Journal of Ravishankar University–B, 33 (1), 08-17 (2020)
|
Spectrophotometric Determination of
Phenthoate in Vegetables and Fruit Samples of Kabirdham (Chhattisgarh)
Chhaya Bhatta*,
Deepak Kumar Sahua,c, Thakur Vikram Singhb, Kalpana
Wania, Jyoti Goswamia, Ajay Kumar Sahua, Harshita
Sharmaa, Geetanjali Deshlehrea, Manish Kumar Raia*,
Joyce Raic
aSchool of Studies in
Chemistry, Pt. Ravishankar Shukla University, Raipur (Chhattisgarh), 492010,
India.
bSchool of Studies in
Environmental Science, Pt. Ravishankar Shukla University, Raipur
(Chhattisgarh), 492010, India.
cChhattisgarh Council of
Science and Technology,MIG-25, Indrawati Colony,Raipur (Chhattisgarh),492007,
India.
*Corresponding Author: mkjkchem@gmail,chhaya05bhatt@gmail.com
[Received:
27 November 2019; Revised version: 07 July 2020; Accepted: 09 July 2020]
Abstract. A large variety of pesticides have been used in the
agriculturearea to raise the quality, extend and yield storage life of
crops.However, the use of pesticides has been greater than before now a day
dueto the growing rapid urbanization and population. The nonstop uses ofthese
pesticides have resulted in pollution of the environment and alsocaused risk to
human health. For the rapid detection of selective phenthoate pesticides, we
developed a simple and highly sensitive spectrophotometric method based on
azo-coupling reaction. After a simple pretreatment of phenthoatewith a
diazotized solution,the resulting is rapidly undergoing azo-coupling reaction with
4-aminoazobenzene with adramatic color change only in few minutes.Finally, we
successfully applied the concentration of phenthoate pesticides on vegetable,
fruit, water, and soil samples. In this method, we found the absorption maxima
of the orange dye compound was measuredat480nm.ThecolorsystemobeysBeer’slawinthefollowingworkingrangeof5µg
to 40 µg in a final solution of 25 mL. The molar absorptivity, Sandell’s
sensitivity, standard deviation, and the relative standard deviation was found
to be 1.083X107L mol-1 cm-1, 0.99X10-5µg
cm-2, ±0.003 and 0.89% respectively. This method is simple, sensitive,
andfree from interferences of other pesticides and diverse ions. Other
pesticides do not interfere with the proposed method. The method is highly
reproducible and has been successfully applied for the determination of
phenthoate insecticides in vegetables and fruit samples.
Keywords: Spectrophotometer,
Phenthoate, Diazotization, vegetables, and fruit Samples.
Introduction
Pesticides are substances, or a mixture of substances
that are widely used on crops and vegetables it increases agricultural
productivity because of their effectiveness, low cost, and acute toxicity to the
target organism. (Khedr et al., 2019).
Pesticides are used to prevent, repel, or kill organisms and substances that
are harmful to crop growth. (Wu et al.,
2018). Pesticides and
herbicides are divided into four sections with a focus on toxicology, ecology,
risk assessment, modeling, and treatment strategies (Choudri et al., 2018).Pesticides may simultaneously
be harmful both for the environment (e.g., accumulating in ecosystems) and for
human health(N.M. Bhojane et al.,2018). In this second task, they
can give adverse effects, including cancer, acute and chronic injury to the
nervous system, lung damage, reproductive dysfunction, and possibly dysfunction
of the endocrine and immune systems(Christopher DN Paul CE et al.,2013). One of
the main pesticide sources is the diet. Indirectly, the consumer assimilates
small pesticide quantities (residues) from different foods such as meat, fruit,
and vegetables (Notardonato et al.,
2018).
