053-1066.

Ferella, F, Michelis, I.D., Zerbini, C., Veglio, F. (2013). Advanced treatment of industrial wastewater by membrane filtration and ozonization. Desalination, 313:111.

Fernández, P., Alder, A.C., Suter, M.J.F., Giger, W. (1996). Determination of the quaternary ammonium surfactants ditallowdimethylammonium in digested sludges and marine sediments by supercritical fluid extraction and liquid chromatography with Postcolumn ion pair formation. Analytical Chemistry, 68: 921-925.

Ferrer, I., Barceló, D. (2001). Identification of a New Degradation Product of the Antifouling Agent Irgarol 1051 in Natural Samples.Environmental Science & Technology, 35:2583–2588.

                Fountoulakis, Water Research, 41:4339-4347.

Frka, S., Dautović, J., Kozarac, Z., Ćosović, B., Hoffer, A., Kiss, G. (2012). Kiss Surface active substances in atmospheric aerosol and electrochemical approach. Tellus B: Chemical and Physical Meteorolog, 13: 16410-16422.

Fujii, S., Polprasert, C., Tanaka, S., Lien, H., Pham, N., Qiu, Y. (2007). New POPs in the water environment: Distribution, bioaccumulation and treatment of perfluorinated compounds-A review paper. Journal of Water Supply: Research and Technology-AQUA, 56: 313-326.

Gandolfie, C., Facchi, A., Whelan, M.J., Tartari, G., Marcomini, A. (2000). Validation of the GREAT-ER model in the river lambro catchment, 5th world cesio congress. World CESIO Congress, 2:1370-1379.

Gill, P.S., Graedel, T.E.,Weschler, C.J., (1983). Organic films on atmospheric aerosols particle, fog droplets, cloud droplet raindrops and snowflakes. Review of Geophysical Space Physics, 21:903-920.

Gomez, V., Ferreres, L., Pocurull, E., Borrull, F. (2011). Determination of non-ionic and anionic surfactants in environmental water matrices. Talanta 84 (2011) 859866.

Halim, N.H.A., Hanif, N.M., Othman, M.R., Latif, M.T. (2010). Colourimetric determination of features of an air sampling technique optimal for detection of surfactants. Sains Malaysiana, 39: 175-179.

Hanif, N.M., Adnassssn, S.N., Latif, M., Zakaria, A.M., Othman, M.R. (2012). Composition of Surfactants in River Water and its Influence to the Amount of Surfactants in Drinking Water,World Applied Sciences Journal, 17: 970-975.

Heinig, K., Vogt, C. (1999). Determination of surfactants by capillary electrophoresis. Electrophoresis 123:338-349.

Hellmann, H. (1978). Tensidabbau and abbaupotenz in strom. Tenside Surfactants Detergents,15:1971-1977.

Hellmann, H. (1981). Surfactants in rivers and sewage, Gas-Wasefach. Wass/Abwass. 122:158-162.

Hellmann, H., Fresenius, Z. (1980). Trace analysis for nonionic surfactants in sewage and other sludge. Analytical Chemistry, 300:44-47.

Hellmann, H., Fresenius, Z. (1983). Determination of extractable cationic surfactants in activated sludge. Analytical Chemistry, 315:425-429.

Hennes, E.C., Rapapost, R.A. (1989). Calculation and analytical verification of LAS concentration in surface waters, sediment and soil. Tensiles Surfactant and Detergents, 26:141-147.

Hesseloe, J., Jensen, D., Skals, K., Olesen, T., Moldrup, P., Rosley, P., Mortensen, G.K., Henriksen, K. (2001). Degradation of 4- nonylphenol in homogeneous and nonhomogeneous mixture of soil and sewage sludge. Environmental Science & Technology, 35:3695-3702.

Holt, M.S. (2000). Source of chemical contaminants and routes into the freshwater environment. Food Chemistry and Toxicology, 38: 21–27.

Holt, M.S., Fox, K.K., Burford, M., Daniel, M., Buckland, H. (1998). UK monitoring study on the removal of linear alkylbenzene sulphonate in trickling filter type sewage treatmentmet plant contribution to GREAT-ER. Science of the Total Environment, 211: 255-269.

Huang, X., Wu, T., Li, Y., Sun, D., Zhang, G., Wang, Y., Wang, G. and Zhang, M. (2012). Removal of petroleum sulfonate from aqueous solutions using freshly generated magnesium hydroxide. Journal of Hazardous Materials, 219: 8288.