Phenthoate is a systemic organophosphate insecticide
thatis ethylmandelate inwhich the hydroxy group has beenreplaced by a
(dimethoxyphosphorothioyl) sulfanediylgroup(KarraSomaiah et al., 2015). Itis
used against Lepidoptera, jassids, aphids, soft scales, mosquitoes, blowflies, houseflies
anda phenthoate used to control common insects in Rice, Vegetables including
brassicas, eggplant, peppers, radish, turnips, carrot, Soybean, Potatoes, Tea,
Citrus(Jian Wanget al., 2012).It has a role as an acetylcholinesterase
inhibitor, an acaricide, and an agrochemical, It is used for termite control in
construction, forestry and fieldcrops(Kaufmann, A et al.,2012). It is widely
used by farmers to control insect pests of vegetables(KarraSomaiah et al.,
2015). Historically pesticides were
known as economic poison (Reddy et al., 2017). The acute oral LD50 for rats proposed for
phenthoate is 270 mg/kg. The literature revealed many efforts made to determine
phenthoate in various environmental samples.
These methods include high-performance liquid
chromatography, capillary electrophoresis, liquid chromatography/time-of-flightmassspectrometry,andultra-performanceliquidchromatographycoupledtotandemmass
spectrometry (González et al., 2008). Analytical methods for the analysis of
pesticide residues in grapes and by-products in the last decade. The most
widely used detection technique for the determination of pesticides in grapes
is mass spectrometry combined with gas and/or liquid chromatography (Grimalt et
al.,2016).Most of
these pesticides are not completely degraded after application, and their
metabolism as well as some un-changed forms entire the ecosystem (Zhang et al., 2017). Techniques applied fororganophosphoruspesticides
analyses are mostly chromatographic (gas chromatography and liquid
chromatography), electrochemical, immunochemical, and biosensors based ones (Stoytcheva
et al., 2014). Gas Chromatographic Analysis of Extracts from Sediment and Water
Samples (Okoya et al.,2013).
A new data analysis method was developed to determine
the concentration of Carbofuran pesticides by cyclic voltammetry (Chen andChen,
2013).Despite their versatile uses, these techniques have a lot of drawbacks
such as tedious procedure, non-linearity of the calibration curve, and matrix
interference, also these techniques required a large number of solvents for the
extractionand also some limitations in term of high-cost instruments used in
routine analysis and matrix effects. In the proposed work first time a
spectrophotometric method is developed for the determination of phenthoate in
various environmental samples as the literature review suggested no single
spectrophotometric method is reported for estimation of phenthoate. This contamination poses a
great risk to human health since residues in food and drinking water can enter
the body and accumulate in organs and tissues. (Alkan et al., 2018). Due tothe common availability of the instrumentation, simplicity of the
procedure, speed, precision, and accuracy, spectrophotometric methods enjoy
wide popularity. Also, they are more economical and simpler compared to other
analytical methods. So, the present communication involves developed a
spectrophotometric method based on diazotization with diazotized 4-
aminoazobenzene and determined after extraction of phenthoate insecticides in
Environmental and agriculturalSamples.
Structural Formula:
Figure 1. C12H17O4PS2
Molecularweight : 320.358 g mol-1
Appearance : Reddish yellow oily liquid
Meltingpoint : 186-187℃ at 5mm Hg
Boilingpoint : The compound decomposes at normal pressure before reaching the
boiling point.
Partitioncoefficient : Octanol//water
log P = 3.69, 3.82at
two
concentrations
Water
solubility :
11 mg/L (20℃)
Sampling Location Site
Kabirdham, earlier known
as Kawardha, is famous for historic Bhoramdeo temple located between 21.32' to 22.28' N latitude and
80.48' to 81.48' E longitude covering an area of 4,447.5 km2 (1,717.2 sq mi).The
samples were taken from farmhouse, and various vegetable and fruit markets. The
location of the study area has been shown in Figure 2.
Materials and
Method
Apparatus:SystronicsVisiscan Spectrophotometric
model 167 with matched silica cells was used for all spectral measurements. A
Systronics digital pH meter model 335 was used for pH measurements. A Remi
C-854/4 clinical centrifuge force of 1850 rpm with fixed swing-out rotors was
used for centrifugation. All reagents used were of Sigma –Aldrich, Pvt. Ltd.
Double distilled water was used throughout. Calibrated glassware was utilized
after getting cleaned and marinating in the acidified solution of potassium
dichromate and rinsing two times with double distilledwater.