Idouhar, M., Tazerouti, A. (2008). Spectrophotometric determination of cationic surfactants using patent blue V: Application to the waste water industry in Algiers. Journal of Surfactants and Detergents,11:263–267.

Jackson, M., Eadsforth, C., Schawanek, D., Delfosse, T., Riddle, A., Budge,. N. (2016). Comprehensive review of several surfactants in marine environments fate and ecotoxicity. Environmental Toxicology and Chemistry, 35:1077-1086.

Janssens, I., Tanghe, T., Verstraete, W. (1997). Micropollutants: a bottleneck in sustainable wastewater. Water Science and Technology. 35:13-26.

Jardak, K., Drogui, P., Daghrir, R. (2016). Surfactants in aquatics and terrestrial environment: Occurrence behaviour and treatment process. Environ. Environmental Science and Pollution Research, 23:3195-3216.

Jensen, J. (1999). Fate and effects of linear alkylbenzene sulphonates (LAS) in the terrestrial environment. Science of the Total Environment, 226:93111.

Karsa, D.R., Porter, H.R. (1995) Biodegradability of Surfactants. Blackie Acadmic Professiona London,38:36-40.

Kloepffer W. (1996). Test for detection of genotoxines in the fresh water. Chemosphere 33: 1067-1081.

Koga, M., Yamamichi , Y., Namoto, Y., Irie, M. (1995). Determination of anionic and non-ionic surfactants in tap water and river water. Analytical Sciences, 15:563-568.

Koparal, A.S., Önder, E., Öütveren, Ü.B. (2006). Removal of linear alkylbenzene sulfonate from a model solution by continuous electrochemical oxidation. Desalination, 197 (2006) 262272.

Krogh, K.A., Bogel, M.B., Halling, S.B., Cortes, A., Vejrup, K.V., Bercelo, D. (2003). Analysis of alcohol ethoxylates and alkylamine ethoxylates in agricultural soils using pressurized liquid extraction and liquid chromatography-mass spectrometry. Analytical and Bioanalytical Chemistry, 376:1089-1093.

Kurrey, R,. Deb, M.K., Shrivas K. (2019). Surface enhanced infra-red spectroscopy with modified silver nanoparticles (AgNPs) for detection of quaternary ammonium cationic surfactants. New Journal of Chemistry. DOI: 10.1039/C9NJ01795J.

Kurrey, R., Mahilang, M., Deb, M.K., Shrivas, K. (2018). Analytical approach on surface active agents in the environment and challenges. Trends in Environmental and Analytical Chemistry. 

Lang, S. (2002). Biological amphiphilic (microbial biosurfactants). Current Opinion in Colloid & Interface Science,7:12–20.

Lara-Martin, P.A., Gomez-Parra, A., Gonzalez-Mazo, E. (2006). Simultaneous extraction and determination of anionic surfactants in waters and sediments. Journal of Chromatography A,1114, 205- 210.

Latif, M.T.  Brimblecombe, P. (2004). Surfactants in atmospheric aerosols. Environmental Science and Technology, 38: 6501-6506.

Latif, M.T., Anuwar, N.Y., Srithawirat, T., Razak, I.S., Ramli, N.A. (2011) Composition of Levoglucoson and surfactants in atmospheric aerosols from Biomass Burning. Aerosols and Air Quality Research, 11: 837-845.

Latif, M.T., Brimblecombe, P. (2007). Average Molecular Weight of Surfactants in Aerosols. Atmospheric Chemistry and PhysicsDiscussion, 7: 13805–13838.

Latif, M.T., Brimblecombe, P., Ramli, N.A., Sentian, J., Sukhapan, J., Sulaiman, N. (2005). Surfactants in South East Asian Aerosols. Environmental Chemistry, 2 (2005) 198–204.

Latif, M.T., Wanfi, L., Hanif, N.M., Roslan, R.N., Ali, M.M., Mushrifah, I. (2012). Composition and distribution of surfactants around lake Chini, Malaysia. Environmental Monitoring and Assessment, 184: 1325-1334.

Latorre, A., Lacorte, S., Barcelo, D. (2003). Presence of nonylphenol, octyphenol and bisphenol a in two aquifers close to agricultural, industrial and urban areas. Chromatography, 57:111116.

Li, D., Oh, J.R., Park, J. (2003). Direct extraction of alkylphenol, chlorophenol and bisphenol A from acid-digested sediment suspension for simultaneous gas chromatographic-mass spectrometric analysis. Journal of Chromatography A, 1012:207-212.