Reagents:Phenthoate (Coromandel international limited): A stock solution of 1 mg/mL
was prepared in double-distilled water Working standard solutions were prepared
by appropriate dilution of the stock standard solution with double distilled
water.
Sodium Nitrite (Reidel Chemicals, India): A
1% m/v solution was prepared in double-distilled water.
HCl: 0.5 m/L solution was prepared in
double-distilled water.
4-aminoazobenzene: 1% solution of 4
aminoazobenzene was prepared with 25% of ethanol.
Diazotized solution: To 1 mL of 4- aminoazobenzene,
1 mL of 1% sodium nitrite in hydrochloric acid was added and the solution was
kept in a brown bottle at 0-5℃. This was stable for 4 h when kept in cold.
Reaction mechanism of the proposed
method
Figure 3. Reaction mechanism for the determination
of phenthoate
Procedure
An aliquot of test
solution containing 5 to 40 µg ofphenthoate was taken in a 25 mL calibrated
flask, then 1 mL of diazotized solution was added and shaken thoroughly and
kept at 0-5℃ for 10 minutes for full-color development and orange color was
obtained. The solution was then diluted to the mark with water and absorbance
was measured 480 nm against a reagentblank.
Results and Discussion
Spectral Characteristics: The 4-aminoazobenzene reagent dye formed in
the proposed reaction shows maximum absorption at 480 nm (Figure 4). All
spectral measurements were carried out against double distilled water as the
reagent blank showed negligible absorption at this wavelength. The color system
obeys Beer’s law in the range of 5 to 40 µg of phenthoate per 25 mL of the final
solution at 480 nm (Figure5).
Figure 4. Absorbance Curve of the phenthoate
Figure 5. Calibration curve for the determination of phenthoate
Table 1. Reproducibility of Method
No. of Days
|
Absorbance at
480nm
|
1
|
0.331
|
2
|
0.334
|
3
|
0.336
|
4
|
0.340
|
5
|
0.341
|
6
|
0.342
|
7
|
0.340
|
Mean
|
0.337
|
Standard
deviation
|
±0.003
|
Relative
Standard Deviation
|
0.89%
|
*Concentration of
Phenthoate used was 10µg /25mL
Method
validation
Linearity: For this experiment, the
linear graph plotted between absorbance and concentration of phenthoate in the
range of 5 to 40 µg in 25 ml volume and we obtained a linear graph. The graph
was plotted between a small intercept and a high correlation coefficient of a regression
equation (y=mx+c). In the study, the molar absorptivity was also calculated as
shown in Table 2.
Accuracy and
precision: The precision of the method was checked by the three
replicate analysis of a working standard solution containing 10µg of phenthoate
in 25 mL final solution over a period of 7 days. recovery range was found in
the range of 85-98%. The standard deviation and relative standard deviation
were found to be ± 0.003 and 0.89% respectively
Robustness and ruggedness: Robustness
and ruggedness were evaluated for the new method. Sometimes parameters like pH,
temperature, and time were changed. In this method one parameter altered but
another was constant we calculated recovery each time and observed that the
change of parameter does not affect reliving values shown in Table 3.
Lower Limit
of Detection (LOD): Limit of detection is the lowest
concentration of pesticide in a sample, which is detected, but it is not
necessary to this value is quantified,under the condition of analysis.
LOD = 3.3 σ/Slope Where: σ = the
standard deviation of the answer at low concentrations
Slope = the slope of the
calibration curve (Saadati et al., 2013; Kumari et al., 2010).
Limit of Quantitation (LOQ): Limit of quantitation
is the lowest concentration of a pesticide in a sample which is determined with
acceptable precision and accuracy under the condition of analysis.
LOQ = 10 σ/Slope Where: σ = the
standard deviation of the answer at low concentrations.
Slope = the slope of the
calibration curve (Shrivastava et al., 2011).
Tolerance
Limit: Tolerance of pesticide is a maximum quantity of
pesticide residue that can be present in food. Tolerance is expressed in parts
per million (Kumari et al.,2010).
Table 2. Optical
characteristics and Statistical Data of theRegression Equations for the
Reaction
S.No.
|
Parameters
|
Values
for the reaction
|
1.
|
Λmax
|
480nm
|
2.
|
Color
|
Orange
|
3.
|
Beer’s law limit
|
5 to 40 µg in 25 mL
|
4.
|
Molar absorptivity
|
1.083 X107L mol-1 cm-1
|
5.
|
Sandell’s sensitivity
|
0.99X 10-5µg cm-2
|
6.
|
Standard deviation
|
±0.003
|
7.
|
Relative standard deviation
|
0.89%.
|
8.
|
Correlation coefficient(R2)
|
0.972
|
9.
|
Regression
equation
|
|
|
Intercept
|
0.100
|
|
Slope
|
0.010
|
10.
|
Limit of Quantification(LOQ)
|
3.0 µg/mL
|
11.
|
Limit of Detection (LOD)
|
0.99µg/mL
|
12.
|
Lethal Dose (LD50)
|
Oral-245-440
Salvaneschi,
1968;He&Gera,1978a; Toyoshima
et al, 1978; Trabucchi, 1965; Pellegrini & Santi,1972.
|
Effect of different reaction conditions
Effect of temperature: The effect of temperature on the reaction
was studied by the varying temperature range from 0℃-10℃ for the phenthoate and
found that the 0℃-5℃ temperature was sufficient for the complete reaction.With an
increase or decrease in temperature, the absorption values also increased or
decreased.
Effect of pH: The effect of pH on the color reaction was
studied and it was found that constant absorbance values were obtained at a pH
range of ~ 2– 4.0 and no buffer solution was required to stabilize the color.
The colored species remain stable for more than 7 hr. under optimum condition
(Figure-7).
Effect of reagent: when p-amino azobenzene reacts with sodium
nitrite and HCL than form diazonium salt.when the amount of diazonium salt was
increased or decreased the absorbance value also changed. when the
concentration of p-amino azobenzene was altered, firstly absorbance value was
increased by increasing the concentration of p-amino azobenzene,and after that
absorbance value was observed to be decreasing rapidly with increasing
concentration (Figure-6).
Figure
6. Effect of reagent
Figure 7. Effect of pH
Effect of foreign species: The effect of common foreign species and pesticides
was studied to assess the validity of the method. A known amount of metal ions
and pesticides were added to the standard 10 μg/25 mL of phenthoate. The method
was found to be free from interferences of most of the foreign species and
pesticide(Table03).
Effect of interference: We studied different vegetable samples and we found
that different types of compounds are already present in these vegetables. We
added different pesticides and foreign species solution containing 10 µg of
phenthoate in 25ml of the final solution and developed a method for the
analysis by the proposed methods and we found that there was no interference of
those compounds in the method.
Table
3. Effect of Foreign Species
Foreign Species
|
Tolerance limit* µg in 25 mL
|
Chlorphenapyre
|
500
|
Acephate
|
300
|
Dichlorvos
|
500
|
Glyphosphate
|
300
|
Kitazin
|
500
|
Zn2+
|
400
|
Cu2+
|
250
|
Pb2+
|
500
|
Fe2+
|
300
|
*Concentration of Phenthoate 10 µg / 25 mL.
*The amount
causing an error of ±2% in absorbance value.
Table 4. Recovery of Phenthoate in Various
Environmental and Agricultural Samples
Samples
|
Phenthoate originally found
(µg mL-1)a
|
Phenthoate added
(µg mL-1)b
|
Total Phenthoate found after standard
additionc
|
d=c-a
|
Recovery(%±RSD)
(d/b)×100
|
Polluted
|
1.25
|
1
|
2.17
|
0.92
|
92 ± 0.37
|
water*
|
|
|
|
|
|
Rice**
|
3.64
|
1
|
4.49
|
0.85
|
85 ± 0.27
|
Soil**
|
2.48
|
1
|
3.34
|
0.93
|
93 ±0.81
|
Potato**
|
4.02
|
1
|
4.96
|
o.94
|
94±0.17
|
Green
beans**
|
4.08
|
1
|
4.94
|
0.86
|
86 ±0.36
|
Cauliflower**
|
3.09
|
1
|
4.02
|
0.93
|
93 ±0.56
|
Tomato**
|
2.38
|
1
|
3.25
|
0.87
|
87 ±0.19
|
Orange**
|
1.19
|
1
|
2.17
|
0.98
|
98 ±0.16
|
Mean of three
replicate analyses
*Water sample 5 mL; ** Amount
of Sample 5 g.