Li, X., Brownawell, B.J. (2009). Analysis of quaternary ammonium compound in Estauarine sediments by LC-ToF-MS: very high positive mass defects of alkylamine ions as powerful diagnostic tool for identification and structure elucidation. Analytical Chemistry, 81:7926-7935.

Loglio, G., Tesei, U., Meri, G., Cini, R., Pantani, F. (1985). Enrichment and transport of surfactant in marine aerosols during particular weather condition. II Nuovo Cimento, 8:704-713.

Longwell, J., Maniece. C.D. (1955). Determine or anionic detergent in sewage, sewage effluents and river water, Analyst, 80:89-94.

Loyo, J.E., Schmitz, I., Rice, C.P., Torrents, A. (2003). Analysis of octyl and nonylphenol and their ethoxylates in water and sediments by liquid chromatography/tandem-mass spectrometry. Chemosphere, 75:811-4817.

Marcomini, A., Pojana, G., Patrolecco, L., Capri, S. (1998). Determination of non-ionic aliphatic and aromatic poly ethoxylated surfactants in environmental aqueous samples. Analysis,26:64-69.

Matthijs, E., Holt, M.S., Kiewiet, A., Rijs, G.B. (1999). AIS/CESIO environmental surfactant Monitoring programmed, SDIA sewage treatment pilot study on linear alkylbenzene sulfonate (LAS). Water Research 29: 2063–2070.

McAvoy, D.C., Eckhoff, W.S., Rapaport, R.A. (1993). Fate of linear alkylbenzene sulfonate in the environment. Environmental Toxicology and Chemistry, 12:977–987.

Merino, F., Rubio, S., Bendito, D. (2003). Solid phase extraction of amphiphilies based on mixed hemimicelle/admicelle formation: Application to the concentration of benzalkonium surfactants in sewage and river water. Analytical Chemistry, 75:6799-6806.

Moldovan, Z., Avram, V., Marincas, O., Petrov, P., Ternes, T. (2011). The determination of linear alkylbenzene sulfonate isomers in water samples by gas chromatography/mass spectrometry, Journal of Chromatography A, 1218: 343-349.

Mungray, A.K., Kumar, P. (2008). Occurances of ionic surfactants in treated sewage: Risk assessment to aquatics environment. Journal of Hazardous Materials, 160:360-370.

Munoz, D.C., Martin, J., Sentos, J.L., Aparicio, I., Alonso, E. (2014). Occurrence of surfactants in waste water: Hourly and seasonal variation in urbon and industrial waste water from Seville (Southern Spain). Science of total environment, 468:977-984.

Munoz, G., Doy, S.V., Labadie, P., Botta, F., Budzinski, H., Lestremau, F., Liu, J., Sauve, S. (2016). Analysis of zwitterionic, cationic, and anionic poly-and perfluoroalkyl surfactants in sediments by liquid chromatography polarity-switching electrospray ionization coupled to high resolution mass spectrometry. Talanta, 152:447-457.

Myers, D. (2005). Surfactant Science and Technology. John Wiley & Sons, New Jersey. 

Naylor, R.L., Goldburg, R.J., Primavera, J.H., Kautsky, N., Beveridge, M.C., Clay, J., Folke, C., Lubchenco, J., Mooney, H. and Troell, M., (2000). Effect of aquaculture on world fish supplies. Nature 405(2002) 10171024.

Nishiyama, N., Yamamoto A., Takei T. (2003). Annual meeting of Japan society of water environment. Annual Report On Environmental Issues,31: 3337-3404.

Olkowska, E., Polkowska, Z., Namiesnik, J. (2011). Analytics of surfactants in the environment: Problem and Challenges. Chemical Reviews, 111:5667–5700.

Olkowska, E., Polkowska, Z., Namiesnik, J. (2012). Analytical procedure for the determination of surfactants in environmental samples. Talanta,88:1-13.

Olmez-Hanci, T., Arslan-Alaton, I., Basar, G. (2011). Multivariate analysis of anionic, cationic and nonionic textile surfactant degradation with the H2O2/UV-C process by using the capabilities of response surface methodology. Journal of Hazardous Materials, 185 (2011) 193203.

Osburn Q.W. (1982). Cationic fabric softener in water and wastes, Journal of the American Oil Chemists' Society, 59 (1982) 453-457.

Othman, M. S., Lim, E.C., Idris M. (2007). Water quality change in Chini Lake Pahang, Waste Malaysia. Environmental Monitoring and Assessment,131: 279-292.

Pastewski, S., Medrzycka, K. (2003). Monitoring surfactant concentrations in surface water in tricity agglomeration. Polish Journal of Environmental Studies, 12: 643-646.