Applications
The proposed method was applied
satisfactorily, for the analysis of phenthoate in various samples i.e. polluted
water, vegetables, fruits. The amount of phenthoate found in various samples
i.e. water, rice, soil, green beans, potatoes, cauliflower, tomato, orange was
purchased from the market and farmhouse respectively.The results are analyzed
in Table-04.
Analysis of phenthoate in polluted
water: Water samples from rivers receiving runoff from
various agricultural fields, where phenthoate was sprayed are collected. Then
these samples are filtered through Whatman No. 40 filter paper. Now the water
is evaporated to dryness and the residue was dissolved in 10mL of double-distilled
water. Aliquot of water samples were taken in a 25 mL graduatedtube.
Analysis of Phenthoate in Different Fruit,
Vegetables, and soil: Various
samples of vegetables, fruits, and soil each 5.0 gm were collected from agricultural
field and market, where phenthoate had been sprayed as an insecticide. The samples
were macerated with 50 mL double distilled water filtered through a Whatman
filter paper No. 40 and the filtrate were centrifuged at 1850 rpm for 10
minutes. In the case of vegetables and fruits, the filtrate was quantitatively
transferred into a 50 mL calibrated flask and made up to the mark with double distilled
water. 10 mLaliquots were taken in a
beaker. Then 1.0 mL diazotized 4-aminoazobenzene was
added.Shakenthoroughlyandkeptat0-5oCfor10minutesforfull-colordevelopment.
Comparison with other analytical methods:
A newly proposed method for the
determination of phenthoate with P-amino azobenzene is described. The proposed
method could be used as a simple and cheap method as compared to other
expensive techniques. The present method is cheap and easy to handle. In this
method reagents used are easily available and are cheap reagents. A comparison
of the proposed method with other analytical methodsis shown in (Table 5).
Table
5. Comparison with Various Spectrophotometric Methods for Determination of
Phenthoate
S.NO.
|
Methods/Reagents
|
λmax(nm)
|
Beer’s Law rangedetection limit
|
Remark
|
References
|
1
|
Leuco crystal violet
|
590
|
0.4-2.6ppm
|
Less sensitive
|
[Pradhan et al.2007]
|
2
|
Anthranilic acid
|
495
|
5-30μg/10mL
|
Less sensitive
|
[Amin et al.2015]
|
3
|
4-amino antipyrine
|
490
|
2-20 μg/10mL
|
Toxic reagent
|
[Amin et al.2015]
|
4
|
2-chlorophenyl
Hydrazine
|
552
|
5-40 μg/10mL
|
Less sensitive
|
[Amin et al.2015]
|
5
|
Leuco malachite green
|
620
|
10-50 μg/10mL
|
Less sensitive
|
[Nirmal et al. 2015]
|
6
|
4-aminoazobenzene
(proposed method)
|
480
|
10-40μg/25mL
|
Highly
sensitive
|
Selective
|
Conclusion
Fruits and vegetables are the food of
alternative for practically all people due to their healtheffects and cost
compared to different methods, so vegetables are essential for the people in
dailylife which increases the risk of different pesticide residues toxicity.The
proposed method is rapid, simple, sensitive and reagent described here is
sensitive and selective for analysis of phenthoate in various vegetables,
fruits, soil, and water samples. The proposed method was best as compared to
other methods. In this spectrophotometer method interference of any foreign
species are negligible. It can successfully apply for the determination of
phenthoate in water, soil, vegetable sample. Check the recoveries, a known
amount of phenthoate was added to various
samples and then analyzedby the proposed method.Thecalculated LOD and LOQ
values for every constituent make sure that the developed methods arevery
responsive and sensitive to their small doses. Being simpler, good
applicability, and moreeconomic than the reported other expansive techniques,
the introduced methods can be enhancedselections over the reported techniques.
That method uses very complicated, costly, andprocessing steps apparatus.
Acknowledgment
Authors are thankful to the Head, School of
Studies in chemistry Pt. Ravishankar Shukla University, Raipur and Director
General, Chhattisgarh Council of Science and technology Raipurfor providing lab
facility. financial support of this work by the DST-FIST
[NO.SR/FST/CSI-259/2014(C)] is gratefully acknowledged.
References
AderonkeAdetutuOkoya,
Aderemi Okunola Ogunfowokan, Olabode Idowu Asubiojo, and Nelson Torto (2013),
Organochlorine Pesticide Residues in Sediments and Waters from Cocoa Producing
Areas of Ondo State, Southwestern Nigeria Hindawi Publishing Corporation ISRN
SoilScience.
Alkan, E.;
Kapukıran, F.; Er,
E.; Chormey, D.;
Keyf, S.; Özdoğan,
N.; Bakırdere, S.;(2018).,“Simultaneous Determination of
Phorate and Oxyfluorfen in Well Water Samples with High Accuracy by GC-MS After
Binary Dispersive Liquid-Liquid Microextraction”, Water Air Soil
Pollution229-298.
Amin, A.S.,
Moalla, S.M.N., Ali, A., Salama, M.S., Gouda, A.A.(2015), “SensitiveSpectrophotometric
determination of deltamethrin insecticide in its formulation andenvironmental
samples”, International Journal of advanced research in chemical science,2,
72-79.
B.S. Choudri,
Yassine Charabi, Mushtaque Ahmed (2018), “Pesticides and Herbicides, Water
EnvironmentResearch”,Volume90.
Christopher
DN, Njoku I, Denis OU, Chinedu A, Grace CO, Paul CE et al (2013).“Investigation
on acute toxicity andbehavioral changes in a freshwater African cat
fish,Clariasgariepinus exposed to organophosphorouspesticide, Termifos”,
Pakistan Journal of Zoology;45:959-965.
J.Chen
, C.Chen (2013) , “A new data analysis method to determine pesticide
concentrations by cyclic voltammetry , Measurement”,Volume 46, Issue 6, Pages
1828-1833.
Jian
Wang,Willis Chow, Daniel Leung, and James Chang (2012)“Application of
Ultrahigh-Performance Liquid Chromatography and Electrospray Ionization
Quadrupole Orbitrap High-Resolution Mass Spectrometry for Determination of 166
Pesticides in Fruits and Vegetables”,Journal of Agricultural and Food Chemistry;60,
12088−12104.
KarraSomaiah,
Satish V.V. Pothula, Baratha Jyothi Naladi and SunitaKanikaram(2015).“Acute toxicity of Phenthoate (50% EC) on survival andbehavioral pattern
of freshwater fish Labeorohita(Hamilton, 1822)”,International
Journal of Fisheries and Aquatic Studies; 2(6): 38-42.
Kaufmann, A.;
Dvorak, V.; Cruzer, C.; Butcher, P.; Maden, K.;Walker, S.; Widmer, M.;
Schurmann,( 2012) A. Study of high-resolution massspectrometry technology as a
replacement for tandem massspectrometry in the field of quantitative pesticide
residue analysis. J.AOAC Int., 95, 528−548.
Khedr, T.;
Hammad, A.,; Elmarsafy, A.; Halawa,
E.; Soliman, M.; (2019). “Degradation of some
organophosphorus pesticides in aqueous solution by gamma irradiation”, Journal
of Hazardous Materials.
Kumari, B.,
Kathpal, T. S., Pesticides: “Methods for their residue estimation”, New
Publishing Agency,
2010, 5.
Margarita Stoytcheva and RoumenZlatev
(2014), Organophosphorus Pesticides Analysis, Universidad Autónoma de Baja
California Instituto de Ingeniería
Mexico.