Paul, H., Brunner, S., Capri, S., Giger, W. (1988). Streams in the urban landscape. Water Research, 22:1465-1472.

Pedraza, A., Sicila, M.D., Rubio, S., Bendito, D. (2007). Assessment of the surfactant-dye binding degree method as an alternative to the methyl blue method for the determination of anionic surfactants in aqueous environmental samples. Analytica Chimica Acta, 588: 252-260.

Petrovic, M., Barceló, D. (2000). Determination of anionic and nonionic surfactants, their degradation products, and endocrine-disrupting compound in sewage sludge by liquid chromatography/mass spectrometry. Analytical Chemistry, 72:4560–4567.

Petrovic, M., Barceló, D. (2002). Review of advanced sample preparation method for the determination of alkylphenol ethoxylateds and their degradation products in solid environmental matrices. Chromatography, 56 (2002) 535–544.

Petrovic, M., Barcelo, D. (2004). Analysis and fate of surfactants in sludge and sludge-amended soils. Trends in Analytical Chemistry, 23:10-11.

Polish Standard PN-EN 903 “Determination of anionic surfactants by measurements of the methylene blue index MBAS”

Radke, M. (2005). Sterols and anionic surfactant in urban aerosols, emissions from waste water treatment plant in relation to background concentration. Environmental Science and Technology. 39:4391-4397.

Rao, A., Pusey, D., Cooper, T., Hamed, K. (1995). Monitoring Wastewater Flows on a University Campus, Water Resources Engineering-International Conference. American Society of Civil Engineers, 2:1744-1748.

Rivera J., Utrilla, M.I., Bautista-Toledo, Sánchez-Polo, M., Mendez-Diaz, J.D. (2012). Removal of surfactant dodecylbenzenesulfonate by consecutiveuse of ozonation and biodegradation. Engineering in Life Sciences, 12:113116.

Roslan, R.N., Hanif, N.M., Othman, M.R., Azmi, W.N.F.W., Yan, X.X., Ali, M.M., Mohamed, C.A.R., Latif, M.T. (2010) Surfactants in the Sea-surface Microlayer and their Contribution to Atmospheric Aerosols around Coastal Areas of the Malaysian Peninsula. Marine Pollution Bulletin, 60: 1584–1590.

Rudel, R.A., Melly, S.J., Geno, P.W., Sun, G., Brody, J.G. (1998). Identification of alkylphenols and other estrogenic phenolic compounds in wastewater, septage, and groundwater on Cape Cod, Massachusetts. Environmental Science and Technology, 32 (1998) 861869.

Sanemasa, I., Oota, E., Aoi, K., Zheng, J.Z. (2002). Concentation of glass separatory funnel wall of anionic surfactants by ion association with methylene blue. Analytical Science, 18 (2002) 347-350.

Schroder, H.F. (2001). Tracing of surfactants in the biological waste treatment process and the identification of their metabolites by flow-injection-mass spectrometry and liquid chromatography-mass spectrometry and tandem mass spectrometry. Journal of Chromatography A, 926:127-150.

Scott, M.J., Jones, M.N. (2000). The biodegradation of surfactants in environments (review). Biochemica Acta Biophysica Acta, 1508 235-251.

Seidl, W., Hänel, G. (1983). Surface Active Substances on rainwater and atmospheric particles. Pure and Applied Geophysics. 121: 1077-1093.

Seth, R., Singh, P., Mohan, M., Singh, R. Aswal, R.S. (2013). Monitoring of phenolic compound and surfactants in water of Ganga canal, Haridwar (India). Applied Water Science,3: 717-720.

Sibila, M.A., Garrido, M.C., Perales, J.A., Quiroga, J.M. (2008). Ecotoxicity and biodegradability of an alkyl ethoxysulphate surfactant in coustal water. Bulletin of Environmental Contamination and Toxicology, 69: 265-271.

Silva, G.P., Mack, M. (2009). Glycerol: a promising and abundant carbon source for industrial microbiology. Journal of Contiero Biotechnology Advances, 27:30–39.

Sinha, S., Tikariha, D., Lakra, J., Tiwari, A.K., Saha, S.K., Ghosh, K.K. (2015). Effect of polar organic solvent on self aggregation of some cationic monomeric and dimeric surfactants. Journal of Surfactant and Detergent,18: 629-640.

Srivastava, A., Gupta, S., Jain, V.K. (2008). Source apportionment of total suspended Particulate matter in coarse and fine ranges over Delhi. Aerosol and Air Quality Research, 8 :188–200.