Nahla
S. El-Shenawy,(2014) “Phenthoate induced-oxidative stress in fresh isolated
mice hepatocytes: Alleviation by ascorbic acid”. Toxicology and Environmental Health Sciences, Volume 6, Issue2.
Nirmal,
M., Rai, M. K., Patel, V., Khatoon,R., Wani, K., Rai, J(2016)., “SensitiveSpectrophotometric
Determination of Deltamethrin Using Leuco Malachite Green inEnvironmental”,Asian
Journal of chemistry, 28,793-796.
N.M.
Bhojane, R.S. Ingole, S.W. Hajare, S.V. Kuralkar, S.P. Waghmare, P.R. Rathod,
S.J. Manwar and M.V. Khodke (2018) “Individual and Combined Effect of
Indoxacarb and Glyphosate onBiochemical Alterations in Japanese Quails
(CuturnixCuturnix Japonica)”Chem Sci Rev Lett, 7(25), 190-200
Notardonato, I.;
Russo, M.; Vitali,
M.; Protano, C.;
Avino, P.; ,(2018). “Analytical Method Validation
for Determining Organophosphorus Pesticides in Baby Foods by a Modified
Liquid–Liquid Micro extraction Method and Gas Chromatography–Ion Trap/Mass
Spectrometry Analysis”, Food Analytical Methods.
Pesticide
Residues In Food (1980)Joint meeting of the FAO Panel of Experts on Pesticide
Residue in Food and the Environment and the WHO Expert Group on Pesticide
Residue Rome, phenthoate.
Pradhan, S.,
Dhundhel, R.S.,.Rai, M.K, Rai, J.K.(2007), “A new sensitive method for
thedetermination of deltamethrin in environmental , agricultutralabnd
biologicalsamples”, Journal of the Indian chemical society, 84,1176-1178.
R.
Romero-González, A. G. Frenich, and J. L. M.
Vidal (2008), “Multi residue method for fast determination of pesticides in
fruit juices by ultra-performance liquid chromatography coupled to tandem mass
spectrometry”, Talanta, vol. 76, no. 1, pp. 211–225.
Raetano,
C.G.Escola Superior de Agricultural Luiz de Queiroz, Piracicaba, SP (Brazil)
[Corporate Author] (1991). “Residue determination of phenthoate and malathion
by gas chromatography in tomato fruits”.
Reddy,
N, D.; Kumar, D.;(2017) “High Pesticide use in India: Health Implication”,
Health Action,
Saadati,
N., Abdullah, M. P., Zakaria, Z., Sany, S. B. T., Rezayi, M., Hassonizadeh, H.,(2013)
“Limit of detection and limit of quantification development procedures
fororganochlorine pesticides analysis in water and sediment matrices”,
Chemistry Central Journal 7, 63-73..
SomaiahKarra,
Satish V.V. Pothula, Baratha Jyothi Naladi and Sunita Kanikaram(2015). “Acute
toxicity of Phenthoate (50% EC) on survival and behavioral pattern of fresh
water fish Labeorohita” International Journal of Fisheries and Aquatic Studies
2(6):38-42.
Shrivastava,
A., Gupta, V. B.,(2011)“Methods for the determination of limit of detection
andlimit of quantitation of the analytical methods”, Chronicles of Young
Scientists, 2, 1, 21-25.
Susana
Grimalt, Pieter Dehouck (2016), “Review of analytical methods for the
determination of pesticide residues in grapes”, Journal of Chromatography A,
1433 1–23.
Wu, X.; Li, W.;
Guo, P, R.; Zhang, X, Z.; Xu, H, H.; (2018), “Rapid trace detection and
isomer quantitation of pesticide residues via Matrix-assisted Laser
Desorption/ionization Fourier Transform
ion Cyclotron resonance mass spectroscopy”, Journal of agriculture and food
chemistry, 66 (15), 3966-3974.
Zhao-YangLi,
Zhi-Chao, ZhangQi-Lin, ZhouRu-Yu, GaoQin-Sun Wang,(2002). “Fast and precise
determination of phenthoate and its enantiomeric ratio in soil by the matrix
solid-phase dispersion method and liquid chromatography” . Volume 977, Issue 1,
Pages17-25.