Sublayrolles, C., Montresaud, V.M., Silvesre, J., Treilhou, M. (2009). Determination of linear alkylbenzene sulfonates: Application in artificial polluted soil- carrots system. International Journal of Analytical Chemistry, 6-11.

Sukapan, J., Brimblecombe, P. (2002). Ionic surface-active compound in Atmospheric aerosols. The Scientific World Journal 14:1138-1146.

Sun, H.F., Takamori, A., Hata, N., Kasahara, I., Taguchi, S. (2003). Transportation and fate of cationic surfactant in river water. Journal of Environmental Monitoring, 5:891-895.

Szymanski, A., Wyrwas, B., Jesiozowska, A., Kazmierczak, S., Przybysz, T., Grodecka, J., Yukaszewski, Z. (2001). Surfactant in river Warta. Surfactants.  Polish Journal of Environmental Studies,10 :371-378.

Tabor, C.F., Barber, L.B. (1996) Fate of linear alkylbenzene sulfonate in the Mississippi River. Environmental Science & Technology, 30:161-171.

Terzakis, M. S., Kalogerakis, N., Manios, T. (2009). Removal of polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbons and linear alkylbenzene sulfonates from domestic wastewater in pilot constructed wetlands and a gravel filter. Engine Ecology, 35:17021709

Thiele, B. (2005). Analysis of surfactants in aquatic environment. Chromatographic Analysis of the Environment L.M.L. Nollet (Ed.) CRC Press, Boca Raton, 1173–1198.

Vejrup, K.V., Wolkoff, P. (2002). Linear alkylbenzene sulfonates in indoor floor dust. Science of the Total Environment, 300:51-58.

Wahid, N.B.A., Latif, M.T., Suratman, S. (2013). Composition and source apportionment of surfactants in atmospheric aerosols of urbon and semiurban area in Malaysia. Chemosphere, 17: 291-297.

Waters, J., Feijtel. T.C.J. (1995). Environmental surfactants monitoring program: outcome of five national pilot studies on linear alkylbenzene sulfonate (LAS). Analytica Chimica Acta, 85:241-243.

Waters, J., Kupfer, W.,Holt, M., Matthijs, E. (1976). Fate of LAS in sludge amended soils, Tenside Surfactant Detergent, 26:129–135.

Ying, G.G., Fate, (2006). behavior and effects of surfactants and their degradation products in the environment. Environmental Science Internships, 32:417431

Zembrzoska, J., Budnik, I., Lukaszewski, Z. (2016). Monitoring of selected non-ionic surfactants in river water by liquid chromatography-tandem mass spectrometry. Journal of Environmental Management,169:247-252.

 

 

 



Related Images:

Recomonded Articles:

Author(s): BP Jadhav and BB Waghmode

DOI:         Access: Open Access Read More

Author(s): Manjula Guha; Priti Pachouri

DOI:         Access: Open Access Read More

Author(s): Manas Kanti Deb; Mithlesh Mahilang; Jayant Nirmalkar

DOI: 10.52228/JRUB.2017-30-1-2         Access: Open Access Read More

Author(s): Princy Dugga; Shamsh Pervez; Rakesh Kumar Sahu; Madhuri Verma; Shahina Bano; Manas Kanti Deb

DOI: 10.52228/JRUB.2017-30-1-5         Access: Open Access Read More

Author(s): R Javdani Yekta; BB Waghmode

DOI:         Access: Open Access Read More

Author(s): JK Nandagawe; PK Patil; RD Lawangar-Pawer

DOI:         Access: Open Access Read More

Author(s): Swati Chandrawanshi; Manas Kanti Deb; Ramsingh Kurrey

DOI: 10.52228/JRUB.2017-30-1-3         Access: Open Access Read More

Author(s): Mitashree Mitra; P.V. Kumar

DOI:         Access: Open Access Read More

Author(s): A P Kashid; R T Patil; N B Patil; S H Chavan

DOI:         Access: Open Access Read More

Author(s): Archana Sharma; M.L. Naik

DOI:         Access: Open Access Read More

Author(s): Rakesh Gupta; Pradeep Kumar Sharma; Shivakar

DOI:         Access: Open Access Read More

Author(s): Monika Swami; Kinjal Patel

DOI: 10.52228/JRUB.2021-34-1-2         Access: Open Access Read More

Author(s): Swarnlata Saraf; Shailendra Sarafp; Shikha Srivastava

DOI:         Access: Open Access Read More